Stookie
member
Joined: 15/07/04
Posts: 36
Loc: Basel, Switzerland
|
19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
#398431 - 29/12/06 12:06 PM
|
|
|
Hi all. I just discovered some measurment problems that shocked me a little. Thing is. I am about to build a Table for my studio with rack enclosures to
go with it. A friend of mine is going to cut the wood and i will build it. Now i
have constructed the whole thing by using 483mm as the width for the 19 inch
compartments. However, in this article: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Feb03/articles/studioinstallation0203.asp<
/a> it is written to have it 489mm wide.
What shall i do now? Has anyone
build a rack by himself and which measures (483mm or 489mm) have you used?
Any
help is greatly appreciated. With kind regards Jan Stucki
-------------------- In the end, it's all about the breakbeat...
|
Frank Eleveld
Joined: 30/08/04
Posts: 3767
Loc: NL
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: Stookie]
#398600 - 29/12/06 05:43 PM
|
|
|
|
19" equals to 482.6 mm, so I think there must be a printing error in the article.
If I'd build a rack, I'd keep a small margin - perhaps two mm on either side, so I'd end
up with a width of 487 mm.
Cheers, Frank
-------------------- Imagination is more important than knowledge - A. Einstein
|
Stookie
member
Joined: 15/07/04
Posts: 36
Loc: Basel, Switzerland
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: Frank Eleveld]
#398605 - 29/12/06 05:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote Frank Eleveld:
19" equals
to 482.6 mm, so I think there must be a printing error in the article.
True. 19" is 482.6mm thats why i ask for
483mm.
Quote Frank Eleveld:
If I'd build a rack, I'd keep a small margin - perhaps two mm on either
side, so I'd end up with a width of 487 mm.
Well i guess thats why it is stated in the article 489mm. It also
seems that the used rails in the article are the same that i am about to order.
Thank you very much for your reply but i really would like an 489mm or 483mm answer...
;-)
GreetZ Jan
-------------------- In the end, it's all about the breakbeat...
|
IvanSC
Joined: 08/03/05
Posts: 7760
Loc: UK France & USA depending on t...
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: Stookie]
#398614 - 29/12/06 06:22 PM
|
|
|
|
489mm. There - I expect you feel MUCH better now!
Never let it be said
that we don`t give the punter what he asks for at SOS land.
But it is probably
more apposite to consider that there is always several mm of play in the captive nuts used
in most rack rail, so the most critical dimension is the width of the widest piece of 19"
equipment you are going to mount. I suggest the wider dimension based on personal
experience that there are a lot of 19" units that leave you precious little room
laterally! 489 will give you a decent amount of play without actually leasving sodding
great gaps at the sides.
-------------------- Me? But I`m such a loveable old bugger!
|
*INACTIVE USER*
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 1217
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: IvanSC]
#398644 - 29/12/06 07:38 PM
|
|
|
You could do worwe than following the standard: http://www.blinkbits.com/en_wikifeeds/IEC_60297The opening
between the rails is very important as is the pitch of the holes and the centre-to-centre
of the holes (between rails).
-------------------- Expert in non-working solutions
|
MikeOates
Joined: 16/01/06
Posts: 387
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: Stookie]
#398805 - 30/12/06 09:46 AM
|
|
|
Stookie, Have you seen my post: [Project: Quick
and easy Studio Rack] I used a spacing of 486mm which was quite ample. (but if
others say use 489 then who an I to argue, use that instead) In my post I went through the
stages of building a rack and any problems I encountered to help anyone else who was
thinking of building one. If you have already had all your wood cut, you may
have to get some more wood cut, but all you vertical pieces may be ok. But you also need
to allow for an extra 6-9mm for the height and when fitting the rails, leave equal gaps
top and bottom. With a 6mm allowance (i.e. 3mm top and bottom) when you have fitted your
equipment, those gaps get filled up and it can be a tight fit, so aim for a minimum of
6mm. Mike
-------------------- Audio Recording Live
|
IvanSC
Joined: 08/03/05
Posts: 7760
Loc: UK France & USA depending on t...
|
Re: 19 inch. 483mm or 489mm
[Re: Stookie]
#398940 - 30/12/06 04:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Since this thread is getting too anal to live, I decided to go measure a few racks.
Everything I measured is around 487 to 488, including a couple of quikloks.
However, I come back to my original point that it is the distance between the
rails that is more likely to give you trouble than the width of the opening you fit them
to.
You need to be close to 18.75" between centres on the nut cages, but also
check that you have plenty of clearance for the BODY or CASE of the widest 19" box you are
going to mount. It is no use slavishly sticking your rails 486mm apart if that leaves
you much under 447mm BETWEEN the inner edges of the fitted rails.
I hope this
will help reassure you, but if push comes to shove and you make the gap too wide you can
always add washers to space the rails off a bit. On the other hand, it is somewhat
harder to expand a too-small rack case.
-------------------- Me? But I`m such a loveable old bugger!
|