_Nuno_
Joined: 20/05/06
Posts: 804
Loc: Cork, Ireland
|
Re: Reporting in Inspiron 1525 - Part II
[Re: Achtern Styg]
#638362 - 18/07/08 07:54 AM
|
|
|
Quote Achtern Styg:
Hei, guys. I
am back with some more info on my new Dell Inspiron 1525.
The conclusion (if
you wanna skip reading the rest of this message) is NOT TO GET AN INSPIRON 1525 for music
production.
I have tried both Vista and XP SP2 or SP3. The problem is that the
DCP latencies are not low enough to run a ASIO driver with low enough latency for real
time midi playing. Namely, using DPC latency checker tool, in Vista the average latencies
are around 500 micro-seconds, where as in XP they are around 190 micro-seconds, which is
not too bad. ( My older Inspiron 6400 , XP SP2, stays flat at 40-50 microseconds). THE
actual problem is that every now and then, there are red spikes and yellow spikes on top
of the smooth green background. The red spikes I managed to trace back to the wireless
card, a crappy Dell 1395 WLAN MiniCard. When I disable the card (from the Device Manager,
or rightclick on the wireless icon in the right hand of the taskbar->Disable) , the red
spikes go away. Nevertheless, the yellow spikes, as big as 1-2 ms, come about 2-3 every 30
seconds and spoil my attempts to run at latencies as low as 64-128 buffersize , equivalent
to a total of 5-7 ms at 96000kHz. This is a pitty, as this laptop seems otherwise quite
promising. I could not find any culprit for these yellow spikes, I tried to disable most
of the components, turned off a lot of windows services, etc. One can also hear pops
when playing an mp3 in winamp, completely correlated to spikes seen in the DPC checker.
Hope this helps. I am trying either to get a refund on my 2 day old machine, have
my motherboard changed or otherwise pray for a quick release of a new BIOS version, if
they track down and fix the problem. Dell Tech support has been informed.
Achtern Styg
I have an
inspiron 1520 and by installing the fan control utility mentioned elsewhere in this
thread, setting the fan speed to manual and choosing the high speed setting I got rid of
those spikes. Works flawlessly.
|
Achtern Styg
Joined: 27/01/08
Posts: 11
|
Update on 1525
[Re: _Nuno_]
#638380 - 18/07/08 08:33 AM
|
|
|
Hi, guys. So, more news. 1) Nuno, of course the fan utility was tried few times with
no success. It doesnt actually manage to control the fan. Even more, it doubles the
average DPC latencies (the green background). What really proved to be a
breakthrough in my case was removing the damn battery (9 cell). Not disabling it in the
Device manager, but actually removing it. This removes most of the DPC yellow spikes. So, to recap, so far I have: disabled the Wireless card (1395 dell)->red spikes
gone, disabled the onboard sound card (sigma) and remove the battery phyiscally ->more
yellow spikes are gone. This leaves me with very low green background ( around 30
micro-seconds) and one single yellow spike coming regularly every 32 seconds.
WHYYYYYYYYY??????????  )) I have
been trying to understand why this is so. I am almost there, although my comp is becoming
an empty box. I have been reading on threads about Gigabyte motherboards of people with
similar problems which were ultimately solved by a new BIOS update. For all of
you who have Ableton Live, open a project, go to Properties/Audio and turn on the Tone
sound, with processor simulation to 80% (maximum allowed in Ableton 6). Then listen to any
crackles coming through the sine wave sound. They will correspond to actual spikes in the
DPC checker, even when these spikes are still within the green zone. It's incredible.
Disable different components until you get a clean sound with 80% CPU simulation. Do all
this on as low as possible buffer size.
|
_Nuno_
Joined: 20/05/06
Posts: 804
Loc: Cork, Ireland
|
Re: Update on 1525
[Re: Achtern Styg]
#638400 - 18/07/08 09:10 AM
|
|
|
Quote Achtern Styg:
Hi, guys. So,
more news. 1) Nuno, of course the fan utility was tried few times with no success. It
doesnt actually manage to control the fan. Even more, it doubles the average DPC latencies
(the green background).
With mine using the fan thing in automatic mode also made things worse, but in manual
mode and setting the fan to high speed works fine.
|
Nolet909
Joined: 01/07/08
Posts: 1
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#638408 - 18/07/08 09:49 AM
|
|
|
|
Hey! I'm new here, but have been reading sos for 10 years or so. After getting a new
laptop and reading this thread and the article in print I donwloaded the tool and got some
great results.
Specs: ASUS s96s laptop. WinXP SP2. Dual core 2,2 Ghz Intel. 4
GB Ram. Intel PM965 chipset. Echo Audiofire 4 soundcard.
My latency was great.
Typically about 30 microseconds. But I had peaks up to 4000 every 45 seconds or so. I
started disabling stuff and found that my DVD drive was the culprit. Disabling it gave me
straight 5 to 25 microseconds performance. No peaks whatsoever. Whenever I need to install
something or burn something I just turn the drive on again.
Note: I
modded/configured my laptop quite heavily for good ASIO performance:
- disable
everything that says bleutooth. - Get a silent drive, Samsung HM160HI - Tweak
Windows for performance (disable all fancy graphic etc.)
I now have a rocksolid
laptop with great audio performance. Cost me about 950 euros.
|
stevek999
Joined: 21/07/08
Posts: 1
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#639492 - 21/07/08 09:16 PM
|
|
|
Hi I am investigating an apparent problem with P4 processor(s) and it may have
a bearing on your forums relating to latency spikes I was recently evaluating a
P4 based board for our in-house realtime O.S and had problems with mysterious time gaps.
The system works Ok with pentium & P3 Celeron boards but they are going obsolete hence
the P4 After a bit of digging (2 weeks work  ) I think
that the problem is that the processor sometimes 'stalls' when executing an Input
instruction (hope you know what I mean by an Input instruction) for a 'long' time. Checks
on a variety of P4, and variants, PCs shows that this can be 100s of microseconds Now for the bit that may interest you & your forumites. I was playing with an old
Dell Dimension 4400 this weekend and found that turning off the USB in the BIOS cleared
the problem. Sadly when I tried it at the office today on other PCs I found that it would
fix the problem on some PCs but only reduce it on others. My point is that disabling
devices in Device Manager may not be sufficient, it may be worth disabling the devices in
the BIOS as well By the way I have not yet managed to reproduce this apparent
problem on any AMD processors Hope this is of use and doesn't just muddy the
waters
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16381
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: stevek999]
#639794 - 22/07/08 04:19 PM
|
|
|
Welcome to the SOS Forums Steve, and thanks for the info! I suspect some older
PCs did have 'dodgy' USB implementations that could result in significant DPC spikes. It also doesn't surprise me that some hardware devices still cause problems even
when disabled in Device Manager, yet the problem is resolved once they are disabled in the
BIOS so Windows doesn't see them at all. Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
Icarus
Joined: 23/07/08
Posts: 18
Loc: South Australia
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#639913 - 23/07/08 01:27 AM
|
|
|
|
2.2GHz Acer 6592 laptop, 2Gb Ram, 5400rpm harddrive.
Spent many hours
collecting a list of all the tips to get it to work reliably with sound with reasonable
success (see next post).
Used the latency checker after reading about it
yesterday. Had spikes every 5 seconds of 4000us
It turned out to be
my infrared port - which I don't use. Disabled it and my laptop has a clean bill of
health for sound. Fabulous
|
Icarus
Joined: 23/07/08
Posts: 18
Loc: South Australia
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: oggyb]
#639914 - 23/07/08 01:36 AM
|
|
|
Here is a list of all the tips I gathered to get a Windows laptop set up for music
recording. I hope it saves others a lot of time.
Setting up a PC laptop for
audio recording
Hardware Notes
1 Minimum laptop spec. 2GHz processor,
2GB Ram, 5400rpm Hard Drive (7200rpm 10ms avg. seek time preferable).
Many
interfaces claim that 1Ghz, 512Mb Ram and 4200rpm will suffice. In general the lower the
spec. the sooner problems will occur and the lower the number of tracks you will be able
to record simultaneously.
For recording without simultaneous playback or mixing
without the use of multiple sound modifying plug-ins a slower computer such as a 1GHz
should be OK provided that the interface and drivers are all compatible and the matters
below are dealt with.
The list below are all the things I tried to get a 2.2GHz
Acer 6592, 2Gb Ram, 5400rpm to work with a Firewire interface running only two
simultaneous recorded tracks. Ultimately this laptop specification was fine to record 8
simultaneous tracks while playing back more than 16 tracks once the settings were made and
a good quality interface was selected.
2 Ensure Firewire/USB cables are high
quality, ultra/high speed cables with good shielding and firmly fitting plugs. It is
possible for all your problems to be caused by a poorly manufactured cable using
incorrectly tolerance plugs and the wrong quality of wire, insulation and shielding –
(eg many cables available from retail electronics shops). If you can’t use the cable
that was supplied with your interface because of plug incompatibility (eg mini 4 pin
Firewire socket instead of full sized 6 pin socket) make sure the substitute is of
equivalent or better quality or get a PCMCIA adaptor card with full sized sockets so you
can use the original.
3 Cable length should be as short as possible –
capacitance per metre is an issue.
Maximum cable length USB 2 = 5 metres
Maximum cable length Firewire 400 = 4.5 metres
Beware of pushing to this limit if
you have recording problems with the original short cable supplied.
4 There
are potential functionality issues with Firewire in XP (Service Pack 2) – It may only be
running at 100MB per second – see Microsoft website. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885222
This appears to only
affect Firewire B plugs (800 MB/s)
Firewire (A) 400 MB per second should be OK.
Apple laptop computers/operating system now have the capability of 800 MB per second
Firewire. This is less common on PC laptops but you should be able to get a PCMCIA adaptor
card.
5 USB 2 is 480 MB per second.
USB 2 interfaces may work more
successfully on a PC laptop than Firewire. (eg ZOOM H4 USB2 interface recording 2 tracks
simultaneously worked perfectly first time.)
However USB uses more processor
resources than Firewire (14% vs 3%) and ultimately will record less simultaneous tracks
than a functioning Firewire 400 setup.
6 If you are still having problems try
an interface from a completely different manufacturer. There are significant differences
in the quality of hardware and software (drivers etc.) between the different
manufacturers. A MOTU 8 Pre was able to write 8 simultaneous tracks of 24bit 96kHz audio
perfectly to the laptop spec in Item 1 first time while playing back 16 or more previously
recorded tracks (all laptop settings as in points 2 – 19). A Presonus Firebox was unable
to write two error free 44.1KHz tracks under the same settings.
7 It is
possible to use an external Firewire or USB2 drive to record your audio to (such as the
Maxtor One Touch III Firewire). Ensure that the drive speed is 7200rpm or better. Use a
high quality cable. Check that the record rate of the drive is at least equivalent to your
internal drive (eg say 35Mb per sec). Speed checking utilities are available on line such
as HD Tune http://www.hdtune.com.
eSATA drives are now available as external back-up drives. These should be much faster,
but check the specs before you buy.
Preparing the laptop
Must
do
1 Control Panel - Display - Screen Saver - None - Apply.
2 Control
Panel - System - Advanced - Error Reporting - Disable.
3 Control Panel -
Power Options - Always On.
Control Panel - Power options - Monitor - Never Off -
Apply.
This step is both to ensure that your notebook doesn’t power-down
during a session and also to ensure that the CPU speed is not downgraded as a power
conservation method. Use a CPU speed utility to check if you are unsure that you’ve
completely disabled this feature.
4 Control Panel - Sounds/Audio - Sounds -
No Sounds - Apply.
This is both intended to prevent unintentional
corruption of recordings by sounds interrupting recording internally or by being picked up
by your mics externally, and to guard against the sample rate of your sound card being
switched by a sound file during recording.
5 My Computer - Right Click -
Properties - Hardware - Device Manager -
Double Click IDE ATA/ATAPI - Double
Click Primary IDE Controller - Advanced Settings - DMA if Available.
Repeat
for Secondary IDE Controller.
6 My Computer - Right Click - Properties -
Advanced - Performance - Settings - Advanced Tab - Processor Scheduling - Background
Services.
7 Disable Virus Protection software.
Make sure that virus
program is not running Auto Update of software.
8 Make sure that computer is
not running a scheduled system Virus Scan in background.
9 Disable Windows
Firewall on 1394 protocols (Network Access).
Control Panel - Network Connections -
double click 1394 Connection - Properties - Advanced - Windows Firewall Settings - Off
Disable Windows Auto-updates. (Control Panel - System)
10 Turn off
Wireless Communication.
Start Menu - Control Panel - double click Network
Connections - right click Wireless Network Connection - Disable.
11 Disconnect computer from Local Network.
12 Disable Taskbar
auto-hide.
Taskbar right click - Properties - un-tick 'Auto-hide the Taskbar'
13 Turn off System Restore on all drives
Control Panel - System - System
Restore - Turn off System Restore on all drives - Disable.
Could
do
1 Control Panel - Display - Themes - Windows Classic - Apply.
Control
Panel - Display - Desktop - Background - None.
Control Panel - Display - Appearance
- Effects - All Off.
2 My Computer - Double Click - CD Drive Right Click -
Properties - Auto Play - Music Files - ‘Prompt Me Each Time’.
Repeat for
all CD file types.
3 If laptop has mini-Firewire plug only, add PCMCIA
Firewire Adaptor with full sized plugs.
(May not be essential but this will enable
you to use the original cable supplied with the interface). Make sure that the interface
has a Texas Instruments chipset.
For a discussion on which PCMCIA cards work with
which interfaces read:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/dec06/articles/pcnotes_1206.htm
4 Check
the wattage required for any device you attempt to power directly from a 6 pin Firewire
plug. Your laptop power supply (or battery) may not have sufficient power to reliably run
the device. Use the supplied AC adaptor for the device to reduce power drain on your
computer or in some cases you can plug an AC adaptor into your PCMCIA card to provide
power for the Firewire chain.
5 Defragment the drive that you are writing
audio to before each project.
6 Check the interface manufacturer’s website
for a more recent driver or software update.
Running the audio
software
1 Check that your monitoring method in your software is not software
intensive – eg Tape Monitor in Cubase – use hardware monitoring options.
2 Increase Buffers to maximum – start with lowest specification (most latency) in all
hardware settings and step up through them until drop outs are evident.
EG in
Cubase in the Device Setup/VST Multitrack/Expert Settings box set Audio Priority to
‘Very High’, time to 2 Seconds, and uncheck each of None Buffered Read, None Buffered
Write, Lower Latency, and Multi Processing. Set the number of disk buffers to 12; set disk
buffer size to 128 or 256; and click "APPLY".
3 Latency – the delay as a
signal passes through your software and hardware - is only a problem if you are trying to
sing or perform while monitoring your performance in real time or performing to other
instruments being processed by your computer in real time. Recording new tracks without
any need for performers to interact with the recorded material can be done without needing
to minimize latency. Mixing down already recorded tracks can also be done without
minimizing latency as the only effect is to create a slight lag when software controls are
operated.
4 ASIO buffer size of 64 samples = latency of 1.5ms (extremely
low). 3ms is a more suitable figure to aim for. Most musicians are happy with 6ms or more.
You can increase latency to 12ms or 23ms (1024 samples at 44.1kHz) while mixing down to
let you run a few more plug-ins. It is not recommend to increase buffer size beyond 1024
samples. Start with a 256-sample (or 6ms at 44.1kHz) buffer size.
5 FirePod
and FireBox only: Right click on your PreSonus interface icon in your system tray just to
the left of the time. Set the CPU setting to HIGH. If HIGH setting does not improve
performance, try LOW.
Testing Tips
A quick way to test
recording stability of an interface is to record a fast drum beat (160bpm) from a drum
machine. Any drop outs in a single track played back are obvious as missed beats.
You don’t necessarily have to feed a signal to each of the multiple tracks you
are trying to record simultaneously. For example – if you are trying to test the ability
of an interface with the ability to record 8 tracks simultaneously you can enable all
eight tracks for recording, feed a signal to tracks 1 and 8, and allow the other 6 tracks
to record silence. All eight tracks should produce files of equal size, and any drop-outs
will be evident on the two tracks with recorded information.
Recording an
identical drum beat to many tracks (starting the record process at random) and playing
them back while the next track(s) are being recorded creates a complex layered drum beat.
Any read or write drop out on any of the tracks instantly changes the rhythm of the
multiple beat even if the discontinuity would not have been audible in a recording of a
random signal like voice or guitar.
Edited by Icarus (23/07/08 01:46 AM)
|
MrHope
Joined: 01/11/07
Posts: 8
Loc: Planet Earth
|
Old with XP vs. New with Vista (old wins so far)!
[Re: Martin Walker]
#640296 - 24/07/08 06:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Well I have two computers, old and new...
OLD: Gateway Select 750, AMD Athlon
750 MHz CPU, XP 32bit Home two 5400 RPM hard drives, 256 MB RAM... from
2000-2001
NEW: Gateway GT5622, Intel dual core 1.8 GHz CPU(s), Vista 32bit
Home two 7200 RPM hard drives, 3 GB RAM... from this year
XP Home (comes
with SP2) has just been installed and activated on the old computer, and no optimization
tweaks have been applied to it yet, except for disabling disk indexing.
Vista
Home Premium came preinstalled on the new computer. I have struggled a lot with this new
computer to get it optimized for audio. I have disabled lots of services and devices,
indexing, and even recently disabled SuperFetch, PreFetch, ReadyBoost, ReadyBoot, and
ExecutivePaging. This has resulted in Vista finally overworking the hard drive a bit
less, but it's still busy writing to the hard drive when it should be idle.
Both computers are kept virus and malware free, and both computers are not connected to
the internet. Both computers have defragged NTFS hard drives. Unneeded Windows
programs/components were removed from each computer. M-Audio Audiophile 2496 PCI
soundcards are installed in both computers. I tend to use the same soundcard buffer
settings in both computers: Something like around 1024. Both computers use the same
screen resolution of 1152 x 864 at about 75Hz.
I'm currently in the process
of installing the same programs onto the older computer to make it nearly identical to the
new one. So far, I've only installed about 5 programs on it.
The older
computer runs surprisingly well, since everything about it is technically slower: USB,
CPU, FSB, hard drives. It also has a lot less RAM. This older computer is too slow
to even install a DVD-RW burner in because it's FSB and CPU speed is too low! Luckily, XP
Home comes on CD-ROM and it's system requirements are meager, so the XP Home installation
and configuration was easy.
Today I just happened to install DPClat.exe on
the old supposedly slow computer and noticed that it's statistics are almost identical to
the new supposedly fast computer. Both computers stay focused in the green zone at about
100, indicating that dropouts should not be a problem.
However, the newer
computer (GT5622) has irregular spikes into or just below the yellow about every 10-20
seconds, whereas the older computer (Select 750) doesn't! The older computer thus far is
actually more reliable in this test!
I haven't yet done any recording on the
old computer since I installed XP on it. But it was very stable and glitch-free when it
ran Windows 98 SE optimized for audio with those same 5400 RPM hard drives.
In contrast, the new computer with Vista and with optimization tweaks has been subject
to frequent stuttering-interrupted audio recordings! This newer computer also scores low
in Window Experience indexes, because of the built in Intel graphics hardware. The older
computer has some kind of PCI graphics card I think.
It will be interesting
to see how the old computer holds up after I install the complete set of audio programs I
intend to use on it. But so far, so good.
So you CAN teach an old dog new
tricks!
|
Icarus
Joined: 23/07/08
Posts: 18
Loc: South Australia
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Icarus]
#640581 - 25/07/08 12:21 AM
|
|
|
Quote Icarus:
2.2GHz Acer
6592 laptop, 2Gb Ram, 5400rpm harddrive.
Spent many hours collecting a list of
all the tips to get it to work reliably with sound with reasonable success (see next
post).
Used the latency checker after reading about it yesterday. Had spikes every 5 seconds of 4000us
It turned out to be my infrared port -
which I don't use. Disabled it and my laptop has a clean bill of health for sound.
Fabulous
Last night I had
time to do a test of the laptop. I was able to daisy chain my drummer's Presonus
Firepod with a Presonus Firebox for 12 simultaneous error free recorded tracks while
playing back 24. A miracle!
Previously I could not even reliably record one
track with a Presonus device. (Whereas Motu interfaces and USB2 devices worked fine.)
While mucking around I also discovered that the laptop worked perfectly when
plugged into its power supply - but when I switch to battery the battery management driver
once again creates havoc with processor priority. All this can be seen easily with the
Latency Checker.
The annoying thing is that most of the things I had spent
hundreds of hours finding to fix the PC before (see my earlier post) are totally
unnecessary - for example, with the infrared driver turned off the laptop is quite happy
to run the virus checker and the wireless network while recording.
|
IvanSC
Joined: 08/03/05
Posts: 7760
Loc: UK France & USA depending on t...
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#640601 - 25/07/08 07:32 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for dpclat.exe - a useful little utility if its output is to be believed. Currently see no reason not to believe it & will try it on my lappy later today. Amazing the difference it makes turning stuff on and off, let alone disabling
devices. One of those things you "always knew" but nice to see it confirmed in a
tangible manner!
Now - are there any opther cool little utils like this I might
not know about? (grin)
-------------------- Me? But I`m such a loveable old bugger!
|
Achtern Styg
Joined: 27/01/08
Posts: 11
|
MSP multiprocessor versus ACPI - Xtreme solution for the laptop owners
[Re: Martin Walker]
#641015 - 26/07/08 11:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi, guys. My Inspiron 1525 saga as come to an end. I have sent the machine back, asked for
a refund. In the meantime, i have ordered and received a Toshiba Satellite A200-28P
(T8100, 3 Gb Ram@667) which I managed to get up and going, after quite some struggle. The
DPC latency checker in XP SP3, running in ACPI mode, reports mostly an average of about 70
microseconds, maximum three hundred micro-seconds (when fan kicks in and out). I have
tried the MPS multiprocessor XP instalation and it works great, much lower latency, no fan
issue, but the price to pay is no ACPI related functions (is my batt. charnged? I wouldnt
know) and a slightly higher CPU core ( from 49 C in ACPI mode goes up to 65 C in MPS
mode). In any case, for all of those hopeless laptop owners out there, try to install XP
in MPS multiprocessor mode ( read up on google about it), by pressing F5 when early in the
XP setup you're demanded to press F6. It seems this is an older trick from
music
producers to get more outta their machines (components tend to sit on idividual irq's in
MPS mode rather than crammed together on fewer irq's in ACPI mode). If you do try MPS
mode, monitor your CPU under heavy prolonged load as the fan will now keep working always,
but not on the highest speed. FanSpeed is a good tool to monitor temps. I have read posts
of people whose CPU's were 90 C hot ( apparently, Core2Duo T series can take more than 100
C).
Edited by Achtern Styg (26/07/08 11:38 PM)
|
maggotspawn
Joined: 18/02/06
Posts: 346
Loc: Los Angeles, California
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#641190 - 27/07/08 07:01 PM
|
|
|
|
I just got an Acer Extensa 5620-4428. Really happy with it. I just spent all night setting
up a Vista/XP dualboot. DPC latency on the XP parttion says 35 micro seconds average, max
47 micro seconds. I turned off the wireless for this.
--------------------
|
Domsmart
Joined: 29/03/06
Posts: 90
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#641537 - 28/07/08 07:57 PM
|
|
|
Well, in the end Dell technical support have told me flatly that they can't deal with my
problem. I find this infuriating, given that there must be a fair few other users out
there who are suffering from the same problem, but they have refused to investigate it any
further  Time to go laptop shopping again
|
Vanmartinrooy
Joined: 09/11/05
Posts: 11
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#643739 - 04/08/08 08:11 PM
|
|
|
My Acer Travelmate 5720 has just arrived - this is what was reported running DPC straight
out of the box: Considering this is in Vista, with everything
enabled and all manner of pre installed cr*p running (which will be swiftly removed  ) I think
the results are promising. I get the occasional red spike, but it seems to be connected
with me moving/opening windows etc in Vista rather than anything related to the laptop
itself/BIOS etc. Have heard the fan kick in without any discernable effect being shown. Question... has anyone succeeded in getting Vista down to a manageable level, or
is it best to plough straight on with the XP dual boot install...
|
thescientist
Joined: 14/02/08
Posts: 497
Loc: USA
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Vanmartinrooy]
#643795 - 05/08/08 12:43 AM
|
|
|
Quote Vanmartinrooy:
My Acer
Travelmate 5720 has just arrived - this is what was reported running DPC straight out of
the box:
Considering this is in Vista, with everything
enabled and all manner of pre installed cr*p running (which will be swiftly removed ) I think
the results are promising. I get the occasional red spike, but it seems to be connected
with me moving/opening windows etc in Vista rather than anything related to the laptop
itself/BIOS etc. Have heard the fan kick in without any discernable effect being shown.
Question... has anyone succeeded in getting Vista down to a manageable level, or
is it best to plough straight on with the XP dual boot install...
i've been using xp w/sp3 and it seems to be
performing better than xp w/sp2.
-------------------- Fostex 812 Mixer -> MOTU 828 mk3 -> MacBook: C2D, 2.4Ghz, 4G RAM, OSX 10.6 || i7 920, 2.66Ghz, 6G RAM, Win 7 Pro -> Reaper v3.6
|
maggotspawn
Joined: 18/02/06
Posts: 346
Loc: Los Angeles, California
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Vanmartinrooy]
#643802 - 05/08/08 01:32 AM
|
|
|
Quote Vanmartinrooy:
My Acer
Travelmate 5720 has just arrived - this is what was reported running DPC straight out of
the box:
Considering this is in Vista, with everything
enabled and all manner of pre installed cr*p running (which will be swiftly removed ) I think
the results are promising. I get the occasional red spike, but it seems to be connected
with me moving/opening windows etc in Vista rather than anything related to the laptop
itself/BIOS etc. Have heard the fan kick in without any discernable effect being shown.
Question... has anyone succeeded in getting Vista down to a manageable level, or
is it best to plough straight on with the XP dual boot install...
I would dualboot. Vista is nice looking, but XP
will out perform it for audio tasks. Here's a link to how I set up a Vista/XP dualboot on
my Acer notebook: XP/Vista Dualboot It's fairly straight foward.
--------------------
|
onesecondglance
Joined: 02/01/08
Posts: 2138
Loc: Reading, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Vanmartinrooy]
#643816 - 05/08/08 07:28 AM
|
|
|
Quote Vanmartinrooy:
Question...
has anyone succeeded in getting Vista down to a manageable level, or is it best to plough
straight on with the XP dual boot install...
yes, Nuno_ has posted excellent results earlier (page two or
three?), as have some others.
but like so many others here, you seem to be
assuming that yellow spikes automatically equal "bad performance". until you *actually*
experience dropouts, DPC latency means nothing. i have results similar to yours on my
laptop and run comfortably at 4ms, and never get a DPC related dropout. constant red
levels are one thing, but the graph you've posted shows no problems to speak of.
i guess what i'm saying is don't create a "problem" where there is none.
-------------------- hourglass | random thoughts | doubledotdash!? collective
|
thenortherner
Joined: 06/01/07
Posts: 13
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#643824 - 05/08/08 08:11 AM
|
|
|
|
What? I get a very good reading on my Dell Dimension 520 when I am running Cubase studio
4, but when I close the application the meter just shows red, red, red at nearly
15000ps.
Whats's that all about. I hardly ever have problems with this
computer - so why the reading when the siftware is off?
Strange. Mr Wud
|
MrHope
Joined: 01/11/07
Posts: 8
Loc: Planet Earth
|
Gateway Select 750 August 2008 Update
[Re: Martin Walker]
#643994 - 05/08/08 06:19 PM
|
|
|
Gateway Select 750, AMD Athlon 750 MHz CPU, XP 32bit Home two 5400 RPM hard drives,
256 MB RAM... from 2000-2001 OK I posted here earlier when I had just installed
XP and things were going well on this old computer. Well here is an update. I finished optimizing XP Home (SP2) for audio. The only thing I haven't done yet is
given the computer some more RAM to work with, but that's next on the agenda, and perhaps
add a faster audio hard drive (current both drives are at 5400 RPM, and the RAM is
currently at 256). Today I replaced the old 32MB NVIDIA RIVA Pro 64 AGP video
card with an 8MB Generic ATI Rage XL PCI video card. Like I always do, I set the video
resolution to 1152x864 @ 16bits. The new card can do 24 and 32 bits, but I can't see all
those colors anyway very well and I don't have much RAM. Good news... the DPC
dropped from 100 to about 25, occassionally going up to 52 ! It's in the green zone!
 In contrast, my optimized Vista computer (with built-in video) is
still at 100 with peaks going up to 1000 about every 20 seconds. To put things into
perspective, consider that the Vista computer has 3GB of RAM and dual cores at 1.8 GHz.
The XP computer has only 256MB of RAM and one core at 750MHz! The XP computer has only
USB 1.x support. Both computers have the same screen resolution and the same M-Audio
Audiophile 2496 sound cards installed. Both are Gateway computers. One from 2000, the
other from 2007. Newer is not always better I guess.
-------------------- hear my music @ http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=576070
|
jonnytunes
Joined: 05/08/08
Posts: 1
Loc: london UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#644087 - 05/08/08 11:29 PM
|
|
|
Hi Martin and SOS team and readers - first post but have read the mag for 10 years... dpc on my PC read between 22 and 48 steadily, absolute figure 158us with cubase LE (busy
song loaded but stopped), winrar, dpc and 2 instances of firefox running. internet, spybot
and avg virus all on. setting soundcard latency to 64 samples on the terratec makes no
difference to dpc figures, but LE is at 70% when stopped, 40% at 256 samples. reaper
seems to give much better low-latency performance, with 25+ instances of the reaper
compressor running before audio breakage - heavier load than the LE song. pleased with
the dual core at last, after mucho tweaking to get things working properly(the usual
cubase MIDI port and Midisport 8x8 timing issues and eprom upgrades...  i
still got better latency performance with cubase on 1.7ghz athlon under XP, but the DC
rocks for track count.  May
just be able to make some music again now  happy tweaking! john
-------------------- asus HP Pavilion,pentium d 2x2.8ghz,2g ram,2x150gb wdc hdd, win xphomesp3, cubase vst3.7/LE,e-mu 0404+terratec phase 88 pci, midisport 8x8,akai s6000,korg x5,e-mu proteus 2000,nova supernova etc
|
Richulu
Joined: 06/08/08
Posts: 1
|
Re: Reporting in Inspiron 1525 - Part II
[Re: _Nuno_]
#644420 - 06/08/08 08:58 PM
|
|
|
|
I just got a new Dell Vostro 1510 Dual core 2 and I'm having the same problem. Every 30
second the latency peaks. Nuno, are you not aware of a solution to this yet? I know I
didn't buy a MAcbook pro but this is [ ****** ] up. Are you sure it has got to do with the
fan? I'm sitting here all furious..
|
Shifty
Joined: 06/07/05
Posts: 33
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#644654 - 07/08/08 02:34 PM
|
|
|
A quick update on my HP NX7400 Laptop after a recent re-install: Spec: HP
NX7400 Laptop (2.0Ghz Core2Duo) 2GB RAM Windows XP Pro SP3 EMU1616
SOundcard DPC Latency is now down to 50-60 with no spikes (before it was
@80-120) The culprits were Wireless Card Ethernet Modem Wireless keyboard I noticed that after this re-install when I clicked on an
folder with Ableton running, I would get a huge spike (2500+). It turns out to related to
the 'click' sound that the on-board soundcard makes when opening folders. Setting the
sound scheme to 'no sounds' cured this. A common tweak, but easily overlooked (by me
anyway!).  I also noticed that my wireless keyboard and mouse added another
40-50 (spikes, not steady) onto my DPC score. During a lot of mouse activity, DPC would
rise to 110. Unplugging it sorted it out. So with the wireless keyboard
unplugged: 14-16 with no jumps with Ableton running 50-60 with
no jumps Disabling the on-board sound didn't make any difference, as long as
the sound scheme is set to 'none'. Very pleased now ! As a previous
poster has said - if you do work at low latency and with very CPU intensive plug-ins
(using 50% + CPU), every little DPC spike means a glitch or a crackle, even if it doesn't
go into the red. I can live with a wired keyboard for the occasions when I
need really low latency performance.
|
_Nuno_
Joined: 20/05/06
Posts: 804
Loc: Cork, Ireland
|
Re: Reporting in Inspiron 1525 - Part II
[Re: Richulu]
#644675 - 07/08/08 03:37 PM
|
|
|
Quote Richulu:
I just got a new
Dell Vostro 1510 Dual core 2 and I'm having the same problem. Every 30 second the latency
peaks. Nuno, are you not aware of a solution to this yet? I know I didn't buy a MAcbook
pro but this is [ ****** ] up. Are you sure it has got to do with the fan? I'm sitting
here all furious..
I fixed
mine long time ago. It took a bit experimenting and a few OS reinstalls but it working
fine since.
You can find the details in this thread.
The fan
control utility may be what you need to fix that. I found that only by setting the fan to
manual control fixed it completely.
|
sohel1
Joined: 09/08/08
Posts: 3
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#645167 - 09/08/08 05:39 AM
|
|
|
DPC Latency Checker is a tiny 310KB Windows utility, doesn't require installing (just
double-click the file to run), and is really easy to use. It polls the DPC (Deferred
Procedure Call) latency once every second and displays the results in a
horizontally-scrolling graph. Hardware drivers issue periodic interrupts, and Windows
deals with these as soon as it can on a first come first served basis (the DPC).
-------------------- Digital Signage Free scouts website
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16381
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: sohel1]
#645266 - 09/08/08 02:10 PM
|
|
|
Quote sohel1:
DPC Latency Checker
is a tiny 310KB Windows utility, doesn't require installing (just double-click the file to
run), and is really easy to use. It polls the DPC (Deferred Procedure Call) latency once
every second and displays the results in a horizontally-scrolling graph. Hardware drivers
issue periodic interrupts, and Windows deals with these as soon as it can on a first come
first served basis (the DPC).
Welcome to the SOS Forums sohel1!
I'm not sure what you're getting at though
- you've just copied and pasted a paragraph from my very first post on this thread.
Did you have a query about DPC Latency Checker?
Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
the pentacle queen
Joined: 26/06/08
Posts: 6
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#645688 - 11/08/08 03:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a Fujitsu Siemens Laptop- The Esprimo Mobile V5535- 2ghz
processor, 765mb ram, 5400 rpm hard drive. Vista. Edirol Usb audio capture ua-25
sound card, Emu X board midi controller.
Currently I can't record
anything through midi, as whenever I try the sound warps and buckles and goes completely
out of time, completely different to what I play onto the keyboard. I did a thread
about it and someone suggester upping the buffer size, which i tried to the maximum- no
difference. I think it's either that I don't have enough RAM (a lot of people
suggest 2mb which i don't have) Or the latency.
I ran the latency test and I
get a reading between 51 and 1150, and the rest of the spikes hitting random results
inbetween. When I type or record this sends all the spikes into the yellow.
I
tried disabling devices, but nothing seems to make a difference. I turned firewall off and
windows defender.
From reading the rest of these posts it appears that most
people find that the problem was vista. I'm stuck really, and can't decide what to
do. I'm not overtly technical, and I just worry that if I spend all this money and effort
on downgrading then things still may not work and I don't have the technical intuation to
sort things out! I'm a student and I've been trying to get a studio for ages, but it's all
turned into a major major hassle. I'm trying to get it set up for september. What
would anyone advise?
|
Temp
Joined: 25/04/05
Posts: 208
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#646232 - 13/08/08 03:09 AM
|
|
|
Spec from CPU-z CPU: Pentium 4 @ 3.0 Ghz (Prescott) MOBO: Gigabyte
81848P775-G Chipset: 848p Southbridge: 82801 EB FSB: 201 MHz Bus
Speed: 803.9 MHz 1 Gig PC2700 Corsair DDR RAM ------ XP Pro (sp2) Marvell Yukon Gigabit NIC Audiophile 2496 PCI System Drive: 80 Gig Seagate
Barracuda Media Drive: 140 Gig Hitachi Deskstar Promise Ultra133 TX2 IDE Card
with 2 more 120 Gig Seagates 2 x External USB2 250 Gig Seagate Barracudas  Low Idle: 10-14 Average: 20-40 Max: 87 (when one of
the external USB drives decided to wake up) I'm really very surprised at this
what with the huge specs of some of the systems on here. The PC was originally built as a
DAW but it's now used primarily as a Flash, website and Photoshop authoring workstation.
I'm also running Firefox, Spyware Doctor, NIS and its host of associated background
processes. With all the talk of network adaptors slowing things down I thought
I'd stream a Div-X movie across my network from the host PC and crack open my FTP software
and perform a few uploads. This resulted in a higher peak of 135 and an average of around
35. I then prompted Symantec's LiveUpdate as I know it's a really hungry
process - it jumped momentarily to 195 and then calmed down again. So it seems
a higher spec system doesn't necessarily mean lower DPC timings. Groovy.
-------------------- jQuery Text-To-Speech Framework
|
batmanjd
Joined: 16/08/08
Posts: 1
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#647343 - 16/08/08 11:04 AM
|
|
|
Great forum - just what I need to get rid of annoying clicks etc that I had in the past
recording on computer (I'm only part time sound engineer now). My new laptop (Dell Vostro
1710) should be much smoother for sound now. I tried out the tool and got good
improvement, but still was left with annoying peaks every 60 sec. I then disabled the
battery management, and they disappeared - looks good to start recording again. Thanks again. No change: Then disabled all network devices under "Network Adaptors": Then disabled Microsoft ACPICompliant Control Method Battery,
but don't know what effect this will have on the battery, though: I had tried lots of other things, but nothing had any effect,
even switching off the wireless (WI-FI & Bluetooth) using the switch on the side of
the laptop. John D.
|
Damcat74
Joined: 17/08/08
Posts: 29
Loc: London
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#647697 - 17/08/08 11:00 PM
|
|
|
AMD 64 3500 ASUS AV8 motherboard 3G RAM Windows VISTA with som firewire
problems I'm geting 1000us
|
CATMAN
Joined: 05/08/08
Posts: 111
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#647706 - 17/08/08 11:45 PM
|
|
|
Home built PC(2005)- AMD 64 2800+/80Gb&120gB HDD'S/GForce FX5700/2Gb ram... After
installing XP(SP2),EMU,CUBASE etc on a suggestion (I believe in an old article by
Mr.Walker  )I followed the list of 'TUNING TIPS' from musicXP.net.By some of the previous
posts,I wonder if everyone is aware of these. My readings run less than 100 playing a
song in Cubase,less than 30 at rest.
-------------------- Cubase LE.Emu Proteus/Emulator.ZeroG Celtic.JBL LSR25P.Gibson LP.Ibanez JS.THD Univalve.Fylde Alexander. http://www.myspace.com/catmanxbob
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16381
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: CATMAN]
#647912 - 18/08/08 01:51 PM
|
|
|
Quote CATMAN:
After installing
XP(SP2),EMU,CUBASE etc on a suggestion (I believe in an old article by Mr.Walker )I followed
the list of 'TUNING TIPS' from musicXP.net.By some of the previous posts,I wonder if
everyone is aware of these.
Yes, I did recommend Music XP.net many moons ago, but have since compiled my own
(hopefully) definitive set of Windows XP Tweaks in this feature published in SOS September
2006:
www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep06/articles/pcmusician_0906.htm
Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
Stuart Churchill
Joined: 30/10/03
Posts: 1551
Loc: Wales
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#647972 - 18/08/08 04:27 PM
|
|
|
OK, here's my setup: Asus P4P800E de luxe Pentium 4 single core 2800 1 stick Corsair PC3200 DDR 400 512 MB 1 stick Crucial PC3200 DDR 400 512 MB Radeon graphics (can't remember model) running 2 X 17" CRT monitors LG CD R/W Liteon DVD R/W Windows PX Pro SP1 2 X Seagate Barracuda ATA 80 GB Emu 1212m Cubase VST 32 Results: Typical 50 - 60 with
occasional peaks of around 100. Absolute 157 using Cubase.
-------------------- Birthday Song 4 U. Personalised Birthday Songs
|
CATMAN
Joined: 05/08/08
Posts: 111
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#648209 - 19/08/08 10:14 AM
|
|
|
Thanks M for that link..
-------------------- Cubase LE.Emu Proteus/Emulator.ZeroG Celtic.JBL LSR25P.Gibson LP.Ibanez JS.THD Univalve.Fylde Alexander. http://www.myspace.com/catmanxbob
|
Dameo
Joined: 08/10/05
Posts: 150
Loc: sheffield.
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#648354 - 19/08/08 03:45 PM
|
|
|
|
system:-
intel p4 3.0 gig processor
Asus p4c800 deluxe rev 2.0
2.0 gig
memory crucial 2.5 cas
radeon 7000 graphics card.
emu 1820m soundcard.
notes:
ethernet is disabled, parallel ports disabled, serial port disable.
Xp is tweaked for low services and set to favour background processes.
my
latency was fully stable at 43ms no spikes, but when usb drive used small spikes occured.
-------------------- A gentleman is a man who can play "jump" on keyboards, but chooses not to
Edited by Dameo (19/08/08 03:47 PM)
|
grahamem
Joined: 03/10/04
Posts: 5
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#649288 - 22/08/08 11:55 AM
|
|
|
|
I've been having a glitch problem for some time. I downloaded the software from
thesycon and found that I am getting a single spike of 3144us, aprox. once an hour
but as yet haven't found the cause. My computer has a Pentium (single core
)3.6Ghz processor on an Intel 955xbk Mobo with 2G ram sata drives and dual 19 inch
monitors. My DAW is Soundscape with a Mixpander 5 DSP card and a UAD-1 card for
FX etc... I only have a problem when using the UAD card otherwise the DPC spike
doesn't seem to affect Soundscape.
Anyone else seeing this hourly (approx.)
spike?
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16381
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: grahamem]
#649291 - 22/08/08 12:03 PM
|
|
|
Welcome to the SOS Forums grahamem! Hmm... Could it be a printer utility? Some
printer manufacturers periodically check that their printer is still plugged int, or check
its ink levels. Infuriating! Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
grahamem
Joined: 03/10/04
Posts: 5
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: Martin Walker]
#649328 - 22/08/08 01:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Martin hmmmm I have a Primera Disc Publisher 2 connected but the printer only
seems to update ink levels during a print cycle, still it's worth a try. What I
really need is a utillity that takes a snapshot when a spike occurs and lists any
processes happening because each time it happens is when I'm doing something important
like burning a master CD. ( I must have loads of scrap CDRs hiding in corners after
I've thrown them in disgust.)
Grahame
|
PCDAWuser1
Joined: 25/08/08
Posts: 1
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - Weird DPC readings after DAW application crash
[Re: Martin Walker]
#650150 - 25/08/08 09:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Weird DPC readings after DAW application crash, what could still be wrong, and the case of
the PC that speaks with forked tongue ...............
I had cause to
investigate DPC meausrements after an application crash, and afterwards the audio
application would not run with the soundcard's ASIO driver without dropouts. I measured
the DPC peaks as over 45,000 (!) ie 45ms. Hmmmm. (well actually that was not exactly I
said, but anyway ....)
So I then went to the other partition on the same
machine and measured again, and found all green readings at around 250us average, and
whilst playing a soundfile using Directsound with WM player, the DPC readings were
doubling, i.e. around 500us.
Now this second partition was in fact my original
hard drive partition, and I always liked the sound I got off this using WMPlayer (with all
the EQ/SRS etc switched off).
So then began the long process of trying to find
the driver that had obviously been taken down by the application crash. Anyway, after
reinstalling the chipset drivers, NIC card driver, and graphics card driver, I found using
RATTV3 that the main culprit was atapi.sys - so I booted into the other (E:) partition
and from there replaced the disk drivers in the (C:) system32 folder and in the dll cache.
I now had the DPC readings down to around 300us with a regular spike appr every 5.5
seconds of 4000 - 5000us. That is except when there was any hard disk activity whatsoever,
when the whole system went absolutely ballistic with a constant DPC reading level of
around 10,000us.
Nothing I did made any difference, until I found one of my
original installation CDs that came with the computer - which contained the manufacturer's
system software. Aha !!
So I reinstalled this software, and hey presto, the DPC
spikes vanished. The measurements were all in the green, at around 300us, but on this
partition (C:) no change in readings when playing an audio file. So far so good. I then
reinstalled the soundcard, and played an audio file with WM Player, just as a test.
Huuuuh ??? It sounded different to how it had before the crash!! All the drivers
were reading fine, DPC was fine, everything OK in Device Manager, but it sounded
different.
So just in case I was imagining things, I went back to the E: drive
and listed to the same file again using WM Player, and no I was not imagining things. It
did sound different. The drum track I was using as a reference was now much soggier (but
only in the C: drive) - mpre bass, less top. So next I went back to the DAW software and
EQ'd the file to how I remeber it sounding before the crash, and it needed about 6db at
1kHz and 12 db at 20khz rsing up from about 10kHz. Now that's a lot of EQ just to get to
the point where a drum track sounds like it did before a DAW app crash.
And
what is bothering me now is that I have no way of knowing which is the correct playback -
that from the E: drive - punchy as anything - or that from the C: drive - lots more
whooomph in the bass but quite soggy overall.
But what is even more concerning
about this little episode is that I could be mixing away ITB, blissfully unaware of these
problems, adding my bucketfuls of EQ to get the drum track to cook again, and then if it
transpires that my C: drive system is indeed still messed up (even though it now measures
well from a DPC perspective), then if I render files straight from the DAW software to a
WAV or MP3, then the rendering will be done AFTER I have added the EQ !!!
So
really, unless you get the sound out of the little beasts in the first place, and
recaptuing it, you really do have no way of knowing whether you are getting what you think
you are getting. Sorry to all the forum members that see this as completely obvious, but
as far as I am concerned this i something I have just discovered - and I have a major
problem in my system that is affecting the sound quality coming out of it.
It
is tempting to offer the standard solution which is to reformat the C: drive (after
backing up the data files !!), and then I'll know it's correct. Perhaps that is true. And
it is also true that there are still some tell-tale signs of the C: drive system
misbehaving, which is that opening and closing windows sometimes leads to audio droputs
even though the DPC checker shows no variation whatsoever. Go figure !!
I have
posted this to try and shed some light on what on earth could be the problem in the system
(it seems to be a system issue as the file played first with the Directsound driver and
the ASIO driver does not sound right), but also to raise some awareness on this type of
problem, so maybe we can all share some intelligence on this type of issue, whcih is why I
believe Martin posted his request for DPC readings initially.
Before this
application crash around 1 week ago, everything was relatively ok and stable.
Any comments Martin ??!!
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16381
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: DPC Latency Survey - please contribute
[Re: grahamem]
#650269 - 26/08/08 10:58 AM
|
|
|
Grahame - that's a mighty spike if it results in useless CD burns! Have you tried Process
Explorer? ( http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/default.aspx ) This lets you capture CPU activity and see what process causes particular
spikes. Hope it helps! Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|