Main Forums >> Production - Mixing, Mastering, Gear & Techniques
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Matt Houghton
SOS Reviews Editor


Joined: 08/08/07
Posts: 591
New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews...
      #922248 - 24/06/11 09:55 AM
Just to let you know that Mike Senior has posted the latest Mix Review analyses of commercial hit tracks in the Mix Review forum.

This month's tracks are by Ke$ha, Tinei Tempah, Alexis Jordan and Chris Brown. Mike's kindly added a bit more background there than you'll find in this month's magazine — so why not head over and have a read... and maybe offer some comments of your own?

--------------------
SOS Reviews Editor


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Evie McCreevie



Joined: 06/09/04
Posts: 1028
Loc: Dublin
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922275 - 24/06/11 11:32 AM
I think the Mix Review series is a very good idea.

I'd like to suggest the names of all concerned should be listed with the tracks i.e. mix engineer, recording engineer, producer, studio etc.

Even (especially) on the tracks which get bad reviews.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Jennifer Jones
Web Editor, Support & Social Media


Joined: 06/11/07
Posts: 1101
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Evie McCreevie]
      #922287 - 24/06/11 11:48 AM
This information is not printed in the mag but Mike does post it in the Mix Review forum threads

--------------------
SOS Web Editor, Support & Social Media
Friend SOS on Facebook | Follow SOS on Twitter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mixedup
active member


Joined: 03/09/03
Posts: 4799
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Evie McCreevie]
      #922303 - 24/06/11 01:13 PM
Quote Evie McCreevie:

I'd like to suggest the names of all concerned should be listed with the tracks i.e. mix engineer, recording engineer, producer, studio etc.




Fair point, though I'm less sure if that's a good idea... for one, it takes up space that I'd rather see filled with the reviews themselves; for another, I think this is less about naming and shaming and more about critical listening and analysis. In other words, I'm less worried about who did the recording/mixing/mastering than I am about what I can learn from it.

As Jen says, Mike has been expanding on the reivew with these sort of details, including which version of the track he used for reference over at the Mix Review forum.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
narcoman
active member


Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8514
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922336 - 24/06/11 04:07 PM
I'd like to see you reviewing some other stuff other than middle of the road! How about one chart track and one "out there" track - after all.... the money ISN'T in chart music.....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
JamesSimpson



Joined: 24/12/05
Posts: 1075
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922402 - 24/06/11 10:12 PM
Want to put your neck on the line narco?

I'd be interested in this too, plenty of fantastic mixing and not so much, in more leftfield area's.

--------------------
Squarehead Jam Jar Facebook Jam Jar

Edited by JamesSimpson (24/06/11 10:12 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
narcoman
active member


Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8514
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922417 - 25/06/11 12:12 AM
well - yup. So far, more than half of the mixes that have been reviewed are pretty bloody poor.

Quality and success are not hand in glove. Kesha, for example - distorted toss. Pretty good song, but it isn't a good mix.

So come on - let's see some meaningful reviews.... criticise issues... clarity is not brightness, for example. The BEST mix work out there is NOT in the charts - lowest common denominator drives many respected names to shoot for punch and volume over sonic excellence... I know - I've had to go there (fek it - you pay the money, I'll go where you like) but that's no reason to praise it. This is a pretty good mag, so let's get to the roots of it....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
RitchieM



Joined: 18/06/10
Posts: 246
Loc: Skelmersdale, Lancashire
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922424 - 25/06/11 01:03 AM
As I have posted before, the Matt Cardle review by Mike inspired a blog post by me(not that I have had time for THAT recently), and I love that series in the mag, but I think doing older or less mainstream songs would be such a good idea!

I was driving back from a rehearsal last night (or is it the night before last, it is 1:48am???!!?!?!? Anyway, I digress!!!) and me and the other guitarist were listening to stuff on my cars hard-drive, flirting between Queen, STP etc... and went onto REM, Automatic, and its the first time in ages I have listened to it NOT on ear buds, and then Frequency, Strange Currencies and Tongue from Monster. We talked production and it was the same for him, having only heard it on the shady iPod buds that come with it for such a long time. Driving back from his place, I just forgot how much space and quality there is on albums like that (irrespective of if you appreciate Georgia's finest (worksong)! Ha, a pun in parenthesis!!!!) and how much detail that you can hear.

I would love Mike to dissect something like that, a track where the quality of the production shines through. I know there is Classic Tracks and Secret of the Mix Engineer, by that is more of a anecdotal piece.

I remember being in my friends studio, a proper commercial jobby, not like mine in my garage, and he got the multi-track masters for Queen, Bob Marley etc... that had been floating around and he said that by studying those, in about a week he had learned more about production than he had in the 15 years previously.

Ritchie

--------------------
Engineering Surveyor and Musician Pretty Vegas Northwest Function and Wedding Band
Wedding Band Blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
BigElectricCat



Joined: 14/02/07
Posts: 289
Loc: South Korea
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: RitchieM]
      #922428 - 25/06/11 05:40 AM
Quote RitchieM:

As I have posted before, the Matt Cardle review by Mike inspired a blog post by me(not that I have had time for THAT recently), and I love that series in the mag, but I think doing older or less mainstream songs would be such a good idea!





I'd love to see a bit of rock n roll in there. How about the Slash album from last year? To my ears it has great production.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist


Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1393
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922756 - 27/06/11 07:01 AM
Quote narcoman:

I'd like to see you reviewing some other stuff other than middle of the road! How about one chart track and one "out there" track




I can see where you're coming from here, and I like the idea in principle. The column is in its early days at the moment, and is proving a tricky balancing act already. The initial reason for going with this article concept was to increase the magazine's coverage of current high-profile productions which (for better or worse!) many SOS readers are trying to emulate, and in that context it makes sense to focus on the productions which appear (from the charts at least) to be successful commercially, and will therefore have the broadest appeal. However, I am also conscious that we need to maintain a bit of a balance of styles within this context too, so I have specifically favoured things like Adele, Ellie Goulding, and (forthcoming) Noah And The Whale to try to shift the bias a little away from the current electronica saturation of the charts. There's also the issue that some tracks seem to have clearer lessons to teach than others, and therefore tend to suit the format better than others, irrespective of their quality or commercial success.

All that said, though, I imagine that the column will continue to evolve, and I don't have anything in principle against including more in the way of 'worthy but obscure' tracks as long as there's still adequate coverage of the mainstream -- love it or hate it! One angle I'm currently toying with is grazing more amongst the album charts, simply because more high-quality work tends to achieve success in that forum than in the singles arena.

The main thing to say, though, is that we're certainly taking these comments seriously, although (publishing lead times being what they are) it may take a few months for the fruits of any discussions to begin filtering through to the mag itself.

Quote RitchieM:

I love that series in the mag, but I think doing older or less mainstream songs would be such a good idea!




Reviewing classic tracks from a Mix Review perspective is something that has certainly been on my own mind, and it could be a great learning resource, but I think that it might be better to do that kind of thing in a separate article from time to time, rather than within the regular column. There'd be more scope for meaningful comparison that way, I think.

Quote Mixedup:

I think this is less about naming and shaming and more about critical listening and analysis.




Oh. Oops. Maybe I should've been nicer...

--------------------
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio
A complete mixing method based around the techniques of the world's most famous producers.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
narcoman
active member


Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8514
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922867 - 27/06/11 05:10 PM
Sure - but I suspect the problem there is most people AREN'T involved in commercial styles. Even those that are are thinking waaay outside of the Katy Perry's and Ke$ha's of this world. The fastest selling aren't the biggest selling and most muso's know that - whether they're in hip hop, RnB, rock or jazz....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
turbodave



Joined: 25/04/08
Posts: 2356
Loc: derbyshire uk
Re: New 'Mix Review' Commercial Production Reviews... new [Re: Matt Houghton]
      #922871 - 27/06/11 05:48 PM
I think one of the issues relating to this particular area of the mag is whether to express technical changes or creative changes ( or both?). Some of the tunes I would completely redo as they don't float my boat , but is that relevant?...or does the forum section want" this up, that down, this re eq'd "etc.? Dave

--------------------
My head hurts!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
2 registered and 13 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, SOS News Editor 
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating: *****
Thread views: 3756

September 2014
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for September 2014
DAW Tips from SOS

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media