Brian Moynihan
member
Joined: 14/11/02
Posts: 677
Loc: Boston
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#592709 - 18/03/08 04:58 PM
|
|
|
|
The above thread confirms my own suspicions about Vista, I mean apart from all the
evidence pointing to Vista being problematic for music, it seems Vista on the same machine
as an XP partition will have much higher interruptions on the DPC latency....
I
had the chance to try out a new Dell XPS this week and the Vista partition has a terrible
constant but random DPC spike that doesn't go away not matter which hardware you
disable.
It's almost as though there's some kind of emulated hardware layer.
Wonder if it has anything to do with the security technologies like Trusted Platform,
Windows Defender or DRM.....
I ran the DPC checker on my older 3ghz
P4P800E-deluxe and while the figure was 90us, it was absolutely rock solid consistent at
that figure, no activities in the OS seemed to change the readout.
On my
Core2duo 2.66 P5B Deluxe Wifi/AP the figures are more like an average of 90us with peaks
up to 140us.
----------
I think that the Nvidia card can be the
culprit for sudden interruptions, I've always experienced issues where the DAW is playing
fine but a closing of a window or tabbing to another application suddenly throws the
system and after analyzing the readout of the DPC checker while doing those things I'm
sure it's the Nvidia driver doing this.
I've also read that AHCI can be a
problem. RME explicitly recommend against it on their forum saying that it will interrupt
audio at least once an hour, enough to crash playback or record. I'm going to test this
myself since my current system is in AHCI mode.
It's dissapointing to see that
the new system doesn't have as good figures as my older box, but these readings totally
reflect my experience with it, the Core2 has a lot of juice for applications like Reaper,
but my 3ghz performs absolutely flawlessly, never interrupting audio or glitching. I can't
run the Fireface800 on the Core2 machine since it falls over a lot under the lightest
load.
The thot plickens.....
|
Jadoube
member
Joined: 13/05/03
Posts: 364
Loc: Calgary, Canada
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Brian Moynihan]
#592780 - 18/03/08 08:54 PM
|
|
|
|
It seems that vista in general is very prone to audio playback problems. I have a niggley
little pop on / pop off audio artifact on my XPS 1530 laptop and I have been trolling
forums for insights. I have learned nothing concrete as of yet, but what I have read on
the MSDN site suggests that the new audio api in vista replaces "DirectSound" and the pain
and suffering appears to me to be in this direction. Audio is now implemented mostly in
software and this is where the problems seem to be. Perhaps Martin knows more and could
supply a more qualified and technical explanation? I haven't really gotten too scientific
about it yet (I use XPP for pro audio) and I know from experience... this could be one of
many blind alleys.
-------------------- David
|
Brian Moynihan
member
Joined: 14/11/02
Posts: 677
Loc: Boston
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#592795 - 18/03/08 09:33 PM
|
|
|
|
It's amazing to think that in one fell swoop Microsoft can render thousands if not
hundreds of thousands of perfectly functional audio production machines utterly
useless!
I guess this is what's to be expected when their idea of getting the
professionals on board is to talk to a couple of guys and a dog at Cakewalk then ignore
what they said anyway.
The big question I'm gonna ask now is:
Will
the audio community manage to hold onto XP for music production against the odds, or will
the hardware manufacturers force a shift to Vista, regardless of how broken it is, via new
hardware and drivers being restricted to Vista only? I mean you might wanna keep your
existing machines running fine with XP but sooner or later they die, often before you
planned to replace them and when you go looking for the replacement machine, will it be a
rock and a hard place?
|
Tímo
Joined: 25/09/02
Posts: 1823
Loc: Derby, England
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#592855 - 18/03/08 11:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote Jadoube:
Alright then... I
tested my 'music only' system and learned something interesting.
The System
is:
- Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 running 2GB of low latency RAM at
1066MHz front side bus on an Intel DP35DP mother board.
- nVidia GeForce 8600 GT with
passive cooling driving dual Viewsonic 22" LCDs.
- On board Intel Gigabit NIC.
- 3
UAD PCI cards and I use the on board TI Firewire to run a MOTU Traveller.
- I use
Windows XPP and Reaper 2. I have Cubase SX3, but I haven't fired it up since Reaper 2 came
out.
No anti-virus, no internet crap... a very minimalist machine to
do a specific job. It works very well.
So... when I first ran the Latency
tool I was seeing an average of around 500 micro seconds with peaks to 750ish. Pretty
high... Hmmm... thats way too high for what's on this machine. What gives? I opened the
Device Manager and disable good ol' Sigmatel HD audio...and WTF!!! latency jumped off the
scale! Turned that back on in a hurry.... but it got me thinking. So I rebooted and
disabled on board audio in BIOS.
Now I see an average of 15-20 microseconds.
Peaks at 105. YEAH BABY YEAH!
Conclusion: Sigmatel HD audio = BAD.
Hiya Jadoube, very nice DPC figures
(after disabling the HD!).
Slightly off-topic. What (audio) latencies can you
run the Traveller down to on your system, before pops/clicks? And how many channels do you
use?
I'm about to purchase a similar quad core system and have the Traveller
myself, so would be great to learn what people are getting, given the DPC figures.
Thanks a lot,
Timo
--------------------
http://Infekted.org ~ Access Virus news & community
|
default
Joined: 25/07/05
Posts: 1098
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#592883 - 19/03/08 01:50 AM
|
|
|
I have tried everything I can think of, but it stays at a steady 1000 microseconds, even
after having gone through some of the tips in this thread. Nothing makes a difference!
I'll disable the processor and hard drive next.  This is on a Dell E520 desktop running Vista CPU: Pentium D 916 2.8 GHz dual
core 1 Gig ram Thing is, I have dropouts in Adobe Audition 3
and I am running out of options...
|
Jadoube
member
Joined: 13/05/03
Posts: 364
Loc: Calgary, Canada
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Tímo]
#592888 - 19/03/08 03:50 AM
|
|
|
Quote Tímo:
Slightly
off-topic. What (audio) latencies can you run the Traveller down to on your system, before
pops/clicks? And how many channels do you use?
Hey Timo... Sorry mate, I am afraid I don't ever use the
Traveller to record! (How weird is that?) One day perhaps... but for me currently it is
strictly a playback mixing device. The only time I have recorded with it, I used the old
ADAT serial interface to get 4 ADATs to sync up and dump to the hard drive.... the main
reason I bought a MOTU unit. So the latency is irrelevant to me.
-------------------- David
|
Jadoube
member
Joined: 13/05/03
Posts: 364
Loc: Calgary, Canada
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: default]
#593192 - 19/03/08 09:18 PM
|
|
|
Quote Muied Lumens:
Thing
is, I have dropouts in Adobe Audition 3 and I am running out of options...
I am guessing this Dell is running the
Sigmatel HD audio? Can you disable it in the bios? If not, you definitely want to go and
download the latest Dell drivers
-------------------- David
|
default
Joined: 25/07/05
Posts: 1098
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#593199 - 19/03/08 09:43 PM
|
|
|
Yup, it is disabled, in the BIOS. I checked my friend's dell, an old Dimension
2400 - and his latency is around 13-15 microseconds on average! Running XP home... Go
figure. In fact, I might swap mine with his... Or buy a new PC.
|
Jadoube
member
Joined: 13/05/03
Posts: 364
Loc: Calgary, Canada
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: default]
#593223 - 19/03/08 10:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Hmmm I have a suspicion the problem is vista. Can anybody get ultra low DPC Latency
running Vista?
-------------------- David
|
willshak
Joined: 26/03/08
Posts: 5
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#595433 - 26/03/08 02:19 AM
|
|
|
|
Not me, I'm getting a steady 1000us with occasional spikes to 35000us, that's pretty
abysmal, considering that everything (all USB, network, serial, parallel, audio, DVD…)
is disabled, only hard disk on SATA and Gfx connected.!
This with Vista SP1
32-bit Premium on ASUS P5LD2, E6400, Gigabyte 7900GT.
This looks exactly like
the kind of symptom to make musicians swear off Vista for the next 5 years, well done MS
eco-system...
|
jaminem
active member
Joined: 19/03/01
Posts: 1127
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#595703 - 26/03/08 06:10 PM
|
|
|
|
I did my new and old DAW's
Old: ASUS P4P800 deluxe Northwood P4 2.8Ghz 1 Ghz Lowest 9 Highest 137
New: ASUS Commando, Q6600, Poco Mk2, UAD1, 4GB
Kingston RAM, RME hDP Lowest 20 Highest 96
|
Tímo
Joined: 25/09/02
Posts: 1823
Loc: Derby, England
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#595826 - 26/03/08 09:44 PM
|
|
|
Quote Jadoube:
Hey Timo... Sorry
mate, I am afraid I don't ever use the Traveller to record! (How weird is that?) One day
perhaps... but for me currently it is strictly a playback mixing device.
No worries, when the new mobo (DS4) and
stuff arrives I have 7-days to test it, due to long-distance/internet sales laws.
Anyway, here was my initial results on my current 1.8GHz Athlon 3000+, RX480 Neo2
V1.1 mobo, with 512MB Kingston PC3200 RAM (lol!), Asus 128MB ATI Radeon x300 (passive),
running XP + SP2. It has Lucent onboard firewire, and the Motu Traveller is hooked up
(bus-powered) and switched on. The internet (USB ADSL modem) is enabled and connected,
with Windows XP SP2's firewall and Avast antivirus enabled:-
Average: 100-400µs
Absolute max: 550µs
Disabling the onboard Realtek RTL8169/8110 Gigabit ethernet via device manager totally
got rid of the regular spikes:-
Average: 30-130µs
Absolute max: 226µs
^
Also, the above was me wildly moving the mouse as, oddly, stopping moving the mouse
reduced DPC latencies significantly:-
Average: 15-25µs
Absolute max: 100µs
I
think this may be because it's a wireless mouse attached to a (secondary) USB hub? I guess
a hard-wired mouse (connected directly to a primary USB or PS/2 socket) may fair better.
Think I have a spare mouse lying around somewhere, if so I'll
test it.
--------------------
http://Infekted.org ~ Access Virus news & community
|
default
Joined: 25/07/05
Posts: 1098
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Jadoube]
#595943 - 27/03/08 01:33 AM
|
|
|
Quote Jadoube:
Hmmm I have a
suspicion the problem is vista. Can anybody get ultra low DPC Latency running Vista?
Well, I have now switched to
XP after a year of trying to fine-tune Vista. I now have a fresh install, no tweaks,
nothing switched off - on the exact same desktop:
1 Gb RAM, no wireless
(but ethernet), Pentium D 915 dual core (2,8 GHz), TI FW pci card with Echo Audiofire 4,
nVidia Geforce 7300 graphics card, standard USB mouse/keyboard...
XP:
Average 12-15, never peaks over 100 -
sometimes goes as low as 5.
Compare this with Vista...
I waited for Vista SP1 to see if that would
make any difference, but didn't notice any at all - not just on this test, but on general
performance and functionality. Not that I bothered to read what MS had to say about their
new pack... But hey, I'm happy now. I won't look back, er, forward... whatever.
Edited by Muied Lumens (27/03/08 01:38 AM)
|
danf
Joined: 14/02/08
Posts: 10
Loc: Ireland
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#596254 - 27/03/08 05:30 PM
|
|
|
That's pretty much the exact same experience I had with the Dell XPS M1330... Vista gave a
fairly constant 1000 reading, even when everything in device manager was disabled. When I installed XP, the latency dropped to about 9, with occasional peaks to
about 100. Based on this evidence, I have some idea where the blame lies...
-------------------- Podcomplex Music Technology
|
hugol
Joined: 28/03/06
Posts: 839
Loc: London, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#597076 - 29/03/08 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Quick update regarding the P35-DS4 motherboard and DPC spikes relating to
BIOS versions >F5. I had a reply from Gigabyte who say that I should stick with the F5
BIOS and that they aren't planning on fixing DPC spikes in later BIOS releases because
they are now just adhering to Intel's specifications!
If this were really so
then surely many other boards would suffer the same issues? Also unless this is a
specific hardware design issue (quite possible) then what does this say about the
suitability of Gigabyte P35 motherboards for DAW use? Here are the responses from
Gigabyte:
"We discovered this status is caused by south bridge settings and
those settings are followed by Intel ICH9R specification to modify. It means that BIOS
before F5 version had not been added Intel’s spec and we just followed Intel. Stay with
F5 BIOS is the best solution."
Q: Are you likely to "fix" the issue in a
later BIOS release?
"Sorry but we will not to modify a special version BIOS
for this issue since we had followed Intel’s specification already."
I have
asked them if they are going to raise the issue further with Intel....
Regards,
Hugo.
Edited by HL (29/03/08 11:48 AM)
|
Shifty
Joined: 06/07/05
Posts: 33
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#597237 - 29/03/08 07:19 PM
|
|
|
Another one:
Dell Latittude D800 Laptop (old!) Pentium M 1.73ghz
1Gb
Ram, XP Pro
Echo Indigo DJ PCMCIA souncard Card
TI chipset for FW &
PCMCIA
Average value (running Ableton)
500-700 us
Peak
@950
So not brilliant then.
Then I noticed this : The graphics
card ( Nvidia GeForce FX go 5200) shares IRQ 11 with quite a few other devices Ethernet
card, PCMCIA, USB controllers etc.. pretty common with Dell laptop apparently. Disabling
the Ethernet made a very small improvement. Wireless was already disabled.
I
also noticed that when I minimised Ableton, the DPC value went to a more reasonable 65 -
80 !
I thought it must therefore be graphics related. So I tried disabling some
of the graphics options in the Nvidia control panel.
No joy.
Then I tried using the windows graphics option to remove harware acceleration
(Display>Options>advanced>Troubleshoot)
I moved the slider to midway so that it
disables all acceleration of DirectDraw and Direct3D applications.
And blow
me if it didn't work.
I now have DPC values of 65-80 with an occasional peak
of 100.The graphics performance is still fine in the DAW.
So it seems like a
possible solution if your graphics card is sharing an IRQ with a soundcard. Anyone else
had something similar ?
Oh, and many thanks again to Martin for bringing our
attention to this excellent program !
Edited by Shifty (29/03/08 07:25 PM)
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16393
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Shifty]
#597859 - 31/03/08 02:44 PM
|
|
|
Well I'm pleased DPC Latency Checker is proving such a useful tool for us all! However, that's yet another intriguing post Shifty. I wouldn't normally recommend
reducing graphic hardware acceleration, since this means your PC is doing the grunt work
instead of the graphics hardware. I also wouldn't expect IRQ sharing to be a problem on
any modern PC. Nevertheless you've measured the improvement. I'd suggest
checking whether or not you have the latest graphic drivers installed, since every time
you move graphic hardware acceleration back a notch, you're telling Windows to handle
another group of video tasks itself rather than turning them over to the video driver.
Your results suggest that Windows is currently doing a better job by hand than the graphic
drivers are doing with hardware acceleration  Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
Shifty
Joined: 06/07/05
Posts: 33
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#597932 - 31/03/08 05:56 PM
|
|
|
I know what you mean, it's almost the opposite of what should happen ! I did read on
another forum that someone who was having massive trouble with a firewire soundcard (Dell
laptop, same IRQ as graphics) was able to solve there problems by disbling certain
features of the NVidia graphics card. I'll do some further testing this weekend
with the D800 - I need to do another full backup first, just in case it all goes horribly
wrong..  I might try removing the useless Nvidia control panel app and just
install the latest video card drivers on there own. The bottom line is that if
it works well in the current config, I might just leave it - it's a minimal music only
machine (for Dj-ing) so graphics slickness is of very low importance.
|
A Non O Miss
Joined: 07/02/08
Posts: 910
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#597984 - 31/03/08 08:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Well I'm no expert at this at all..
I have a Dell running Vista, DualCore Intel
Pentium 2.8 Ghz Processors 3 Gb DDR2 ram. Using a MIA Midi with vista drivers Not sure
about all the other info you need and where to find it...
Anyways
basically it seems to average around 125 however when I have nothing running it spikes
inconsistently to 1000 every 0 - 15 seconds sometimes with 4 seconds in a row of
1000....When I load up say a fairly complex Reason session and listen to it it spiked up
to 1000 pretty much consistently only every 20 seconds again other than that its @
125....However with a complex Sonar session the results are more similar to when nothing
is running. :-S
Also at first it had said I had a bad driver so I disabled one
thing, it never resulted in changed results however it does not say anything is bad
anymore...Does this mean issue resolved or should I keep digging until it does not spike??
I just don't want to start messing around with stuff that I am not sure what it does and
whether or not it should be disabled.
I don't get huge dropouts but when
recording at high sample rates or listening with a decent amount of real time fx the
latency and drop outs can be pretty brutal. For the most part my ASIO buffer settings are
at 1024 but have to go to 2048 once it gets a little more complex..Since going back to 48
khz it seems a lot better.
It hasn't been a huge issue other than inconsistent
latency issues while recording and having to nudge everything into time after the
fact....
If you want more info let me know and Ill try and help as best as I
can...
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16393
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: A Non O Miss]
#598154 - 01/04/08 11:23 AM
|
|
|
Your results suggest that Reason suffers from spikes but Sonar doesn't, which is unusual.
Are they both using the same ASIO drivers? If you have occasional spikes of
over 1000 then something is definitely taking more than its fair share of the interrupt
time, and it would be worth trying to track down the culprit. I suspect you might be able
to run with a smaller buffer size or at higher sample rates with complex songs if those
spikes were eradicated. However, if you don't want to 'mess around with stuff'
then leave well alone - this doesn't seem to be causing you many practical problems at the
moment. Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
onesecondglance
Joined: 02/01/08
Posts: 2138
Loc: Reading, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#598242 - 01/04/08 01:09 PM
|
|
|
Quote Martin Walker:
However, if
you don't want to 'mess around with stuff' then leave well alone - this doesn't seem to be
causing you many practical problems at the moment.
i think that would be an important point to stress in your
article, Martin - that pops and clicks are not always going to be linked to DPC latency,
nor does having high DPC readings *necessarily* make your machine unusable for audio.
although it's not going to help...
-------------------- hourglass | random thoughts | doubledotdash!? collective
|
A Non O Miss
Joined: 07/02/08
Posts: 910
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#598358 - 01/04/08 04:28 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Are they both using the
same ASIO drivers?
Yes I
have disabled every sound driver other than my Echo and usually try and keep it to one app
running at a time....There is something weird going on as I did some recording yesterday
about 2 hours and upon finishing that the DCP was spiked to 16000 steady At
which exact point it did that I am unsure, the recording of course was in Sonar but did
not have any issues whilst recording...I just rebooted and it was back to normal, if there
is such a thing for Vista.
I say there are no issues but there are and I have
already previously disabled some services that I probably shouldn't have as some sketchy
things happen from time to time. Such as inability to type into wordpad or even select
Winamp to change songs. A simple ctrl/alt/delete to open task manager and everything is
back to normal but it kinda scares me...
I would really like to be able to run
with a lower buffer size....Is there any Drivers that cannot or should not be disabled?? I
would like to try and give it a shot I just can't afford to be without my studio comp
right now....Thanks
|
A Non O Miss
Joined: 07/02/08
Posts: 910
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: A Non O Miss]
#598370 - 01/04/08 04:58 PM
|
|
|
|
You know what.....It spikes and holds at 16000 every time I close down an audio app,
Sonar, Reason, Winamp etc. It holds there until I get another one going....
|
pego.be
Joined: 07/10/04
Posts: 42
Loc: Brussels
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#598439 - 01/04/08 07:55 PM
|
|
|
Hello,
I am using for quite some time now an Acer aspire 3610 notebook.
Windows XP (with inspirat skin)
1 gig ram
integrated intel grafics
(shared)
Intel celeron mobile 1.5 CPU (that's more or less a centrino banias
rebadged and with a little less cache)
Used it succesfully with Cubase SX
3
Sonar 7
Line6 Toneport UX2
DPC latency results (no apps
running), wifi disabled (wifi causes HUGE spikes)
Lowest: 5 to 6 us, some
jumps to about 20 / 30. Thats nice
but, whatever I disable I get every 40 seconds or
so a spike up to about 1550.
Running the gearbox software gets the avarage to
between 60 and 90, but that's no big deal.
This didn't prevent
the laptop to be "usable" for audio, but still...
Anyway I am shopping for a
new one. Quite interested in the Dell xps range, so if anyone can elaborate on them.
Hugo
Edited by pego.be (01/04/08 07:57 PM)
|
Rudi
new member
Joined: 25/09/02
Posts: 14
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#598647 - 02/04/08 11:26 AM
|
|
|
Vista Update: I posted earlier on about my DPC latency being around 750ms. After
weeks of going through all the devices, trimming all the services, slimming processes
etc., I found out that although my Alesis IO14 Firewire interface was disabled (for
testing purposes), the actual Firewire interface (TI chipset) wasn't. Once I
disabled it, the latency dropped to around 100ms. However there are lots of spikes. Using
ProcessMon to check what's going on behind the scene, it looks like Vista security (and I
suspect DRM stuff) is going on more or less all the time. So it looks like the
prime source of my high DPC latency is.. the firewire interface and Vista's DRM, which for
someone using a firewire interface to create his own audio is a bit of a stinker and very
ironic  I'm considering downgrading to XP, but there might be problems with
finding drivers for all my built-in devices.. Rudi PS Disabling the
NVidia drivers, Aero, tranparency etc., made no difference.
|
directresolution.com
Joined: 13/09/06
Posts: 594
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Rudi]
#598723 - 02/04/08 01:00 PM
|
|
|
Our new test system Tempest i5400XT (S5396) 2x Intel Xeon E5420 2.5GHz 16GB 677MHz Corsair ECC RAM 2 x ATI 2400PROs Lynx2 Just pulled it
up quickly, with a bit of tweaking in XP PRO a steady 35 with a peak of 75. To
come soon, Results with 2 bios revisions, XP64, Vista 64 and a couple of audio
interfaces. It is a really useful little application.
-------------------- www.directresolution.com
home of the DARC audio computer
|
Brian Moynihan
member
Joined: 14/11/02
Posts: 677
Loc: Boston
|
Macbook Pro and DPC Latency - Interesting info
[Re: directresolution.com]
#599955 - 04/04/08 06:33 PM
|
|
|
I've posted to another thread in the Mac section here: http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=599954&page=0&v
iew=collapsed&sb=5&o=365&vc=1#Post599954Interesting information regarding
Boot Camp/XP running on a Macbook Pro. Clearly with the right settings the machine is
capable of being a great XP laptop for audio.
|
aspenleaf
Joined: 05/04/08
Posts: 4
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600088 - 05/04/08 05:27 AM
|
|
|
I have a Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4 and I'm experiencing spikes, even after disabling everything
that is not necessary. I've tried all three BIOS for this motherboard, and the problem
persists. Here is what I am referring to: Does anyone else have this problem, or suggestions on
how to fix it? Thanks, Dan
|
hugol
Joined: 28/03/06
Posts: 839
Loc: London, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600330 - 05/04/08 06:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi,
That pattern looks very familiar.... exactly what I was getting on the
Gigabyte p35-ds4 with BIOS versions > F5. Unfortunately their reaction as I've already
mentioned in this thread was if F5 fixes it we don't care as we are following Intel's
recommendations. If this is a wider problem with Gigabyte P35 motherboards then we need
to get this more publicity. If it's a new motherboard and you're within the 7 day distance
selling obligation then I'd consider sending it back to be honest rather than risk it.
Otherwise I guess all you can do is raise it with Gigabyte - at least they are very good
at responding to mails.
From their previous email to me it sounds like they
could be configuring certain registers on the chipset in a particular way. If that's the
case then maybe we could find a way to reconfigure them.... Actually I have noticed I
still get pretty bad DPC spikes when CPU-Z is running, but only then - don't know if that
is because it is polling or if it sets something a particular way. Anyone know of any
utilities in this area?
Regards, Hugo.
|
aspenleaf
Joined: 05/04/08
Posts: 4
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600344 - 05/04/08 07:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Hugo,
This is a new motherboard, and unfortunately, I am past the date that
I can return it. There are 3 BIOS versions for this model, and the spikes remain with any
of them. I sent an email to Gigabyte and I'm awaiting their response. I did download the
F4 and F5 BIOS for the GA-P35-DS4 rev. 1, but I haven't tried to install it. I don't want
to chance ruining my BIOS since it wasn't designed for this model.
In
practical terms, I can still get very low latency. I'm using two Delta PCI cards and a
Q6600 CPU. And I'm not noticing any performance problems in Sonar 6. But I'm certain the
spikes are keeping the system from performing up to it's full potential.
I
even reinstalled a clean version of Windows XP with no chipset, audio or video drivers to
see if the spikes remained, and unforntunately, they do.
At this point it's up
to Gigabyte to release a BIOS that is current and solves the problem. If they get enough
demand for it, I'm hoping they will.
|
hugol
Joined: 28/03/06
Posts: 839
Loc: London, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600531 - 06/04/08 03:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Yeah I went through all of that - clean installs with no drivers at all.
Disabled every single device etc etc. It sounds like you're having better luck with your
Deltas and Sonar then I did with a firewire sound card and Cubase 4 - but I've often
thought that Cubase is much fussier than other DAWs. Maybe if enough people raise this
with Gigabyte they'll do something about it.
Regards, Hugo.
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16393
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600968 - 07/04/08 01:56 PM
|
|
|
HL - the big difference with your Gigabyte P35-DS4 rev 1.1 problem is that you had major
timing problems with Cubase 4 and pop/clicks when accessing HD and playing back, whereas
aspenleaf (welcome to the SOS Forums to you by the way!) can still achieve 'very low
latency' and is not noticing any performance problems in Sonar 6. By all means
try to track down their cause of your DPC spikes if you're interested aspenleaf, but
personally I wouldn't worry unduly about then unless they tie in with audio
interruptions. Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
hugol
Joined: 28/03/06
Posts: 839
Loc: London, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#600981 - 07/04/08 02:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Martin,
True, but the timing was also really off playing back MIDI through a
USB connected Virus TI when not accessing the HD. Totally agree with you though it sounds
like he's not having the same problems as me and the real-world effect of DPC latency is
going to very dependent on individual setups.
Regards, Hugo.
|
aspenleaf
Joined: 05/04/08
Posts: 4
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#601229 - 07/04/08 08:32 PM
|
|
|
Quote Martin Walker:
(welcome to
the SOS Forums to you by the way!) can still achieve 'very low latency' and is not
noticing any performance problems in Sonar 6.
By all means try to track down
their cause of your DPC spikes if you're interested aspenleaf, but personally I wouldn't
worry unduly about then unless they tie in with audio interruptions.
Martin
Thank you for the
welcome, Martin. By very low latency, I mean I am getting 1ms with 128 samples in
the Delta buffer with 24 bit/48K audio recording, and 2ms with 256 samples in the Delta
buffer with 24 bit/96K audio recording. But my CPU useage is very low, less than 12% on
the highest used core of my Q6600. So I think I could get down to 64 samples for 24
bit/48K, and 128 samples for 24 bit/96K if I could eliminate the DPC latency spikes.
For my audio hard drive I am using a Seagate 7200.11 500GB SATA II drive, running
AHCI drivers, and there doesn't seem to be any problem with hard drive throughput even
with many audio tracks.
Dan AspenLeaf Studio - Allenspark, Colorado
|
thescientist
Joined: 14/02/08
Posts: 497
Loc: USA
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#601556 - 08/04/08 03:18 PM
|
|
|
|
wow this thread is amazing! I can see that everyone is getting much better results with
wi-fi off, which makes sense given my current rig has a wi-fi card and it seems like a
likely culprit. Anyway, I ill try this program out tonight and post my results, and
hopefully, I'll be able to get somewhere! Thanks for this, it might just save my life!
-------------------- Fostex 812 Mixer -> MOTU 828 mk3 -> MacBook: C2D, 2.4Ghz, 4G RAM, OSX 10.6 || i7 920, 2.66Ghz, 6G RAM, Win 7 Pro -> Reaper v3.6
Edited by thescientist (08/04/08 03:19 PM)
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16393
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#601572 - 08/04/08 03:37 PM
|
|
|
aspenleaf - that sounds pretty good performance to me Dan! Let us know if you
track ever manage to cure those spikes though, especially if it's the result of a new
Gigabyte BIOS update. thescientist - Wi-fi is indeed a common cause of large
spikes. Most network adaptors seem to result in regular spikes, but wireless ones tend to
be significantly more problematic! Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
thescientist
Joined: 14/02/08
Posts: 497
Loc: USA
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#601778 - 08/04/08 11:40 PM
|
|
|
|
this thread and in the info in it saved my life! Apparently the problem I was suffering
form was because of PCI Wi-Fi card.
thanks for all the help guys!
-------------------- Fostex 812 Mixer -> MOTU 828 mk3 -> MacBook: C2D, 2.4Ghz, 4G RAM, OSX 10.6 || i7 920, 2.66Ghz, 6G RAM, Win 7 Pro -> Reaper v3.6
|
thenoizzbox
Joined: 09/04/08
Posts: 8
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#601954 - 09/04/08 12:16 PM
|
|
|
Hello people. This is my first post here. Someone in the Reaper forum asked me
to post my Vista DPC latency findings here. We've been having a few similar threads over
there and a few people were surprised at my results. First thing first, I do
music as a hobby now (after playing in original bands and pursuing my dream for over 20
years). I play, write music and record for my own pleasure now. So my Vista machine is not
an optimized audio workstation. I use it more for graphic and Web design and
development. So here it is:  These measurements were taken after a fresh
boot. A similar test 2 days ago showed numbers that typically oscillated between 45ms and
95ms with "spikes" every 45 seconds (yes, forty-five seconds) to either 500, 700 or 900ms.
The highest spike I have seen was 950ms in several minutes of testing in 3 sessions, two
after fresh boots and one after the machine had been up and running for several days
without a boot up and with other apps open (Outlook, Opera). The image above
was taken this morning and this was about 45 seconds to 1 minute into the test (you can
see the highest number it had reported in that time was 302ms. System specs: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Dual Core ASUS Crosshair mobo (800 MHz system bus) 4 GB 800 MHz Dual channel DDR2 Ram SoundBlaster X-Fi Elite Pro NVidia 8800GTS
640 MB DDR3 onboard Ram Vista 64 Ultimate SP1 Other probably relevant
details about my setup. I run no firewall as I am behind a router. Windows Defender is on.
Windows Firewall is off. UAC is off. My antivirus is Eset's NOD32 and it is always on. FWIW, in terms of "real world usage", I never get audio dropouts or pops or
crackles in Reaper and I run my ASIO driver at 7ms (conservative for some but works great
for me). Typical projects run 10 to 25 tracks (audio and MIDI) with DR-008 for drums, at
least acouple instances of Wusikstation and other synths and plenty of VST plugins.
-------------------- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Dual Core, ASUS Crosshair mobo, 4 GB 800 MGHz DDR2 Ram, SoundBlaster X-Fi Elite Pro, NVidia 8800GTS 640 MB DDR3, Vista Ultimate 64, Reaper 2.2
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16393
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: thenoizzbox]
#601994 - 09/04/08 01:46 PM
|
|
|
Welcome to the SOS Forums theniozzbox! Thanks for your results, which to my
eyes look good for a Vista 64 desktop PC, especially one that's not been optimised for
audio in any way. I'm not surprised you get no audio dropouts with such results. Why are other people surprised at these results? Is it that they are comparatively good
when plenty of other people posting here have extremely poor results for a variety of
Vista-based PCs? I suspect that the main Vista problems are due to specific drivers
(possibly graphic ones) that cause mammoth spikes, and that whatever devices you have in
your Athlon 64 X2 PC have better-behaved drivers. Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
thenoizzbox
Joined: 09/04/08
Posts: 8
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#602032 - 09/04/08 02:50 PM
|
|
|
Quote Martin Walker:
Welcome to
the SOS Forums theniozzbox!Why are other people surprised at these results? Is it that
they are comparatively good when plenty of other people posting here have extremely poor
results for a variety of Vista-based PCs?
That would be my guess. I've seen plenty of much worse numbers
here as well as on the Reaper forum.
Quote Martin Walker:
I suspect that the main Vista
problems are due to specific drivers (possibly graphic ones) that cause mammoth spikes,
and that whatever devices you have in your Athlon 64 X2 PC have better-behaved drivers.
I'm really not sure. With
every computer I'Ve owned before this one, I used to optimize everything that ran on it,
turn off non-essential services and I would keep up to date with every driver update
directly from my hardware manufacturer. But on this machine I've taken a different
approach and, so far, I've only installed signed drivers released through Windows Update.
The only exception being my sound card for which I installed Creatve's latest releases.
That driver is also the only one that has given me problems and caused my machine to blue
screen twice (both times in the first week I've had this computer). Turned out that I had
installed a beta version or something. I uninstalled and re-installed the latest stable
release and my machine has not blue screened or crached since. Yes, you read that right. I
have had no system crashes on this machine since late July 2007 and it runs 24/7. That's a
marked stability improvement over any XP box I've owned or worked on...
My
new philosophy is that I really have better things to do with my time than worry over
objectively measuring minute (or not so minute) performance differences between XP and
Vista. For one thing, this machine is generally so fast that it "waits" for me more than I
wait for it. That is an amazing change for me. Secondly, that a new OS requires more
powerful hardware to run than the previous one is par for the course. XP may run faster
than Vista but both Win 2K and Win 98SE ran faster than XP on the same hardware when I
upgraded computers to XP in 2001 and 2002 (on top of my own machines, I am the unoficial
"tech guy" at work so I handle these kinds of stuff for about 7 windows workstations of
varying age). I'm sure Windows 3.1 would scream on my current hardware if it supported it
But the thing is, in relative terms, this machine is the fastest performing
computer I've used yet and in the end, isn't that all that matters? It lets me work with
resource intensive graphic apps without slowing me down and runs my audio software
flawlessly. Whatever anyone may say... I'm happy with Vista
Btw, thanks for the welcome!
-------------------- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Dual Core, ASUS Crosshair mobo, 4 GB 800 MGHz DDR2 Ram, SoundBlaster X-Fi Elite Pro, NVidia 8800GTS 640 MB DDR3, Vista Ultimate 64, Reaper 2.2
Edited by thenoizzbox (09/04/08 02:52 PM)
|