Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Logic metering query
#444783 - 08/04/07 06:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Is it just me, or are Logic's meters essentially useless?
I track something.
The Logic meter peaks at say -2db during the track. I do not get a clipping warning
window. The track is in every respect fine, and sounds fine.
But Logic's
meters on playback (with no plug-ins or any other changes made to the track at all) are
now happily going 2 or 3 dbs into the red.
This happens consistently, on
practically every recording I make. I've just stopped taking any notice of the playback
meter readings and instead use tham as a guide only, relying more on the meters on my
console.
Should I just carry on assuming that 2 to 3 dbs "over" is no problem
as long as it sounds OK?
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
__
Who's never been here
Joined: 28/11/02
Posts: 6263
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444792 - 08/04/07 06:58 PM
|
|
|
I've never managed to get much sense out of them. Why not try the PSP Vintage Meter from here for reference, it's free.
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444799 - 08/04/07 07:20 PM
|
|
|
|
What's your pan law set to?
|
Ay Carumba!
member
Joined: 02/10/02
Posts: 827
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444800 - 08/04/07 07:20 PM
|
|
|
You know what they say - if it sounds ok, it is ok. I seem to remember from the
MacProVideo tutorial that 'overs' on individual audio and instrument channels are fine to
a degree - there is a certain amount of headroom. You just need to ensure you aren't
clipping the outputs. C
-------------------- www.2b-media.co.uk
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Ay Carumba!]
#444813 - 08/04/07 08:01 PM
|
|
|
|
There's something like 1500dB of headroom in a 32float mixer. (And that's not a typo!)
Just don't clip the outputs, and pay attention on plugin gains, as some designs
use a 24bit fixed implementation, so if you have high channel levels or outputs from
previous plugins, these *can* distort.
But the meters in Logic here have
always proved accurate enough for me. If you have a stereo signal on a stereo channel with
the fader at 0dB, and your master is at 0dB, the levels should be indentical.
If they are not, you may have some other routing funkiness going on (for example -
you've sent that channel to a bus which is also sending to the main output, thus raising
the volume)
Mono channels can vary in overall level when panned depending on
the pan law.
|
tomafd
Joined: 03/10/05
Posts: 3468
Loc: uk
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Ay Carumba!]
#444814 - 08/04/07 08:02 PM
|
|
|
Quote cwillsher:
You know what
they say - if it sounds ok, it is ok.
I seem to remember from the MacProVideo
tutorial that 'overs' on individual audio and instrument channels are fine to a degree -
there is a certain amount of headroom. You just need to ensure you aren't clipping the
outputs.
C
All
depends. I did a quick 'mastering' job (assembly basically) for a mate, in Logic, and
noticed some of his tracks looked pretty hot, but everything sounded 'ok', and Logic
wasn't showing clipping.
So... I finished the job and sent it off to the CD
manufacturer- who promptly sent it back, saying it was 'over' and unprintable ! So I
invested in Elemental's Inspector (now Roger Nichols and no doubt some idiot name...) and
ran the same files through it. Mayhem broke out, so to speak- multiple 'overs' with some
blocks of 40 or so samples all over the limit, on at least 3 tracks. No wonder it came
bouncing back.
So- yes, Logic's meters are not exactly on the case. Probably
best to keep your peaks bouncing around -3db at max...
-------------------- http://anotherfineday.bandcamp.com/ http://anotherfineday.co.uk http://apollomusic.co.uk
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3213
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444816 - 08/04/07 08:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Whatever you record is exactly what Logic plays back. If there is a seeming level gain
during playback, the signal must be arriving not only once, but twice, at your output
channel. Check your routing, there has to be an error somewhere (happens easily).
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: desmond]
#444823 - 08/04/07 08:23 PM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
What's your pan
law set to?
-3 db
compensated....
It's not a routing problem. I've got lots of carefully put
together templates, but I almost never use busses or auxes because I do so much on the
console... most of the time Logic is a glorified tape recorder, for me.
I
can set up a song with one channel, record myself saying hello, and watch the meter peak
at X db (the little orange box above the meter records this and displays the peak
throughout, and after, the recording process, till you press play or whatever).
I play back, it peaks at a different level.
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
Edited by Steve Hill (08/04/07 08:28 PM)
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444828 - 08/04/07 08:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Hmmm... just done a quick test. Recorded a mono track centre panned at 0db. Panned it
hard left and it played back at +2.9db...
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
PaulD
Joined: 04/01/03
Posts: 1270
Loc: Bristol UK
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444841 - 08/04/07 08:59 PM
|
|
|
Hi
In the Apple Soundtrack Pro forum there is a corresponding thread about STP's
level meters being as unreliable - the Mixer level at zero gain reading lower than the
Track level for a reference signal.
|
Studio Support Gnome
Not so Miserable Git
Joined: 22/07/03
Posts: 8995
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: PaulD]
#444847 - 08/04/07 09:15 PM
|
|
|
|
I havea theory
in terms of metering.... it's possible that the playback
metering detection, is effectively a bit faster as it can look ahead on the source data ,
and therefore, shows more transient information, but as it's fairly slow display wise...
it appears as a higher overall level. The input metering cannot detect and display as
much as it cannot look ahead on the signal source.
answer... use more
accurate external metering and ignore Logic.
and track with more
headroom......... it's not like you're short of dynamic range to play with....
-------------------- if you don't know who i am, i aint gonna tell you.
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
|
|
Hi Max. I quite agree about headroom and usually I do... my 0db test was with an
oscillator to prove a point.
If the playback meters are the more accurate ones,
that's fine. It's when I start adding EQ, compression or whatever in the box, adding
several dbs, that I need to rely on the playback meters.
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444911 - 09/04/07 02:32 AM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
Hmmm... just
done a quick test. Recorded a mono track centre panned at 0db. Panned it hard left and
it played back at +2.9db...
Well, it should be +3dB, but there's only so much resolution in the numbers in the
meter, and the meters aren't reading on every sample, they average, so every "sample" of
the signal used to redraw the meter probably is averaged over 256-samples or so, causing a
slightly innacurate reading, depending on where the meter samples are taken, and what the
sample values are - it's like an averaging sample-and-hold circuit. Displaying metering on
every sample across all channels would take up significant CPU, which is why is done like
this - and Logic always gives priority to audio, and it's metering/GUI priority will fall
if the audio needs all the CPU it can get.
Don't forget, Logic's meters
*aren't* intended to be highly accurate sample-level displays - they are an indication of
levels and track activity. For accurate levels, Logic provides more sophisticated metering
plugs, or third party tools such as Inspector XL are invaluable - a good set of meters is
a production must, imo. This is true for all DAW's as far as I know.
As for
tomafd's mastering thing - don't forget the meters won't show reconstruction overs - it's
quite possible to have sample values of significantly less than 0dBFS, and thus Logic's
meters won't display overs, but those sample values cause the reconstructed waveform to go
over 0dBFS, which was why your mastering guy rejected them.
This is yet
another reason to print your mixes with headroom, or at the very least, use decent
metering that can handle these sorts of complexities...
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: desmond]
#444920 - 09/04/07 07:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks Desmond - I wasn't expecting massive accuracy. and as I said I rely far more on the
meters on my desk anyway.
But you'd think Logic might issue some kind of health
warning, would you not? I wonder how many people trust these displays as a matter of
course?
Anyway, one object lesson learned: record with the pan pots in Logic
more or less where you would expect the final pan position to be...
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
genius sinner
member
Joined: 28/04/03
Posts: 190
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#444938 - 09/04/07 09:07 AM
|
|
|
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445027 - 09/04/07 12:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
Anyway, one
object lesson learned: record with the pan pots in Logic more or less where you would
expect the final pan position to be...
Well, you're using the 3dB compensated setting, so you're
*asking* Logic to raise your centre panned signals by 3dB.
If you don't want
this, then use the -3dB pan law (not -3dB compensated).
See: http://logicquicktips.blogspot.com/2006/10/laws-of-pan.html
|
Guy Johnson
Joined: 02/05/03
Posts: 3955
Loc: Pembrokeshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445190 - 09/04/07 07:59 PM
|
|
|
Interesting.For me, as far as I recall, the 'in' levels on my Fireface mixer and logic
very nearly agree, and Logics outputs agree with what I put in. I will have to
do some checking. And I'm on the -3 pan law setting.
-------------------- PA stuff on FB
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Guy Johnson]
#445210 - 09/04/07 08:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Logic has three pan law settings - 0dB, -3dB, and -3dB compensated.
The two
-3dB settings are identical apart from a 3dB offset.
Using the compensated
setting will keep hard panned mono signals at 0dB and push them up by 3dB in the centre -
hence the +3dB discrepancy reported earlier.
Using the -3dB (non-compensated)
setting, hard panned signals will be -3dB (rather than 0) with centre panned ones being
0dB (rather than+3dB).
|
monosyllabic
Joined: 06/04/07
Posts: 491
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445212 - 09/04/07 08:53 PM
|
|
|
|
This has been annoying me for ages!
I'm pleased it's not just me having these
problems. I'm forever turning down channels even though they sound fine. I'll give up now
and put it down to Logic just being buggy (which it most definitely is - Core Audio
Overload? On 2 tracks!?!)
SJ.
|
genius sinner
member
Joined: 28/04/03
Posts: 190
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: desmond]
#445215 - 09/04/07 08:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Sorry folks, made a mistake, you cant really use bit veiwer for metering.
:-)
|
refinerymusic
Joined: 12/06/06
Posts: 147
Loc: Phoenix, Arizona, US
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445285 - 10/04/07 04:52 AM
|
|
|
|
is this feature not available in logic express?
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: refinerymusic]
#445303 - 10/04/07 07:45 AM
|
|
|
Quote refinerymusic:
is this
feature not available in logic express?
What? The inaccurate meters feature?
Probably!
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3213
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445310 - 10/04/07 08:14 AM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
Quote refinerymusic:
is this
feature not available in logic express?
What? The inaccurate meters feature?
Probably!
Are you saying that your
meter troubles are not down to user error, but caused by Logic itself?
|
tipex
new member
Joined: 22/04/03
Posts: 983
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: genius sinner]
#445381 - 10/04/07 11:26 AM
|
|
|
|
not entirely unrelated - there was a long, long thread a while back about distortion at
the two bus, lots of stuff about 32 bit float and all that, and how it shouldn't be a
problem - but I think logic does start to sound 'orrible the closer you get to 0dbfs on
the two bus, especially if you use a limiter or whatever - I reckon about -6dbfs is OK,
above that it gets sorta fizzy
|
Tomás Mulcahy
active member
Joined: 25/04/01
Posts: 2815
Loc: Cork, Ireland.
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445471 - 10/04/07 03:01 PM
|
|
|
I'm not a Logic user, but this might help... -2dB peaks are a bit close to the edge aren't
they? I set the peak level at -12dB in Pro Tools when tracking. Gives me lots
of head room. Might as well use those 24 bits for something! No clipping distortion and
loads of room for mixing. Sounds a hell of lot better than -6dB. I'll use the
PT meters, but If I need real metering I'll use Waves PAZ, particularly on the master
outs.
-------------------- madtheory creations
Synths and pianos for Kontakt
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: tipex]
#445517 - 10/04/07 04:25 PM
|
|
|
Quote tipex:
not entirely
unrelated - there was a long, long thread a while back about distortion at the two bus,
lots of stuff about 32 bit float and all that, and how it shouldn't be a problem - but I
think logic does start to sound 'orrible the closer you get to 0dbfs on the two bus,
especially if you use a limiter or whatever - I reckon about -6dbfs is OK, above that it
gets sorta fizzy
What's
possibly/probably happening is that as you start to get close to 0dB on your main outputs,
you're actually clipping your output convertors from overs from the reconstructed
waveform, even though the individual sample values are not clipping.
Headroom
folks. There's reasons why it's a good thing, and as we have such high s-to-n ratios these
days, it's even more of a good thing than it was in ye olde days of analog/tape...
|
refinerymusic
Joined: 12/06/06
Posts: 147
Loc: Phoenix, Arizona, US
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445601 - 10/04/07 06:49 PM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
Quote refinerymusic:
is this
feature not available in logic express?
What? The inaccurate meters feature?
Probably!
LOL! i meant the
preference option to turn on or off the -3db compensation. i cant find it in logic express
and im afraid it is not an available option.
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: refinerymusic]
#445612 - 10/04/07 07:04 PM
|
|
|
|
I don't think Logic Express has user selectable pan laws. It probably just defaults to
0dB, as all earlier versions did.
It's under Song Settings -> Audio in Logic
Pro
|
monosyllabic
Joined: 06/04/07
Posts: 491
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#445677 - 10/04/07 10:42 PM
|
|
|
|
What're pan laws? I've never heard of them.
SJ.
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7891
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: monosyllabic]
#445701 - 10/04/07 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
tipex
new member
Joined: 22/04/03
Posts: 983
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: desmond]
#445704 - 11/04/07 12:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
Quote tipex:
not entirely
unrelated - there was a long, long thread a while back about distortion at the two bus,
lots of stuff about 32 bit float and all that, and how it shouldn't be a problem - but I
think logic does start to sound 'orrible the closer you get to 0dbfs on the two bus,
especially if you use a limiter or whatever - I reckon about -6dbfs is OK, above that it
gets sorta fizzy
What's
possibly/probably happening is that as you start to get close to 0dB on your main outputs,
you're actually clipping your output convertors from overs from the reconstructed
waveform, even though the individual sample values are not clipping.
Headroom
folks. There's reasons why it's a good thing, and as we have such high s-to-n ratios these
days, it's even more of a good thing than it was in ye olde days of analog/tape...
yep, keep them levels down and
beware of crap plugins on the two bus
|
refinerymusic
Joined: 12/06/06
Posts: 147
Loc: Phoenix, Arizona, US
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: desmond]
#445793 - 11/04/07 08:51 AM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
I don't think
Logic Express has user selectable pan laws. It probably just defaults to 0dB, as all
earlier versions did.
It's true. Weak.
|
Tui
active member
Joined: 02/09/02
Posts: 3213
Loc: Chiang Mai, Thailand
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: monosyllabic]
#445797 - 11/04/07 09:00 AM
|
|
|
Quote simonmitchell:
What're pan
laws? I've never heard of them.
SJ.
"Despite a great surge of popularity throughout the country, the
instrument continued to enjoy official disfavor as being noisy and disreputable,
associated with troublemakers and anti-colonial rabble-rousers. An anti-pan law was
passed in 1949, giving the police the freedom to smash the drums and arrest anyone caught
playing them. But the easy availability of the drums made it impossible to wipe them
out."
http://www.stephenbrookes.com/music/
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Tui]
#446103 - 11/04/07 10:42 PM
|
|
|
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Guy Johnson
Joined: 02/05/03
Posts: 3955
Loc: Pembrokeshire
|
Re: Logic metering query
[Re: Steve Hill]
#446267 - 12/04/07 10:38 AM
|
|
|
I just did a small experiment in Logic, with a Fireface 800 interface:
Logic's Test Oscillator, square wave at 0 dB, inserted on and audio track. All outputs
set to 0dB, panned centre, -3 pan law. (Very funny joke, BTW!)
Channel Meter
= -1.1
Output Meter = -1.1
Bus Meter =
-7.1
Aux Meter = -4.1
Output to FF 800; FF Mixer input
from Logic shows a -0.02 input.
The FF 800 out meter = -0.02
Patched this to
a FF800 input, analogue.
FF 800 input meter shows -0.62
The Logic input
meter from FF800 shows -1.7
The recorded signal in Logic shows -4.7 on the
channel meter and -4.7 on output meter ... which then shows up as -3.62 on the FF 800
mixer.
Here are the white noise figures:
Test
Oscillator, white noise at 0 dB, inserted on audio track. All outputs set to 0dB, panned
centre, -3 pan law.
Channel Meter = -3.0
Output Meter =
-3.0
Bus Meter = -9.0
Aux Meter = -6.0
Output to FF 800; FF Mixer input from Logic shows a -4.68 input.
The FF 800 out
meter = -4.68
Patched this to a FF800 input, analogue.
FF 800 input meter
shows -5.47
The Logic input meter from FF800 shows -2.2
The recorded
signal in Logic shows -5.2 on the channel meter and -5.2 on output meter ... which then
shows up as -8.46 on the FF 800 mixer.
Hmm...
-------------------- PA stuff on FB
|