Main Forums >> Recording Techniques
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1393
Loc: Cambridge, UK
"Where you listen" versus "Where you mic"
      #1059489 - 27/07/13 02:45 PM
Here's an interesting little methodological question for all you recording engineers out there. When miking up any instrument, it's a studio truism that you should listen for a good spot in the room before placing the mic. My question is this: assuming that you've found a spot for your head where you like the wet/dry balance you're hearing, what would be your miking distance relative to that head position in the following three cases:
  • if you're using a single cardioid mic.
  • if you're using a single omni mic.
  • if you're using a coincident stereo pair of cardioids at (let's say) a 120-degree mutual angle.

    (If you block one ear or cup you hands around them in any way to aid with these kinds of judgements, I'd be interested to hear about that too.)

    For my own part, I usually like the sound of a single subcardioid where I'm standing, so a cardioid feels a bit dry and an omni a bit wet if I set them up at my preferred head position. The 120-degree XY pair usually works pretty well at head position for me. I've never had much luck with blocking an ear (it sounds distracting), so I don't do that.

    --------------------
    Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio
    A complete mixing method based around the techniques of the world's most famous producers.


  • Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    MGBR



    Joined: 20/07/06
    Posts: 67
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059491 - 27/07/13 03:19 PM
    I find that even when you have found a place where the balance seems right,I find it very difficult to guess where to put the microphone exactly.
    What I now do is place the mic, put on my AKG K701 and put a delay of approx. 8 seconds on the signal and let the instrumentalist play, or play it myself, so then after a few seconds of delay I can hear exactly how it will record without also hearing the original signal.

    MGB


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator
    SOS Technical Editor


    Joined: 25/07/03
    Posts: 21731
    Loc: Worcestershire
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059496 - 27/07/13 04:23 PM
    I'm with you -- I can't get on with the blocked ear technique! Also, I agree that where it sounds good via ears is usually a bit too close for a cardioid spot mic, so that needs to go a bit further back, and a close omni usually need to be a bit closer. A stereo ORTF pair usually works if I place it where my ears were.

    I like the idea of an 8 second delay on the headphones to separate live from recorded. Obvious and simple, but I've never heard of it being done before. Good tip.

    Hugh

    --------------------
    Technical Editor, Sound On Sound


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Mike Senior
    SOS Mix Specialist


    Joined: 08/08/03
    Posts: 1393
    Loc: Cambridge, UK
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Hugh Robjohns]
          #1059503 - 27/07/13 05:13 PM
    Quote Hugh Robjohns:

    I'm with you -- I can't get on with the blocked ear technique! Also, I agree that where it sounds good via ears is usually a bit too close for a cardioid spot mic, so that needs to go a bit further back, and a close omni usually need to be a bit closer. A stereo ORTF pair usually works if I place it where my ears were.




    Glad to be in such exalted company! Thanks for the input Hugh.

    Quote:

    I like the idea of an 8 second delay on the headphones to separate live from recorded. Obvious and simple, but I've never heard of it being done before. Good tip.




    +1! This is a fantastic tip, and one I'd also never heard before. Maybe finally, I'll be able to do the headphone mic-positioning trick that I'v never been able to really use before -- the spill always used to put me off.

    --------------------
    Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio
    A complete mixing method based around the techniques of the world's most famous producers.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Evie McCreevie



    Joined: 06/09/04
    Posts: 1028
    Loc: Dublin
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: MGBR]
          #1059543 - 28/07/13 01:29 AM
    Quote MGBR:

    ... put a delay of approx. 8 seconds on the signal and let the instrumentalist play, or play it myself, so then after a few seconds of delay I can hear exactly how it will record without also hearing the original signal.

    MGB




    BRILLIANT! How come no-one's thought of or mentioned this before?

    Is this a genuinely new idea? Should be standard practice from now on.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    John Willett
    Sound-Link ProAudio


    Joined: 07/03/00
    Posts: 12386
    Loc: Oxfordshire UK
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Evie McCreevie]
          #1059553 - 28/07/13 08:13 AM
    Quote Evie McCreevie:

    Quote MGBR:

    ... put a delay of approx. 8 seconds on the signal and let the instrumentalist play, or play it myself, so then after a few seconds of delay I can hear exactly how it will record without also hearing the original signal.

    MGB




    BRILLIANT! How come no-one's thought of or mentioned this before?

    Is this a genuinely new idea? Should be standard practice from now on.





    Well, this sort of thing used to be standard practice in the old days when we listened to an analogue recording off-tape as you had the delay between the record head and the replay head.

    This method extends the delay to several seconds.

    This could not be done, of course, until digital delay became affordable and high quality.

    Great idea, though.

    --------------------
    John - Sound-Link ProAudio
    President - Federation Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Tomás Mulcahy
    active member


    Joined: 25/04/01
    Posts: 2954
    Loc: Cork, Ireland.
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059556 - 28/07/13 08:28 AM
    Ha, yes I used to do that when mixing to a Revox B77 back in the day (because that thing had a "sound"!). Basically I'd start the mix that way, and after a while you'd have a good idea of what the tape was doing. Mostly HF loss. I assumed it was fairly standard practice. I asked a "big name" US mix engineer who's an analogue fanatic if he did it, I think he felt it was a dumb question. He'd just listen to the tape when he was finished and was "always happy" with what came back.

    Great idea for mic positioning though. Incidentally 8 sec would be within the average for auditory memory. Sound engineers can be a lot longer although there isn't much research done on that.

    --------------------
    madtheory creations
    Synths and pianos for Kontakt


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator
    SOS Technical Editor


    Joined: 25/07/03
    Posts: 21731
    Loc: Worcestershire
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Tomás Mulcahy]
          #1059566 - 28/07/13 10:41 AM
    Standard BBC practice was certainly to listen and check the sound off tape, and tweak the mix and processing accordingly, although for normal broadcast programming work you had to listen to the desk output to get the timings of fades right of course.

    The eight (or whatever) second delay completely separates the monitored sound from the live performance, and so removes the spill issue very neatly, especially if the player performs in short stints! You couldn't do that with a quarter-second delay in off-tape monitoring.

    H

    --------------------
    Technical Editor, Sound On Sound


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Tim Gillett



    Joined: 30/01/13
    Posts: 530
    Loc: Perth, Western Australia
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059577 - 28/07/13 11:54 AM
    Of course what might apply to a live mix and broadcast doesnt necessarily follow in a recording scenario.

    We can record each instrument as dry as we like, and record room reverb on separate tracks. That is, we can capture everything, putting off the balancing choices until later.

    Reverb is easy to add later, but very difficult if not impossible to reduce once it's already mixed in.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Kwackman



    Joined: 07/11/02
    Posts: 1386
    Loc: Belfast
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Tim Gillett]
          #1059581 - 28/07/13 12:24 PM
    Quote Tim Gillett:

    Of course what might apply to a live mix and broadcast doesnt necessarily follow in a recording scenario.

    We can record each instrument as dry as we like, and record room reverb on separate tracks. That is, we can capture everything, putting off the balancing choices until later.




    It's not only about dry & reverb sound though.
    It's about placing a mic where it sounds good for the instrument.
    Placing a mic to record an acoustic guitar, even in a dry room, takes a bit of experimenting to get a nice sound.

    --------------------
    Cubase, guitars.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Tim Gillett



    Joined: 30/01/13
    Posts: 530
    Loc: Perth, Western Australia
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Kwackman]
          #1059590 - 28/07/13 01:29 PM
    Quote Kwackman:

    Quote Tim Gillett:

    Of course what might apply to a live mix and broadcast doesnt necessarily follow in a recording scenario.

    We can record each instrument as dry as we like, and record room reverb on separate tracks. That is, we can capture everything, putting off the balancing choices until later.




    It's not only about dry & reverb sound though.
    It's about placing a mic where it sounds good for the instrument.
    Placing a mic to record an acoustic guitar, even in a dry room, takes a bit of experimenting to get a nice sound.




    Sure, that's a given, but I take it Mike was talking specifically about the room acoustics wet/dry balance as it affects different mics such as omni, unidirectional, figure 8 etc..

    Tim


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Guy Johnson



    Joined: 02/05/03
    Posts: 4339
    Loc: North Pembrokeshire
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059609 - 28/07/13 06:29 PM
    A cracking thread, thanks guys!

    --------------------
    Facebok Page for acoustic music PA-ing in smaller venues


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Phil Aitman



    Joined: 25/05/08
    Posts: 154
    Loc: Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059617 - 28/07/13 07:41 PM
    Agreed this is a brilliant thread. Thanks for superb tips as always.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Mike Senior
    SOS Mix Specialist


    Joined: 08/08/03
    Posts: 1393
    Loc: Cambridge, UK
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Tim Gillett]
          #1059620 - 28/07/13 07:59 PM
    Quote Tim Gillett:

    Quote Kwackman:


    It's not only about dry & reverb sound though.
    It's about placing a mic where it sounds good for the instrument.
    Placing a mic to record an acoustic guitar, even in a dry room, takes a bit of experimenting to get a nice sound.




    Sure, that's a given, but I take it Mike was talking specifically about the room acoustics wet/dry balance as it affects different mics such as omni, unidirectional, figure 8 etc..




    That's right. I agree that distance isn't just about wet/dry balance, though, which is why I'm intrigued as to how different people work around the fact that the position which sounds right with your ears from a wet/dry balance perspective isn't necessarily where you'll want to put the mic. It implies that you should listen for wet/dry balance first, then move your head to the distance you think you'll actually put the mic so that you can find a spot at that distance that also fits the bill on tonal grounds (trying to ignore that the wet/dry balance in that position will then sound wrong, of course).

    --------------------
    Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio
    A complete mixing method based around the techniques of the world's most famous producers.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    turbodave



    Joined: 25/04/08
    Posts: 2357
    Loc: derbyshire uk
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1059734 - 29/07/13 05:07 PM
    I think if you work with the same mics, in the same room with the same (ahem) ears....then you start to make choices almost instinctively...knowing (roughly) the parameters of each part of the chain. I have come to the conclusion that in a great environment, an omni mic placed close to your head ( in a good spot) is quite useful...that or a stereo spread. In fact I am experimenting more with omni pencil condensers! Dave

    --------------------
    My head hurts!


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    benniferj



    Joined: 11/06/07
    Posts: 317
    Loc: Camberley, Surrey, UK
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1060588 - 04/08/13 10:10 AM
    Almost always let a guitarist bring up their ideal tone for a song before micing... then actually listen on axis to the cabinet and hear what's going on. They're normally shocked when I get them to listen with me how harsh they've made the tone actually coming out of the speaker and how different it sounds to what it does when they stand up and move away from it. Often a bit less gain and treble and it's unbelievably better at most mic positionings.


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Exalted Wombat



    Joined: 06/02/10
    Posts: 5721
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: benniferj]
          #1060591 - 04/08/13 10:17 AM
    Quote benniferj:

    Almost always let a guitarist bring up their ideal tone for a song before micing... then actually listen on axis to the cabinet and hear what's going on. They're normally shocked when I get them to listen with me how harsh they've made the tone actually coming out of the speaker and how different it sounds to what it does when they stand up and move away from it. Often a bit less gain and treble and it's unbelievably better at most mic positionings.




    Yes, a lot of guitarists only know how their amp sounds when aimed at the back of their knees!


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator
    SOS Technical Editor


    Joined: 25/07/03
    Posts: 21731
    Loc: Worcestershire
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Mike Senior]
          #1060608 - 04/08/13 12:52 PM
    Quote Mike Senior:

    That's right. I agree that distance isn't just about wet/dry balance, though...




    There is always the 'scientific approach' too, either to support the untuitive approach or to use instead of.

    The Critical Distance measurement for the room tells you where the level of direct and reverberant signals are equal, and you would normally expect to need to place a cardioid mic a little closer than 50% of that distance for a 'good' sound quality. The directivity index of microphone polar patterns then tells you the ratio of relative distance from the source to achieve the same quality, and thus an Omni would need to be closer than 30% of the Dc.

    Useful science in an unfamiliar room -- especially a very reverberant one like a church or cathedral!

    H

    --------------------
    Technical Editor, Sound On Sound


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Richard Graham



    Joined: 10/04/06
    Posts: 3021
    Loc: Gateshead, UK
    Re: "Where you listen" versus "Where you mic" new [Re: Hugh Robjohns]
          #1060628 - 04/08/13 03:02 PM
    Interesting advice Hugh. How do you calculate the Critical Distance of a room then?

    --------------------
    "if you don't have much soul left and you know it, you still got soul" - Bukowski


    Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
    Pages: 1

    Rate this thread

    Jump to

    Extra Information
    0 registered and 19 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

    Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, SOS News Editor,  
    Forum Permissions
          You cannot start new topics
          You cannot reply to topics
          HTML is disabled
          UBBCode is enabled
    Rating:
    Thread views: 3803

    September 2014
    On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
    SOS Web Shop)
    SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
    Click image for September 2014
    DAW Tips from SOS

     

    Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

    Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

     

    Email: Contact SOS

    Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

    Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

    Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

    Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

    Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

             

    All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
    The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

    Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media