It sounds as if Marina has been listening to P!nk, Ke$ha, and Katy Pe®®y on repeat, but
who’s complaining if it’s spurred her into writing mouthy pop lyrics like these, and
supporting them with a terrifically gutsy performance? What I particularly like about the
latter is its sense of range, both in terms of pitch and expression. The low register of
every fourth verse line is wonderful, for instance, not just because it’s a rarity to
hear a female singer exploiting this region so confidently, but also because it gives
those lyrics a kind of boozy petulance that’s very much in keeping with their meaning. I
also like the contrast between the breathier head-voice of the choruses and the stridently
chest-voice verses, as well as the distinctly Perry-esque alternation of these two timbres
during the pre-choruses. But within those broad outlines there are wonderful subtleties to
the performance, too: the break-up of those low lines as they tend towards speech; the
hammed-up, cheerleader parody of the “ooh”, “yeah”, and “wow” pre-chorus BVs;
and the surprisingly affecting change of tone as the chorus line descends for “it all”
and “fall”.
All those good things notwithstanding, however, I do wonder
whether there’s something a bit strange going on with the vocal formants in this song.
Formants are resonance peaks in every singer’s frequency response that we humans are
very sensitive to, and which provide us with strong clues as to a performer’s age, size,
and gender. Shifting human vocal formants unnaturally low gives the impression of some
kind of mythical giant or monster (an effect used to death on film and TV), but as the
formants shift upwards, you move through the natural vocal ranges for males, then females,
and, finally, children, before heading off into Tombliboo territory. Of course, even the
briefest comparison between Michael Jackson and Tracy Chapman illustrates that there’s
bountiful overlap between these notional formant ranges in practice, and it’s not the
specific formant range of Marina’s voice in this production that bugs me — it’s that
the formants appear to be moving about! So “someone else’s fault” at 0:19 comes
across like a fresh-faced learner driver, whereas “pop that pretty question” packs
more testosterone than the entire cast of Glee.
Now, it’s conceivable that
this is simply a virtuoso performance, because there is a significant degree of physical
control you can exert over your own formants. Indeed, it’s the stock-in-trade of
voice-over artists the world over. However, I’d hazard a guess that there’s some
artificial manipulation going on here. It’s not something that’s difficult to do in
something like Celemony Melodyne (as Will.I.Am has demonstrated with depressing
regularity), so it wouldn’t surprise me at all to discover that some producers are now
deliberately modulating formants more subliminally during post-production, to add
synthetic expression to their lead vocals. After all, it’s not a huge step beyond adding
fake pitch nuances with Antares Auto-Tune’s vibrato facilities, a technique almost
unheard of a few years ago, but which is now thoroughly commonplace.
--------------------
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio
A complete mixing method based around the techniques of the world's most famous producers.