mikeebee
Joined: 06/12/05
Posts: 16
Loc: canada montreal
|
Cubase or logic for scoring ?
#241705 - 23/01/06 11:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi! I'm a composer, work with cubase and my work is song writing. Now,I look toward
scoring for picture. I'm wondering if logic as more integreted fonctions for scoring,
composing for tv,film... than cubase. Any advices ,preferences or even cathegoric
answers ?? thanks. m.
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Cubase or logic for scoring ?
[Re: mikeebee]
#241742 - 24/01/06 12:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Never used the Cubase score facilty but I've done a lot of scoring in Logic and it's a
pain. I understand that Cubase is not a lot better!
All the reports I hear are
that for serious commercial scoring work you want to be using Sibelius or Finale....
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
* User requested ...
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 2235
|
Re: Cubase or logic for scoring ?
[Re: Steve Hill]
#241785 - 24/01/06 06:58 AM
|
|
|
|
mmmm,
logic is far from being intuitive for scoring, in the way that I've
found Sibelius to exel; though, to qualify that, I gave up trying to get the score
function in Logic to produce meaningful results, after ver. 5
Things could be
very different now - however, with the amount of other stuff that's been intorduced into
Logic recently, I can't see the programmers at emapple having much time to overhaul an
unloved aspect of their programme.
I do know that there's a hard core of users
over on the Apple Pro / Logic forum that would dispute what I'm saying, including a couple
of successful London based media composers - try posting there and see if you can get them
to give you the other side of the argument.
I second what Steve says - try the
Sibelius / Finale route, if you're serious about scoring.
|
Chris Wood
Joined: 26/09/05
Posts: 157
|
Re: Cubase or logic for scoring ?
[Re: mikeebee]
#241816 - 24/01/06 09:20 AM
|
|
|
|
I have logic pro 7.1.1 and its no better than 5.0 for scoring, its still a pain in the
arse. Its really akward. Sibelius I have heard is a little better for scoring but still
not very good.
I thrid sibelius, I use sibelius for all my scoring as its just
SOOOOOOOO much easier, if you want professional results.
Chris x
-------------------- Racecar is Racecar backwards.
|
PatG
Joined: 30/09/04
Posts: 45
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
|
Re: Cubase or logic for scoring ?
[Re: mikeebee]
#241835 - 24/01/06 09:55 AM
|
|
|
|
I use Logic for sequencing and Sibelius for scoring(sometimes).
I believe it
is largely a matter of who your product is aimed at.
Logic (and I presume
Cubase) has the advantage if you are writing quickly and are only in need of producing
written parts for musicians who need a printed score to perform. If they will not be too
fussed about some of the dynamic markings, you can explain to them what you are looking to
achieve (in person) and they will write in their own cues and dynamics. Sometime the
results are not pretty but at least the job can be done quickly. I have played in quite a
few bands and orchestras and I find that must players are not too fussed as they often
have to play from 20 year old illegible hand written scores!
Sibelius is much
more of "create a beautiful score" for the more fussy amongst us (and if you want to have
some music published or cataloged for posterity).
Unless you are competent in
music theory and are happy writing (or clicking in) notes on a stave, Sibelius will be a
bit of a learning curve as the live record feature for inputing in real time via a midi
keyboard is a pain. It will be an overkill for someone who is a midi-musician who wants to
create parts quickly.
Note also that Logic has improved its "writing for
picture" facilities in that iit has video tracks in the timeline and facilities to
synchronise the two. I believe that Sibelius Version 4 also has beefed up in this area.
Regards P
-------------------- Interested in Location recording (Audio & Video)
|