Main Forums >> PC Music
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Andy__D
posting's fun


Joined: 08/06/04
Posts: 232
Loc: Denver, CO
Sequencers
      #1019695 - 22/11/12 03:32 AM
So I was hunting through my box of wires, and right at the bottom, I found an old long-lost friend, my Logic 5 XS key. Yeah, from back when it used to run on Windows....Now this came at an interesting time, as I'm working on a very midi-focused project right now, and I'd been struggling a bit with using my usual DAW of choice, Reaper, as a MIDI sequencer (which is understandable, because it's a DaW, not a sequencer...) So I found the CD and installed logic and had a good few hours playIng with it and remembering the good 'old days. Now, I'm not suggesting that I'm going to try to use logic for 'real' work (some bits, like the mixer, are barely functional on a modern OS), but I'd forgotten how much I missed the score editor for tweaking slightly off time midi parts, and the significantly more flexible quantizing and editing options that I'd taken for granted back in the 98 days.

But it got me thinking: are there still any Windows MIDI sequencer products that also do audio out there, as opposed to DAWs that also do MIDI?

(and sorry if this is a dumb noobie question: one the whole I've been happy with Reaper for what I usually do, so it's been a while since I've paid attention to what else is out there...)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
The Elf
active member


Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 9600
Loc: Sheffield, UK
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Andy__D]
      #1019698 - 22/11/12 08:17 AM
Cubase grew from a MIDI-only product and still shows a lot of sophistication with MIDI that others seem to lack.

--------------------
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
BJG145



Joined: 06/08/05
Posts: 3483
Loc: Norwich UK
Re: Sequencers new [Re: The Elf]
      #1019704 - 22/11/12 09:14 AM
Quote The Elf:

Cubase grew from a MIDI-only product




Sonar also.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
C.LYDE
member


Joined: 22/10/02
Posts: 233
Loc: South Africa
Re: Sequencers new [Re: The Elf]
      #1019730 - 22/11/12 11:20 AM
Quote The Elf:

Cubase grew from a MIDI-only product and still shows a lot of sophistication with MIDI that others seem to lack.




+1 .. been saying that (mostly to myself) for a long time; one would swear synthesis only existed as plug-in if one is to believe the "demand" for Ableton Live or Fruity Loops

It does remind one how complex or varied, different people approach the same task. Let's take programming a drum track to accompany a sequence of chords strummed on a guitar.

Now lets say my favourite snare sound is on my old Korg 03R, but I love the HHat sound from Toontrack Vintage - on a decent DAW, the ability to use both should be a relatively simple task.... nooorrt.

--------------------
C.LYDE
http://soundcloud.com/c-lyde


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
JeffB
member


Joined: 03/03/03
Posts: 174
Loc: Devon, England.
Re: Sequencers new [Re: C.LYDE]
      #1019735 - 22/11/12 11:54 AM
Quote C.LYDE:


Now lets say my favourite snare sound is on my old Korg 03R, but I love the HHat sound from Toontrack Vintage - on a decent DAW, the ability to use both should be a relatively simple task.... nooorrt.




Drum maps?

--------------------
Sonar X2 PE. i7 4770K 12Gb DDR3, W8.1 x64, 2408 MkIII. Cantabile. Lenovo W530 i7 16Gb, W7 x64, 828MkII. Kronos 61, Fusion 6HD, Fantom XR, TR-Rack, E-Synth Ultra, Proteus 2K, JV2080.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
ken long



Joined: 21/01/08
Posts: 4605
Loc: The Orient, East London
Re: Sequencers new [Re: BJG145]
      #1019742 - 22/11/12 12:15 PM
Quote BJG145:

Quote The Elf:

Cubase grew from a MIDI-only product




Sonar also.




Logic also.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Exalted Wombat



Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 5861
Re: Sequencers new [Re: C.LYDE]
      #1019746 - 22/11/12 12:25 PM
Quote C.LYDE:

Now lets say my favourite snare sound is on my old Korg 03R, but I love the HHat sound from Toontrack Vintage - on a decent DAW, the ability to use both should be a relatively simple task.... nooorrt.




The very simplest way would be to set up two tracks, one "playing" the Korg, one the Toontrack, and put the notes you want each to play on that track. If you want to work with patterns in a Drum Edit page, you'll need to define a Drum Map (or whatever your particular DAW calls it.)

There aren't really MIDI-only sequencers any more. But Cubase has all the MIDI it ever did, plus more. I'm sure its competitors do too. The "alternative" approaches of Ableton, Fruity Loops etc. tend, I'm afraid, to come down to merely restricting choice of functions rather than offering revolutionary new ones.

Reaper does what it does. Like Linux applications, it gets over-praised.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
BJG145



Joined: 06/08/05
Posts: 3483
Loc: Norwich UK
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Exalted Wombat]
      #1019771 - 22/11/12 02:01 PM
Quote Exalted Wombat:

The "alternative" approaches of Ableton...come down to merely restricting choice of functions rather than offering revolutionary new ones.



Can't agree with that. Max for Live is an outstanding product; innovative and highly versatile.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Andy__D
posting's fun


Joined: 08/06/04
Posts: 232
Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Sequencers new [Re: BJG145]
      #1019783 - 22/11/12 03:37 PM
Thanks very much. I'd kinda forgotten Cubase and Cakewalk were still around. I'll download some demos. Thanks!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Exalted Wombat



Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 5861
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Andy__D]
      #1019801 - 22/11/12 04:54 PM
Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
johnny h



Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 3580
Re: Sequencers new [Re: BJG145]
      #1019804 - 22/11/12 05:09 PM
Quote BJG145:

Quote Exalted Wombat:

The "alternative" approaches of Ableton...come down to merely restricting choice of functions rather than offering revolutionary new ones.



Can't agree with that. Max for Live is an outstanding product; innovative and highly versatile.




Also Ableton 9 seems to feature vastly improved midi functions. If only they can sort out the ridiculous lack of VST3 support (essential for sidechaining) I think I'd ditch Cubase forever.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
johnny h



Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 3580
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Exalted Wombat]
      #1019807 - 22/11/12 05:15 PM
Quote Exalted Wombat:

Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?




Damn ... where do you start ? Being able to adjust the BPM and everything stays in time whatever happens ... being able to structure whole songs live, it asks you explicitly if you wish to stop the audio, the integration with touchable and so many control surfaces, max for live, and that's just version 8.

For making tracks its far more creative and produces superior results in a shorter space of time.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
ken long



Joined: 21/01/08
Posts: 4605
Loc: The Orient, East London
Re: Sequencers new [Re: johnny h]
      #1019808 - 22/11/12 05:16 PM
Quote johnny h:


Also Ableton 9 seems to feature vastly improved midi functions. If only they can sort out the ridiculous lack of VST3 support (essential for sidechaining) I think I'd ditch Cubase forever.




Ableton sucks donkey balls when it comes to MIDI.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Goddard



Joined: 04/04/12
Posts: 953
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Andy__D]
      #1019814 - 22/11/12 05:31 PM
Anyone interested in playing around with the old DOS Voyetra Sequencer Plus?

Free download from Voyetra/TB (hunt down some floppies!):

http://www.turtlebeach.com/support/index.php?View=files&CategoryID=315

Can be run under DOSBox with MIDI In support available here:

http://blog.netandif.de/downloads/

Utoob: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_p4IgBD5oE



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
johnny h



Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 3580
Re: Sequencers new [Re: ken long]
      #1019820 - 22/11/12 06:42 PM
Quote ken long:

Quote johnny h:


Also Ableton 9 seems to feature vastly improved midi functions. If only they can sort out the ridiculous lack of VST3 support (essential for sidechaining) I think I'd ditch Cubase forever.




Ableton sucks donkey balls when it comes to MIDI.




I haven't tried version 9 yet but it claims to have much better MIDI...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
C.LYDE
member


Joined: 22/10/02
Posts: 233
Loc: South Africa
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Exalted Wombat]
      #1019917 - 23/11/12 11:47 AM
Quote Exalted Wombat:


The very simplest way would be to set up two tracks, one "playing" the Korg, one the Toontrack, and put the notes you want each to play on that track. If you want to work with patterns in a Drum Edit page, you'll need to define a Drum Map (or whatever your particular DAW calls it.)

There aren't really MIDI-only sequencers any more. But Cubase has all the MIDI it ever did, plus more. I'm sure its competitors do too. The "alternative" approaches of Ableton, Fruity Loops etc. tend, I'm afraid, to come down to merely restricting choice of functions rather than offering revolutionary new ones.

Reaper does what it does. Like Linux applications, it gets over-praised.




Thanks for that ...(I actually know that already)

My point was rather that not all sequencers are up to the "task" of handling MIDI and audio in a neat, powerful way.
Cubase has a drum map - Ableton Live has something like a map, but works completely different; immediately what would take a few minutes in Cubase is frustrating compromise in Live.
I clearly realise Live and other DAWs have other strengths, but often enough, managing MIDI data to external kit is not one of them...

Quote Exalted Wombat:


But Cubase has all the MIDI it ever did




Actually it has more...


--------------------
C.LYDE
http://soundcloud.com/c-lyde


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
C.LYDE
member


Joined: 22/10/02
Posts: 233
Loc: South Africa
Re: Sequencers new [Re: JeffB]
      #1019918 - 23/11/12 11:50 AM
Quote JeffB:


Drum maps?




Lets discuss that term, and how different OEMs interpreted the spec...

--------------------
C.LYDE
http://soundcloud.com/c-lyde


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
C.LYDE
member


Joined: 22/10/02
Posts: 233
Loc: South Africa
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Andy__D]
      #1019919 - 23/11/12 11:53 AM
Quote Andy__D:

Thanks very much. I'd kinda forgotten Cubase and Cakewalk were still around.






--------------------
C.LYDE
http://soundcloud.com/c-lyde


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
C.LYDE
member


Joined: 22/10/02
Posts: 233
Loc: South Africa
Re: Sequencers new [Re: johnny h]
      #1019921 - 23/11/12 12:01 PM
Quote johnny h:

Quote Exalted Wombat:

Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?




Damn ... where do you start ? Being able to adjust the BPM and everything stays in time whatever happens ... being able to structure whole songs live, it asks you explicitly if you wish to stop the audio, the integration with touchable and so many control surfaces, max for live, and that's just version 8.

For making tracks its far more creative and produces superior results in a shorter space of time.





In other words, instead of using several samplers or DJ decks - Ableton Live is focused on the loop musician and or DJ - nothing wrong with that - in fact it Roxxx!. For a traditional musician using keyboards, drums, live guitars, the benefit is not too big (IMO) and from a traditional recording workflow approach... it hmm... Suxxxx.

--------------------
C.LYDE
http://soundcloud.com/c-lyde


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
johnny h



Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 3580
Re: Sequencers new [Re: C.LYDE]
      #1019922 - 23/11/12 12:09 PM
Quote C.LYDE:

Quote johnny h:

Quote Exalted Wombat:

Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?




Damn ... where do you start ? Being able to adjust the BPM and everything stays in time whatever happens ... being able to structure whole songs live, it asks you explicitly if you wish to stop the audio, the integration with touchable and so many control surfaces, max for live, and that's just version 8.

For making tracks its far more creative and produces superior results in a shorter space of time.





In other words, instead of using several samplers or DJ decks - Ableton Live is focused on the loop musician and or DJ - nothing wrong with that - in fact it Roxxx!. For a traditional musician using keyboards, drums, live guitars, the benefit is not too big (IMO) and from a traditional recording workflow approach... it hmm... Suxxxx.



Why? Have you tried editing audio in Live? Shifting a drum hit or a vocal? Being able to nudge the tempo and have everything perfectly synced? Going back to Cubase after Live is like falling into quicksand.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
ken long



Joined: 21/01/08
Posts: 4605
Loc: The Orient, East London
Re: Sequencers new [Re: johnny h]
      #1019926 - 23/11/12 12:49 PM
Quote johnny h:

Quote C.LYDE:

Quote johnny h:

Quote Exalted Wombat:

Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?




Damn ... where do you start ? Being able to adjust the BPM and everything stays in time whatever happens ... being able to structure whole songs live, it asks you explicitly if you wish to stop the audio, the integration with touchable and so many control surfaces, max for live, and that's just version 8.

For making tracks its far more creative and produces superior results in a shorter space of time.





In other words, instead of using several samplers or DJ decks - Ableton Live is focused on the loop musician and or DJ - nothing wrong with that - in fact it Roxxx!. For a traditional musician using keyboards, drums, live guitars, the benefit is not too big (IMO) and from a traditional recording workflow approach... it hmm... Suxxxx.



Why? Have you tried editing audio in Live? Shifting a drum hit or a vocal? Being able to nudge the tempo and have everything perfectly synced? Going back to Cubase after Live is like falling into quicksand.




Digital performer did this ages ago. I don't like what Ableton does to the sound once you've manipulated it in such ways. AS for the MIDI implementations, it failed drastically last time I attempted to set it up in 2 different studios. No MIDI clock and posts on their forums with regards to this went un-answered. I expect this kind of thing from post-Emagic Logic but not from a company for which this is their flagship product.

As an aside, there is a newish DAW from some of the guys who worked at Ableton but can't remember the name now.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
desmond



Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 9167
Re: Sequencers new [Re: johnny h]
      #1019927 - 23/11/12 01:03 PM
Quote johnny h:

Going back to Cubase after Live is like falling into quicksand.




It really depends on your approach to music/production and what's important to you. Live is brilliant for what it does, and traditional DAWs are great for they do - there is some overlap, but I use each for their strengths, not complain about their weaknesses...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
johnny h



Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 3580
Re: Sequencers new [Re: ken long]
      #1019928 - 23/11/12 01:09 PM
Quote ken long:

Quote johnny h:

Quote C.LYDE:

Quote johnny h:

Quote Exalted Wombat:

Yup, still around, getting on with the job. And there are only so many ways you can manipulate wav or MIDI data. I'll bet Cubase can do anything the "alternative approach" DAWs can.

Feel free to prove me wrong though! What's a unique result you can get with e.g. Ableton that nothing else can manage?




Damn ... where do you start ? Being able to adjust the BPM and everything stays in time whatever happens ... being able to structure whole songs live, it asks you explicitly if you wish to stop the audio, the integration with touchable and so many control surfaces, max for live, and that's just version 8.

For making tracks its far more creative and produces superior results in a shorter space of time.





In other words, instead of using several samplers or DJ decks - Ableton Live is focused on the loop musician and or DJ - nothing wrong with that - in fact it Roxxx!. For a traditional musician using keyboards, drums, live guitars, the benefit is not too big (IMO) and from a traditional recording workflow approach... it hmm... Suxxxx.



Why? Have you tried editing audio in Live? Shifting a drum hit or a vocal? Being able to nudge the tempo and have everything perfectly synced? Going back to Cubase after Live is like falling into quicksand.




Digital performer did this ages ago. I don't like what Ableton does to the sound once you've manipulated it in such ways. AS for the MIDI implementations, it failed drastically last time I attempted to set it up in 2 different studios. No MIDI clock and posts on their forums with regards to this went un-answered. I expect this kind of thing from post-Emagic Logic but not from a company for which this is their flagship product.

As an aside, there is a newish DAW from some of the guys who worked at Ableton but can't remember the name now.



Its called Bitwig - apparently the coders in Ableton weren't impressed that they had to basically bugfix for 2 years rather than get on with new features. From what I hear of the early versions of Bitwig its a very unstable piece of software at the moment and has a long way to go before being useable. Whether they can succeed without Ableton's resources, hardware compatibility and user base is another matter. I hope it does.

I agree the MIDI is very poor and I'm really hoping for an improvement in version 9. As for the timestretching, the default setting is 'beats - transients' which sounds ok for beats, but really bad on some sources (such as vocals, bass, synths). If you try the other settings (complex is the best most of the time) you can get very high quality real time stretching at even quite extreme ranges.

Even with drum sounds, the 'beats - transients' is normally not the best setting. Setting to beats - 16/s, 1/8s or 1/4s (depending on what you are stretching) normally gives a much more natural result.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
DC-Choppah



Joined: 20/07/12
Posts: 354
Loc: MD, USA
Re: Sequencers new [Re: Goddard]
      #1020992 - 27/11/12 03:17 AM
Oh man! Voyetra Sequencer Plus. I spent years with that thing and made a lot of music with it back in the early 90's.

I still miss some of the functions that it had for processing midi that I can't do in Pro Tools today. The MIDI editor was very powerful.

I still have a luggable Compaq 286 that can actually run that today and trigger a Korg M3R.

Thanks for that blast from the past.

Has anyone tried using this on a modern PC alongside ProTools or some other DAW. Would love to get access to the editor again.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
1 registered and 11 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, SOS News Editor,  
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 7106

November 2014
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for November 2014
DAW Tips from SOS

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media