Helmutcrab
Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
|
Questions about partition wall decoupling
#606191 - 20/04/08 01:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Matt and co., Im sound proofing a garage that im due to have built shortly as a
studio. Just read this months article on soundproofing and the thread below 'urgent help
needed with soundproofing'. I am a total novice in this area so will have to do some
reading, but one thing i dont understand that is mentioned in this thread and in the
article this month, is how to decouple a partition wall from a structural brick wall. It
is mentioned neoprene strips can be used to decouple studwork supporting the plasterboard
from the wall but i dont understand how this enables the partition wall(studboard) to be
attached/supported - is neoprene a strong adhesive? or is it used in conjunction with
actual screws into the wall through the studwork? In the article it mentions that
both sides of a plasterboard-on-studding construction are built onto separate frames that
are not in contact, but again i dont understand how the frames could be supported/attached
in order for them to be stable if they are not in contact with anything. Any help
will as always be very much appreciated, Thanks, Peter
|
Studio Support Gnome
Not so Miserable Git
Joined: 22/07/03
Posts: 8999
|
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling
[Re: Helmutcrab]
#606208 - 20/04/08 02:58 PM
|
|
|
|
you don;t attach...... in a proper room within room, the frame should be self supporting
, and NOT fixed in to the outer wall. fixing to the outer wall is defeating the point of
having a separate wall in the first place
and if I'm honest.... doing
so with a bigger gap and not using neoprene at all is a better way to do it...
of if you feel the need to use it, roll strips of it into little springy circles ,
rather than use it flat.
obviously many people lack the space to lose an extra
couple of inches (or better yet a foot) , and on practical level, at this point, the
article's suggested use of neoprene (actually usually EPDM) is a valid and practical
solution.... it's just not ultimately as effective as a proper gap.
think
abut it... 4 walls are self supporting because they hold each other up.... same is true
of te inner independent framework .
-------------------- if you don't know who i am, i aint gonna tell you.
|
Helmutcrab
Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
|
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling
[Re: Studio Support Gnome]
#606239 - 20/04/08 04:29 PM
|
|
|
Quote Max!:
you don;t
attach...... in a proper room within room, the frame should be self supporting , and NOT
fixed in to the outer wall. fixing to the outer wall is defeating the point of having a
separate wall in the first place.
Hi Max, and thanks for help, this is what i thought but its been mentioned
neoprene can be used to decouple, and whilst i understand this isnt as effective as no
contact, i dont understand how it is used without screwing the studding to the wall, so do
the screws go through the strut and neoprene and then into the wall thereby reducing
contact between strut and wall? In the article, it mentions making two partition
structures (with no contact between them). How would the inner partition be stable as it
would still have to be attached to something-does it mean-like you say- building one stud
wall frame and then a second one, this time walls AND ceiling to support inner partition?.
This seems to be as much work and less effective (as you pointed out) than building a self
stabilised frame (room within a room), as the inner part of the partition used in the
article would still have to be made this way in order for it to be stable AND have no
contact with outer frame.
Quote
Max!:
obviously many people lack the space to lose an extra couple of
inches (or better yet a foot) , and on practical level, at this point, the article's
suggested use of neoprene (actually usually EPDM) is a valid and practical solution....
it's just not ultimately as effective as a proper gap.
So, would the method in article simply be used to save the 4-6
extra inches? it would take to make a proper 'room within a room' when room space needs
priority?. Using the method in the article, is the inner frame acting as 'a room
within a room' and the outer frame is more mass and less contact with wall?
Have bought the book recommended by forum users here but i am a really slow reader. Thanks again Peter
|
Setter
member
Joined: 06/11/02
Posts: 546
Loc: Tesside UK
|
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling
[Re: Helmutcrab]
#606255 - 20/04/08 05:43 PM
|
|
|
|
I've read the article again in the light of your comments. I'm not sure that the wooden
frame mentioned is intended to be screwed to the bricks at all. As you say, a big screw
fixing should couple the layers together pretty effectively.
Resilient bars are
also worth considering here.
J
PS I've sent a PM
|
Helmutcrab
Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
|
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling
[Re: Setter]
#608023 - 25/04/08 05:02 AM
|
|
|
|
Yes i think your right - i got the wrong end of the stick when i read it. Sorry for
the confusing babble above Max. Peter
|