Bit like hearing about a movie coming out, seeing the trailers and then when it does come out... its well you know - But you have the feeling that there is going to be something more in the pipeline, 4G and a HD screen, having said that the 4G side of things will have Samsung up in arms

Any way I'm sure there will be tons of news, reviews and whatever when it comes out on the 21 of September

Full Story on BBC

Apple iPhone 5 unveiled with taller screen and 4G

--------------------
www.dragonlogos.co.uk

I'm a big fan of Apple and own stacks and stack of their products. Personally I've never been as disappointed by a launch as I am now.
Trying to replace the standard headphone jack with some proprietary apple-only headphones was a big mistake that didn't work for them on the nano a few years back. Also the new Dock connector is nothing but a cynical money grab. If I was a developer in any number of fields making 3rd party devices that interact with the iPhone or iPad I'd feel like giving up this morning. Just when all cars, and audio devices agree on an industry standard that we can all use, Apple change it all for no reason what so ever.
No interest in any of the new products announced yesterday, and make me think it's just another step towards Apple teaching us to be obedient and get rid of perfectly good devices simply because they say so.
Honesty, how often have you looked at your iPhone and said 'This screen JUST ISN"T TALL ENOUGH?'

I think people expect too much from technology these days. The ability to make leaps between generations seems to have passed and any changes on new products seems to be small increments.

--------------------
http://soundcloud.com/richie-royale
http://www.mixcrate.com/richieroyale

Never mind the phone, where is the new Imac ?

--------------------
http://soundcloud.com/violentchimp
www.myspace.com/vylon

yeah, not so impressed with the (lack of) new features.

--------------------
www.Lozjackson.com

Quote Paul Farrer:

---

Trying to replace the standard headphone jack with some proprietary apple-only headphones was a big mistake that didn't work for them on the nano a few years back.

---

are you saying they've changed the standard headphone jack on the new iphone5?

--------------------
www.Lozjackson.com

I agree it all seems a bit underwhelming.

Changing the multi-connector seems cynical (25 quid for a lovely, convenient, doesn't get in the way, always to hand when you need it adaptor? Yeah...), and finally lets me say 'I told you so' to all those who have iPhone-specific connections around their homes and cars - I distrust proprietary formats.

The change in screen size seems an admission that it should have been 16:9 from the start.

Some reporters are suggesting that lack of Near-Field is going to hobble it too - dunno.

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Quote Bossman:

---

are you saying they've changed the standard headphone jack on the new iphone5?

---

If so, s/he's misinterpreted the BBC story. There's a standard 3.5mm stereo headphone jack socket on the iPhone5 according to Apple: http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html

I guess it was this quote from the BBC article (referenced above) that was confusing "The handset also uses a new, smaller, socket for its charger. This means owners will need to use an adapter to plug the device into existing speakers and other equipment."

Nice of Apple to use the word 'lightning' to describe the new connection on the iPhone. Seems like their nomenclature department is getting a bit weather focussed at the moment. I look forward to the 'tornado' hi-res monitors on the new iMac models when they arrive.

Underwhelmed here. Still, I suppose it's saved me £500+ on an upgrade.

I think changing the connector is wrong, but the also changed from the 3G to the 4 for some accessories. That was worse in a way as they still appeared to be identical.

Bazza

--------------------
This time next week, who'll give a sh*t
http://www.podcastrevision.co.uk

It is only the position of hp jack that was changed. Great, I hated the current position every single time putting in and taking out from my pocket.

this amused me

iPhone 5 marketing




--------------------
MBP 17", PC 100(Nubus Protools) Motu 896, X-Station, Logic9, Reason6, Korg legacy, ACE, Alchemy, Emax II, E-Synth, Evolver MEK, Waldorf Pulse and Blofeld, AS Telemark, AS Leipzig-S

Well, to balance out the cynics above

They changed the connector because it was inhibiting the form factor of the device, and they felt the benefits of making the device thinner and lighter were a worthwhile tradeoff. In addition, the old connector is unnecessarily large, unwieldy, tricky to connect to and easy to force in the wrong way and damage something, which Apple probably have service stats for.

The new connector is essentially smaller, easier to connect, reversible so it doesn't need to use to figure out which way to put it in, less prone to damage, and enables the device to be smaller.

You don't change things "for no reason", and Apple's designers kinda of know what they are doing, even if Apple are, more so than pretty much all companies, prone to obsolete, move forward and abandon old stuff much more readily than other companies. Much of the time, and perhaps I'm not cynical enough as you folks, I think the designers identify a need, and think "How can we do this better?" "What are the opportunities?" "What does redesigning this give us?" and go from there.

All valid design approaches for new products, technologies and formats - though of course, not the only considerations.

Quote desmond:

---

You don't change things "for no reason", and Apple's designers kinda of know what they are doing

---

They know exactly what they're doing. A new connector means a whole new surge of income for new adaptors, cables, chargers and accessories. All they then had to do was to improve it enough to convince us it was necessary - job done!

It's a strange thing. My old Sony phone managed to do everything the iPhone does (and more - it didn't restrict content) with a standard *tiny* USB connector...

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

OK, so the big news was that Apple changed the connector and are playing catching up with the rest of the smartphone industry. Nothing revolutionary this time.

Bigger screen, 4" is more or less standard on all other brands, for half the money of what a iPhone5 costs. If Samsung can make a phone for half the price and they still don't make any money from selling apps, why couldn't Apple? Seems like another example of the Apple tax.

I have several Apple devices at home (Macbook, iMac, iPad, Macmini) but the recent iPhones do not provide me with anything the other (andriod-based) phones can't provide me with, for way lower price. The only reason to get an Apple phone is to have access to all the apps, but with the ipad I have that covered already.

I am also growing increasingly irritated with Apple reliance on the iTunes for everything. I want to upload/download videos, songs or pictures to/from my phone/iPad/computer using just a standard USB cable and not have to install and start iTunes and do a syncronisation. It's just plain stupid and limits the ease of flow of information between the devices.





--------------------
TritonExtrMOSS/EX800, NordRack2, ATC1, D550/XV5080/MKS70/MKS7/MKS50/MKS80/S550/JP8080/Ju60/JD990, Blofeld, Mopho, TG77/An1X, ESQM, Emax, Esynth, AkaiS5k/MPC1k, Indigo2, Rogue, Machinedrum, ProOne

Quote desmond:

---

They changed the connector because it was inhibiting the form factor of the device,

---

Does it now have a straightforward USB connection?
Can I transfer my media without being controlled by iTunes?

I'm personally more interested in seeing the developments with iOS 6 and whether they've implemented multichannel audio output. An ipad would be a great alternative to CDJs for DJs.

--------------------
mac book pro 10.6.8 / emu tracker pre soundcard / m audio BX8a monitos / M Audio pro keys 88 stage piano.

Its just a phone, now get back to moaning about something important.

--------------------
Daniel Davis
Edinburgh Recording Studio Windmill Sound

Quote DePulse:

---

I want to upload/download videos, songs or pictures to/from my phone/iPad/computer using just a standard USB cable and not have to install and start iTunes and do a syncronisation.

---

FWIW the OSX "Image Capture" utility lets you quickly download photos without iTunes.

I always find the broo-ha-ha surrounding apple product launches mystifying - particularly the anti-reactions.

Apple have always been good at that final polish. For some people - I count myself in that number, particularly as my iPhone becomes my wife's phone and probably my daughter's phone eventually and I want an easy life when I have to support them - that last five percent of refinement is well worth it.

There are also some odd people out there with not much in the way of lives. Its a free world. Get over it.

Steve

--------------------
arK music

i usually find the people complaining are the same ones with old iPhones.

Personally, I've never wanted one... until now. Looks beautiful.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Am I missing something? I thought this was a music technology forum, not a mobile phone forum.

Quote N WILLIAMS:

---

Am I missing something?

---

Yes you are.

Smartphones can be DAW controllers, performing devices, synthesisers, recorders and have the potential to open up new areas for collaboration and musical innovation. They are touch screen portable computers after all.

Stephen

--------------------
New Henry Fool album (Featuring Phil Manzenera and Jarrod Gosling) out now. https://www.burningshed.com/store/henryfool/

Quote Stephen Bennett:

---

Quote N WILLIAMS:

---

Am I missing something?

---

Yes you are.

Smartphones can be DAW controllers, performing devices, synthesisers, recorders and have the potential to open up new areas for collaboration and musical innovation. They are touch screen portable computers after all.

Stephen

---

Correction:
iPhone can be DAW controllers, performing devices, synthesisers, recorders and have the potential to open up new areas for collaboration and musical innovation.
There is hardly anything you can do with Android OS as far as music is concerned. Most of people I know bought iPhone mainly for the reason of useful apps which don not exist and probably will never be developed due to hardware & OS limitations.

I wish the Cubase app worked better! It is terrible at locking to the time. I think I should go to TouchOsc for my remote stuff.

--------------------
http://soundcloud.com/richie-royale
http://www.mixcrate.com/richieroyale

Quote Daniel Davis:

---

Its just a phone, now get back to moaning about something important.

---

Everything's Amazing & Nobody's Happy

Quote Richie Royale:

---

I think people expect too much from technology these days.....

---

That's because some get sucked in by the hype that promises so much, faster, better, sexier etc etc etc - never cheaper though! When after all, all it is is a little box you can send messages on and look at pics

There was a time when computers and phones did make huge leaps from generation to generation, but that time seems to have passed.

--------------------
http://soundcloud.com/richie-royale
http://www.mixcrate.com/richieroyale

think we need to take a little step back and put things into perspective.

smart phones (and iPhone in particular) have rendered many devices obsolete:

- Satnav

- Video recorder

- Camera

- Music player (including the iPod, whose sales are way down since iPhone)

- and one could argue phone calls (Facetime, or VOIP)

Not a fanboy in the least. But got the email from Apple to pre-order this mornign and usually bin those emails but this time checked it out...

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

I'm not sure I agree.

Quote ken long:

---

Satnav

---

Phone screens are too small for satnav, IMO. And what happens when the phone rings while you're driving?!

Quote ken long:

---

Video recorder/camera

---

I've seen nothing in a phone yet that replaces my HD video camera, or adequately replaces a dedicated stills camera. Just hunting for the shutter button on a phone can be a pain.

Quote ken long:

---

Music player

---

Phone storage is far too limited IMO. My Archos 500GB holds *all* of my audio and photos, and a great deal of video content.

Phones have come a long way, and they certainly do a reasonable 'rough and ready' job of most of the tasks you mention, but I think we're yet a long way from dedicated devices being 'rendered obsolete'.

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Quote The Elf:

---

Phone screens are too small for satnav, IMO. And what happens when the phone rings while you're driving?!

---

I don't know. What do you do now when your phone rings? My Android HTC serves me well as a navigator. Possibly better than my Satnav ever did.

Quote:

---

I've seen nothing in a phone yet that replaces my HD video camera, or adequately replaces a dedicated stills camera. Just hunting for the shutter button on a phone can be a pain.

---

iPhone video and pictures are amazing. Couple that with on-board vid editing / photo processing and the ability to share that content or back it up on location poo poos this argument.

Quote:

---

Phone storage is far too limited IMO. My Archos 500GB holds *all* of my audio and photos, and a great deal of video content.

Phones have come a long way, and they certainly do a reasonable 'rough and ready' job of most of the tasks you mention, but I think we're yet a long way from dedicated devices being 'rendered obsolete'.

---

Ah! But you aren't taking into account 4G network speeds. With cloud storage now available, there will be no need for you to carry files around.

In any case, it's not just 'my' argument. One need only look at market forces to realise that this is in fact a reality.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote The Elf:

---

Just hunting for the shutter button on a phone can be a pain.

---

There are only 2 buttons - if it is pain for you to memorise which of the 2 is the shutter you should better stick to paper and pencil and dont even think to try SLR or any video cameras- those buggers have way more things to "hunt" - find, turn, press or twist then the iPhones 2 buttons.

Edited by electrotimba (14/09/12 11:41 AM)

It's and expensive phone, or a not so expensive small computer that you can make phone calls with.

Either way, the user experience of the iPhone outstrips the competition for me. It does exactly what I need it to do in the simplest way possible.

However, my brother the software designer thinks the UI is outdated and over simplistic, and doesn't like the fact that he can't mod it without paying apple money for the SDKs.

If I had £530(!!!) quid to spend on a phone, I'd buy it. But as it stands, I'll probably get a 4s in the next couple of months.

--------------------
www.exaviormusic.com
www.manninmusic.com Music Teacher, Isle of Man

Quote ken long:

---

iPhone video and pictures are amazing. Couple that with on-board vid editing / photo processing and the ability to share that content or back it up on location poo poos this argument.

---

Really? 1080p video? Nah!

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Quote ken long:

---

smart phones (and iPhone in particular) have rendered many devices obsolete:

---

Not they haven't... not yet anyway. All they've managed to do so far is trade in high quality standards in exchange for a hefty dollop of convenience and ubiquity.

This is particuarly true in the cases of camera, video recorder and audio player -- all of which are impressive given the fact that they come for free in something that's supposed to be a phone (often not a very good phone, actually, but we'll skip over that... ), but not very good when compared to dedicated quality devices.

For that reason there is very much still a valid and vital role for decent cameras, video recorders and auido systems, as least for the quality-conscious. They are far from obsolete.

For Joe Average who would previously have used and been quite happy with a cheapo camera, camcorder and 'hifi', he/she could do away with them and not notice much difference... but I'm not very interested in products only designed to satisfy the lowest common denominator!

H

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote electrotimba:

---

Quote The Elf:

---

Just hunting for the shutter button on a phone can be a pain.

---

There are only 2 buttons - if it is pain for you to memorise which of the 2 is the shutter you should better stick to paper and pencil and dont even think to try SLR or any video cameras- those buggers have way more things to "hunt" - find, turn, press or twist then the iPhones 2 buttons.

---

I'm not speaking for the iPhone, or for myself! My mother, for instance, can't figure out how to take a photo with her phone, but she copes with her simple digital camera. Not everyone is of the techno generation you know!

My point here is that dedicated devices are not 'obsolete' - phones are low-quality, low-end versions. For many of us plebs taking video, or playing music on a phone is ok as far as it goes - it is 'good enough' - but for anyone serious about the genre I don't see dedicated cameras disappearing any time soon.

When Speilberg films his next blockbuster on an iPhone, or the next semi-naked royal peep-shots are taken from 2 miles away with a Samsung phone I might be convinced!

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

OK - 2 things:

1) obsolete was perhaps too strong... but the day will come.

2) by cameras, I meant snap cams, obviously not SLRs an pro cameras with larger lenses. that, it will never achieve.

All my other points were valid and i notice no-one has challenged them so I can only assume we're in agreement.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote ken long:

---

OK - 2 things:

1) obsolete was perhaps too strong... but the day will come.

2) by cameras, I meant snap cams, obviously not SLRs an pro cameras with larger lenses. that, it will never achieve.

---

That pretty much sums it up!

BTW: In answer to your earlier question... when my phone rings I answer using hands-free. My satnav keeps on sat-navving. I think a device can do too many things.

As to the cloud doing away with the need for storage space. Nice idea - it appeals to me - but most of the time I can't even get a decent phone signal, let alone reliable 4G on the motorway! I hope in the long run you are correct though.

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Quote The Elf:

---

I'm not speaking for the iPhone, or for myself! My mother, for instance, can't figure out how to take a photo with her phone, but she copes with her simple digital camera. Not everyone is of the techno generation you know!

---

She'll eventually need to figure it out, because sales of point-and-shoot cameras are going through the floor now everyone carries a camera with them permanently anyway (their phone).

Quote The Elf:

---

My point here is that dedicated devices are not 'obsolete' - phones are low-quality, low-end versions. For many of us plebs taking video, or playing music on a phone is ok as far as it goes - it is 'good enough' - but for anyone serious about the genre I don't see dedicated cameras disappearing any time soon.

---

They are of course not going to replace high-end dedicated devices. They *are* largely going to replace low end consumer devices, because they do the photo bit just as well, and offer a whole bunch of connected-to-the-net opportunities making it easier than ever to share photos.

Quote The Elf:

---

When Speilberg films his next blockbuster on an iPhone, or the next semi-naked royal peep-shots are taken from 2 miles away with a Samsung phone I might be convinced!

---

That's not the point - they won't replace high-end gear.

Quote The Elf:

---

That pretty much sums it up!

---

How does selectively quoting me sum it up?

Quote:

---

BTW: In answer to your earlier question... when my phone rings I answer using hands-free. My satnav keeps on sat-navving. I think a device can do too many things.

---

Ah yes, but i hope for you and your passenger(s) sake that you aren't using both devices at once! So, two devices but one can only be used at a time renders the need for 2 separate devices redundant.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Edited by ken long (14/09/12 12:51 PM)

Sums up =

'obsolete' was too strong

SLRs and pro cameras with larger lenses will not be made obsolete.

That better?

Quote:

---

Ah yes, but i hope for you and your passenger(s) sake that you aren't using both devices at once!

---

Of course I am! Using the phone doesn't stop me hearing 'take the next left'!

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Quote ken long:

---

smart phones (and iPhone in particular) have rendered many devices obsolete:

---

Not they haven't... not yet anyway.

---

snappy cameras are out man. why bother when you've got the same thing on your phone? d es beat me to it.... don't believe me? look at some stats http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20073271-264/iphone-4-tops-flickr-camera -stats-a-closer-look/

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote ken long:

---

Ah yes, but i hope for you and your passenger(s) sake that you aren't using both devices at once! So, two devices but one can only be used at a time renders the need for 2 separate devices redundant.

---

Huh? Aside from the potential for distraction, there's no inherent technical or practical problem with having a dedicated sat nav and a hands-free phone operating at the same time. And the advantage is that you don't lose the sat nav screen when answering a call on the phone -- so you can still see which exit to take at the roundabout!

I tried using my smart phone sat nav when I first had it, but quickly realised that a dedicated sat nav was better for me. I do use the phone nav system occasionally, but usually only when walking and trying to find somewhere in an unfamiliar town.

H

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote The Elf:

---

I've seen nothing in a phone yet that replaces my HD video camera, or adequately replaces a dedicated stills camera. Just hunting for the shutter button on a phone can be a pain.

---

unless your HD cam and your "stills" cam are of pro range (ie, not point and shoot, and not of the flip type) then my point still stands. Your devices are redundant. Not obsolete, not yet. Redundant is the word I should have used.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Quote ken long:

---

Ah yes, but i hope for you and your passenger(s) sake that you aren't using both devices at once! So, two devices but one can only be used at a time renders the need for 2 separate devices redundant.

---

Huh? Aside from the potential for distraction, there's no inherent technical or practical problem with having a dedicated sat nav and a hands-free phone operating at the same time. And the advantage is that you don't lose the sat nav screen when answering a call on the phone -- so you can still see which exit to take at the roundabout!

I tried using my smart phone sat nav when I first had it, but quickly realised that a dedicated sat nav was better for me. I do use the phone nav system occasionally, but usually only when walking and trying to find somewhere in an unfamiliar town.

H

---

i don't use hands free so our driving differs there. point taken.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote ken long:

---

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Quote ken long:

---

smart phones (and iPhone in particular) have rendered many devices obsolete:

---

Not they haven't... not yet anyway.

---

snappy cameras are out man. why bother when you've got the same thing on your phone?

---

yes... I think we've already established now that your sweeping claim that the iPhone was making whole classes of equipment obsolete was actually meant to be confined to low-end 'snappy cameras'.... and I agree you are correct at that level for the yoof and technically savvy market. Meanwhile, like the Elf, my dear old Mom and even my wife struggle with that level of technology and still much prefer old-school 'snappy cameras'.... so not quite obsolete just yet!

It is possible one day that the quality of phone camera / video / audio might rise to the kind of 'semi-pro' level that might render half-decent dedicated equipment redundant for many (if not obsolete). The quality has certainly risen a lot of the last decade... but it still has a very long way to go to my mind, and they will probably never be able to offer the flexibility and versatility of dedicated devices.

H

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Meanwhile, like the Elf, my dear old Mom and even my wife struggle with that level of technology and still much prefer old-school 'snappy cameras'.... so not quite obsolete just yet!

---

But Hugh, though point and shoot appear to be simpler in theory, what about the actual transferring of data off the memory? Driver headaches, interfacing issues, Finding that bl**dy proprietary USB cable at the bottom of a drawer... etc.

Quote:

---

It is possible one day that the quality of phone camera / video / audio might rise to the kind of 'semi-pro' level that might render half-decent dedicated equipment redundant for many (if not obsolete). The quality has certainly risen a lot of the last decade... but it still has a very long way to go to my mind, and they will probably never be able to offer the flexibility and versatility of dedicated devices.

---

Ah non! I won't allow the argument to stretch to pro audio.

Just like pro cameras with their large lenses, one of the most important part of a recording path will include the size and quality of the mic diaphragm. I can't see iPhones with either. Accessorising these would be counterproductive.

P.S. I'm not one to make sweeping statements.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

hmmm

I'm wondering if we are actually seeing the death of high end devices - or at least a vast reduction in the sales of high end devices because of this sea of change in iPhone and others (although Apple do seem to have the lead in the smartphone and tablet market)....

if there are too many companies not making enough money from the high end devices, because 'the prosumer' is not buying them - then maybe they will end

how are canon doing? - or HP - or other such mid-high end market firms in the face of the competition...what about nokia? motorola? - arn't they now all owned by software companies.....an unthinkable idea 5 years ago!

could we see the same pattern as happened in music - where studio's closed cause people could do it at home and there wasn't enough money/clients to keep them going?

or do we see a change in the high end companies products - like API with the lunchbox - UAD with the all in one apollo? - will the high end camera manufacturers ride on the success of the iPhone/iPad and create 'pro additions' (like camera attachments) for the bog-standard iPhone? - I've got a feeling that is the only way specialist technology is going to survive.

- as for the 'luddite' argument (my mother can't work an iPhone camera etc) I don't think it washes.....you need to look at the kids (man) - and what they are using - cause they are the consumers of the future....and everything is portable and socially networked.....

As for schools - 1-1 iPad is becoming more fashionable - and even BYO devices - there are lots of schools now buying iPod touch/iPad etc for individual students use over the lifespan of their school career - because you can set/receive homework and lessons etc etc - all in 1 device ....that lasts 5 years....the savings on paper alone are astonomical! - i have lists of examples if you really want them! (btw primary schools are way ahead in this area!)

So - the iPhone 5 is important - it's followed quite major legal wranglings between the only real players in this market and Apple seem to be winning - they are certainly doing alright for cash....what are the competitors actually producing that's going to equal or match what Apple have? (and therefore the money)

is it groundbreaking? i don't know - i think 4g is going to be interesting (why bother with fixed line broadband?) and iPhone 5 is one of the only devices set-up for it...the app store has certainly been very successful and the features on iPhone are certainly worth copying by other companies - and this phone does get the 'it looks sexy!' tagline

is there a premium for a new product - of course.....will i buy it? - not yet....but maybe one day! - will others buy it - i don't doubt - and they'll have a great phone!

i wish i had one.....and thats the big selling point - for any company.

--------------------
http://soundcloud.com/seaapes

Quote ken long:

---

But Hugh, though point and shoot appear to be simpler in theory, what about the actual transferring of data off the memory?

---

They take the camera to Boots or Jessops and walk away half an hour later with a bunch of prints and a CD-Rom... Simples!

Quote:

---

Ah non! I won't allow the argument to stretch to pro audio.

---

You're a contrary old bugger at times aren't you

Quote:

---

Just like pro cameras with their large lenses, one of the most important part of a recording path will include the size and quality of the mic diaphragm. I can't see iPhones with either. Accessorising these would be counterproductive.

---

...and yet there are broadcast journalists all around the world already using iPhones to record interviews and vox-pops on location... sometimes with decent mics wired in via an adapter on the multiport, and sometimes using rather naffer mics via the earphone socket. And there are muso's doing the same up and down the land. The rot has already set in... lowest common denominator...

It really won't be long before someone has a hit recorded entirely on an iPhone. I'm surprised no one has done it yet!

H

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

It is not about mobile recordings with 2 U87, photos with few thousand $ worth SLRs or video cameras. It is about having something usable when you do not have 5-20 kg heavy equipment bag with you. Photographers always had their tiny Leicas or Olympuses for such situations and also where you simply cant use attention calling equipment. Now they have their iPhones and iPads. I saw Karl Lagerfeld taking stunning photos live on telly that none of millions of amateurs, semi pros and pros wont be able to do with whatever pro gear. Knowing that new connector is inevitable I waited with buying Tascam or Bluemic, but will, as soon as they are available, simply because the most interesting things to record happen when you left your stand alone field recorder at home. Same with the cameras. Most of people have their phones always with them. I can record any time, take video or pic, issue bills, print out contracts ( because all the stuff is always there backed up over iCloud). So it is exactly about situations when I dont have my MBP, iPad, SLR, field recorder or video camera have something that can bring decent results. I dont expect audio quality compared to recording open air concert of symphonic orchestra with 70 mics, 40 people crew etc, or taking nightshots like with Nikon D4. Yet I can capture some unusual samples or with good light decent photos and videos

Edited by electrotimba (14/09/12 02:39 PM)

Quote electrotimba:

---

Photographers always had their tiny Leicas or Olympuses for such situations and also where you simply cant use attention calling equipment. Now they have their iPhones and iPads.

---

Watching someone taking photos with their i*Pad* is really rather amusing...

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

You're a contrary old bugger at times aren't you

---

I try my best...

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote chris...:

---

Quote electrotimba:

---

Photographers always had their tiny Leicas or Olympuses for such situations and also where you simply cant use attention calling equipment. Now they have their iPhones and iPads.

---

Watching someone taking photos with their i*Pad* is really rather amusing...

---

Yes, more and more schools are using them.

Occasionally during my school performances I notice some very short sighted person reading their iPad, holding it up so I can't see their face, 'how bloody rude' I think, until I realize they're videoing the show.....

As to the thread .... Meh ..... As if Apple (or any other company) are going to release a new product with the marketing slogan "this is our new product, but it's really rather boring and we're only realeasing it to make more dollars out of poor unsuspecting souls like yourself".

I like Apples philiosophy of pushing the design boundaries and taking risks in introducing new technologies ahead of the pack, someone has to do it, and it drives progress ( most of the time).

Bob

--------------------
www.bickerton.co.nz

I don't care of the iPhone 5 but I **** DO ***** care about the new iPod Touch 5. Really a good step above it's predecessor. I ordered one.

The real point is can you record a hit tune on it whilst using it as a sat-nav to drive to the record company head office, with the video camera running so you can use the footage for the video, and then send all over the internet to the afore-mentioned office (hands free) so they can release the tune on iTunes in time for tea ?

If it cannot do that, whats the point ????

I have had many phones that can do many things but for me one thing stands out as their major weakness and that is making and receiving phone calls, other than that mobile phones are great..

--------------------
Strictly an amateur with some nice toys,

Now that I've used apps like TouchOsc and others on the iPad my beefy fingers can't imagine doing the same on an iPhone, bigger screen or not. But the thing that bothers me the most is how we overpay for absolute [ ****** ] service, dropped calls, cool echos that destroy any intelligibility etc even in the big bloody cities there are dead spots acknowledged by the telcos. I'd be happy with clear, clean understandable connections with my cell fone aka good sound quality! But then I'm old!

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

... but I'm not very interested in products only designed to satisfy the lowest common denominator!

H

---

same here - but as any entrepreneur will tell you "that's where the money is"...

Quote Paul Farrer:

---

Honesty, how often have you looked at your iPhone and said 'This screen JUST ISN"T TALL ENOUGH?'

---

Sounds like you need to wait for the iPhone 10.

--------------------
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Quote narcoman:

---

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

... but I'm not very interested in products only designed to satisfy the lowest common denominator!

H

---

same here - but as any entrepreneur will tell you "that's where the money is"...

---

The iPhone 5 is targeted at China and is linked to a strategic alliance with China Unicom and China Telecom as retail outlets for the iPhone.