hollowsun
Joined: 20/01/05
Posts: 4517
Loc: Cowbridge, South Wales
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: johnny h]
#813501 - 20/02/10 09:48 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
Dont think you
ever did
No - I probably
didn't.
But if you want to believe that some tunesters banging out (in all
fairness, rather good) ditties to order have a deeper understanding of music and 'soul'
than others, so be it.
-------------------- Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8164
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: hollowsun]
#813517 - 20/02/10 11:26 PM
|
|
|
|
I'm constantly dismayed by the suggestion that 'popular' automatically equates to 'good'.
By that standard McDonalds must be the best food on the planet.
And if
longevity is anything to go by then 'three blind mice' must be one heck of a song.
Simplicity sells, but some of us are looking for a little more.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
narcoman
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8469
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: The Elf]
#813526 - 21/02/10 12:12 AM
|
|
|
|
here here
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2553
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: hugol]
#813574 - 21/02/10 01:12 PM
|
|
|
|
I more or less agree, but at the same time simple tunes have their place.
If
I'm a bit stressed and want to chill out, a nice easy-listening tune is exactly what I
want.
I read some time ago (sorry can't remember where) that when you listen to
music your brain tries to guess what the next note will be, and every time it gets it
right, gives itself a mental pat on the back. Whereas when it's wrong a sort of alert
warning is given and you end up paying more attention.
This would seem to fall
in line with my experience that when I specifically want to listen to music, the
simple stuff doesn't cut it.
The exception (for me) is music that is obviously
composed purely to show of how clever the performer is - that irritates me and i'll get
away from it as fast as I can.
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: hollowsun]
#813585 - 21/02/10 02:37 PM
|
|
|
Quote hollowsun:
Quote johnny h:
Dont think you
ever did
No - I probably
didn't.
But if you want to believe that some tunesters banging out (in all
fairness, rather good) ditties to order have a deeper understanding of music and 'soul'
than others, so be it.
I'm not sure how you can
conclude this to be honest.
|
hollowsun
Joined: 20/01/05
Posts: 4517
Loc: Cowbridge, South Wales
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: Folderol]
#813599 - 21/02/10 03:42 PM
|
|
|
Quote Folderol:
I more or less
agree, but at the same time simple tunes have their place.
Of course they do.
But the assertion
made earlier that Motown's writers had a deeper understanding of music than others was
absurd.
-------------------- Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog
Edited by hollowsun (21/02/10 03:42 PM)
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2270
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: hollowsun]
#813607 - 21/02/10 04:00 PM
|
|
|
Quote hollowsun:
Quote Folderol:
I more or less
agree, but at the same time simple tunes have their place.
Of course they do.
But the assertion
made earlier that Motown's writers had a deeper understanding of music than others was
absurd.
Oh no it wasn't...
|
hollowsun
Joined: 20/01/05
Posts: 4517
Loc: Cowbridge, South Wales
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: johnny h]
#813625 - 21/02/10 04:44 PM
|
|
|
I thought the panto season was over now!
-------------------- Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog
|
Wizard Moon Chopper
Joined: 28/10/05
Posts: 620
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: hugol]
#813626 - 21/02/10 04:44 PM
|
|
|
|
What's so great abou having a deep understanding of music, anyway? Surely to have a deep
understanding means to have a deep knowledge of what has gone before, and that just means
you are efficient at making things that are like stuff that's been done before. Ok if you
do that for a living, perhaps an orchestrator or arranger, but not much good if you aspire
to make new fresh and exciting contemporary music. All that education will just be a
hinderance.
As Roger Waters said "if you can play it's hard not to copy things,
but we couldn't play, we couldn't copy things."
If by 'understanding' you mean
being in touch with your wizard spirit muso soul, then ok, i'd go along with that.
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7903
|
|
Quote The Southern Baptist:
Surely to have a deep understanding means to have a deep knowledge of what has gone
before, and that just means you are efficient at making things that are like stuff that's
been done before.
I don't
think that necessarily follows. For instance, if I have a greater knowledge of the guitar
and how to make it sing, where the notes are and how to do various techniques, it helps me
construct music that goes to different places compared to if I only had a basic knowledge
(a few chords for instance).
Sometimes that knowledge helps you break away
from things that have gone before (in as much as it's possible to do these days.)
Sure, knowledge doesn't guarantee *good* music - there are plenty of widdly
widdly guitarists who have amazing technique but not much originality, soul or
inspiration. And I'm sure that sometimes it *can* get in the way - lots of good music is
made by people who have seemingly less skills or technique.
Limitations can
be good, and they can be bad. Really, it's not down to any one thing - the quality of the
music is purely down to the creator, and the listener, and are the result of many many
variables on a given day.
|
Wizard Moon Chopper
Joined: 28/10/05
Posts: 620
|
Re: Audio myths
[Re: desmond]
#813643 - 21/02/10 05:33 PM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
Limitations can be
good, and they can be bad. Really, it's not down to any one thing - the quality of the
music is purely down to the creator, and the listener, and are the result of many many
variables on a given day.
That quote should be framed and hung over the entrance to the forum.
|