ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#976297 - 16/03/12 07:22 PM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote ef37a:
I thought you
meant that there was a nationwide rolling program to get all our supplies harmonized to
230volts?
Tthere is a
rolling program... and it's being done as and when equipment is replaced or undergoes
major overhauls. So it's going to take quite a while to complete.
hugh
Well I would have said that was a
rolling program to replace kit not to harmonize us all! But never mind eh?
Dave.
|
Bossman
active member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 1565
Loc: UK
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976319 - 16/03/12 10:19 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Quote:
There is no intrinsic
reason why there should be any audible hum at any setting of the monitoring level control.
None of my systems have audible hum when maxed out.
Intresting. I thought that would be the norm. Well, if I can
irradicate the rest I will. Ideally Id like hum free.
Should that go for
hiss too or is that another story?
I wonder, could my 1993 mixer be the
problem in itself? (Soundtracs Solo)
Unplug everything from the mixer, then listen to the output of
the mixer and see if you still have hum. Some hiss is normal.
If there is no
hum, then plug things back in one piece at a time and listen again. And if, as you add
something, it causes a hum, then look at ways of fixing it. Then move onto the next piece
of kit.
-------------------- www.Lozjackson.com
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976394 - 17/03/12 12:25 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Done this Hugh.
Spen a day taking every cable out of my mixer.
But that was before you sorted out the mains wiring. The
situation is different now. It's worth trying again... I'm sure it won't take more then 15
minutes!
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976396 - 17/03/12 12:33 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
I thought that
would be the norm. Well, if I can irradicate the rest I will. Ideally Id like hum
free.
Should that go for hiss too or is that another
There should be no hum in a good system. Hum
comes from three places: EM interference which can be dealt with using balanced cables and
careful cable placement/separation, ground loops which we've already discussed, and power
supply ripple which is caused by poor design or a failing supply and which can be
fixed.
Hiss, on the other hand, is an intrinsic aspect of electronic
circuitry... But again, good design and sensible gain structures should render it
inaudible for all normal purposes. Older equipment is often noisier than modern gear, but
it shouldnt be a problem.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976402 - 17/03/12 01:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Yeah the reason it took a day before was because I had everything plugged in and Velcro'd
so it looked pretty :0
Now i've just plugged in what I need and to hell with
it. Going to unplug everything today or tom and report back.
A
final question on this. My ADAT isn't actually balanced or unbalanced as I previously
reported. Its either or. So you can plug either balanced or unbalanced cables into it
apparently. How does that work then?
In this case is it ok to used unbalanced
cabling for the 24 unbalanced mixer tape outs to my HD24s 'either or' Inputs, or would
these Psuado (spelling) balanced ones still be the way to go for optimal results?
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976408 - 17/03/12 02:06 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
A final
question on this. My ADAT isn't actually balanced or unbalanced as I previously reported.
Its either or. So you can plug either balanced or unbalanced cables into it apparently.
How does that work then?
Basically the input and output circuitry effectively switces half off when it detects
unbalanced sources and destinations. If your console has balanced inputs and outputs it
would be best to connect with balanced looms as that reduces the risk of ground loops.
if not, see how the hum is with unbalanced connections, and use pseudo-balanced if
you have ground loops.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976446 - 17/03/12 07:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Hugh,
My mixer is bizzare. I dont know it its the norm but my mixer has the
following ballanced connections. Line in, Mic, Tape in on each channel. Great!
But then the tape outs are acctuall unballanced and also on each channel? Not sure why
they done this but its the way it is. It was no cheapo desk either. In its day it was
around 8 grand. (Sountracs Solo Midi)
So its not as simple as balanced to
balanced. I do get that thouhgh, basically if you have a balanced connector going to a
balanced connector, always use a balanced cable.
But what do I use on the
unblanaced tape outs to the ADATs 'either or' ins? Of course im guessing use an
unbalanced cable but id love to hear the difinitive answer from yourself.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976454 - 17/03/12 07:53 PM
|
|
|
|
I'd buy a balanced loom and then modify the connector wiring at the desk end to
pseudo-balanced operation. The unbalanced output jack plug tip wired to the balanced adat
input hot, the unbalanced jack sleeve to the balanced cold, and the cable screen isolated
at the unbalanced end (or, better, tied to the sleeve via 100 ohm resistor).
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976625 - 18/03/12 07:42 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
I'd buy a balanced loom
and then modify the connector wiring at the desk end to pseudo-balanced operation. The
unbalanced output jack plug tip wired to the balanced adat input hot, the unbalanced jack
sleeve to the balanced cold, and the cable screen isolated at the unbalanced end (or,
better, tied to the sleeve via 100 ohm resistor).
....Oh no, I must have set my browser to Japanese again
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976631 - 18/03/12 08:04 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Starting to warm to the
idea of a soldering iron yet, Kola?
Seriously though, this is an aspect of a
hardware set-up that a lot of people fail to appreciate. If I had to replace all my
cabling in one go I'd be crying over my mouse mat.
Sorry Elf I missed your reply.
Yes doing it myself
is seeming like a great idea. I haven't much confidence with these things though. Ive
never even used a soldering iron before.
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976663 - 18/03/12 11:13 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Quote:
Starting to warm to the
idea of a soldering iron yet, Kola?
Seriously though, this is an aspect of a
hardware set-up that a lot of people fail to appreciate. If I had to replace all my
cabling in one go I'd be crying over my mouse mat.
Sorry Elf I missed your reply.
Yes doing it myself
is seeming like a great idea. I haven't much confidence with these things though. Ive
never even used a soldering iron before.
Good man! If you want to PM me I will walk you through it all.
Dave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976714 - 19/03/12 09:54 AM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Yes doing it
myself is seeming like a great idea. I haven't much confidence with these things though.
Ive never even used a soldering iron before.
It's not that hard, it doesn't require much of an investment in
tools, and its a skill that will often save the day and definitely save you money for the
rest of your music-making years!
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8214
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976728 - 19/03/12 10:47 AM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Yes doing it
myself is seeming like a great idea. I haven't much confidence with these things though.
Ive never even used a soldering iron before.
If you knew the extent of my DIY skills (pratically zero) then you
would be much more confident. I honestly mean it when I say that if *I* can do it, then
truly *anyone* can!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9706
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976766 - 19/03/12 01:08 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
Done this
Hugh. Spen a day taking every cable out of my mixer. I wasnet until the very last cable
was unplugged that the hum stopped. (The last cable was from my balanced MPC to Ballanced
Mixer in but using an unballanced cable.) I dont think it was the last instrument fault
though somehow.
Doesn't
mean that they were all at fault though. It would make more sense to work the other way
round - disconnect everything and then just connect one thing at a time until you hear the
hum. If something hums, disconnect it again and carry on reconnecting everything else. You
will probably discover a pattern of things that hum and things that don't.
James.
PS - check your mixer manual carefully as some Soundtracs mixers had
TRS connectors that weren't balanced as they had different input sensitivities on the tip
and ring.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
Edited by James Perrett (19/03/12 01:10 PM)
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976773 - 19/03/12 01:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Ef37a
Thanks for the offer of help via PM mate. Appreciated. If its all the
same ill just keep this thread running. May help someone out. Also the I find PMs harder
to scan back through than forum posts.
Guess i'll mutate this thread into a
'how the hell do I do this then' one.
Everyone
Thanks for all
the advice, going to give rolling my own a shot. For the amount of cables I need I just
cannot afford to buy them all.
So what do I need? (Im researching
this now, just wanted to reply here first)
Obviously a soldering iron haha
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976778 - 19/03/12 01:58 PM
|
|
|
http://cpc.farnell.com/duratool/d00675/soldering-station/dp/SD01387http://cpc.farnell.com/duratool/d01681/solder-wire-sn60-pb40-0-7mm-100g/dp
/SD01535?in_merch=Featured Products&MER=e-bb45-00001001 http://cpc.farnell.com/duratool/d00099/60mm-swivel-table-vice-with-anvil/d
p/TL10308?in_merch=Featured Products&MER=e-bb45-00001001 That gets you
started. You can pay a lot more for a solder station but I have had that one (from Maplin
actually) for 3 years and no problems. Buy more solder if you can. Note that is LEAD
solder (wash hands after, don't eat, drink or smoke and solder but don't get anal about
it. I did all 3 for about 30yrs and nothing wrong with me, the Emperor of France
BLEURGH!!!)You do not want to start with leadfree solder. Then you need
sidecutters, small pliers but don't buy super dinky expensive things. Some heatshrink
sleeving, Maplins do a handy assorted pack and a hobby knife will see you right. Dave.
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976780 - 19/03/12 02:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey thanks mate, thats great advice.
Ill look into getting the kit together and
report back.
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976781 - 19/03/12 02:02 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
the Emperor of France
BLEURGH
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976787 - 19/03/12 02:13 PM
|
|
|
Is this cables OK for both balanced and pseudo balanced cabling?
http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Pro-Grade-Classic-X
KE-Jet-Black-100m-02-3490/?source=googleps&utm_source=googleps
It
sticks to the 1 pound per meter that James P's rule of thumb highlights above.
And these for sockets. I know there over 2 quid (Per JPs rule) but I do like the
Neutrik brand. Have bought some ready made before. These seem to be the cheapest stereo
jacks Neutrik do and I take it I need stereo jacks for all my balanced and pseudo balanced
stuff??
http://cpc.farnell.com/neutrik/np3x/6-35mm-jack-plug-stereo/dp/AV11225?in_
merch=Products%20From%20This%20Range
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976797 - 19/03/12 03:08 PM
|
|
|
|
That's all fine K.
I would rather go for foil screened cable unless it is going
on the road as it is rather easier and quicker to trim up and solder. Make sure you tease
out and twist the shield wires and don't leave any whiskers. Solder the end of the twist
and slip over a piece of sleeving.
Dave.
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976801 - 19/03/12 03:27 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
I would rather go for
foil screened cable unless it is going on the road as it is rather easier and quicker to
trim up and solder. Make sure you tease out and twist the shield wires and don't leave any
whiskers. Solder the end of the twist and slip over a piece of sleeving.
woooow, we've jumped 5 spaces 
First im going to get the kit together and then Ill try and work out what shield wires
are and why they have cat whiskers.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976804 - 19/03/12 03:33 PM
|
|
|
I agree with Dave. The van damme cable is great, but over the top for your application
here where you are making semi-permanent wiring for a fixed installation. Something like
this foil-screened cable would be easier to work with. http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Evolution-XPC-OFC-Professiona
l-1-pair-62370James' post above is worth confirming -- I wasn't aware of
the dual-level input configuration on some soundtracs desks...so make sure it really does
have ordinary balanced inputs and unbalanced outputs before commiting yourself! Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976805 - 19/03/12 03:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Didn't notice that part of James post Hugh. Pleased you pointed this out.
Ill
scan the page of my manual and try and put it on here.
Ive also got the
schematics but they make no scene to me (Surprise surprise)
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976806 - 19/03/12 03:43 PM
|
|
|
Also thanks for the link Hugh My make who may go into this with me prefers Van
Damn cable for whatever reason. Is this a Van Damn equivalent of what you
kindly linked me too? (Similar price and keeps his face straight.) http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Pro-Grade-Classic-X
KE-1-Pair-Jet-Black-100m-02-3555
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9706
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976810 - 19/03/12 03:57 PM
|
|
|
That Van Damme cable looks fine if you aren't going to move the cables around too much. It
may come in under my 50p rule but don't let that put you off.
One other
thought - know anyone with some snake cable offcuts? While 2-3 metre lengths aren't much
use for making multi-core snakes, they're great if you separate out the cores and use them
as patch cables.
James.
PS - for connectors take a look at http://cpc.farnell.com/neutrik/nys202/6-35mm-jack-plug-stereo/dp/AV09104
a>
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
Edited by James Perrett (19/03/12 04:03 PM)
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#976817 - 19/03/12 04:29 PM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
I agree with
Dave. The van damme cable is great, but over the top for your application here where you
are making semi-permanent wiring for a fixed installation. Something like this
foil-screened cable would be easier to work with.
http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Evolution-XPC-OFC-Professiona
l-1-pair-62370
James' post above is worth confirming -- I wasn't aware of
the dual-level input configuration on some soundtracs desks...so make sure it really does
have ordinary balanced inputs and unbalanced outputs before commiting yourself!
Hugh
Huge, that rapid
cable is a bit wee at 3.5mm OD? Electrically fine, I have a lot similar in red but it is a
bit of a PITA in standard jacks and XLRs because the cable clamp barely works. No matter
to me since I just built out the diameter with some data cable outer but the newb will not
appreciate such messings about?
Dave.
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16477
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: ef37a]
#976834 - 19/03/12 05:10 PM
|
|
|
What about this one Dave- it looks more suitable to me yet still reasonably priced: www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Tour-grade-classic-XKE-mic
rophone-cable-5000916.35mm overall diameter and can be bought in 10m and
25m lengths for £1/metre Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: ef37a]
#976842 - 19/03/12 05:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Good spot -- most Neutrik jack plugs can accommodate cable diameters of 4-7mm, so might
struggle with this. As you say, some sleeving would solve the issue... but it sounds like
he's going to use some van damme stuff anyway...
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976845 - 19/03/12 05:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#976847 - 19/03/12 05:37 PM
|
|
|
No wonder I didnt find thoese Neutrik plugs. There not even listed on the Neutrik
website. http://www2.neutrik.com/content/home/home.aspx?portal=uk&language=1And enter NYS202 Bizzare
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8214
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Martin Walker]
#976854 - 19/03/12 06:02 PM
|
|
|
I've maybe missed something here (and I don't want to add to the confusion!), but why have
we abandoned foil screened cable? That seems the ideal cable for permanent installation.
Or is there something I don't know?
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: The Elf]
#976857 - 19/03/12 06:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Dave was worried about the cable diameter not being compatible with the more upmarket
Neutrik connectors.
With the simpler ones K is now talking about, which use
crimp cable clamping, the thinner foil cables previously discussed would be fine....
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5669
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: The Elf]
#976859 - 19/03/12 06:32 PM
|
|
|
Quote The Elf:
I've maybe missed
something here (and I don't want to add to the confusion!), but why have we abandoned foil
screened cable? That seems the ideal cable for permanent installation. Or is there
something I don't know?
"We" haven't Elf it is just that there
does not seem to be one of reasonable outside diameter, as Hugh says, sub 4mm is going to
cause problems.
Dave.
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8214
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: ef37a]
#976893 - 19/03/12 09:02 PM
|
|
|
OK guys. Gotcha. Just thought I should ask!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#977182 - 21/03/12 08:11 AM
|
|
|
Guys can I just get a conformation from thoese who know. Its going to cost me a few
hundred pounds for the cabling and connectors alone thats without the soldering gear and
seems as this is virgin teritory for me Id love a reasured 'yes'
http://cpc.farnell.com/neutrik/nys202/6-35mm-jack-plug-stereo/dp/AV09104
a>
http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Tour-grade-classic-
XKE-microphone-cable-500091
Am I correct in thinking I use the exact
cable and plugs for both the balanced and psuedo balanced cables I intend to make and its
just how there wired up that makes a diff? Or do I have to buy diffrent plugs and cable
for the diffrent types? Rather buy everything at once to save postage fees buying twice
from the same outlets.
On another note.....
I
think now would be a great time to incorperate a patchbay (or 3) into my set up.
How would I do this?
1 - Unblanaced cable from my unbalanced synth to the
patchbay, then Psuedo Balanced for the rest of its journey into my desk (for an EG).
2 - Or Psuedo balanced straight out of my synth and then balanced from patchbay
to desk?
Im guessing the second option?
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#977231 - 21/03/12 11:45 AM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
...as this is
virgin teritory for me Id love a reasured 'yes'
http://cpc.farnell.com/neutrik/nys202/6-35mm-jack-plug-stereo/dp/AV09104
a>
YES. I wouldn't use these
on cables that will get a lot of use, but for your application where they'll be plugged in
once and left alone they'll be fine.
Quote:
http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Tour-grade-classic-
XKE-microphone-cable-500091
YES... although personally I'd go with a foil screened cable simply becuase you don't
need the thicker robust outer jacket and foil is a lot quicker and easier to prepare and
terminate.
This stuff: http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/Van-Damme-Pro-grade-classic-X
KE-1-pair-install-cable-500094 is roughly half the price and will be fine.
Quote:
Am I correct in
thinking I use the exact cable and plugs for both the balanced and psuedo balanced cables
I intend to make and its just how there wired up that makes a diff?
YES... you use balanced cable for both.
However, the unbalanced equipment ends will need plugs wired for unbalanced (tip-sleeve)
operation. You might save some money by purchasing proper tip-sleeve plugs for these
connections rather than using re-wired TRS plugs. Depends on how many you need and what
the bulk discounts are.
Quote:
I think now would be a great time to incorperate a patchbay (or
3) into my set up. How would I do this?
By buying some patchbays and a shed load more cable and
connectors.... it will push the cost up significantly and I would ask whether you really
need a patchbay or just want one? Will you really need to repatch your sources and
destinations regularly? Patchbays introduce a lot of potential points of failure, and also
make the ground loop problem considerably more complex. If you an do without, then I'd
recommend doing without!
Quote:
1 - Unblanaced cable from my unbalanced synth to the patchbay,
then Psuedo Balanced for the rest of its journey into my desk (for an EG).
No, you'd need balanced patchbays to
minimise the risk of creating ground loops, so pseudo-balanced cable from synth to patch,
and balanced everywhere from there on.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9706
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#977485 - 22/03/12 01:08 PM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
You might
save some money by purchasing proper tip-sleeve plugs for these connections rather than
using re-wired TRS plugs. Depends on how many you need and what the bulk discounts are.
Not only would you save
money, but potentially avoid problems with certain mono jack sockets whose sleeve
connection just happens to line up with the extra insulation ring on TRS plugs.
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote:
I think now would be a
great time to incorperate a patchbay (or 3) into my set up. How would I do this?
By buying some patchbays and a
shed load more cable and connectors.... it will push the cost up significantly and I would
ask whether you really need a patchbay or just want one? Will you really need to repatch
your sources and destinations regularly? Patchbays introduce a lot of potential points of
failure, and also make the ground loop problem considerably more complex. If you an do
without, then I'd recommend doing without!
I'm afraid I threw in the patchbay suggestion in a private
message exchange...
It was an alternative way to allow Kola to sample his
synths without going through the mixing desk. Probably best to make up the cables to wire
straight to the desk for now as they will still be useful if you ever want to add a
balanced patchbay.
James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#977489 - 22/03/12 02:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks Hugh.
No James it wasn't you to blame mate. Id been thinking about a
Patchbay for a while now. I get sick of plugging and unplugging inserts and instruments to
different channels etc. Your sampling idea was simply a cherry on a cake.
Interestingly Hugh states (in a nutshell) the more kit I put in the chain the more
chance of ground loops, what sound totally plausible and ive no reason to doubt Hugh. But
I was under the impression by going Pseudo Balanced and Balanced for all of my cabling and
not having any unbalanced cables in my entire studio, got rid of any hum no matter what?
Or am I mistaken? If not surely no matter how many patch bays I have ill be
fine as long as my cabling is spot on? No?
If hum can still come through on PB
and B cabling is there actually any point in doing this?
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18530
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#977524 - 22/03/12 04:04 PM
|
|
|
Quote Kolakube:
I was under the
impression by going Pseudo Balanced and Balanced for all of my cabling and not having any
unbalanced cables in my entire studio, got rid of any hum no matter what?
In theory, yes... but patch bays have
grounded sockets and grounded metalwork, and hence the possibility of creating more
grounds loops by accident. In theory, anything with balanced inputs shouldn't be affected
by ground loop currents, but not all equipment is designed in the way it should be and
it's not that unusual to find mixing console inputs being susceptible to ground loop
currents on their balanced inputs.
It's always possible to find workarounds if
these things should materialise, of course, but avoiding the problem in the first place is
a lot easier!
In any case, it's not a big step to add a balanced patchbay
afterwards, but it would make sense to resolve your current hum issues before making
things even more complicated.
So I'd still recommend making up the
pseudo-balanced cables for your synths and working through the current set up to get it
hum free first, before expanding the rig.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Kolakube
Joined: 01/12/09
Posts: 1645
Loc: Geordieland
|
Re: Balanced vs Unballanced questions.
[Re: Kolakube]
#977575 - 22/03/12 07:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
So I'd still recommend
making up the pseudo-balanced cables for your synths and working through the current set
up to get it hum free first, before expanding the rig.
Yeah great advice. Keep it simple, get
that sorted first and then build on that. Ok, patchbay a distant menory for now. THanks
mate.
|