JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Jack Cable Soldering
#1028703 - 15/01/13 12:22 PM
|
|
|
Hi, I've purchased some Pro Jack Plug Stereo Connectors, which I'm looking to
solder to some Unbalanced Cable reel. I don't need the connection to be in stereo, I
simply bought the stereo connectors as I was told that their generally of a higher quality
(in terms of solder points, reliability) than their mono compatriots. These are
the connectors I've bought: http://www.studiospares.com/connectors/pro-jack-plug-stereo/invt/568410/#R
eviewHeaderAs the cable reel is not stereo, if I connect to only one of
the ports, will that still be valid/work? On each connector there's 2 ports (L & R),
and the ground, so naturally one of the ports will not be connected. Any
advice? Will this work? Thanks!
|
Sam Spoons
member
Joined: 23/01/03
Posts: 349
Loc: Manchester UK
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028728 - 15/01/13 02:34 PM
|
|
|
These connectors are referred to as TRS (tip, ring and sleeve) they are the same as used
for headphones, some balanced audio cables and insert leads, in each case the three
conductors serve different purposes, only on headphones are they L and R. Don't leave one connector un-connected, join the ring and sleeve together to the screen
(ground) of your cable and the tip to the core. BTW, TS (mono) jacks are easier
to solder and their should be no difference in quality between TS and TRS jacks if from
one range, this, http://www.studiospares.com/connectors/pro-jack-plug-mono/invt/568400/?VBM
ST=* will be identical quality to the TRS jacks you have bought (and slightly
cheaper).
-------------------- Turn it down lads (but only a little bit)
|
Bossman
active member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 1565
Loc: UK
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028729 - 15/01/13 02:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
..I simply bought
the stereo connectors as I was told that their generally of a higher quality (in terms of
solder points, reliability) than their mono compatriots.
I haven't found this to the case. On all
the jack plugs I've seen/used, the build quality and reliability is the same for both TRS
(stereo) and TS (mono) jacks. The only difference is that the TRS jack has an extra
conductor.
Generally, I've found TS jack plugs easier to solder because there
is only two terminals instead of 3. and the third can make it a little more fiddly. There
is no advantage to using TRS jacks with unbalanced/mono cable runs as far as I can
see.
So, I would say you are better off with TS jacks for unbalanced or mono
cables. Plus TS Jacks are normally cheaper than TRS.
Quote JBoy90:
As the cable reel is not stereo, if I
connect to only one of the ports, will that still be valid/work?
If I had to use a TRS jack plug for an
unbalanced or mono cable, I would solder the hot to the tip of the jack (as normal), and
the ground to both the ring and the sleeve of the jack.
Hope that helps
EDIT: I see Sam got there first, and confirms my thoughts on the subject.
-------------------- www.Lozjackson.com
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028771 - 15/01/13 05:30 PM
|
|
|
|
So I'd need to solder the ground to one of the connectors? Without sounding rude, can I
ask what this achieves? Just wondering really. Do I lose anything by not soldering to a
connector?
Also, I've bought a Behringer CT100 Cable tester, can I ask which
lights should light up if all is connected correctly? Will this be affected by the stereo
situation we've discussed so far?
Sorry to be a pain, just really wanna get
these right!
|
TSH-Tim
Joined: 21/02/11
Posts: 817
Loc: Guildford
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028821 - 15/01/13 11:11 PM
|
|
|
If you want / need reliability heatshink everything with glue heatshink  I've got 12
year old cable from doing this.
-------------------- PA Hire Surrey
Lighting Hire Surrey
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028826 - 15/01/13 11:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Well those jack plugs look like Neutriks but if so they are remarkably cheap!
You will know instantly when you open one up because the centre, tip connector is a
solid piece of brass no nut or rivet is used.
I too see no advantage in buying
TRS plugs if you don't need them, just giving yourself extra work and I speak as one who
has soldered hundreds of such connectors!
Yes, the ring should be tied to the
sleeve if only for the reason that most guitar pedals and active DI boxes rely on a solid
sleeve to switch the power. In fact a TRS plug, even with the ring tied to sleeve does not
work on some jacks due to an unfortunate tolerance situation in the contact spacing.
Take a critical look at those plugs and if the quality is at all suspect ship them
back for mono jobbies and pay a bit more for Nukes. You don't SAVE money making your own
cables but at least you can get assured top build quality!
Dave.
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: ef37a]
#1028834 - 16/01/13 12:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Well I've been at it all night, and the suggestions regarding the ground have so far
helped massively, as well as the fact my soldering is slowly improving also.
So I've now finished a few cables that work fully, with the hot lead connected to the
tip, and the ground coiled into 2 seperate strands, one connecting to the ring, and one
connecting to the sleeve. Both work fine with a guitar amp, and don't seem to produce any
hiss or less volume than some of my other leads (not made by me).
However, on
the CT100 tester, one of the cables has all 9 lights lit up, whilst the other has the
lights lit in an 'X' shape. I believe the latter is correct, but as it's a stereo
connector, surely that would change it so that all the connections need to be made? And
finally, am I worrying over the CT100's results too much? My main concern is that whilst
these work now, we've got a gig over the weekend and I'd hate for them to go mid song!
And yeah I realise now that the stereo connectors are of no benefit whatsoever,
just too late to change them unfortunately!
Edited by JBoy90 (16/01/13 12:35 AM)
|
Sam Spoons
member
Joined: 23/01/03
Posts: 349
Loc: Manchester UK
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: ef37a]
#1028869 - 16/01/13 11:32 AM
|
|
|
Quote ef37a:
Well those jack
plugs look like Neutriks but if so they are remarkably cheap! Dave.
Pretty sure they're cheapo Neutric copies,
better than plastic nasties but not a patch on the real thing.
-------------------- Turn it down lads (but only a little bit)
|
Exalted Wombat
Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 4315
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028874 - 16/01/13 11:49 AM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
Hi,
I've
purchased some Pro Jack Plug Stereo Connectors, which I'm looking to solder to some
Unbalanced Cable reel. I don't need the connection to be in stereo, I simply bought the
stereo connectors as I was told that their generally of a higher quality (in terms of
solder points, reliability) than their mono compatriots.
These are the
connectors I've bought:
http://www.studiospares.com/connectors/pro-jack-plug-stereo/...
Rule #1 "Anything
labelled Pro, isn't."
They were under £1 each. They're the wrong sort. Throw
them away and get the right sort.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028888 - 16/01/13 12:30 PM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
However, on the
CT100 tester, one of the cables has all 9 lights lit up, whilst the other has the lights
lit in an 'X' shape. I believe the latter is correct
It is. Sleeve and ring should be connected, lighting the corner
LEDs, and the tip should only connect to the tip, lighting the centre LED. If all nine are
on, you have a complete 'short' in the cable somewhere, with the tip, ring and sleeve all
connected together. it might be a whisker of wire or solder bridging the terminals inside
the plug, or you may have overheated the cable while soldering, melting the insulation
between screen and core in the cable.
Quote:
...am I worrying over the CT100's results too much?
There's no point using a cable tester
and then ignoring what it's telling you!
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Sam Spoons
member
Joined: 23/01/03
Posts: 349
Loc: Manchester UK
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: Exalted Wombat]
#1028899 - 16/01/13 01:15 PM
|
|
|
Quote Exalted Wombat:
Rule #1 "Anything labelled Pro, isn't."
If I had a pound for every time I've told
people that I'd have ...... Er...... £3.50
-------------------- Turn it down lads (but only a little bit)
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#1028904 - 16/01/13 01:43 PM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote JBoy90:
However, on the
CT100 tester, one of the cables has all 9 lights lit up, whilst the other has the lights
lit in an 'X' shape. I believe the latter is correct
It is. Sleeve and ring should be connected, lighting the corner
LEDs, and the tip should only connect to the tip, lighting the centre LED. If all nine are
on, you have a complete 'short' in the cable somewhere, with the tip, ring and sleeve all
connected together. it might be a whisker of wire or solder bridging the terminals inside
the plug, or you may have overheated the cable while soldering, melting the insulation
between screen and core in the cable.
Quote:
...am I worrying over the CT100's results too much?
There's no point using a cable
tester and then ignoring what it's telling you!
hugh
Ahh damn I see, but if it's a stereo
connector does this affect whether the tip should be lit up or not? I've completed a few
cables now, most have all 9, one or two don't have the tip lit up. All of them work
though?!
And if that is a big problem, how can I fix it? I've got the
soldering iron set to 400 degrees C, is that too high?
Edited by JBoy90 (16/01/13 02:19 PM)
|
MarkPAman
Joined: 06/04/06
Posts: 248
Loc: Somewhere between Portsmouth &...
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028922 - 16/01/13 02:58 PM
|
|
|
400 is very hot. I find I can do most connectors at about 320 without any problem using
lead free solder. The leaded stuff would be cooler than that.
The CT100 is a
good little tester and will show up shorts that may not be enough to stop your guitar
working, but will probably change the way it sounds. They'll probably get worse over time
too.
So, cut back a few inches from all the ones that have been overheated,
and try again! Don't worry, soldering is good for you
(Edited for typo in my temperature!)
Edited by MarkPAman (16/01/13 03:09 PM)
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028923 - 16/01/13 02:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
...but if it's a
stereo connector does this affect whether the tip should be lit up or not?
Hmmm... step 1 was learning how the cable
tester works and how to interpret the indicators!
It's not a 'stereo'
connector. Stereo is a signal format. It's a three-pole cable connector which you want to
employ with two-pole chassis connectors.
The equivalent two-pole connector
has a long 'sleeve' connection. In the three-pole version that sleeve is cut short to
leave space for the 'ring' connection. That's why you were advised earlier to wire the
sleeve and ring together (with both connected to the cable screen), so that it will
operate in the same way as a normal two-pole connector.
The tip contact
carries the signal voltage, and the sleeve/ring carries the ground reference via the
screen. The tip of one plug should only connect with the tip of the other plug. So the
middle light should come on, indicating that the input tip connects to the output tip.
The input sleeve should be connected to the input ring, as well as to both the
output sleeve and ring. Consequently, the four corner LEDs should be on.
The
top centre LED illuminates when the input tip connects with the output sleeve. If that
happens, you have a dead short on the cable and it won't work. The same applies with the
other midle LEDs on each side of the array.
If you are sure that the cables
all work but that really have all nine lights on then either the cable tester is broken or
there's something really weird going on!
Quote:
I've got the soldering iron set to 400 degrees C,
is that too high?
It's
certainly on the high side, but it depends what kind of solder you're using, how big the
solder tip is, how much heat wick you're getting with the conenctors you're using, and --
most importantly -- how the temperature is measured and displayed!
With my
own temperature controlled iron I would expect to use a setting between 300-320C for
leaded solder, and up to about 340-360C for lead-free solder, but I've used other irons
that required settings a lot lower than that for the same results.
You can
get away with a hotter iron as long as you minimise the time spent in contact, to avoid
melting the plastic substrate of the connectors or the cable insulation.
H
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#1028927 - 16/01/13 03:15 PM
|
|
|
Ahh yikes this all would have been so much simpler with the mono connector! Right, okay. So I'll lower the temperature to 350ish and try that. It's Maplin Lead-Free
Silver solder that I'm using. So what I've done with all these cables is taken
the ground connector, and seperated it (imagine splitting your fringe to two sides),
connected one to the ring, and one to the sleeve. Is that not what was suggested at the
start? Getting really confused  Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote JBoy90:
...but if it's a
stereo connector does this affect whether the tip should be lit up or not?
Hmmm... step 1 was learning how the cable
tester works and how to interpret the indicators!
It's not a 'stereo'
connector. Stereo is a signal format. It's a three-pole cable connector which you want to
employ with two-pole chassis connectors.
The equivalent two-pole connector has
a long 'sleeve' connection. In the three-pole version that sleeve is cut short to leave
space for the 'ring' connection. That's why you were advised earlier to wire the sleeve
and ring together (with both connected to the cable screen), so that it will operate in
the same way as a normal two-pole connector.
The tip contact carries the signal
voltage, and the sleeve/ring carries the ground reference via the screen. The tip of one
plug should only connect with the tip of the other plug. So the middle light should come
on, indicating that the input tip connects to the output tip.
The input sleeve
should be connected to the input ring, as well as to both the output sleeve and ring.
Consequently, the four corner LEDs should be on.
The top centre LED illuminates
when the input tip connects with the output sleeve. If that happens, you have a dead short
on the cable and it won't work. The same applies with the other midle LEDs on each side of
the array.
If you are sure that the cables all work but that really have all
nine lights on then either the cable tester is broken or there's something really weird
going on!
Quote:
I've got the soldering iron set to 400 degrees C, is that too high?
It's certainly on the high side, but it
depends what kind of solder you're using, how big the solder tip is, how much heat wick
you're getting with the conenctors you're using, and -- most importantly -- how the
temperature is measured and displayed!
With my own temperature controlled iron
I would expect to use a setting between 300-320C for leaded solder, and up to about
340-360C for lead-free solder, but I've used other irons that required settings a lot
lower than that for the same results.
You can get away with a hotter iron as
long as you minimise the time spent in contact, to avoid melting the plastic substrate of
the connectors or the cable insulation.
H
|
Sam Spoons
member
Joined: 23/01/03
Posts: 349
Loc: Manchester UK
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028931 - 16/01/13 03:21 PM
|
|
|
Splitting the shield and connecting the two tails to the ring and sleeve is fine. I'd have
just gone from one to the other 'cos it's slightly quicker, but your way is more elegant,
well done
-------------------- Turn it down lads (but only a little bit)
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028932 - 16/01/13 03:22 PM
|
|
|
|
It is often easier to avoid damage to insulation etc by having a hot iron and getting in
and out quickly (and when you have several boxes a day of 200strips of 8 RJ45 jacks each
with 8 contacts to solder you get fast! Tho' I never did get nearly as fast or as good as
the gals!)
I agree with Hugh's temperatures and that it depends on the solder.
We had some reet cheap ***te that you could not get to flow with a MIG welder! Solder
tip care from the horses mouth (Weller peeps on a visit. Well! We did have about 100
stations!) Do not use a damp sponge. Use brass or stainless steel wool. I don't have
any so I use kitchen paper. Keep the tip well tinned and wipe often and re tin. Never
use a file or emery paper on the tip.
You can buy a tin of a very agressive
tip cleaner. Works but only as a last resort and sparingly.
Wipe and flood the
tip with solder before switching iron off. MOST important for lead free as a dirty
untinned tip will quickly go black and is the divil to get clean again. Switch off
the iron when not needed or away from the job. Modern T'stat irons get to temp' in 30
seconds or so, no point in boiling the thing uselessly.
Dave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028933 - 16/01/13 03:32 PM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
So what I've done
with all these cables is taken the ground connector, and seperated it (imagine splitting
your fringe to two sides), connected one to the ring, and one to the sleeve. Is that not
what was suggested at the start?
Yes. Personally, I wouldn't split the cable screen -- it's just making work for
yourself. I'd twist it into one 'wire' and then loop it between the ring terminal and the
screen terminal. But what you've done should be fine. You just have to be careful that the
screen wires don't accidentally come into contact with the tip connection when you
assemble the plug bodies.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
Edited by Hugh Robjohns (16/01/13 03:34 PM)
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028935 - 16/01/13 03:44 PM
|
|
|
|
So to summarise, I'm looking for the 4 corner, and the 1 central LED to be lit?
And if it hasn't overheated, could it be because the 2 ground strands (that I've split)
are touching?
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1028959 - 16/01/13 06:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Yes. Using TRS plugs at both ends, with the ring linked to the sleeve at both ends, the
display for a correctly wired cable should be all four corners plus the centre LED.
It doesn't matter if the two screen strands touch each other -- they are two parts
of the same thing. What does matter is if either touch the tip terminal or the centre core
of the cable. Look out for stray strands of wire or bridges of solder.
H
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
JBoy90
Joined: 06/12/11
Posts: 33
Loc: Herts
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#1030100 - 24/01/13 11:08 AM
|
|
|
Yeah okay that sounds right, although surely it doesn't matter if it touches the
insulation that encases the core that connects the tip? Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Yes. Using
TRS plugs at both ends, with the ring linked to the sleeve at both ends, the display for a
correctly wired cable should be all four corners plus the centre LED.
It
doesn't matter if the two screen strands touch each other -- they are two parts of the
same thing. What does matter is if either touch the tip terminal or the centre core of the
cable. Look out for stray strands of wire or bridges of solder.
H
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1030122 - 24/01/13 01:10 PM
|
|
|
Quote JBoy90:
Yeah okay that
sounds right, although surely it doesn't matter if it touches the insulation that encases
the core that connects the tip?
Quote
Hugh Robjohns:
Yes. Using TRS plugs at both ends, with the ring linked
to the sleeve at both ends, the display for a correctly wired cable should be all four
corners plus the centre LED.
It doesn't matter if the two screen strands touch
each other -- they are two parts of the same thing. What does matter is if either touch
the tip terminal or the centre core of the cable. Look out for stray strands of wire or
bridges of solder.
H
In fact it is better not to have any bare
wire inside the plug at all. twist the braid tightly and tin the end then sleeve with
either heatshrink or silicone sleeving then link ring and sleeve.
Dave.
|
Alec Spence
Joined: 16/11/04
Posts: 46
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1030422 - 25/01/13 02:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Agreeing with others further up the thread, your plugs aren't the best in the world (but
neither are they the worst). They key problem I've had with them is that the cable clamp
isn't fantastic - in fact with thinner interconnects it's rubbish. Ideally, you'd just by
Neutrik NP2X plugs.
You were given a totally duff steer on buying stereo plugs
rather than mono. No benefits at all if you're simply using unbalanced cable (as you are
for regular instrument leads). And, as you've found out, it can actually complicate your
soldering. Plus the fact that others might assume that the lead is wired up balanced
(which it's not).
On the positive side, you've had an introduction into cable
making & soldering - which is never pretty when you first start. And things should
only now get better. In future, though, just shell out and buy Neutrik connectors -
you'll be amazed at how much better they feel - and they won't break.
And also,
good for you for getting the cable tester. As you've discovered, it's a great way of
testing cables for problems you might not otherwise spot (but never forget a visual
inspection of your work too, in case you've got cuts in the sleeving, or stray whiskers of
conductors.
Onwards & upwards!
|
tacitus
Joined: 04/02/08
Posts: 780
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: JBoy90]
#1030432 - 25/01/13 04:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Good point there about the possibility of thinking a TRS is wired separately to each
contact. I used to be fairly anal about that, to the point that I used black shells on TRS
and XLR leads and silver ones on unbalanced jack plugs to make it absolutely clear. I
still do that on Jack plugs but I do have some XLRs with silver shells now.
I
decided to go all Neutrik on connectors way, way back and have never regretted it nor yet
lost a connector to damage. Some connectors have been re-soldered when I've re-configured
leads but otherwise, the older ones aren't as neatly done as more recent ones but they are
100% functional, so they've not been touched for 20 years or more.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9706
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Jack Cable Soldering
[Re: Alec Spence]
#1030449 - 25/01/13 06:43 PM
|
|
|
Quote Alec Spence:
You were
given a totally duff steer on buying stereo plugs rather than mono. No benefits at all if
you're simply using unbalanced cable (as you are for regular instrument leads). And, as
you've found out, it can actually complicate your soldering. Plus the fact that others
might assume that the lead is wired up balanced (which it's not).
One slightly more serious problem is that
they won't work with some T-S sockets which have the sleeve connection right on the
insulating section between the sleeve and the ring of a TRS plug. They're not particularly
common but I've had problems with this in the past.
James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|