6120
member
Joined: 10/03/03
Posts: 68
Loc: London
|
Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
#1023376 - 09/12/12 11:37 PM
|
|
|
|
I'm normally a backing vocalist but have started recording lead vocals on my own acoustic
songs. I've used a Rode NTKv1, AT4040, SM58, and SM57, on the guitar, and the NTK, 4040,
and SM58 on vocals into my RME FF400 and then into Cubase 6.5. The acoustic guitar
recording sounds fine but my vocals sound very 'nasally' so I'm assuming I've got a bit
more mid-range in my vocal range than I'd like. I've been trying to take out some of
the mids using Cubases own EQ and also NI's Passive EQ but not too good at identifying
what I should be cutting or boosting so would appreciate any help in what I should do. Thanks in advance
|
Dynamic Mike
Joined: 31/12/06
Posts: 1482
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: 6120]
#1023380 - 10/12/12 12:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Are you compressing the vocal? I get a similar effect which is exagerated whenever I
compress my voice. I've tried blaming the mics, the room, the positioning, my diet, the
time of day etc. but had to admit it's just how I sound. However I've recently found that
by using multi-band compression & simply excluding a fairly narrow band generally
somewhere around 2k it's a huge improvement. Like you I had no joy trying to correct it
with EQ, but whilst I haven't eliminated it, it's a massive improvement.
-------------------- Not much in life worth running for. Or from.
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8161
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: 6120]
#1023400 - 10/12/12 09:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Mic choice can make a big difference to the nasal quality of a voice. Sometimes I want to
emphasise this aspect, and I'd head for an SM57/58, or an MD421. At other times I want to
play it down and my mic of choice for that is the MD441. Aiming the mic up or down can
also have a significant effect.
The room can also play a part. Home-made
'booths' are often culprits for adding an ugly 'honk' to vocals.
Don't overlook
vocal technique, though. I can often improve a vocalist's tone by reminding them to sing
from the pit of their stomach, rather than from their chest.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Guy Johnson
Joined: 02/05/03
Posts: 3955
Loc: Pembrokeshire
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: 6120]
#1023446 - 10/12/12 12:34 PM
|
|
|
Try keeping the back of the tongue down... part of singing techniques. Best
way to hear yourself is by hearing recordings. As an experiment you could try singing
(outside or in a good acoustic) about a foot or two away from a condenser mic to make sure
you have the close but blended sound of your voice. Mixing-wise, a big wide
cut at around 350 Hz can help.
-------------------- PA stuff on FB
|
Exalted Wombat
Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 4212
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: 6120]
#1023449 - 10/12/12 12:45 PM
|
|
|
Quote 6120:
I'm normally a
backing vocalist but have started recording lead vocals on my own acoustic songs. I've
used a Rode NTKv1, AT4040, SM58, and SM57, on the guitar, and the NTK, 4040, and SM58 on
vocals into my RME FF400 and then into Cubase 6.5. The acoustic guitar recording sounds
fine but my vocals sound very 'nasally' so I'm assuming I've got a bit more mid-range in
my vocal range than I'd like. I've been trying to take out some of the mids using
Cubases own EQ and also NI's Passive EQ but not too good at identifying what I should be
cutting or boosting so would appreciate any help in what I should do. Thanks in
advance
You can do a little
with mic choice, a little more with mic positioning. But it's really about singing
lessons.
Remember that EVERYONE hates the sound of their own voice! A
singer/recordist often over-processes his track, in a hopeless quest to make it sound like
someone else. Concentrate on your strengths, and record your voice as it is. Everyone
else is listening to the words, the tune and the emotion, not criticising your vocal
quality.
|
6120
member
Joined: 10/03/03
Posts: 68
Loc: London
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: 6120]
#1023451 - 10/12/12 12:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks all for your comments. I must admit it's been very revealing to hear your own
voice as the lead vocal and I'm sure a combination of bad mic technique and bad breathing
(I couldn't make the notes last consistently and was short of breath on some) probably has
more to do with it. My studio is quite small (about 3m square) and I've got some good
bass traps and absorbers on the walls and in the corners so I think I've covered the
essentials quite well. My acoustic guitar sounds very good (a really good quality Santa
Cruz dread) with the same mics so I'll look at my technique again. I recently bought
the NI Premium Tube series of effects in their half price deal and I'm still learning how
to use them as well as exploring the in-built Cubase processors. I'm not too good at using
compressors at the moment so will look at cutting some of the ranges in the EQ as you
suggest instead. Thanks again!
|
RegressiveRock
Just half a pint of cherryade for me
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 5351
Loc: Knebworth, Herts
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: Exalted Wombat]
#1023462 - 10/12/12 01:46 PM
|
|
|
Quote Exalted Wombat:
Remember
that EVERYONE hates the sound of their own voice! A singer/recordist often over-processes
his track, in a hopeless quest to make it sound like someone else. Concentrate on your
strengths, and record your voice as it is. Everyone else is listening to the words, the
tune and the emotion, not criticising your vocal quality.
Yup. That's pretty much the thick and the
thin of it.
Reg
-------------------- Google less; read more!
|
BJG145
Joined: 06/08/05
Posts: 2159
Loc: Norwich UK
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: Exalted Wombat]
#1023464 - 10/12/12 01:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote Exalted Wombat:
Everyone
else is listening to the words, the tune and the emotion, not criticising your vocal
quality.
I'm not sure if that's
entirely true - for me, the vocal quality is a crucial aspect of a song's appeal.
|
RegressiveRock
Just half a pint of cherryade for me
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 5351
Loc: Knebworth, Herts
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: BJG145]
#1023468 - 10/12/12 02:06 PM
|
|
|
Quote BJG145:
Quote Exalted Wombat:
Everyone
else is listening to the words, the tune and the emotion, not criticising your vocal
quality.
I'm not sure if that's
entirely true - the vocal quality is an important aspect of a record's appeal.
I think that observation is highly
dependent on genre. The point being made is that the artist is often the worst person to
making value judgements about vocal quality.
Reg
-------------------- Google less; read more!
|
BJG145
Joined: 06/08/05
Posts: 2159
Loc: Norwich UK
|
Re: Correcting 'nasaly' vocals?
[Re: RegressiveRock]
#1023480 - 10/12/12 03:20 PM
|
|
|
Quote RegressiveRock:
The point
being made is that the artist is often the worst person to making value judgements about
vocal quality.
That's true
enough.
Quote Geoff
Emerick:
That was typical John Lennon. Despite the fact that he was one
of the greatest rock 'n roll singers of all time, he hated the sound of his own voice and
was constantly imploring us to make him sound different. "Can you make it sound nasally?
No, I'll sing it nasally - that's it." Anything to disguise his own voice.
|