Simon (aka UK03878)
Joined: 02/11/05
Posts: 1504
Loc: Munching a Carrot, The Fens
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: The Red Bladder]
#476561 - 22/06/07 07:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote The Red Bladder:
That is the first article I have ever read in that publication. Resolution - yes, Audio
Media - yes, even SOS if someone leaves it lying around. But tape op? Sorry, it seems to
be another "how to mic up a drum kit" magazine. That and interviews with people I have
never heard of.
Sorry mate I am
going to have to pull you up on that one as well I assume you are talking about the
Special Drum Micing issue of Tape Ops - where Dave Mattacks talks about drum tuning and
mic placement Sorry that would be the "special drum micing issue" Yeah and I
have never heard of Bill Bottrell and Lincoln Fong either by name -but yeah I have heard
their work and now know their names And regarding the reviews - they are mostly
reader reviews And no - I do not work for Tape Op - it's just sweeping statements
that piss me off
|
narcoman
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8469
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Man of Style]
#476574 - 22/06/07 08:13 PM
|
|
|
Quote Man of Style:
By the way I
don't do exploding, cool as a cucumber over here, some could learn from that.
Sennheiser MD441 = one of the best vocal mics I have heard ever, in fact chose it over a
£3K valve Neumann mic in a shootout once : )
Ok youv'e made it clear you
don't want it, I'm out of here, hope you find you way through the minefield without any
tangible help from SOS.
for
a dynamic, my love , that IS a boutique mic.
And of course for a particular use
you would choose it over other mics. If it was the case that there was an ordering of
"bestest" mics then we'd all have a cupboard full of one particular mic. The point is, you
said U87's where rubbish poop and could be replaced by a big list of budgets instead. Well
thats is CLEARLY nonsense. A U87 has a particular sound then is tempered by varying
degrees through its pre and general use. It is robust, dependable and of high technical
quality. The fact that you dont like it doesnt change this quality. Some of the mics you
mentioned are great for the price - but they are of variable quality even within another
example of the same mic, with often poorer components and equally unstable sound due to
marginally lower standard of design in the first place. I think SE mics are pretty much
the best low price mics out there, but they suffer from slightly lumpy response. They
sound of the price they are. I dont like BMWs - (apart from the Z4 coupe) - but i can tell
they are well built good quality cars when i drive one. The U87 is a well specified high
quality microphone (which doesnt cost the earth by the way - and the price i got my 87's
for would not provide you with the money to buy your list) - not the highest quality, but
of the price it sold for. Youre subjective dislike of them doesnt change that.....
see yas!!
-------------------- Battenburg to the power of 20 - said by Richie Royale in a moment of genius. 4pm. Wed 16th Nov 2011. Remember where you were....
|
Matt P
member
Joined: 19/06/04
Posts: 348
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Man of Style]
#476616 - 22/06/07 09:15 PM
|
|
|
|
What an utterly daft thread.
Deary me.
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Man of Style]
#476645 - 22/06/07 09:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Right, a bit of a summary!
MoS, you probably feel a little bruised. Or maybe
not.
We try above all else to be fairly authoritative on this forum - not
necessarily perfect, but good enough. So if you start a thread saying don't buy a
Neumann, buy a dozen cheapies instead, you ARE going to get a response.
Partly because we value our reputation for being fairly authoritative (and indeed fair,
full stop).
And partly because it would be quite wrong to leave lots of
people under the misapprehension that your world view on this topic was right when,
clearly, you are in a minority of one.
This thread could have been locked or
binned a while back. At least one regular forum member has suggested we just bin YOU! It
is a credit to SOS and this forum that we've let it play out and not done any of that (I
suggest).
You're welcome as a member, and you're as entitled as anyone to
express your views, within forum rules (which you have).
If you think we've
been a little harsh, try the same opening post on say Gearslutz or some of the other
pro-audio forums, and see if you last the day. Then judge us.
Meanwhile,
here's to debate.
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Man of Style
member
Joined: 18/01/02
Posts: 205
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Man of Style]
#476647 - 22/06/07 09:54 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
The point is, you said
U87's where rubbish poop
Can you quote me where I said this?
No, so don't fabricate things to make
your replies more interesting than they actually are please.
This is why I have
difficulty in taking some people seriously on forums. Cause half have not even
bothered to read what has been said and simply make things up in there own mind.
I said that a U87 is not worth the money these days compared to owning the array of
suggested (not definitive list) mics where you can hardly tell the difference unless
you need specifically to impress clients.
Well Matt P if you think it's
unpalleteable go and browse another thread, why even waste your precious time posting?
|
Steve Hill
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Man of Style]
#476650 - 22/06/07 09:58 PM
|
|
|
|
When oil is being poured on troubled waters, it might be best to go with the flow rather
than randomly abuse fellow members.
Unless a ban is what you crave.
-------------------- Dynamite with a laser beam...
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Re: Is a mic of with the caliber of a U87 worth it ?
[Re: Steve Hill]
#476653 - 22/06/07 10:00 PM
|
|
|
|
I think this thread has run it's course.
It's definitely used it's share of
bandwidth.
I'm locking it.
|