fruitylooper
Joined: 25/04/07
Posts: 77
|
behringer patchbay
#470482 - 07/06/07 11:54 PM
|
|
|
|
just wondering, does this actually effect the sound qualtiy in anyway? im about to buy a
load of equipment and i need a patchbay. i can get a behringer 2nd hand for £15 (off the
same dealer i actually sold my old behringer patchbay to for a measly £5 !!) but i just
want to make sure it wont have a negative effect on the sound.
thanks
|
Gone To Lunch
member
Joined: 11/06/04
Posts: 857
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470485 - 08/06/07 12:11 AM
|
|
|
|
I have had two of them for a couple of years, and never had any problems with them...
|
E D
Joined: 10/01/04
Posts: 1088
Loc: London
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470505 - 08/06/07 01:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Someone on this thread claimed that putting anything through his behringer patchbay, did
nasty things to the clarity of sounds and something about the top end going.
Being Behringer (all about the budget). This doesn't surprise me.
|
Bays
Joined: 21/08/05
Posts: 3
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: E D]
#470508 - 08/06/07 02:50 AM
|
|
|
|
It's compulsary in every forum to have someone trash Behringer when a question about their
stuff comes up. I have a Behringer patch bay, and a Neutrik one. The Behringer one is
easier to configure and they sound the same.
|
Peter Conz Connelly
active member
Joined: 17/09/02
Posts: 2190
Loc: Tyne & Wear, UK
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: Bays]
#470518 - 08/06/07 07:16 AM
|
|
|
Quote Bays:
It's compulsary in
every forum to have someone trash Behringer when a question about their stuff comes up. I
have a Behringer patch bay, and a Neutrik one. The Behringer one is easier to configure
and they sound the same.
I
can't see ANY reason why they would sound inferior to another similar patchbay. I used to
have the Behringer ones and now have the Neutrik ones. The Neutrik are a bloody PITA to
configure, having to take them apart and flip bits around to get how you want them. The
Behringer ones have switches... Awww, bliss... Perfect. I've NO idea why more expensive
competitors DON'T.
P
-------------------- Composer, Producer, Sound Designer
www.universal-sound-design.com
|
Dave B
Joined: 03/04/03
Posts: 5367
Loc: Maidenhead
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470523 - 08/06/07 07:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Buy one!!? You can have mine if you want - I don't use patchbays any more and it would
help with my 'de-clutter' strategy!
-------------------- Veni, Vidi, Aesculi
(I came, I saw, I conkered)
|
mcguirk
Joined: 08/09/04
Posts: 619
Loc: Wendover, Bucks
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470524 - 08/06/07 07:24 AM
|
|
|
|
I've used a bunch of Behringer PX3000 balanced jack patchbays over the years. I've always
found them to be totally reliable, and the three-way switchable configuration for each
pair of sockets is incredibly useful.
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470533 - 08/06/07 07:45 AM
|
|
|
|
They work but so do Neutrik at not much difference in price.
The Neutrik,
however, is likely to work for longer.
At the prices we are talking about, that
may not be a major issue.
If you really want reliability, get a B-gauge bay.
But it'll cost you, and "configuring" is done with a soldering iron! (Much more reliable
than switches!).
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Arpangel
active member
Joined: 12/07/03
Posts: 5527
Loc: London
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: E D]
#470551 - 08/06/07 08:29 AM
|
|
|
|
Yes, simple solution, don't buy it, it does "do something" to the top end, like most
Behringer gear. I cant stress this enough, don't waste your money. Some Behringer
stuff is OK, but these aren't.
Take care,
Tony.
|
Martin Rawlins
member
Joined: 03/10/01
Posts: 339
Loc: Kent, UK
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470563 - 08/06/07 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote fruitylooper:
i can get a
behringer 2nd hand for £15 (off the same dealer i actually sold my old behringer patchbay
to for a measly £5 !!)
I don't get it... you used to own one, have you lost your memory?
|
Frank Eleveld
Joined: 30/08/04
Posts: 3767
Loc: NL
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470583 - 08/06/07 09:47 AM
|
|
|
|
I bought a berhinger PX2000 the other year to get a cheap enclosure for my monitor
controller DIY project. Fact is, that the A-gauge sockets are pretty poor quality - cheap,
fragile and nasty plastic. The metal bits in the connectors tarnish pretty quickly, too.
Switches aren't very durable either and will probably fail after a few hundred switch
cycles. The quality of the soldering work is questionable at best, too. Oh, and it's
unbalanced too - you wouldn't want that - although the connectors on mine are actually TRS
and could be used for balanced connections, but the switch has to be bypassed then.
Behringer has balanced patchbays too, but these aren't any better.
It's very likely that some sockets will give all kind of intermittent problems and those
are often really hard to find. You wouldn't want to unconnect and remove a fully
patched-up patchbay from your rack just because some channels don't (always) work.
Do as Steve says; get a good quality (Mosses & Mitchell, Re'An) B-gauge
patchbay, or if you can't afford it, a decent A-gauge model (Neutrik, Re'An).
I've two Re'An A-gauges in my home studio (one of which is rebranded and marketed as 'AP
Audio'), we had 12 rows of the same Re'An model in the studio I worked for - never had
problems, but then these were only in light use anyway.
Given the relatively
low price of the Neutriks, which use genuine Neutrik connectors anyway, I wouldn't
hesistate one second and pick the Neutrik over the Behringer any day.
Cheers,
Frank
-------------------- Imagination is more important than knowledge - A. Einstein
|
trevorownage
Joined: 22/12/05
Posts: 42
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: E D]
#470586 - 08/06/07 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Quote E D:
Someone on this thread
claimed that putting anything through his behringer patchbay, did nasty things to the
clarity of sounds and something about the top end going.
Being Behringer (all
about the budget). This doesn't surprise me.
Complete load of cobblers
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: trevorownage]
#470626 - 08/06/07 11:20 AM
|
|
|
The clarity problem is just the intermittent crackling caused by the corroded contacts in
the dodgy jack sockets after the first few weeks of use!
And of course the complete destruction of your noise floor if you were using otherwise
balanced gear.
For £36 why would anyone not prefer the Neutrik?
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
Edited by Steve Hill (08/06/07 11:23 AM)
|
mcguirk
Joined: 08/09/04
Posts: 619
Loc: Wendover, Bucks
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: Steve Hill]
#470633 - 08/06/07 11:34 AM
|
|
|
Quote Steve Hill:
The clarity
problem is just the intermittent crackling caused by the corroded contacts in the dodgy
jack sockets after the first few weeks of use! 
That said, the pair of PX3000's
I installed to run alongside a mac / 01V96 / MOTU 828 in the studio I used to be a partner
in are still working 100% fine, with no crackles, switch failures, or detrimental effect
on the audio.
And as for the claim further up that the switches would fail
after a few hundred uses - to be honest, I think this isn't an issue for most people, as
they're hardly likely to be constantly de-racking the patchbays, changing configuration
via the switches, and re-racking them.
If someone wanted quite a complex
patchbay, which is going to be seeing a lot of large-scale patching and re-patching, then
I'd probably recommend something other than a Behringer for sure. But my experience in my
old place with the PX3000s was entirely positive.
|
MarkOne
Joined: 15/02/07
Posts: 950
Loc: Bristol, England, Earth, Perus...
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: Arpangel]
#470722 - 08/06/07 02:07 PM
|
|
|
Yes, obviously the top end is horribly distorted by the er... copper in the little PCBs
and the er... copper in the sockets and the er... um... switches? These things
have no active components. Its a two pairs of sockets and some switching per channel.
To "do something" to the top end there would need to be something there, a
capacitor, perhaps, or an inductor, or some active components... Don't tell
me... You have directional wire in your studio too perchance?
-------------------- New album 'Fantasy Bridge' available now!
Making of Fantasy Bridge Diary
|
Frank Eleveld
Joined: 30/08/04
Posts: 3767
Loc: NL
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: MarkOne]
#470747 - 08/06/07 02:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote MarkOne:
Yes, obviously the
top end is horribly distorted by the er... copper in the little PCBs and the er... copper
in the sockets and the er... um... switches?
Sockets in the PX2000 I dismantled had thin, fragile metal
contacts which were chrome-plated. However, the quality of the electrical contacts is not
very good - I've a bunch of cheap Hosa patch cables which, like the PX2000's connectors,
tarnish very quickly.
Plugging these into connectors which also conduct
electricity in less than an optimal way is not a good idea if you want reliable
connections.
Corroded contacts and bad solder joints will degrade the sound,
or even prevent it from being routed through the patchbay altogether.
As for
the quality of the switches: the lifespan is probably adequate for their intended use;
light homestudio work. Still, I wouldn't want to rely on a Behringer patchbay as the
central connecting hub in my home studio as the switches are unsealed. Dust may get in and
cause all kinds of very hard-to-relocate problems...
-------------------- Imagination is more important than knowledge - A. Einstein
|
TAKEN.BALL.GONE.HOME
posting's fun
Joined: 16/09/02
Posts: 1638
Loc: Manchester, UK and Den Haag, N...
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470755 - 08/06/07 03:11 PM
|
|
|
|
I used a single PX2000 in my simple setup in 1999-2000 and never experienced any problems.
Once set, the switches were never touched again, and the top of the unit was covered up. I
wasn't patching and repatching constantly anyway.
I think it's a question of
expectations. It is a seriously budget item. But for light use, it will probably work out
fine for the short term.
But consider a balanced version (the 3000) and ideally
get the Neutrik one for a few extra quid.
-------------------- TAKEN.BALL.GONE.HOME
|
Arpangel
active member
Joined: 12/07/03
Posts: 5527
Loc: London
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: trevorownage]
#470807 - 08/06/07 05:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote trevorownage:
Quote E D:
Someone on this
thread claimed that putting anything through his behringer patchbay, did nasty things to
the clarity of sounds and something about the top end going.
Being Behringer
(all about the budget). This doesn't surprise me.
Complete load of cobblers
Thats a complete load of cobblers as well, I have a few DAT tapes
from my Behringer days that definitely sound odd, you can tell these tapes any day of the
week, this is not a subtle effect, its a horrible nasty metallic top end, that only
Behringer can produce. Some of their stuff is OK, but some isn't, mixers, (and PB's even
though they don't have any active circuitry) are a no-no. Even my Minimon talkk-back unit
sounds like this, but I only use it for talkback so I'm not worried, but I wouldn't dream
of putting in "in circuit" This distortion is not even nasty enough to be interesting, its
just nasty
Tony.
|
trevorownage
Joined: 22/12/05
Posts: 42
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470901 - 08/06/07 11:06 PM
|
|
|
|
The word psychosomatic springs to mind when reading through this thread. Yes they probably
are poorly made but a patch bay is a patch bay. I've used behringer patch bays before and
had absolutely no loss in audio quality what soever. Just because it reads behringer on
the front panel doesn't automatically make it crap.
|
E D
Joined: 10/01/04
Posts: 1088
Loc: London
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: trevorownage]
#470919 - 09/06/07 02:46 AM
|
|
|
Quote trevorownage:
Quote E D:
Someone on this
thread claimed that putting anything through his behringer patchbay, did nasty things to
the clarity of sounds and something about the top end going.
Being Behringer
(all about the budget). This doesn't surprise me.
Complete load of cobblers
Yes. You're right. I forgot I only tell lies. Sorry everyone.
(p.s. just noticed i originally wrote "on this thread". I meant "in this forum")
|
The Red Bladder
Joined: 05/06/07
Posts: 2067
Loc: . ...
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470933 - 09/06/07 08:04 AM
|
|
|
|
For those of you who think that it would be impossible for a patch-bay to distort, we had
a couple of strips from Signex Isopatch. Normally we only use Neutrik, but I was given
these things and I though "What the Hell, they can't do any harm." and shoved them in
somewhere.
Weeks later, a customer complained that the signal from the ProTools
in the machine room was distorted, but when he unplugged the Radar and rerouted through
its signal path, everything was OK.
We investigated and found nothing, but
the distortion was there and so just threw in new cable for the PT. After the customer
left, we tested the signal and there was a strange diodial property in the signal. The
patch-bay had corroded on the circuit board and the result was a whole row of plugs (they
were all on one board) suffered from having one side have an effect similar to an early
wire diode.
|
Arpangel
active member
Joined: 12/07/03
Posts: 5527
Loc: London
|
|
|
Come on chaps, lets face it, if the majority of Beringer gear worked and sounded like a
consort of heavenly angels I'd be the first in the queue to buy it, it would save me a lot
of money ! but it doesn't ! And unfortunately in this field like many others, you do get
what you pay for. I have two items of Behringer equipment, a Composer Pro, which is
very useful and has no side effects at all, and my Minimon, which isn't even used in the
audio path, as I said, it has "that sound" I tried a Behringer mixer for two weeks, it
ruined everything we recorded with it. It ended up as a back-up PA mixer.
Take
care,
Tony.
|
Simon (aka UK03878)
Joined: 02/11/05
Posts: 1504
Loc: Munching a Carrot, The Fens
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470939 - 09/06/07 09:07 AM
|
|
|
|
Had a behringer patchbay - after 6 months - the contacts were so buggered - some of the
routings became unavailable I then hard patched - but then the cheap insert cables
gave up after a while I picked up a couple of bantams from ebay for a steal £5 each
for a switchcraft and a mosses and mitchell These are now redundant because somebody
just gave me for free a B type BBC 96 hole 4U patchbay with a stack of cables (the cables
may be naff and old but I have the connectors)
|
Shambolic Charm
Joined: 13/07/05
Posts: 898
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#470940 - 09/06/07 09:17 AM
|
|
|
had my beringher patchbay for some years and there is no difference in sound wether the
signal goes through it or not. I have also never had any problems with it breaking.
-------------------- www.myspace.com/shambolic-charm
|
hegiian
Joined: 17/11/06
Posts: 137
Loc: Telford, UK
|
|
Quote Shambolic Charm:
had my
beringher patchbay for some years and there is no difference in sound wether the signal
goes through it or not. I have also never had any problems with it breaking.
Same here. Cheap, cheerful and does
what it says on the tin. If contacts are becoming eroded in a studio environment,
then you really need to look at the environment - not the equipment!! Unless behringer are
supplying their equipment with damaging substances already in them? No - me thinks not.
According to my analyzer, there is no difference whether the px2000 is in the signal chain
or not, but if some peoples ears are more accurate than complex electronic measuring
equipment..........
A little gear snobbery here I think... "I can afford a more
expensive one, which must be better".
JMO
-------------------- Baby we were born to run
|
BigAl
Just The Bass Player
Joined: 24/01/02
Posts: 2665
Loc: The King's Height
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: Steve Hill]
#471039 - 09/06/07 03:49 PM
|
|
|
Quote:"The Neutrik, however, is likely to work for longer." mmmm...... As long as the contacts are clean (ie. not dirt or dust), they'll both work for as long
as each other.
-------------------- Jack of all trades, master of some.
|
Frank Eleveld
Joined: 30/08/04
Posts: 3767
Loc: NL
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: hegiian]
#471122 - 09/06/07 09:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote hegiian:
Same here. Cheap,
cheerful and does what it says on the tin. If contacts are becoming eroded in a
studio environment, then you really need to look at the environment - not the
equipment!!
The contacts
don't become eroded - at least, not directly - but the chrome finish on the contacts gets
dull pretty quickly. And that has nothing to do with the environment of my home studio.
I've got two rows of Re'An patchbays which are older than the PX2000 I wrecked for my
monitor controller and the connectors on the Re'An's are perfectly clean and shiny.
Same goes for all my cable connectors. The chrome plating is just poor quality.
When the connectors are clean, the electrical connections will be ok and there won't be
any noticeable effect on the sound. Only if the connectors are dirty or not making contact
properly sound may be affected.
In brief; if the connectors are making proper
contact the Behringer patchbays won't have any negative effect on sound quality. But the
chance the connector busses wear out is somewhat larger than with more expensive
patchbays. Hasn't got anything to do with snobbery, it's just that you get what you pay
for.
-------------------- Imagination is more important than knowledge - A. Einstein
|
Arpangel
active member
Joined: 12/07/03
Posts: 5527
Loc: London
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: hegiian]
#471123 - 09/06/07 09:58 PM
|
|
|
|
"but if some peoples ears are more accurate than complex electronic measuring
equipment.........."
Surprise surprise, yes, they are, I believe them rather
than graphs or print-outs.
Take care,
Tony.
|
Shambolic Charm
Joined: 13/07/05
Posts: 898
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: Arpangel]
#471187 - 10/06/07 08:50 AM
|
|
|
Quote arpangel:
"but if some
peoples ears are more accurate than complex electronic measuring equipment.........."
Surprise surprise, yes, they are, I believe them rather than graphs or
print-outs.
Take care,
Tony.
Wow! I'm speechless!
-------------------- www.myspace.com/shambolic-charm
|
Simon (aka UK03878)
Joined: 02/11/05
Posts: 1504
Loc: Munching a Carrot, The Fens
|
Re: behringer patchbay
[Re: fruitylooper]
#471192 - 10/06/07 09:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Hunt down the Geoff Emerick - dodgy console story The initial engineers reports where
the users was mad - they then brought up the heavy measurng equipment and guess
what,...
Interview with RN... "A 48 input console had been delivered to
George Martin’s Air Studios, and Geoff Emerick was very unhappy about it. It was a new
console, made not long after I had sold the Neve company in 1977. George Martin called me
and said, "please come and make Geoff happy, while he’s unhappy we can’t do any
work".
They’d had engineers from the company there, and so on. The danger is
that if you are not sensitive to people like Geoff Emerick, and you don’t respect them
for what they have done, then you are not going to listen to them. Unfortunately, there
was a breed of young engineers in the company ( I hasten to say this was after I sold it
!) who couldn’t understand what he was bitching about. So they went back to the company
and just made a report saying the customer was mad and there wasn’t really a problem.
Leave it alone, forget it, the problem will go away. They were acting like used car
salesmen. I was very angry with it. So I went and spent time there, at George Martin’s
request, and Geoff finally managed to show me what it was that he could hear, and then I
began to hear it, too.
Now Geoff was The Golden Ears - and he still is - and he
was perceiving something that I wasn’t looking for. And it wasn’t until I had spent
some time with him, as it were, being lead by him through the sounds, that I began to pick
up what he was listening to. And once I’d heard it, oh yes, then I knew what he was
talking about. We measured it and found that in three out of the full 48 channels, the
output transformers had not been correctly terminated and were producing a 3dB rise at
54kHz. And so people said, "oh no, he can’t possible hear that". But when we corrected
that problem, and it was only one capacitor that had to be added to each of those three
channels, I mean, Geoff’s face just lit up ! Here you have the happiness/ unhappiness
mood thing the Japanese were talking about. "
|