calmposer a
member
Joined: 02/08/04
Posts: 139
|
NI Massive
#1031231 - 30/01/13 07:29 PM
|
|
|
This synth is fantastic, complex but insanely good. Listening to tracks on the
radio etc you can quite easily single it out and it always sounds MASSIVE. After experimenting and reading I'm still finding it hard to make it sound really big. I
think producers do that even when using just one oscillator. Any tips about how
to make it sound BIG?
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7890
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1031272 - 30/01/13 11:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Personally, I didn't like it, I thought it was fairly bland sounding and lacking in
character.
However, there are many tools to make things sound "big" but it
does kinda depend on what your personal impression of "big" is (what you mean by big isn't
necesarily what I might mean by big).
But in general, layer oscillators,
slightly detune them, add some subtle LFO pitch modulation, use unison to stack up
oscillators, and don't also forget how integral effects are, reverbs, delays and
compression can all help to give an illusion of bigness. And the rest is all in the
arrangement and the mix (actually, *most* of it is here, to be honest... Some things that
are small in isolation can sound *massive* in the right context)
|
Skerrick
Joined: 10/01/13
Posts: 192
Loc: Sydney NSW
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1031274 - 30/01/13 11:46 PM
|
|
|
i have a hard time getting my head around massive, i just dont wanna dedicate enough time
to learning how to use it to its full potential (which i really should) but man theres
some incredible youtube tutorials. just make sure the person in the tutorial knows
what theyre talking about. ive seen a couple where the guy is like "now grab the
blue thing and put it on the yellow thing and turn the top right second from the left knob
to the right a tiny bit." so frustrating when youre trying to use your memory to
recall how you saw it done haha! a few of my friends swear by it, its all just about
the crazy modulation tbh. ive donw my fair share fo experimenting with it but i cant
seem to get those detuned/out of synch tubular bass wubs.. the tune "cyclical" in my
soundcloud is the closest ive come but that was with a fat pad i found in razor and i
modulated band 4 and 5 of the eq im using like a madman hahah and it gave me a similar
effect, backing up what old mate said about making things sound big in other ways. also man, yeah i reckon its a bad ting being able to pick a synth out of a tune on the
radio, i mean some synths fit in perfectly the way they are and need little or no
modulation (guilty as charged) but i prefer to mod them or make my own where i can..
-------------------- www.soundcloud.com/skerrick
|
Pete Kaine
Scan Computers
Joined: 10/07/03
Posts: 3150
Loc: Manchester
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1031314 - 31/01/13 09:42 AM
|
|
|
Further to Desmonds advice and depending on what your comparing it too I'd probably say
it's just as much about the effects chain as it is the synth.
Obviously at
this point I don't know what you are comparing it aginst, but if it's along the lines of
big room electro/dnb/dubstep you wouldn't go amiss sticking Guitar rig and Sausage
Fattener on it and then slamming it through a group buss with the rest of the bass layers
sticking something like cytomics the glue on it.
So breaking it down all
that's going on there is distortion, limiters, compression, eq rinse and repeat and of
course the are plenty of other effect combinations that will do the job as well, it's just
what springs to my mind right now. Be warned you'll lose your dynamics with that lot, but
if it's for the dancefloor thats probably what you want anyway.
-------------------- ScanProAudio & 3XS Audio Systems
ScanProAudio Blog
|
Persian Bit
Joined: 02/03/12
Posts: 73
Loc: Tehran \ IRAN
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1031336 - 31/01/13 10:37 AM
|
|
|
I found Massive a very powerful synth, but I think it suits only some certain type of
music. I still have it in my toolbox, but very rarely I use it. I don't know if it's about
its character or what, but the sounds are too 'strong', coloring and sci-fi. Someone would
say 'so you gotta create your own presets'. but man! too many knobs and stuff to learn.
 Reagrding making the sounds 'big', beside all techniks and tricks that's said in
above comments I believe arrangement and production are very important to make something
sound big [though as said, 'big' could mean different to different ears. to me, it's being
strong in terms of tone and dynamics AND stereo width and depth]. In a very
busy and full mix you don't have enough space to put a 'big' synth somewhere. you will end
up doing all kinds of low cuts and EQ and compression to keep it up while the master
output doesn't clip. It either loses its bigness, or covers up everything. So I
believe it begins in writing and arrangement stage by smart selection of sounds, writing
across different octaves and making room for each part 'musically' and generally prepare
required space for a big synth to sit in. If listen to those hit songs in radio, you
realize how simple and clean their arrangements are. Though obviously there are many
layers of produced sounds down there in the mix, but you hear only a few well designed and
clean sounds [drums,bass, synth,..]. It lets the mixing engineer put everything in focus,
while having that 'big' sound. Even If you're near a finished mix which you're
not satisfied with yet, thanx to digital audio you still can edit, move and delete stuff
here and there to make more space in your mix. Lack of headroom and space means radical
and harsh EQ and compression usage which screws a mix. Personally, even in last minutes of
closing a mix, I found bits and pieaces that can be cut or be lowered down to let the mix
breath.
|
fay spook
Joined: 09/09/09
Posts: 284
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: Persian Bit]
#1031586 - 01/02/13 12:58 PM
|
|
|
I usually have a problem getting Massive to sit in the mix! You can fill up the frequency
range quite easily with the ideas given above but also try moving where the inserts go in
the routing page, sending an oscillator or two out bypassing the filters and automate
intensity and wavetable position of the oscillators. A little but of overdrive will help.
Or sweeping filters/oscillators at slightly different rates. Then you can start stacking
instances of it in your DAW. Also if you can tell us or give an example of
where you want to be, is it a full frequency sound ie sound with a large frequency range
or one with a lot going on etc???
-------------------- http://soundcloud.com/for-mash-get-ash
|
calmposer a
member
Joined: 02/08/04
Posts: 139
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: fay spook]
#1031681 - 02/02/13 12:01 AM
|
|
|
Thanks a lot people, and especially fay spook - you got it bang on I think: Quote fay spook:
automate
intensity and wavetable position of the oscillators. A little but of overdrive will help.
Or sweeping filters/oscillators at slightly different rates. Then you can start stacking
instances of it in your DAW.
Quote fay spook:
Also if you
can tell us or give an example of where you want to be, is it a full frequency sound ie
sound with a large frequency range or one with a lot going on etc???
Full frequency type sound - that's what
makes it hard!
As an exercise I took a part where the synth is so big and tried
to replicate it.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/36122736/exref.mp3
and my
version
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/36122736/ex5.mp3
Interesting huh?
What you all think?
|
Skerrick
Joined: 10/01/13
Posts: 192
Loc: Sydney NSW
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: fay spook]
#1031690 - 02/02/13 01:18 AM
|
|
|
Quote fay spook:
I usually have a
problem getting Massive to sit in the mix! You can fill up the frequency range quite
easily with the ideas given above but also try moving where the inserts go in the routing
page, sending an oscillator or two out bypassing the filters and automate intensity and
wavetable position of the oscillators. A little but of overdrive will help. Or sweeping
filters/oscillators at slightly different rates. Then you can start stacking instances of
it in your DAW.
Also if you can tell us or give an example of where you want
to be, is it a full frequency sound ie sound with a large frequency range or one with a
lot going on etc???
i dont
usually have any troubles with it at all, i use massive a lot, but i use the presets and
tweak those around rather than trying to make a sound from scratch... ive been watching
some tutorials lately and having a bit more of a crack with it, but honestly, i disagree
about it not sitting well in the mix or sounding too big, all you have to do is use the
right fx etc and play with the volume and eq till you have it where you want it.. ive used
it in some 'big' stuff but ite pretty damn versatile i
reckon it has some GREAT pads especially.
near the bottom of the list in
particular, theres one called "warp x" if you select it and go to the 'attributes'
tab in the top right and turn the drums dial all the way to 0, you have an amazing sound..
theres so many great ones in there..
http://soundcloud.com/skerrick/daydreaming
http://soundcloud.com/skerrick/trap-door-forthcoming-plusquam
http://soundcloud.com/skerrick/sundials
^ pretty much every
synth in each of those three, i got from massive in one way or another.. so if you think
its for big sounds only then i reckon you should have a geeze at these and see what it can
do in terms of the range of sounds that its capable of producing...
-------------------- www.soundcloud.com/skerrick
|
oggyb
Joined: 09/02/08
Posts: 1429
Loc: Leeds, UK
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1031802 - 02/02/13 09:41 PM
|
|
|
Pssh I keep trying to reply to threads and then forget to submit after previewing so I'll
try to remember what I typed! I love Massive and use it often, and I find that
I get good results when I create a patch with lots of frequencies, then EQ them viciously
later on. That way, the top end sparkle is still there and it sounds big, but
the volume of those frequencies is low enough not to mask other things that demand HF
space. The meat of the sound can actually be quite narrow in your chosen frequency "slot",
but if the top end isn't there it sounds too small.
-------------------- Composer;
www.ogonline.org
|
TC higgins
Joined: 03/02/13
Posts: 1
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: desmond]
#1031956 - 04/02/13 12:32 AM
|
|
|
Making your sound big can be done by widening the audio in the stereo field, layering
several sounds on top of each other, boosting certain regions in the frequency spectrum,
adding all sorts of effects, compression,etc etc. This has litle to nothing to do
with the fact if your using massive or any other vst/hardware synth. adding extra
notes to your harmony/melody will also result in a "bigger" sound, especially adding
severall perfect 5th's.
-------------------- Producing music with home studio equipment
|
urbangorilla
Joined: 10/01/13
Posts: 1
|
Re: NI Massive
[Re: calmposer a]
#1032955 - 10/02/13 10:55 PM
|
|
|
|
I've found that the on-board effects inserts and eq (on the upper-ish right) are what
usually take things to the next level for me in Massive. For adding space, the dimension
expander, reverb effects are pretty handy for getting things to really start to sound
amazing. With the dimension expander, you might want to watch out for phase issues if
you're working with real bassy frequencies.
|