RCapes
member
Joined: 22/06/04
Posts: 114
Loc: West Sussex
|
Why have separate, special clocks
#912200 - 03/05/11 04:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Dear Forum,
When all soundcards have clocks in them, what is the purpose of
these very expensive, separate clocks?
Thanks for any answers
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7903
|
Re: Why have separate, special clocks
[Re: RCapes]
#912203 - 03/05/11 05:05 PM
|
|
|
|
If you have three watches that are all good but all tell different times, which you you
use to get the accurate time from?
The purpose of having one good clock is to
a) have a *good* clock, and b) so you can clock *everything* else from it, locking it all
to the one good clock.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18401
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Why have separate, special clocks
[Re: RCapes]
#912207 - 03/05/11 05:28 PM
|
|
|
Quote RCapes:
When all soundcards
have clocks in them, what is the purpose of these very expensive, separate clocks?
The clocks in sound cards can't
always be synchronised to some types of external reference, such as video sync, which is
often necessary in audio-visual applications for example.
Also, it is sometimes
more practical to use a master clock to drive everything from a central point, rather than
chain the clock from a soundcard around a complex system.
For most small
digital systems the clock in the soundcard is entirely adequate and can be distributed to
the few units that need it without much problem.
And from a techniacl point of
view, it is always better to run the main A-D from its internal clock. With only one or
two exceptions, running an A-D from an external clock degrades its technical performance,
sometimes quite significantly.
Hugh
--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
. . . Delete This
Here be Dragons
Joined: 23/06/08
Posts: 3888
|
Re: Why have separate, special clocks
[Re: desmond]
#912208 - 03/05/11 05:29 PM
|
|
|
|
separate clocks are only really useful in complex digital systems where multiple devices
need to be synchronised together... for example, if you have a protools rig, and logic
rig, and a hardware recorder, and some digital FX, and a couple of digital 2 track
recorders (like we do) then you need to get everything sync'ed together from one master
clock, and doing so in parallel form a clock with multiple dedicated outputs is far more
reliably stable than daisy chaining them all .
especially if some of the
clocks use different formats, like Protools does, a master clock capable of generating
all the different formats is essential.
|
RCapes
member
Joined: 22/06/04
Posts: 114
Loc: West Sussex
|
Re: Why have separate, special clocks
[Re: RCapes]
#912392 - 04/05/11 04:18 PM
|
|
|
|
Many thanks to those who answered. I now understand!
cheers
|
Mixedup
active member
Joined: 03/09/03
Posts: 4254
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Why have separate, special clocks
[Re: RCapes]
#912611 - 05/05/11 08:33 PM
|
|
|
Hugh seems too modest to mention his authoritative article on this issue... so I'll post the link here for
him 
|
Previous
Topics
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
