Glenn Bucci
active member
Joined: 28/10/02
Posts: 1159
Loc: Pennsylvania
|
Waves updated their plan
#814865 - 26/02/10 12:59 AM
|
|
|
|
Waves is pleased to introduce a new cap on Waves Update Plan fees! All
non-overlapping Waves products (e.g. Platinum & SSL or Gold & Restoration, etc.)
are now capped at $200 per account per year. No matter how many non-overlapping
products you own or how long their coverage has been inactive - you'll never pay more than
$200 per account per year. To be eligible for the new cap, you will need to confirm
that you use all selected products on one computer at a time. Waves Update Plan
coverage for overlapping products (e.g. Gold & Platinum or Diamond & Mercury,
etc.) or identical products (e.g. two Gold bundles) is still capped at $200 per product
per year, as usual. Here's how to take advantage of the new cap: Access your
Waves account and click Buy Waves Update Plan. Click I Confirm to verify that you use
all selected products on one computer at a time. Select the first product. Identical
and overlapping products will become inactive. Select additional products for Update
Plan coverage. You may de-select and re-select products until you have the best
combination. Click Buy Waves Update Plan to continue. To get Waves Update Plan
coverage for other products, return to your Waves account main menu and repeat the steps
above. Find out more about Waves Update Plan Best regards, The Waves Team
-------------------- revelationsoundstudio.com
|
steve355
Joined: 02/03/07
Posts: 899
Loc: Stevenage, Herts
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814882 - 26/02/10 08:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Universal Audio have also put a cap on their update plan fees for their UAD cards.
0$.
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3212
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814893 - 26/02/10 09:16 AM
|
|
|
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814894 - 26/02/10 09:28 AM
|
|
|
Quote Glenn Bucci:
Waves is
pleased to introduce a new cap on Waves Update Plan fees! All non-overlapping Waves
products (e.g. Platinum & SSL or Gold & Restoration, etc.) are now capped at
$200 per account per year. No matter how many non-overlapping products you own or how
long their coverage has been inactive - you'll never pay more than $200 per account per
year.
Pathetic really.
Don't ever buy Waves.
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814908 - 26/02/10 10:09 AM
|
|
|
|
They announce this like it's good news? We've sold you the software once, we're going to
carry on selling it to you annually, but for a bit less cos there's a recession on.
Genius. Can I have a Brooklyn Bridge to go with that?
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2514
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: steve355]
#814941 - 26/02/10 11:38 AM
|
|
|
Quote steve355:
Universal Audio
have also put a cap on their update plan fees for their UAD cards.
0$.
Couldn't have said it
better.................. unless perhaps in song (sung to the tune of 'She'll Be Coming
Round The Mountain')
You'll be shafted every year on your Waves Plan, You'll be shafted every year on your Waves Plan, You'll be shafted every year,
you'll never need to fear, Your wallet will be be buggered on this plan.
Singing I will, if you will, it's a punt, Singing I will, if you will, they're
all............oops
Apologies 
Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
bigster
member
Joined: 16/12/01
Posts: 245
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814952 - 26/02/10 12:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Whilst I like free software updates as much as the next man, I don't have so much of an
issue with WUP as some folks seem to. You're not required to pay every year - it's not as
if the product ceases to work when your WUP runs out. I end up paying every 18-36 months,
and every time I've done so I've ended up with new, decent plug-ins added to my bundle
(Platinum). Since I like many of the Waves plug-ins a great deal, and have no possibility
of using a platform like UAD, it seems a reasonable arrangement to me.
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: bigster]
#814964 - 26/02/10 12:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote bigster:
Whilst I like free
software updates as much as the next man, I don't have so much of an issue with WUP as
some folks seem to. You're not required to pay every year - it's not as if the product
ceases to work when your WUP runs out. I end up paying every 18-36 months, and every time
I've done so I've ended up with new, decent plug-ins added to my bundle (Platinum). Since
I like many of the Waves plug-ins a great deal, and have no possibility of using a
platform like UAD, it seems a reasonable arrangement to me.
Limp attitudes like that allow Waves to keep
getting away with it imo. Most of their plugs are way past their sell-by date anyway.
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#814980 - 26/02/10 01:27 PM
|
|
|
Atleast with Waves I'm not attached to a desktop, given that 90% of the work I get HAS to
be moved to different locations, even the latest album mixed in the large room at work was
tracked on a laptop using a 002 with some external pre's. Pre production work was started
on headphones and in different studios. Then the final thing was mixed on an SSL G+ with a
ton of outboard, and some plugins. UAD is not compatable with the latest mac laptops,
waves is. UAD can only be used on the machine with the card in it, thats the internal PCI
card. So if i wanted to move projects from my system upstairs I'd have to go into the back
of both the macs and uninstall the UAD card and reinstall it on the mac downstairs. Both systems have their pro's and cons. For the way I work waves works. I think some of us should grow up a little, i had some serious problems with waves
and others have other agenda's why they don't like them. All that should matter
to the end user is whether or not the product meets their needs, if it does then great buy
it.
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
bigster
member
Joined: 16/12/01
Posts: 245
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: johnny h]
#815030 - 26/02/10 04:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Each to his own, Johnny - I don't think it's a limp attitude. Waves plug-ins work great
for my and many other people's needs, for the reasons James mentions above and others. I'm
personally happy to support any company that continues to provide support and updates
-what a concept! If Waves isn't for you - fine. No-one's forcing you to buy anything.
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: JamesSimpson]
#815034 - 26/02/10 05:00 PM
|
|
|
|
I just don't get waves at all. They've always made completely average sounding plug-ins
that cost an absolute fortune!
They are inferior in dynamics to Sonnox, UAD,
SPL, T-Racks.. They are inferior in eq to Sonnox, Sonalksis, TC, UAD, Nebula, Abbey
Road.. They are WAY inferior with reverb to Lexicon, aether, Nebula, TC
Honestly what is the point?
Q-Clone for instance came out and cost £1000 - I
dont know how much it is now, but Nebula uses a FAR more advanced convolution engine and
costs a fraction of the price. Okay it doesn't LOOK as flashy, but sonically its way
ahead.
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2514
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: bigster]
#815074 - 26/02/10 08:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote bigster:
Each to his own,
Johnny - I don't think it's a limp attitude. Waves plug-ins work great for my and many
other people's needs, for the reasons James mentions above and others. I'm personally
happy to support any company that continues to provide support and updates -what a
concept! If Waves isn't for you - fine. No-one's forcing you to buy anything.
On a more serious note, your last
point is true, which I fully accept.
However, given you're a Waves user and I'm
not, I'd have thought you'd be far more interested in Waves changing their policy than I
am!
These 'tit for tat' debates often seem to be time wasters, but their
usefulness lies for people who are considering buying into a new plug-in system. There's
no point in trying to convince current users one way or the other. If you've invested
thousands of dollars in a plug-in suite, you're unlikely to turn round and say the plugs
are inferior and that you're going to stop paying the ongoing rental (WUP), which is the
decision I finally made.
James is right, UAD plugs have to be used on a card,
so would be less flexible if you're moving between several computers, so it's connected to
work flow too, but then any software has to be installed on every computer you use, I
guess the difference is the iLok is more transferable.
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#815081 - 26/02/10 09:36 PM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
James is
right, UAD plugs have to be used on a card, so would be less flexible if you're moving
between several computers, so it's connected to work flow too, but then any software has
to be installed on every computer you use, I guess the difference is the iLok is more
transferable.
There is the
UAD Solo laptop card which you
can stick in your top pocket and move from machine to machine with ease....
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7890
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Steve Hill]
#815085 - 26/02/10 09:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Waves have always had solid products right from the early days.
While it's
true that some of their early plugins are a bit long in the tooth now, and some of them
aren't that great, most are decent and some of the more recent ones are very good -
certainly some are as good as, if not better than some of their UAD counterparts (Some of
UA's plugins are also long in the tooth as well...)
I don't have a problem with
their products, or their support. Up until recently, their authorisation procedure was
hopelessly complicated and arcane, although they've finally junked that old system and
things are I understand a bit better now. They've done some things that are, eh,
'questionable' and it certainly hasn't helped their image.
But I think the
"it's fashionable to be a Waves basher" is getting a bit old now. if you don't like their
products, or their policies, or their politics, buy something else. It's not like we are
short of alternatives... :shrugs:
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3212
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: desmond]
#815088 - 26/02/10 10:04 PM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
They've done some
things that are, eh, 'questionable'
Not trying to hijack, but out of curiosity: Are they still doing this plug-in
Gestapo thing?
|
_ Six _
Joined: 03/06/06
Posts: 1398
Loc: Liverpool
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815089 - 26/02/10 10:08 PM
|
|
|
|
I've been shafted once by Waves.. when buying another of their products. I was told it
wasn't compatible with one of my other Waves plugs and had to upgrade...
Since
then I don't buy Waves and I don't upgrade my main recording rig. It's stable so I don't
try and fix it.
Fluckers.... still great plugs though!
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7890
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Tui]
#815094 - 26/02/10 10:41 PM
|
|
|
Quote Tui:
Not trying to hijack,
but out of curiosity: Are they still doing this plug-in Gestapo thing?
Don't know - I suspect it did far more
damage than accounted for in extra plugin sales revenues, so I doubt it. Maybe a few
people removed removed Warvez (see what I did there?) from their computers out of concern,
but that' hardly going to make any difference to them.
Certainly, "Ban
Piracy" didn't, and despite trying to form an industry-wide coalition to try and reclaim
"lost" revenues due to piracy, as far as I can see, the only company who ever signed up
was Waves. And that was because it was started by an ex-Waves director.
The
last news item on banPiracy regarding "action" was February 2009...
|
chris...
active member
Joined: 12/03/03
Posts: 4151
Loc: Glasgow
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Steve Hill]
#815097 - 26/02/10 10:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
There is the
UAD Solo laptop card which you
can stick in your top pocket and move from machine to machine with ease....
If you have 17" MacBook Pros.
(or old machines, or PCs)
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: desmond]
#815100 - 26/02/10 11:15 PM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
Waves have always
had solid products right from the early days.
Exactly, "solid", which means functional, mediocre and unspectacular.
Unfortunately these "solid" plug-ins are sold at extraordinary prices and come with
obscene usage and upgrading policies.
Quote:
While it's true that some of their early plugins are a bit
long in the tooth now, and some of them aren't that great, most are decent and some of the
more recent ones are very good - certainly some are as good as, if not better than some of
their UAD counterparts (Some of UA's plugins are also long in the tooth as well...)
That's the vaguest paragraph
i've ever read!
Quote:
But I think the "it's fashionable to be a Waves basher" is getting a bit old now. if you
don't like their products, or their policies, or their politics, buy something else. It's
not like we are short of alternatives... :shrugs:
I don't bash things out of fashion. I've always
found Waves to be massively overrated. I was once a big UAD fan, and I do still really
like them as a company, and I respect their plugins too, though I do feel the DSP model is
beginning to show its age.
Waves though, I would recommend to anyone to stay as
far away as possible.
|
jayzed
member
Joined: 19/03/04
Posts: 846
Loc: North London
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815114 - 27/02/10 12:19 AM
|
|
|
|
I understand completely how boring it can get listening to the moans and grumbles and I
agree it's gone on for some time now. However, have a thought for those in a situation
similar to this:
A studio setup, with 5 rooms. Waves plugins bought for each
workstation to achieve 'industry standard' (at the time) and clients, in particular
visiting engineers, often requesting Waves to match what they were used to, or used in
their own rooms.
Waves introduces WUP, which for the reasons mentioned above,
required expensive, complex and unexpected update costs just to keep the workstations up
to date with their systems. In many cases, the options were to either abandon
compatibility with other sessions and write off the purchase, or bite the bullet.
Waves had such customers over a barrel and the extra costs were not mentioned when
the purchase was first made.
Although reasonable costs for upgrades can and
are planned for, unexpected hits like the WUP really bite into budget that is intended for
other items.
Of course, people in this situation usually just have to bend
over, at least until alternatives can be planned. The only way to express the frustration
is to let others know how unhappy they are, and try to get Waves to change their policy
which it seems is happening.
I'm guessing a combination of wide scale moaning
and changing plugin fashion has made Waves think again.
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7890
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: johnny h]
#815115 - 27/02/10 12:22 AM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
Exactly, "solid",
which means functional, mediocre and unspectacular.
It only means that if those are the adjectives you choose to
illustrate it.
There *are* some unspectacular and mediocre ones, and some
great ones, as I already mentioned in my "vague" post (what do you want, an individual
product catalog with my personal views on every plugin they've ever made?)
Quote johnny h:
Unfortunately
these "solid" plug-ins are sold at extraordinary prices and come with obscene usage and
upgrading policies.
Their
prices are on the high side, because they like to market themselves for professionals
rather than the "I refuse to pay more than £20 for my DAW" entitlement generation that
whine and moan whenever they can't afford something.
But that doesn't mean
they are all like this - for example, I bought the Musicians Bundle 2, specifically
because the Renaissance Comps are good sounding and functional, and Doubler is great
without a decent alternative. The EQ's are Ok, and Supertap I don't use as it's imo a
pretty boring bland plugin. But for essentially a hundred quid, I got the RenComp and
RenVox, Doubler, the RenEQ's, SuperTap and RenAxe, and I consider that a pretty good deal.
Then, the ren comps were for me much better sounding and simpler to use than Logic's
compressor, and I bought them specifically as a replacement for the UAD compressors which
I lost due to moving to a laptop.
When I upgraded my machine and had to
generate a new auth because they had moved away from disk authorisation, even though I was
out of WUP Waves did generate me new authorisations, and I paid the £20 later on for WUP
when needing to update the plugins for a new OS.
Less than I've had to pay
for other PPC->Intel upgrades, or new OS versions. That's not really "obscene", at
least in my case. Of course I'm not a massive bundle owner, but it seems $200 for a $4K
bundle is not really obscene. Heck if you want a one time ProSupport phone call with Apple
about ProApps it costs nearly that. For *one* phone call. (That *is* what I call
obscene... ( ! )).
Their new plugins, like the CLA series, are very good and
certainly "up there" in terms of modelling and good sounding DSP. Don't right them off as
"bad" simply because you have a bias against the company.
However, I much
prefer the attitudes of some other, more customer-focused companies and prefer to invest
my money elsewhere these days. But if an individual likes Waves products, and knows the
implications of WUP and what they are buying into and still want to buy them, I can't say
they are a "bad" choice, because politics aside, while not every product they make is a
knockout, they do have some great products still.
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Steve Hill]
#815137 - 27/02/10 02:16 AM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
Quote Bob Bickerton:
James is
right, UAD plugs have to be used on a card, so would be less flexible if you're moving
between several computers, so it's connected to work flow too, but then any software has
to be installed on every computer you use, I guess the difference is the iLok is more
transferable.
There is the
UAD Solo laptop card which you
can stick in your top pocket and move from machine to machine with ease....
Apart from as i said; doesn't work
with any current 13 or 15inch laptops, and the 17 is too big and expensive over the
15inch.
Also it means an expresscard converter in every machine, or a UAD card
in every computer.
As it is i need an internet connection on the host computer
and an ilok.
I actually tried to get hold of a laptop with the
expresscard slot, I went to an apple reseller, they actually had one on show, they refused
to sell it to me because apple would bite their ass if they didn't return the show model.
I then travelled to an apple store and asked if they had any instock, they
didn't and they couldn't sell me one because they were only allowed to sell the new ones,
due to some stupid rule, essentially a jobsworth situation. No matter how I pleaded they
couldn't get me one.
After 2 weeks, I needed to have a laptop, so i gave in to
apple's bullshit rules and got the new version, sad in the knowledge that I could never
work with UAD plugins, atleast till I can afford a Mac Pro in a portable rack anyways.
As for quality, what a load of tosh, Waves produce some fantastic
plugins used by tons of professionals, just look at the mix analysis tracks in
soundonsound. I think you would be hard pressed to find one where not one waves plugin has
been used.
They produce some fantastic plugins, as do UA, Nomad, URS,
PSP.
Tools for the job, not whats in vogue.
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
Neil C
active member
Joined: 01/04/03
Posts: 2525
Loc: Designated cuddle zone
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: johnny h]
#815145 - 27/02/10 03:34 AM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
Quote desmond:
While
it's true that some of their early plugins are a bit long in the tooth now, and some of
them aren't that great, most are decent and some of the more recent ones are very good -
certainly some are as good as, if not better than some of their UAD counterparts (Some of
UA's plugins are also long in the tooth as well...)
That's the vaguest paragraph i've ever read!
I think you must need
to read more often. That paragraph isn't in the slightest bit vague.
|
Jez (mahoobley)
monkey
Joined: 21/03/03
Posts: 2179
Loc: East Midlands
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815187 - 27/02/10 11:41 AM
|
|
|
I'm not keen on Waves business policies either. BUT Waves do one thing no one
else does - offer a big bundle of plugins that do everything that no one else does. Back
when bundled plugins with sequencers were mediocre at best and generally lacking in
certain processing options, Waves offered a one stop shop solution, and became very
successful on the back of that. Now, most sequencers and audio applications
come with a fairly respectable base of plugins themselves, which is why they are now
catching up with other plugin manufacturers and offering more 'boutique' and retro
effects. But their brand is entrenched, and they still offer a one-stop-shop
for EVERYTHING you need audio-processing wise. And until anyone else gets a clue and steps
up and offers what they do, Waves will stay at the top.
-------------------- http://www.jeremycorbett.co.uk
|
* User requested ...
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 2235
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815201 - 27/02/10 12:30 PM
|
|
|
|
If it addresses your needs and you can afford the outlay, the Mercury bundle is a bit of a
no-brainer. Catch Waves at a time when they're doing one of their big discounts and buy
through an American online retailer for further savings and you end up with a shedload of
good plugs that are updated with new releases without cost and a maxxed out WUP of
$200.
What's not to like?
On the other hand, a lot of their other
bundles are way overpriced I think, and the pricing strategy on their recent 'build your
own bundles' promo seems way off beam.
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: desmond]
#815243 - 27/02/10 03:46 PM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
Their prices
are on the high side, because they like to market themselves for professionals rather than
the "I refuse to pay more than £20 for my DAW" entitlement generation that whine and moan
whenever they can't afford something.
Waves plugins have been historically the most easily cracked and
heavily pirated. Perhaps this is the secret to their success; get everyone running the
cracked versions to breed familiarity and network effects, then the studios are forced
into buying them. Whether this will work in the future with falling budgets and studios
closing down all the time, i'm not sure.
Quote:
But that doesn't mean they are all like this - for example,
I bought the Musicians Bundle 2, specifically because the Renaissance Comps are good
sounding and functional, and Doubler is great without a decent alternative. The EQ's are
Ok, and Supertap I don't use as it's imo a pretty boring bland plugin. But for essentially
a hundred quid, I got the RenComp and RenVox, Doubler, the RenEQ's, SuperTap and RenAxe,
and I consider that a pretty good deal. Then, the ren comps were for me much better
sounding and simpler to use than Logic's compressor, and I bought them specifically as a
replacement for the UAD compressors which I lost due to moving to a laptop.
When I upgraded my machine and had to generate a new auth because they had moved away
from disk authorisation, even though I was out of WUP Waves did generate me new
authorisations, and I paid the £20 later on for WUP when needing to update the plugins
for a new OS.
Less than I've had to pay for other PPC->Intel upgrades, or
new OS versions. That's not really "obscene", at least in my case. Of course I'm not a
massive bundle owner, but it seems $200 for a $4K bundle is not really obscene. Heck if
you want a one time ProSupport phone call with Apple about ProApps it costs nearly that.
For *one* phone call. (That *is* what I call obscene... ( ! )).
Their new
plugins, like the CLA series, are very good and certainly "up there" in terms of modelling
and good sounding DSP. Don't right them off as "bad" simply because you have a bias
against the company.
However, I much prefer the attitudes of some other, more
customer-focused companies and prefer to invest my money elsewhere these days. But if an
individual likes Waves products, and knows the implications of WUP and what they are
buying into and still want to buy them, I can't say they are a "bad" choice, because
politics aside, while not every product they make is a knockout, they do have some great
products still.
I haven't tried
out the CLA series. I do think the Renaissance EQs and Compressors were way overhyped,
but did a job. The reverb was very low quality though, bordering on being completely
useless, and even the IR-1 suffers from the same lifelessness of other static convolution
reverbs. Imo this is more of a problem for electronic and pop music than acoustic or
classical.
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: johnny h]
#815255 - 27/02/10 04:10 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
I haven't
tried out the CLA series. I do think the Renaissance EQs and Compressors were way
overhyped, but did a job. The reverb was very low quality though, bordering on being
completely useless, and even the IR-1 suffers from the same lifelessness of other static
convolution reverbs. Imo this is more of a problem for electronic and pop music than
acoustic or classical.
Have
you tried the SSL 4000 emulations? It's great, great EQ, compressor has a great aggressive
bite to it.
API stuff? Neve emulations? The new Helios channel and Pye
compressor? Puig's Pultec and Fairchild emulations? Problem solving plug ins like the
Debreath and De esser?
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
_ Six _
Joined: 03/06/06
Posts: 1398
Loc: Liverpool
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: JamesSimpson]
#815300 - 27/02/10 07:02 PM
|
|
|
|
The SSL 4000 are amazing plugs.. as are the Neve V Series and Maxx Bass plugs I use..
You can't detract from the quality... regardless of the politics.
|
jayzed
member
Joined: 19/03/04
Posts: 846
Loc: North London
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815317 - 27/02/10 07:25 PM
|
|
|
|
I quite like trueverb, using the early reflections only, though. More for placement
than any obvious reverb, it's easier to setup than manually programmed delays for the same
idea.
|
MarcusH
Joined: 02/02/08
Posts: 438
Loc: Was Singapore - Now Mumbai
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815360 - 27/02/10 10:53 PM
|
|
|
|
I just got their Vocal Rider - which is really effective. Except for a similar
product that's ProTools only, it's unique, so I had to buy Waves.
-------------------- You live. You learn.
|
* User requested ...
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 2235
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: MarcusH]
#815427 - 28/02/10 11:39 AM
|
|
|
Quote MarcusH:
I just got their
Vocal Rider - which is really effective. Except for a similar product that's
ProTools only, it's unique, so I had to buy Waves.
Likewise for me with their stereo to 5.1 upmix plug. Saved my
bacon a few times, is very effective and costs a whole lot less than anything comparable
on the market.
|
stinkfinger
Joined: 31/07/07
Posts: 358
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815719 - 01/03/10 12:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Waves-bashing, count me in, where do I sign?
I stopped using them as soon as
they introduced the WUP. I used to love the renaissnace compressor, soooo glad I never
forked out for one of the more expensive bundles.
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: stinkfinger]
#815877 - 02/03/10 12:46 AM
|
|
|
Quote stinkfinger:
Waves-bashing,
count me in, where do I sign?
I stopped using them as soon as they introduced
the WUP. I used to love the renaissnace compressor, soooo glad I never forked out for one
of the more expensive bundles.
That's exactly the attitude a lot of people on many forums, not just this one
take,
State that they hate such n such a company. Go on to say they used to
love a product they did once, go on to say they never wanted to pay for some of that
companies high end stuff, and end up saying that they did [ ****** ] up once so they are
never going to buy stuff ever again.
Don't get me wrong, some companies
do some bad things they lose customers, however i do tire of needless bad press when a
company takes steps to right previous wrongs...
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: JamesSimpson]
#815887 - 02/03/10 01:53 AM
|
|
|
Quote JamesSimpson:
Quote stinkfinger:
Waves-bashing, count me in, where do I sign?
I stopped using them as soon as
they introduced the WUP. I used to love the renaissnace compressor, soooo glad I never
forked out for one of the more expensive bundles.
That's exactly the attitude a lot of people on many forums,
not just this one take,
State that they hate such n such a company. Go on to
say they used to love a product they did once, go on to say they never wanted to pay for
some of that companies high end stuff, and end up saying that they did [ ****** ] up once
so they are never going to buy stuff ever again.
Don't get me wrong, some
companies do some bad things they lose customers, however i do tire of needless bad press
when a company takes steps to right previous wrongs...
Yes I kind of agree with you, despite the
fact that i've been waves bashing myself!
As for your earlier comments about
the newer plugins, I've tried the SSL which was okay, not life changing or anything. I've
got a UAD card so I've never been tempted to try the Fairchild or Pultec - are Waves
emulations superior to UAD's?
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815890 - 02/03/10 01:59 AM
|
|
|
Afraid i've never been able to try the UAD's I rather like the waves SSL myself, really
comes together when using lots of instances to glue things together, imparts some sort of
pleasing sound to my ears. I don't own the fairchilds but i demo'd them and found them
great, couldn't afford all the plug ins i want though haha.
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2514
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: JamesSimpson]
#815896 - 02/03/10 02:29 AM
|
|
|
Quote JamesSimpson:
State that
they hate such n such a company. Go on to say they used to love a product they did once,
go on to say they never wanted to pay for some of that companies high end stuff, and end
up saying that they did [ ****** ] up once so they are never going to buy stuff ever
again.
Don't get me wrong, some companies do some bad things they lose
customers, however i do tire of needless bad press when a company takes steps to right
previous wrongs...
This is
getting tiresome but let me say:
Waves is the only company I criticize like
this and I'm very consistent in my criticism.
I did buy some 'high-end'
stuff from them including two suites, including the mastering one.
They
haven't taken steps to right the wrong of WUP - it still exists!
Had they had
a different policy re WUP I probably would have bought many more thousands of dollars of
plug-ins from them.
My advice to people about to buy into plug-in suites is
to avoid Waves because I believe their WUP scheme is extortionate.
My advice
to current users is to do yourselves a favour, stop defending Waves, and lobby them to
change their policy!
Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
MarcusH
Joined: 02/02/08
Posts: 438
Loc: Was Singapore - Now Mumbai
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815900 - 02/03/10 03:41 AM
|
|
|
Can I ask - is WUP wrong in principle or is it the actual prices that they've set? I mean
if it was capped at $50 a year would people still be annoyed? Yes if I'd
bought say stuff like Mercury Native for $9,800, then Waves' rather self-satisfied press
release, graciously capping my contribution at $200 p.a. would indeed have me
seething.  But if they had wanted $50 a year for the same products, it might not bother
me.
-------------------- You live. You learn.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: MarcusH]
#815944 - 02/03/10 10:30 AM
|
|
|
I think the whole Ban Piracy episode was shameful and they should realise that entrapping
potential customers and then prosecuting them isn't going to win any friends. I own a few
of their plug-ins and I was thinking of buying more but I'm now going for alternatives as
a matter of policy. I don't want to support a company that treats their potential
customers as criminals. Cheers James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
JamesSimpson
Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1064
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: Glenn Bucci]
#815964 - 02/03/10 11:33 AM
|
|
|
All you have to do if you don't like it though is not buy their products which as you say
you do. So if your not buying its no longer a problem for you and no longer a
moan, for those of us who need these plugins as a matter of course, any cap on update
fee's is welcome. Essentially what i'm trying to say is people who don't
even use or own waves products seem to bitch and moan continuously like waves come
knocking at their door bending them over their mixing desk and scream at them to buy their
plugins. Waves have a place, as do UAD, URS, Sonnox, TC, IK multimedia,
etcccc
-------------------- Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3212
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Waves updated their plan
[Re: JamesSimpson]
#815984 - 02/03/10 12:16 PM
|
|
|
Quote JamesSimpson:
Waves have a place
They
sure do - one that's been especially reserved for them:
|