Main Forums >> DIY, Electronics, Studio Design & Acoustics
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Helmutcrab



Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
Questions about partition wall decoupling new
      #606191 - 20/04/08 01:39 PM
Hi Matt and co.,
Im sound proofing a garage that im due to have built shortly as a studio. Just read this months article on soundproofing and the thread below 'urgent help needed with soundproofing'. I am a total novice in this area so will have to do some reading, but one thing i dont understand that is mentioned in this thread and in the article this month, is how to decouple a partition wall from a structural brick wall. It is mentioned neoprene strips can be used to decouple studwork supporting the plasterboard from the wall but i dont understand how this enables the partition wall(studboard) to be attached/supported - is neoprene a strong adhesive? or is it used in conjunction with actual screws into the wall through the studwork?
In the article it mentions that both sides of a plasterboard-on-studding construction are built onto separate frames that are not in contact, but again i dont understand how the frames could be supported/attached in order for them to be stable if they are not in contact with anything.
Any help will as always be very much appreciated,
Thanks,
Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Studio Support Gnome
Not so Miserable Git


Joined: 22/07/03
Posts: 8999
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling new [Re: Helmutcrab]
      #606208 - 20/04/08 02:58 PM
you don;t attach...... in a proper room within room, the frame should be self supporting , and NOT fixed in to the outer wall. fixing to the outer wall is defeating the point of having a separate wall in the first place


and if I'm honest.... doing so with a bigger gap and not using neoprene at all is a better way to do it...


of if you feel the need to use it, roll strips of it into little springy circles , rather than use it flat.

obviously many people lack the space to lose an extra couple of inches (or better yet a foot) , and on practical level, at this point, the article's suggested use of neoprene (actually usually EPDM) is a valid and practical solution.... it's just not ultimately as effective as a proper gap.

think abut it... 4 walls are self supporting because they hold each other up.... same is true of te inner independent framework .

--------------------
if you don't know who i am, i aint gonna tell you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Helmutcrab



Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling new [Re: Studio Support Gnome]
      #606239 - 20/04/08 04:29 PM
Quote Max!:

you don;t attach...... in a proper room within room, the frame should be self supporting , and NOT fixed in to the outer wall. fixing to the outer wall is defeating the point of having a separate wall in the first place.




Hi Max, and thanks for help, this is what i thought but its been mentioned neoprene can be used to decouple, and whilst i understand this isnt as effective as no contact, i dont understand how it is used without screwing the studding to the wall, so do the screws go through the strut and neoprene and then into the wall thereby reducing contact between strut and wall?
In the article, it mentions making two partition structures (with no contact between them). How would the inner partition be stable as it would still have to be attached to something-does it mean-like you say- building one stud wall frame and then a second one, this time walls AND ceiling to support inner partition?. This seems to be as much work and less effective (as you pointed out) than building a self stabilised frame (room within a room), as the inner part of the partition used in the article would still have to be made this way in order for it to be stable AND have no contact with outer frame.


Quote Max!:

obviously many people lack the space to lose an extra couple of inches (or better yet a foot) , and on practical level, at this point, the article's suggested use of neoprene (actually usually EPDM) is a valid and practical solution.... it's just not ultimately as effective as a proper gap.




So, would the method in article simply be used to save the 4-6 extra inches? it would take to make a proper 'room within a room' when room space needs priority?.
Using the method in the article, is the inner frame acting as 'a room within a room' and the outer frame is more mass and less contact with wall?

Have bought the book recommended by forum users here but i am a really slow reader.
Thanks again
Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Setter
member


Joined: 06/11/02
Posts: 546
Loc: Tesside UK
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling new [Re: Helmutcrab]
      #606255 - 20/04/08 05:43 PM
I've read the article again in the light of your comments. I'm not sure that the wooden frame mentioned is intended to be screwed to the bricks at all. As you say, a big screw fixing should couple the layers together pretty effectively.

Resilient bars are also worth considering here.

J

PS I've sent a PM


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Helmutcrab



Joined: 08/08/06
Posts: 545
Loc: Durham, UK
Re: Questions about partition wall decoupling [Re: Setter]
      #608023 - 25/04/08 05:02 AM
Yes i think your right - i got the wrong end of the stick when i read it.
Sorry for the confusing babble above Max.
Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
3 registered and 23 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 2507

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

June 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for June 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media