dbfs
member
Joined: 07/05/04
Posts: 97
|
Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
#1000496 - 29/07/12 10:49 PM
|
|
|
Hi all, In December 2011, Matt explained that cubase "can’t compensate for negative
latency" when using outboard. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/dec11/articles/cubase-1211.htmIn the article, it says that steinberg said that "they’ll fix it in an update
during the current product cycle" I was just wondering if anybody could advise
me if the bug has indeed been fixed in the recent versions?
-------------------- Brian Gardiner
|
Matt Houghton
SOS Reviews Editor
Joined: 08/08/07
Posts: 512
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: dbfs]
#1000549 - 30/07/12 10:46 AM
|
|
|
|
Hi Brian,
I don't know the answer but next time I'm sat in front of Cubase I'll
check and report back.
It's worth stressing that most interfaces don't suffer,
in that they don't have to report negative latencies. As I understand it, RME interfaces
in particular suffer, as for some reason (that I don't pretend to understand) they need to
report negative values when working with ADAT expanders, as in my own setup
Regards,
Matt
|
Matt Houghton
SOS Reviews Editor
Joined: 08/08/07
Posts: 512
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Matt Houghton]
#1000550 - 30/07/12 10:47 AM
|
|
|
btw... strictly speaking this shouldn't be in the Mac forum, as Cubase is cross-platform.
Being predominantly a PC user, I was lucky to stumble on this one
|
dbfs
member
Joined: 07/05/04
Posts: 97
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Matt Houghton]
#1000706 - 30/07/12 11:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Matt, Thanks for the reply.
Fair point about the location of the post.
I wasn't sure where to post it myself.
I am using a Fireface 800 and and use
both ADAT ports to hook analogue and some digital gear. I sold my Cubase a while back as I
was using Logic, but would be keen to return to Cubase if this works without issues. I
don't have a dongle at the moment to try the latest Cubase releases.
If you get
a chance to check or indeed if anyone else out there can let me know if its fixed I would
be very grateful.
Thanks a lot, Brian.
-------------------- Brian Gardiner
|
Zukan
Zukan
Joined: 12/09/03
Posts: 8514
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: dbfs]
#1000757 - 31/07/12 08:22 AM
|
|
|
Quote dbfs:
In the article,
it says that steinberg said that "they’ll fix it in an update during the current product
cycle"
If
Steinberg's past are anything to go by then I would not even bother to wait for their
'promised bug fix'. I had this crap from them for over a year when waiting for critical
bug fixes to SX 3 and they eventually ditched the free fix for all SX 3 owners and told us
to BUY version 4.
Needless to say, I don't use their products anymore.
-------------------- Samplecraze
Stretch That Note
|
Mixedup
active member
Joined: 03/09/03
Posts: 4254
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Zukan]
#1000763 - 31/07/12 08:34 AM
|
|
|
|
To be fair, Zuke, in the last paid update, they made all the fixes available for free to
owners of the previous version; just not the new features.
...and Logic 8 was
buggy as hell on my MacBook. Bugs not fixed.
...PT10 on my studio PC is buggy
as hell. Not yet fixed.
...Reaper buggy when presented with plug-ins that it
doesn't get on with, on both platforms. Still not fixed.
...Studio One just
doesn't have the functionality I need.
Etc etc.
If I walked away
from them all I'd be left pretty much with Sonar and DP. [shivers]
Oh, and SX3
was a bit of a pig compared with everything since. Lots of mysterious 'poof' bugs that
lost all your work. And the functionality was pretty poor in terms of routing etc. C6.5 is
working rather nicely or me for the most part.
|
Zukan
Zukan
Joined: 12/09/03
Posts: 8514
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: dbfs]
#1000770 - 31/07/12 08:48 AM
|
|
|
I hear you Mixed. I have no issues with bugs needing ironing out but when a manufacturer
promises it as part of the £360 purchasing price, then they better deliver on their
promise. Steinberg didn't and I'm not really that bothered if they changed their policies
later as I was left with a really flakey piece of software that cost a small fortune in
its day. I use Reaper now and it does need a little fine tuning but I bet
Cockos won't ditch it and tell me to buy 'the new and improved Reaper gazillion.9' after
promising me the fixes for free......well, I hope not......
-------------------- Samplecraze
Stretch That Note
|
Mixedup
active member
Joined: 03/09/03
Posts: 4254
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Zukan]
#1000813 - 31/07/12 11:15 AM
|
|
|
Quote Zukan:
it does need a
little fine tuning
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5627
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Mixedup]
#1000847 - 31/07/12 12:12 PM
|
|
|
Quote Mixedup:
To be fair, Zuke,
in the last paid update, they made all the fixes available for free to owners of the
previous version; just not the new features.
...and Logic 8 was buggy as hell
on my MacBook. Bugs not fixed.
...PT10 on my studio PC is buggy as hell. Not
yet fixed.
...Reaper buggy when presented with plug-ins that it doesn't get on
with, on both platforms. Still not fixed.
...Studio One just doesn't have the
functionality I need.
Etc etc.
If I walked away from them all I'd be
left pretty much with Sonar and DP. [shivers]
Oh, and SX3 was a bit of a pig
compared with everything since. Lots of mysterious 'poof' bugs that lost all your work.
And the functionality was pretty poor in terms of routing etc. C6.5 is working rather
nicely or me for the most part.
I
wonder if Samplitude ProX is mac friendly yet? Don't even need a dongle to try it.....
Dave.
|
dbfs
member
Joined: 07/05/04
Posts: 97
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Matt Houghton]
#1001895 - 05/08/12 08:13 PM
|
|
|
Hi Matt. I was wondering if you had a chance to test this. It would be great to know
if steinberg did follow up on the info in the article.
-------------------- Brian Gardiner
|
Matt Houghton
SOS Reviews Editor
Joined: 08/08/07
Posts: 512
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: dbfs]
#1001941 - 06/08/12 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote dbfs:
Hi Matt. I was
wondering if you had a chance to test this. It would be great to know if steinberg did
follow up on the info in the article.
Not yet. Too busy getting the
latest wonderful issue of SOS out the door, and I don't have the latest version on my
laptop at work...
Should get a chance to investigate in the next couple of days
though
|
Matt Houghton
SOS Reviews Editor
Joined: 08/08/07
Posts: 512
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Matt Houghton]
#1002097 - 07/08/12 09:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Still seems to be an issue. I can set latency values manually, but only to a positive
value. Using the 'ping' function, the audio is going out and coming back through the right
channels, but it's returning a latency of zero. So it doesn't appear to have been fixed as
per Cubase 6.5.0 (which is the current version at the time of writing). I'll drop the guys
at Steinberg a line and see if there's any news...
|
dbfs
member
Joined: 07/05/04
Posts: 97
|
Re: Cubase Negative Latency Issue: Matt Houghton
[Re: Matt Houghton]
#1002388 - 08/08/12 03:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks a million Matt.
I hope that the guys at Steinberg respond.
Best Regards, Brian Gardiner.
-------------------- Brian Gardiner
|