Mart584
Joined: 03/05/10
Posts: 39
|
Pricey Hammond.
#853208 - 12/08/10 02:29 PM
|
|
|
Dont know if this is the right place to post,but any way. i have been looking for an
Hammond organ, you pick them up dirt cheap if you are willing to pick up. but this one is
way too pricey, and i dont think i have heard of Jon Thomas!. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/HAMMOND-ORGAN-MODEL-X-66-COLLECTORS-MODEL-JON-THOMAS
-/220651095216?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8161
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Mart584]
#853234 - 12/08/10 04:08 PM
|
|
|
I don't care what part of their anatomy anyone used to play this thing, it's still way
overpriced.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18390
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Mart584]
#853242 - 12/08/10 04:41 PM
|
|
|
Quote Mart584:
i have been
looking for an Hammond organ, you pick them up dirt cheap if you are willing to pick
up.
Usually only if the
seller doesn't realise what they have, or if it's an electronic instrument rather than an
electro-mechanical one with tonewheels.
Quote:
this one is way too pricey, and i dont think i
have heard of Jon Thomas!.
It's that pricey because the seller is trying to cash in on the unique history of this
particular instrument (which did cost $10,000 when new in the late 60s-early 70s, which
was alot of money!). He's also offering worldwide shipping for free, which accounts for a
fair chunk of the price. I've seen these things go for between $3500 and $5000 before now,
but without any pedigree or history and shipping extra. So it's priced high, but not as
mad as all that...
Your lack of awareness of Jon Thomas and his music is
your loss!
The X66 was built as the flagship portable console Hammond, first
shown as a prototype in 1964, and launched in 1967. It was made for the following seven
years or so. It was supposed to replace the B3 but it was too expensive and never sold in
big numbers.
It was actually a very unusual hybrid design, part tonewheel and
part electronic. It used just 12 tonewheels to generate the top octave frquencies, and
then used electronic dividers to create the rest of the notes.
Even more
unusually, the tonewheels were buried down in the base of the organ alongside the foot
pedals, and the (self-start) motor runs twice as fast as the generator motor on more
common tonewheel Hammonds!
It also had a revolutionary (excuse the pun)
vibrato system that extended the conventional electro-mechanical scanners of older
tonewheel organs, but with split frequency operation (ie, independent bass and treble
scanners) to give an effect similar to a Leslie speaker.
Because of these
two technologies, the X66 doesn't sound quite like any other Hammond... which is either
good or bad, depending on your point of view!
This particular instrument is a standard American 120V and 60Hz model. Although the
operating voltage is easy to deal with for European location using a step-down
transformer, the 60Hz is an issue because the tone wheels are driven by a synchronous
motor. If it's not running on 60Hz mains, it won't play in tune -- and although there are
ways of dealing with that problem they all add to the overall cost...
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
Edited by Hugh Robjohns (12/08/10 05:39 PM)
|
StuartBallingall
Joined: 20/10/06
Posts: 320
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Mart584]
#853246 - 12/08/10 05:17 PM
|
|
|
|
"BUY IT NOW PRICE INCLUDES FREE SHIPPING WORLD WIDE"
damn.....for that money,
i'd want it shipped to my moon base!
-------------------- Ready Eddie?
Bingo Gringo!
|
Mart584
Joined: 03/05/10
Posts: 39
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#853270 - 12/08/10 06:28 PM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote Mart584:
i have been
looking for an Hammond organ, you pick them up dirt cheap if you are willing to pick
up.
Usually only if the
seller doesn't realise what they have, or if it's an electronic instrument rather than an
electro-mechanical one with tonewheels.
Quote:
this one is way too pricey, and i dont think i have heard of Jon
Thomas!.
It's that pricey
because the seller is trying to cash in on the unique history of this particular
instrument (which did cost $10,000 when new in the late 60s-early 70s, which was alot of
money!). He's also offering worldwide shipping for free, which accounts for a fair chunk
of the price. I've seen these things go for between $3500 and $5000 before now, but
without any pedigree or history and shipping extra. So it's priced high, but not as mad as
all that...
Your lack of awareness of Jon Thomas and his music is your loss!

The X66 was built as the flagship portable console Hammond, first shown as a
prototype in 1964, and launched in 1967. It was made for the following seven years or so.
It was supposed to replace the B3 but it was too expensive and never sold in big
numbers.
It was actually a very unusual hybrid design, part tonewheel and part
electronic. It used just 12 tonewheels to generate the top octave frquencies, and then
used electronic dividers to create the rest of the notes.
Even more unusually,
the tonewheels were buried down in the base of the organ alongside the foot pedals, and
the (self-start) motor runs twice as fast as the generator motor on more common tonewheel
Hammonds!
It also had a revolutionary (excuse the pun) vibrato system that
extended the conventional electro-mechanical scanners of older tonewheel organs, but with
split frequency operation (ie, independent bass and treble scanners) to give an effect
similar to a Leslie speaker.
Because of these two technologies, the X66
doesn't sound quite like any other Hammond... which is either good or bad, depending on
your point of view! 
This particular instrument is a standard American 120V and 60Hz model. Although the
operating voltage is easy to deal with for European location using a step-down
transformer, the 60Hz is an issue because the tone wheels are driven by a synchronous
motor. If it's not running on 60Hz mains, it won't play in tune -- and although there are
ways of dealing with that problem they all add to the overall cost...
hugh
Hi, thanks for that. i
did go on to YouTube and give the track a listen, As much as i love the Hammond sound it's
not my cup of tea. It is the electric ones you can pick relatively cheaply.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18390
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Mart584]
#853300 - 12/08/10 10:22 PM
|
|
|
Quote Mart584:
It is the electric
ones you can pick relatively cheaply.
They're
all 'electric'
All the early stuff used tonewheel generators and valve
preamps/amps, culminating in the classic B3, C2, A100 console models and the L100 and M3
spinet models.
More or less everything after that moved to solid state amps and
although there were a few transitional models with tonewheels, they quickly moved over to
all electronic tone generation too. Although a few of these transitional models remain
popular -- the T500 series for example, or the X66 -- most aren't favoured at all and so
command very low prices.
The earlier organs predating the B3 era often go for
little money because people don't appreciate how very similar their internals are to the
B3, and they can usually be updated without too much trouble. Some even had two complete
generators sets to provide a stunningly rich chorus sound! Bloomin heavy though! 
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Mart584
Joined: 03/05/10
Posts: 39
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#853383 - 13/08/10 11:17 AM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote Mart584:
It is the
electric ones you can pick relatively cheaply.
They're
all 'electric'
All the early stuff used tonewheel generators and valve
preamps/amps, culminating in the classic B3, C2, A100 console models and the L100 and M3
spinet models.
More or less everything after that moved to solid state amps and
although there were a few transitional models with tonewheels, they quickly moved over to
all electronic tone generation too. Although a few of these transitional models remain
popular -- the T500 series for example, or the X66 -- most aren't favoured at all and so
command very low prices.
The earlier organs predating the B3 era often go for
little money because people don't appreciate how very similar their internals are to the
B3, and they can usually be updated without too much trouble. Some even had two complete
generators sets to provide a stunningly rich chorus sound! Bloomin heavy though! 
Hugh
Woops!,That came out
all wrong. you are right of course. i used to use a L100 in a band and it was indeed
heavy!i have seen a few on ebay that have not sold perhaps people reckon you can get a
similar sound from a keyboard a hell of a lot smaller.
|
nathanscribe
Joined: 19/01/07
Posts: 716
Loc: Yorkshire, by gum.
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: Mart584]
#853595 - 14/08/10 07:35 PM
|
|
|
... whereas now the new one is something like £18000 and uses "digital tonewheels"...
they don't half look the business though. I saw one the other week and it was quite a bit
of kit. I wonder if they're filled with concrete or something to make those PCBs feel
more 'vintage'.
|
Griggsy
member
Joined: 07/01/03
Posts: 167
Loc: London
|
Re: Pricey Hammond.
[Re: nathanscribe]
#853632 - 15/08/10 08:18 AM
|
|
|
Quote nathanscribe:
... whereas
now the new one is something like £18000 and uses "digital tonewheels"... they don't half
look the business though. I saw one the other week and it was quite a bit of kit. I
wonder if they're filled with concrete or something to make those PCBs feel more
'vintage'.
Actually, as per
the original consoles, I would expect most of the weight is in the manuals (which explains
why making a 'chop' doesn't really reduce the weight that much; makes it smaller though).
Re the organ listed, I wouldn't part with any money for this. To be honest,
the seller should be looking for someone to take it away for nowt - not a desirable model
and not in good condition to boot. My A100 and 147 cost me a fraction of this a few years
ago. Basically, the seller either 1) knows nothing about the value of Hammond organs by
model or 2) is taking the p155, but most likely both of the above.
As for
previous ownership, unless it was someone genuinely famous, I think this info makes it
LESS desirable to own. If some old rocker used it, it is much more likely to have had a
harder life, possibly gigged too. I'd much rather have one that was owned by a little old
lady, kept in the living room and used to play the odd hymn once a week!
|