Main Forums >> Recording Techniques
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1401
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith'
      #915249 - 20/05/11 08:20 AM
There are lots of points of interest here, not least the way distortion allows the lead vocals to maintain some presence in the face of the backing track’s full-frequency assault — a long-standing trick in heavy rock music, which is equally applicable to slab-like saturated synth textures like this. I also love the way the arrangement is constantly evolving through time. Take the first verse (0:27-0:55) for instance. It starts by dropping the drums with a low-end ‘boom’ one-shot and a sizzly HF transition effect. The first vocal phrase follows shortly after, by the end of which the backing has already thinned out and become more muted, to give the sonic details of the voice, high synth riff, and their delay effects a few moments in the spotlight. By the time the second vocal phrase has finished, though, the synth bed is already becoming edgier and more filter-modulated, leading towards the vocal delay spin on the word ‘I’ at 0:40.

Then the tambourine/shaker subtly increase the rhythmic drive and a hint of low bass appears as the synths begin to fade in and open their filters. At 0:48, a siren sound emerges from somewhere below 200Hz and slowly slides upwards to connect with the strong 658Hz fundamental of the vocal ‘Ho!’ at 0:53, while the shadowy low end fades out again in preparation for the main chorus bass part. It’s this kind of continual ebb and flow that seems to typify a lot of the most commercially successful dance music, and Chase & Status exemplify a wide variety of techniques here which you can readily adapt to enhance your own electronica tracks.

Here’s what the sub-80Hz frequency region of Chase & Status’s ‘Blind Faith’ looks like on a vectorscope display. The oval shape shows that there are out-of-phase bass components in the mix, something that can cause problems in real-world playback situations. The second vectorscope shows the much better-behaved sub-80Hz region of Pendulum’s ‘Watercolour’, which delivers a much more consistent bass sound.

The drums and bass are worthy of attention too. The snare has a good chunk of low end to it (another connection with classic rock records), specifically a strong pitched component at 172Hz. Try notching out that frequency with EQ and you’ll quickly realise how significantly it affects the drum’s subjective power. By giving more low end to the snare like this, it doesn’t need to fight as much with the synths and vocals in the 3-5kHz presence region, which helps avoid harshness creeping into the overall mix tonality. It’s also worth noting that 172Hz is an ‘F’, a note which works pretty well with all the main chords of the song: a 7th of G-Major, the third of D-minor, and the root of F-major. By virtue of this, the 172Hz component sinks into the track, contributing power without drawing too much attention to its pitched nature.

The kick rolls off pretty rapidly below 60Hz, as you can hear easily at 0:13, leaving a clear window for the 35-50Hz bass-line fundamentals. Despite this, the low end of this record is not as solid and powerful as it could be, for two reasons. The first is that the levels of the bass fundamentals are quite inconsistent. Compare the ‘D’ notes at 0:57 and 1:04, for example. The fundamental of the latter is considerably stronger (to the tune of about 6dB, judging by my spectrum analysers). Compressing the low frequencies is no remedy, though, because of another problem: the left and right LF channels aren’t well matched, either in terms of level or phase. In other words, in a stereo speaker system, the combined bass output of the speakers will suffer because one of the woofers is usually producing less fundamental than the other; while on a mono system, partial phase-cancellation adds further variability in the combined bass level.

You can easily identify low-end phase mismatch by sending a steeply low-pass-filtered version of the mix to a stereo vectorscope. In ‘Blind Faith’ you get an oval trace, whereas a production that’s better behaved in this regard (Pendulum’s ‘Watercolour’, say) exhibits something close to a straight vertical line with a filter cutoff of 80Hz or so. To hear what I’m talking about, listen to the ‘F’ bass note at 3:09. It starts off with the channels partially out of phase, then drifts into phase towards the middle of the note’s duration, before sliding back out of alignment again. The result in mono is a noticeable low-end swell (maybe 3dB) towards the middle of the note, and this is the kind of instability that’s present right through the track.

--------------------
Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1401
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #915292 - 20/05/11 12:10 PM
I reviewed this one from their album 'No More Idols', which gives the following credits:

Written by William Kennard, Saul Milton, Liam Bailey, David Lee, Dan Hartman.
Produced by William Kennard, Saul Milton.

I believe David Lee and Dan Hartman are the writers of the tracks Chase & Status sampled, rather than being involved with the production of 'Blind Faith' directly. Couldn't find any mastering credit in the sleeve, which is intriguing given the low-end issue I mentioned in the previous post -- did Chase & Status do that bit themselves?

For more critiques of commercial productions, browse The Mix Review Index

--------------------
Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.

Edited by Jennifer Jones (25/07/11 10:25 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
onesecondglance



Joined: 02/01/08
Posts: 2140
Loc: Reading, UK
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #915819 - 24/05/11 07:45 AM
Quote Mike Senior:

Despite this, the low end of this record is not as solid and powerful as it could be, for two reasons. The first is that the levels of the bass fundamentals are quite inconsistent. Compare the ‘D’ notes at 0:57 and 1:04, for example. The fundamental of the latter is considerably stronger (to the tune of about 6dB, judging by my spectrum analysers). Compressing the low frequencies is no remedy, though, because of another problem: the left and right LF channels aren’t well matched, either in terms of level or phase. In other words, in a stereo speaker system, the combined bass output of the speakers will suffer because one of the woofers is usually producing less fundamental than the other; while on a mono system, partial phase-cancellation adds further variability in the combined bass level.




so what sort of things could you do to sort this out?

--------------------
hourglass | random thoughts | doubledotdash!? collective


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1401
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: onesecondglance]
      #915853 - 24/05/11 09:45 AM
Quote onesecondglance:

Quote Mike Senior:

Despite this, the low end of this record is not as solid and powerful as it could be, for two reasons. The first is that the levels of the bass fundamentals are quite inconsistent. Compare the ‘D’ notes at 0:57 and 1:04, for example. The fundamental of the latter is considerably stronger (to the tune of about 6dB, judging by my spectrum analysers). Compressing the low frequencies is no remedy, though, because of another problem: the left and right LF channels aren’t well matched, either in terms of level or phase. In other words, in a stereo speaker system, the combined bass output of the speakers will suffer because one of the woofers is usually producing less fundamental than the other; while on a mono system, partial phase-cancellation adds further variability in the combined bass level.




so what sort of things could you do to sort this out?




There are lots of things you could do, but it depends on where the problem has arisen. If it was a result of an added stereo effect, then you'd just need to high-pass filter that effect. If the effect were part of the synth patch, you could perhaps bypass it there, and then reapply it as a send effect. If it was being caused by detuned/modulated oscillators, then you could try adjusting the synth parameters to avoid this, if that didn't kill the rest of the timbre, or else high-pass filter the synth sound and replace its fundamentals using a separate mono sinewave subsynth patch. In the worst case, you might just be able to deal with it by mono-ing and limiting the low end using multiband processing, but that'd be my least preferred option usually.

--------------------
Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
onesecondglance



Joined: 02/01/08
Posts: 2140
Loc: Reading, UK
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #915890 - 24/05/11 10:58 AM
thanks Mike, good to know what options there are in case i find this in one of my tracks.

--------------------
hourglass | random thoughts | doubledotdash!? collective


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Vlaaing Peerd



Joined: 02/06/10
Posts: 53
Loc: Groningen, Netherworld
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #915931 - 24/05/11 02:27 PM
wow, first time I discovered the mix reviews here on the site. Great stuff! Couldn't find where Mike's referring to with the vectorscop displays though, is it somewhere to be found on this page?

Many thanks anyhow, this is really helpful stuff to consider in my own productions!

--------------------
who is Kees and why is he so special?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1401
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Vlaaing Peerd]
      #915962 - 24/05/11 05:35 PM
Quote Vlaaing Peerd:

Couldn't find where Mike's referring to with the vectorscope displays though, is it somewhere to be found on this page?




Apologies -- these reviews are quoted from the print magazine, in which the pictures appear. You can also view them in the online article archive here:
The Mix Review -- May 2011

--------------------
Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
chris...
active member


Joined: 12/03/03
Posts: 4731
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #917146 - 31/05/11 10:58 AM
Quote Mike Senior:

the low end of this record is not as solid and powerful as it could be



I can report that hearing Blind Faith played live, the bass was pretty f**king powerful.

Some of my internal organs may well have been re-arranged.

Gather they'd brought a truckload of extra subs


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
TSH-Tim



Joined: 21/02/11
Posts: 828
Loc: Guildford
Re: Chase & Status: 'Blind Faith' new [Re: chris...]
      #918929 - 07/06/11 11:41 PM
Quote chris...:

Quote Mike Senior:

the low end of this record is not as solid and powerful as it could be



I can report that hearing Blind Faith played live, the bass was pretty f**king powerful.

Some of my internal organs may well have been re-arranged.

Gather they'd brought a truckload of extra subs




Prob a load of d&b J Subs... or maybe J-Infra if you were lucky !!

--------------------
PA Hire Surrey
Lighting Hire Surrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
3 registered and 57 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, SOS News Editor,  
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 14993

December 2014
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for December 2014
DAW Tips from SOS

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Blog | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media