nedjinski
Joined: 14/12/04
Posts: 9
|
Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
#66636 - 25/12/04 04:32 AM
|
|
|
|
I could use some feedback on your experience about what type of live sound system works
the best. I want to put together a system for a small jazz combo with vocals and the
setups I can see would be -
1) mics & inst. into a mixer which feeds an amp
which powers speakers.
2) mics & inst into a mixer which feeds self powered
speakers.
3) mics & inst. into a powered mixer which powers speakers.
what are the pros & cons of these different types of setups? or does it really matter at
all? cost and sound quality are my main concerns. what works for you? feedback
greatly appreciated!
|
Ultimate Fish
posting's fun
Joined: 06/12/02
Posts: 1910
Loc: York, UK
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#66777 - 26/12/04 11:30 AM
|
|
|
|
There's no real difference between a powered mixer and a seperate mixer and power amp. A
powered mixer is just more convenient to carry around.
It's all down to budget,
requirements and preference as to which you go for. For a small vocal system my current
favourite is a pair of HK PR112 passive speakers and then a poweramp and mixer (if these
are integrated as a powered mixer that makes no difference).
Others may favour
something active like the Mackie SRM450. Personally I find these can be a little harsh,
but they certainly make a lot of noise. There are lots of other actives around on the
market. To be honest either would work well. Just make sure you listen to the system
carefully before you buy.
-------------------- need to get rid of this stupid sig...
|
pressred
Joined: 11/12/04
Posts: 19
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Ultimate Fish]
#66875 - 26/12/04 09:54 PM
|
|
|
It's purely a matter of which combination suits your needs. We use self-powered
cabinets in our hire stocks as it reduces the amount of storage and shipping space,
eliminates the mistake of not taking the amplifier to the job (believe me, it does
happen), reduces the possibility of customer damage, and also means we only have to stock
one cable type for both mics and signal between desk and speakers. In addition,
the guys out on site find it easier as there's no big heavy amp racks to cart about.
-------------------- Audio-Visual, Sound and Video Equipment Hire - www.pressred.biz
|
Ste
Joined: 12/12/04
Posts: 199
Loc: Wimbledon
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#66889 - 26/12/04 11:23 PM
|
|
|
I like the small active stuff Mackie do. It's plently loud enough for a vocal PA for a
rock band, and would do the job perfectly well as a vocal/solo PA for a jazz combo. They
do tend to be a bit harsh, but this can be tamed with a bit of EQ on your desk if needs
be. They are also extremely convenient because you don't need to carry seperate power
amplifiers. Also, if you forget your desk for some reason or it breaks, you're not
completely screwed cause you can still plug a vocal mic directly into the back. I often use RCF/Mackie Art300's, but they have now been discontinued and the Mackie
SRM450's are also excellent.
-------------------- stevebunting.comtotalproaudio.com
|
adrian_k
Joined: 30/01/03
Posts: 1741
Loc: Gloucestershire
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Ste]
#66944 - 27/12/04 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
While I like the Mackie SRMs, it's also worth considering what happens if something goes
wrong. With actives, if one of the amps goes there's not a lot you can do, but if you lose
a channel on an amp there's there's generally a way round it.
|
Bugalee
member
Joined: 12/12/02
Posts: 21
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#66981 - 27/12/04 01:39 PM
|
|
|
Before shelling out for the Mackie SRMs (especially if you're looking at buying subs as
well) take a look at the HK Elias or Lucas active systems. I've just bought a
HK Elias, ex Demo for just under £1800, and have been VERY pleased with it. Not only is
it all wood (well hdf.. but still..no moulded plastic cabs here!) it's light weight, and
each sub contains an additional amp to connect a passive monitor to if desired. Admittedly, I haven't had long to test the system against the rigours of road life, but
personally, £ for £ and for a 'two tops two subs system' the Elias wins hands down. I'll
let you know if I do have any problems with it. Take a look at the website HK Audio.com and don't let
the pictures fool you, these tiny speakers move some real air! Cheers Neil
|
subsonicworld
Joined: 11/12/04
Posts: 559
Loc: London
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Bugalee]
#67138 - 28/12/04 12:03 AM
|
|
|
|
I've tried out one of the lucas systems, and your right for small speakers they don't half
kick out some volume!!
plus... the sub is on wheels, and because the satellite
speakers are powered off the main unit you only have to find one power socket (which is
always a bonus in pubs)
|
orangefunk
new member
Joined: 18/09/01
Posts: 137
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#67750 - 30/12/04 04:09 AM
|
|
|
|
I just bought a used HK audio LUCAS system that is 600 Watts.. it isn't the current LUCAS
600 but the original LUCAS system froma few years back which had a 15" bass woofer...
We just played it full blast today and it was LOUD!! I'm also a jazzy pianist type
and its more than adequate for our needs... sure beats lugging around JBL and Peavey Hisys
cabs like I used to do... moreover, its really clean sounding... great highs and awesome
lows...
So compact too...
My system is this
HK AUDIO
LUCAS ACTIVE PA system Yamaha MG16-6FX mixer
Make sure you use balanced
cables, as it makes a hell of a difference as I found today, when my sax player brought
around his old crappy cable and the hiss was unbearable...
|
jimdrake
new member
Joined: 29/10/02
Posts: 602
Loc: wherever
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Ste]
#76755 - 20/01/05 11:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote Ste:
I often use RCF/Mackie
Art300's, but they have now been discontinued and the Mackie SRM450's are also
excellent.
RCFs sound great
in an ice-rink....
|
Ste
Joined: 12/12/04
Posts: 199
Loc: Wimbledon
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: jimdrake]
#76803 - 21/01/05 01:48 AM
|
|
|
Quote jimdrake:
RCFs sound great
in an ice-rink....
As long as you've got a 10GW EV rig
limited at about -20dBu to back it up, a mix position behind the drummer and a large
amount of teenagers to 'appreciate' it
-------------------- stevebunting.comtotalproaudio.com
|
Ultimate Fish
posting's fun
Joined: 06/12/02
Posts: 1910
Loc: York, UK
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: orangefunk]
#76904 - 21/01/05 11:18 AM
|
|
|
|
It's worth checking out the HK powered gear, although I've spent a bit of time using an
Elias and grew to dislike slightly. I felt it sounded rather like it looked, lows and
highs but not a great deal inbetween.
Nice portable system though.
-------------------- need to get rid of this stupid sig...
|
Grim Audière
Joined: 02/09/04
Posts: 375
Loc: UK and France
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Ultimate Fish]
#77585 - 22/01/05 08:47 PM
|
|
|
|
May I hi-jack the thread?
I'm thinking of getting a small powered-speaker PA
for small ensemble use - especially classical guitar, lute and possibly vocals (though
warbling women can usually belt it out, so its the guitar/lute that needs help).
I was thinking of the HK Lucas 600 or SRM450s and wondered what other systems should be
on my short list to try. From the review in this month's SoS, I will probably add the
Turbosound Q Light, though to be honest, it's a bit more than I would want to pay!
Any suggestions?
|
Ultimate Fish
posting's fun
Joined: 06/12/02
Posts: 1910
Loc: York, UK
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Grim Audière]
#78037 - 24/01/05 09:28 AM
|
|
|
|
The Q light looks superb, but as you say it ain't cheap. You wouldn't need subs, but it's
still about £3k for a couple of top boxes.
The SRM450 are a good speaker but
are prone to being a little harsh. Since you're not talking about serious SPL or lots of
bass I'd look at something like a pair of HK PR112 boxes.
They're not powered
but sound nice with plenty of the clarity you're after. They're also a little less
conspicuous than the SRM450
I'd go for these plus a desk and amp (maybe a
powered mixer) rather than a Lucas simply because the lucas sub is a bit more bulky and
probably won't do a great deal given the sound sources you're talking about. The PR112
still have a good bass response for lower notes.
The other big advantage is
price, from Thomann you can get a pair of PR112 + mixer amp and stands for the same price
as a pair of the mackies that then need a mixer as well.
-------------------- need to get rid of this stupid sig...
|
musicmaniac
Joined: 01/12/04
Posts: 4
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#111471 - 07/04/05 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
I've recently bought a 12 channel active yamaha desk with active DAS speakers. The sound
quality is great and provides a total of 1000 watts, which is more than enough for bands
in bars and small clubs. It is more convenient for self powered systems if you are
constantly gigging.
|
Larry2
Joined: 14/04/05
Posts: 6
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: orangefunk]
#115226 - 14/04/05 04:25 PM
|
|
|
|
"Yamaha MG16-6FX mixer"
I use this mixer, the only issue I have is the internal
eq noise.
|
Sub1ime14
Joined: 19/04/05
Posts: 1
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#117121 - 19/04/05 03:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind how you intend to route your system. For example, in larger venues where the
mixing board is toward the back and/or side of the room (so as to hear the actual room
mix), you'll use a couple of long XLR cables or something similar to route your left and
right mixed-down signals to the power amp, which is usually next to the stage... this
means only two wires (maybe 3 if you're sending it to a sub in addition to the power amp).
Imagine, however, that you have 4 powered speakers instead... then you'd have to send
speaker cables up there (4 speaker cables if you can't daisy chain from one speaker to the
next). I honestly prefer the tried-and-true mixer, power amp, passive speakers (I do,
however, like powered subs, because I can turn them on and leave them alone). Hope this
helps!
|
Bugalee
member
Joined: 12/12/02
Posts: 21
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: Sub1ime14]
#118104 - 20/04/05 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Quote Sub1ime14:
Keep in mind how
you intend to route your system. For example, in larger venues where the mixing board is
toward the back and/or side of the room (so as to hear the actual room mix), you'll use a
couple of long XLR cables or something similar to route your left and right mixed-down
signals to the power amp, which is usually next to the stage... this means only two wires
(maybe 3 if you're sending it to a sub in addition to the power amp). Imagine, however,
that you have 4 powered speakers instead... then you'd have to send speaker cables up
there (4 speaker cables if you can't daisy chain from one speaker to the next). I
honestly prefer the tried-and-true mixer, power amp, passive speakers (I do, however, like
powered subs, because I can turn them on and leave them alone). Hope this helps!
Not really the case...
If you're using an active system, virtually all work using balanced connectors between
them and the signal. So standard mic cable is perfectly adequate, just as if you were
sending signal to your power amps. So, in fact, you reduce the need for any lengths of
expensive speaker cable.
|
Sheriton
Joined: 27/01/03
Posts: 1554
Loc: Leicester, UK
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#118164 - 21/04/05 07:32 AM
|
|
|
|
I suspect what Sub1ime14 meant to say was that if using a powered mixer, you'd need
to send long speaker cables to the front of the room...
-------------------- There's nothing we can't face... Except for bunnies
|
greg
Joined: 04/05/05
Posts: 6
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#124637 - 04/05/05 07:07 PM
|
|
|
Mackie 450s or 1521's all the way. I use every type of pa every day and the only time the
mackies can sound harsh is either when the contour switch is misused or they are being
driven at mic level with a line level signal. I've had lots of people complain at
me, but they have always been misusing the gear. Street price for 450s is
950-1000 and the 1530s can be got for £1000, woohoo! Powered mixers are ok,
but how much power are you losing to cable resistance? go find out... efficiency rules,
and with active speakers you can recitify cone responce issues with the amplifiers output
to get a more balanced sound.
|
ohyeah!
Joined: 27/09/04
Posts: 140
|
Re: Powered speakers vs Powered Mixer vs ?
[Re: nedjinski]
#124702 - 04/05/05 09:18 PM
|
|
|
Yep, as Greg said, I´d go for the Mackie 1530. We had 4 of them on a
small club tour in february/march. 3-way, cristal clear sound and the best: Thomann in Germany has a special offer: 750 € (yes Euro, not Pound) ... I
hope you will invite me on a beer and a cigar one day
|