hi Guys,

I am a parent looking for advice....Not sure if this is the right place to post this, if it is not please tell me.

My 17 yr old son studying Music Technology A level is looking to pursue a career in Live sound or sound engineering (his words not mine....I work in a different industry so have no clue about this stuff). He is looking at his next steps after sixth form.

His choices are:
>>Uni to study audio music technology for 3yrs....(Bournemouth and UWE are candidates)
>>ACM or SAE to study a 2yr degree in Audio technology

My questions are;
>> What are the employment prospects in this industry (I think I know this already)
>> What is the best way to get into the industry...is it via the route above or is there another way?
>> What are the views of the guys here on ACM and SAE and their 2yr degree courses. Do potential employers respect their degrees?

I look forward to your comments and any advice you could offer....

Many thanks

Hey Madame,

By getting an audio diploma in general he can go into music production, sound design (he creates his own sounds by recording them on digital recorders), post-production( after a movie or series is shot, he'll clean the noise of the vocals and sound effects.), Boom operator (the person who is in charge of taking the sound in studio set. Honestly the best way he can make it in the industry is if he's got projects where he worked music or the sound effects for, let's say a movie or series, he can post them on respected websites. one is www.soundcloud.com . About ACM, I never heard of it honestly, but I guarantee that SAE would be the last place where you son would want to be taught because it's not accredited by the government, so basically he will be doing formations, and not getting a recognized certificate. I highly recommend he does some research and so do you, because you'll at least know what your son is doing and if he's under good hands and not teaching him how to really be a sound engineer or music producer.

--------------------
GG

Edited by Georges Gholam (29/10/11 11:03 PM)

Hey!

Quote A helping hand:

---

What are the employment prospects in this industry (I think I know this already)

---

You know this already!

Quote:

---

What is the best way to get into the industry...is it via the route above or is there another way?

---

Very difficult to get a break and if you do, you've got to be exceptional so that you get hired again. Best he find a niche because there are many many services in this industry - not just sound reinforcement.

Quote:

---

What are the views of the guys here on ACM and SAE and their 2yr degree courses.

---

As has been said by Georges (Hi Georges!), not accredited institutes. For serious qualifications, look at Tonmeister but your kid will need music and physics proficiency to get accepted.

Quote:

---

Do potential employers respect their degrees?

---

Respect is a strong word but not in my experience, no.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

I posted a thread on here a while ago from your sons position (almost).

It was more along the lines of "I want to go to uni to do music, what should I know to help me progress further".

The general answer/advice I got was "don't go to uni to do music for the sake of a job; you will find better uses with Physics/Maths/electronics" (I am trying to find the thread now).

At first I was quite shocked to be discouraged to go and do music. However; since then I have taken time to study the underlying physics of sound and acoustics on my own. I've read several books, learning some maths and electronics. I don't know loads yet, but I can already see why I was advised that. I now understand how having a good concept of trigonometry in waves (for example) and be a good musician could do more for you than being taught how to be a producer.

Other options such as math or physics are most likely going to open more doors out-side of music should things not work out.
That said. I've not been; so I can't say what is and isn't covered on the course! Nor am I in a position to talk with much experience outside of a free worker in a studio; so obviously I can't really say whether it's correct or not. This is all just the perception that's lead to my currant choice.

Here's the thread
http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=MRT&Numb er=867985&Searchpage=1&Main=867985&Words=+Modified&topic=&Search=true# Post867985


Just my inexperienced 2p

Best of luck to your son.

Edited by Modified (30/10/11 01:47 AM)

Study electrical engineering and electronics and music. Then go work for a big, high end PA hire company. Network and gain experiences and access to career paths within the industry this way. Forget music technology courses. They are a waste of your child's potential to work!

If your son is serious about heading in that direction he will need two things, contacts who need to employ someone and a skill set that they want.

I would suggest a degree in something like Electrical Engineering and once he's got a serious qualification under his belt to then start working as local crew, ideally in London. You start at the bottom pushing flight cases around, packing and unpacking trucks, and over a few months you work your way up the list and start to get the chance to network with the sound guys as you work with them. Resist the temptation to go too far too fast and soon he'll see the same sound guys coming through town on different shows. If he's reliable they'll recognise him and make sure he's on their team for the show.

A full UK driver's licence helps, and he should have a full passport too. Because if a chance arises it will usually be at short notice, someone has dropped out at the last minute or kicked off a tour because they can't hack it.

And while at university he should volunteer everywhere possible to help with sound. Drama, student radio, hospital radio, student union, local venues... Anywhere he can get some experience while earning his degree.

That will give him a degree that gives a way into the business but still qualifies him for a well paid job elsewhere if it doesn't work out.

Andy

--------------------
When the going gets weird, the Weird turn Pro.

+1 to getting a broad electrical engineering education.

I subscribed to "JustEngineers.net" filtered for electronics and I get 2-4 jobs sent in EVERY DAY!(I am retired now but like to keep up.) This country and the world it seems is crying out for skilled engineers and technicians* and the salaries are good, 30/50kpa (except one for a technician for the NHS which was a deeply insulting £15k...We are all going to die!).

So, as has been said, music jobs are hens' teeth but he needs to eat while waiting for that big break.

*Sore point:Technical people TEND to come from the lower income demograph and so, with fees and debt as it is, this will get worse and worse. If a country wants a highly skilled workforce it should be prepared to PAY for it!

Dave.

Quote zenguitar:

---

If your son is serious about heading in that direction he will need two things, contacts who need to employ someone and a skill set that they want.

---

And absolutely dogged determination...

And be prepared to schlep up and down the highways and byways of our sceptred isle at all times of the day and night, sleep in the van, on the band's front room floor, have no money, be permanently overdrawn and always apologising to his bank manager. And that's when he's successful!

--------------------
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Quote ef37a:

---

*Sore point:Technical people TEND to come from the lower income demograph and so, with fees and debt as it is, this will get worse and worse.

---

Well ... there's never been a better time to study Music Technology at (ahem) 'university'...

They'll end up flipping burgers asking if the customer wants fries with that and earning a far cry from the £21k threshold so they'll never have to pay anything back!

Quote ef37a:

---

If a country wants a highly skilled workforce it should be prepared to PAY for it!

---

Conversely, if a person wants a well paid job, THEY should be prepared to invest in that.

Just saying!

--------------------
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Quote hollowsun:

---

Quote ef37a:

---

*Sore point:Technical people TEND to come from the lower income demograph and so, with fees and debt as it is, this will get worse and worse.

---

Well ... there's never been a better time to study Music Technology at (ahem) 'university'...

They'll end up flipping burgers asking if the customer wants fries with that and earning a far cry from the £21k threshold so they'll never have to pay anything back!

Quote ef37a:

---

If a country wants a highly skilled workforce it should be prepared to PAY for it!

---

Conversely, if a person wants a well paid job, THEY should be prepared to invest in that.

Just saying!

---

"They" might not have to pay anything back but that does not stop the disbelieving bastards hounding the freaking hell out of people for the rest of their lives.

Dave.

Guys,

Thanks for your replies, I think I already understood the state of the industry and how hard it was to break into, so thanks for confirming my fears.

I'm really interested in the comments about electrical and electronic engineering, because that is my background. This gave me a good grounding in all things electrical and electronic which has stood me in good stead over the past 30 years.

Thanks again for all the comments. I will go off and read the links posted for more info.

I look forward to reading any additional comments, especially on the relative merits of ACM,SAE vs the polyversities.


Sounds like I may have some difficult conversations ahead.....


Mark

I'd also echo the advice to do an engineering degree while getting as much experience as possible through volunteering. Of course, if he is serious about this he will probably already be doing live sound or recording for local events and making a name for himself. University isn't necessarily the only route either as HNC/HND qualifications will also stand you in good stead and may possibly show you as more practically biased.

James.

--------------------
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net

Quote A helping hand:

---

Guys,

Thanks for your replies, I think I already understood the state of the industry and how hard it was to break into, so thanks for confirming my fears.

I'm really interested in the comments about electrical and electronic engineering, because that is my background. This gave me a good grounding in all things electrical and electronic which has stood me in good stead over the past 30 years.

Thanks again for all the comments. I will go off and read the links posted for more info.

I look forward to reading any additional comments, especially on the relative merits of ACM,SAE vs the polyversities.


Sounds like I may have some difficult conversations ahead.....


Mark

---

Tell him to check into the backgrounds of most people IN the biz. You'll find the most, if they do a degree, do something outside of music tech. If he still wants to do this at 22 then eh will STILL be very very young and can switch over then.

Also - while at University he can work live sound etc in his spare time.

The basic clue - for a career NEVER do a UK based music tech degree unless it's very science oriented - LIPA or Tonmeister for example. Stay well away from the wallet rinsers such as SAE or Point Blank. I'm an employer (and a major one these days) - I wouldn't even look at a recent CV from one of those places. If you're concerned put him directly in touch with me. If you're lucky enough to get a response from Byre on here listen to it very carefully!!

cheers

Quote narcoman:

---

If you're lucky enough to get a response from Byre on here listen to it very carefully!!

---

That'll be the sound of my cage getting rattled again!

I have been talking to several figures within the industry with successful careers in the music industry in the UK and beyond and they universally expressed their dissatisfaction with the state of tertiary education for careers in audio and music recording and production in the UK. I pointed out at a meeting, held by a universities lobby group that we get a large number of applications from students and graduates, seeking employment or work experience / internships etc., who, on interview, show themselves to be unable to perform even the simplest of everyday tasks required in a music-technology environment, such as soldering cable, reading edit notes from a score, solving simple acoustic problems, or fault finding and simple equipment repairs.

Nearly all employers except the BBC and some of the other major broadcasters (non of whom employ music tech graduates!) are small companies with just a few employees. The larger audio-video multimedia companies can employ one hundred or more staff, but few, if any, audio engineers. There are about 40 commercial recording studios in the UK (although the Yellow Pages lists thousands, but these are largely hobby businesses). There is a similar number (40-50) of post production for TV and film and the same again for live sound.

The result of this landscape of what is, in reality, a cottage industry, is that very few graduates of music technology courses find employment. Many drift sideways and into such fields as hi-fi sales, working as roadies for PA companies, fitting home stereos and media rooms and similar semi-skilled work. It has been my experience, that most just give up and move to something completely different.

Despite this lack of opportunity, UK universities produce some 2,000 music technology graduates (or similar qualifications) all fighting for just a handful of job vacancies. Add to that, the large number of private colleges and schools that continue to promise a glittering career, recording or live-mixing famous rock bands and you have an entire industry dedicated to exploiting the dreams of young people, without much chance of a real career.

There have been many attempts by the music industry to alter this situation, but educators and public bodies have proven remarkably resilient to change. At the same time, the industry employs graduates of the excellent Surrey Tonmeister course, but this is just some 25 graduates every year. Unlike most other courses, the Surrey Tonmeister works closely with the entertainment industry and graduates are snapped up by leading recording studios, film studios, music producers and manufacturers of audio equipment around the World.

In my day, when I started out some 40+ years ago, you could get into the business with a musical education, combined with electronics or electrical engineering. Today, if you go to any of the more notable employers, you find that all the younger ones are Surrey Tonmeister graduates.

So far, so good. The problem is, what do you do now!

Well, firstly, if your son is prepared to do electrical or electronic engineering, then he will have a useful qualification that will stand him in good stead in any career he chooses.

Secondly, chances are, he will change his mind as he matures. I've done live sound and it ain't no picnic! No drinking, no free time on the weekends, no fat pay cheque, no groupies and no hob-nobbing with the acts - and I was the boss! Whilst the band is off to bed and the audience is long gone, you are working.

And in live sound, the very last thing we would have wanted in our wildest dreams would be some idiot with a degree in music technology. Fitters, mechanics, riggers, electricians, HGV drivers and even welders, but no university graduates! Nowadays they also want people with IT skills for the lighting and DMX programming that today goes beyond lighting.

So, to put things bluntly, if he became a mechanic or an electrician, he would stand a better chance of getting a gig with a live sound company than some Mickey Mouse degree.

As to your question on SAE etc., these courses provide what the Germans call an 'Armutszeugnis' (a certificate of poverty). In other words, someone who has attended a private school of this sort is only displaying the fact the he or she could not get a proper education from a real university and in a proper subject! It is something to be ashamed of and to keep quiet about!

There are so many exciting careers out there, especially in retail and in business in general, but kids always think that this kind of thing is boring and that sitting in a stuffy control room with some fourth-rate musicians is groovy and windswept. They think that coiling cables at three in the morning that have been trodden on, vomited on and peed upon (and at minimum wage!) is somehow noble and romantic.

The problem (for you!) is that your son will not always want to do the music and live music thing, but he will (if he goes ahead with studying music technology) be lumbered with a qualification that closes doors in his face. For example, Aldi pays £40,000 plus car to its graduates in training. After that, they get real money. But they want people who have studied hard subjects, people who have been swimming up-stream. Chemistry, biology, maths, physics, economics, geophysics, etc., combined with a language or two and a fabulous career taking the young person all over the World, from China to the US, from Africa to Asia and all over Europe and with a really good pay is his for the asking.

These idiotic vocational degrees are seldom a good bet!

To your other question - "What is the best way to get into the industry...is it via the route above or is there another way?"

The music industry employs thousands and thousands of people around the World, just very, very few recording and live sound engineers. Tell him to try law, banking, accountancy, business studies or economics combined with an MBA, dear God, it employs more drivers or manufacturing chemists, than music techs!

i'd add more dire sounding input, but frankly the responses from Narco and T.R.B are bang on the nail, and i wouldn't want to further depress you about the reality still further.




the vast majority of people even remotely making a living at this game are self employed, hard working, talented problem solving go-getters , with other skill sets besides.... like electronics engineering and physics, as well as musical competence , usually on more than one instrument... and some theory, sight reading ability, and golden ears.

and even then, the living is often borderline poverty.... it takes all the above, and unbelievable amount of good luck, to really make any money.....

you would do as well to invest £150-£200 a week or more in playing the lottery..... using some kind of statistical spread.... for all the chance you'd have of making a profit on the university fees....

I work (sometimes) as a live sound engineer. However I also work as a lighting engineer, HGV driver, LED screen rigger and general dogsbody.

I also attempt to be a historian. It pays to have a number of strings on your bow.

--------------------
Gear List: reverse only.

Quote A helping hand:

---

Sounds like I may have some difficult conversations ahead.....

---

The tricky thing is working out if it is his true calling or not.
If it is, then there are great careers to be had with tonnes of hard work, dedication, commitment, cultured talent etc ..

It's not as simple as, it's all hopeless, the industry's f**ked etc etc ..
- Actually there are great opportunities, for clever, committed, VERY hard working people ..

But you really do have to be the best. the best of the best. And the hardest working.
And the most stubborn and steely willed.

- And it might take decades before you have an actual career. And you jeopardise everything else in your life.

But if it's your calling, it's your calling.

For most people though, it's a hobby plus. That they kinda hope they kinda might be able to go big time with may be some day.. They usually don't get there ..

And a desire to waste a couple of years at Uni, avoiding graft, is usually the first sign that someone isn't serious.

This is kinda relevant, so I'm gunna tell you a ( short ) story..

Mate of mine. Great musician. Well qualified electrical engineer. Working as technical support to big studio equipment suppliers in the UK. He has lots of great stories about rescuing big name recording sessions or gigs with his expertise.

So he's a well connected guy. Well educated guy. Very hard working ( 24 hour call out as you can imagine ).

His calling was live recording. Always wanted to do it. So he leaves the safety of his job, and starts his own company. 2 years pass by and he's working as a rigger, essentially, for a friends PA company. No live recording work to be had, even for one so well connected.

Anyway, His friend does a massive show at the O2 Dome ( or whatever its called now ), and my mate is there in a tech support capacity. The Artist decides at the 11th hour that he wants the show ( both nights ) recording. And that's his lucky break. He has a Pro Tools HD rig at home, brings it ( after a big recommendation from his PA buddy ) and records both nights.

Artist is more than happy, and with that on his CV, my mate is now working recording live gigs for very big names.

Point is, if anyone could make that job work, it was my mate. Connections, experience, equipment and hard working. but he still needed a massive slice of luck to get started.

No guarantees.

Edited by DaleSmith (01/11/11 01:29 AM)

yeh - but he got the slice of luck - by being there, grafting.
That's the point.
- It's not pure 'luck' - that would be when he didnt bother to go out and work, just sat at home watching TV, and a big potential client's car breaks down outside, and you let them in to use your phone, and they end up giving you your lucky break .. that's 'luck'

So many old cliche's are true - and 'The harder I work, the luckier I get' is one of them.
These opportunities are found by throwing yourself into your work, not usually, by hiding in a classroom.

But defo an important point on contacts and industry relationships.. which also works the same - the hard you work, the more you deliver, the more contacts and relationships you build..

This must be the millionth time there is a thread about 'how useless and pointless both polyversities and private diplomas are in MT'. 99.99%, not really, 100% of alleged professionals here call these courses anything short of "rip-offs", waste of time, or worse.

Then, a 'poor' parent, opens the most prestigious sector's magazine and sees lavish adverts from these institutions advertising full page their courses "learn how to mix like the pros".
SOS, of which I am an online subscriber, maybe should run, once and for all, a good, exhaustive and definitive inquest/report article about this side of our business. This would be used as a 'reference' for yet another, "I am/my son/my dog is going to start a three years blah blah, what are his prospects in 'making' it within"... query.

These 'suppliers', especially SAE and PB are continuously slated here in this forum. Any response from them, except continuing investing huge amount of money in advertising? Can SOS survive without their adverts?

If I were them, I would re-phrase their offered wares as a "chance for the music hobbyists and enthusiasts to improve their recording skills", i.e. as a FE course in knitting or bottle ship building. Sure, as hobbyist IF you can justify the purchase of a £2,000 mic preamp for your spare bedroom 'studio', then you should invest many folds into a course or two. And in this case, and just this case, these courses make sense. To me, that is..

--------------------
www.bugiolacchi.com
Songwriter/guitarist

I'll be honest here: I actually have a BA in a music/film related subject. But I did it for love and interest when I was already in my thirties and had been working sometimes full-time, sometimes part-time in and around the industry since I was in my teens.

And I did learn some useful stuff from it, and made some good mates, and did some collaborative work that I wouldn't have done otherwise. But I don't think that it would have got me a job in the industry, given that those fellow graduates that I am still in touch with are either working in other fields (but still making music and/or films as a hobby); or have created their own opportunities as self-employed businesspeople.

I don't make my own music anymore (ran out of ideas and steam), but I do still work in the industry, sometimes on the creative side (sound/lights) and sometimes of the logistical side (driving/rigging). I even do the odd video project from time to time.

But I'm now doing a masters in History in the hope of getting out of it before I'm 50 and my back gives up on me . . .

--------------------
Gear List: reverse only.

Edited by Dave Gate (01/11/11 09:27 AM)

Quote blue manga:

---

The tricky thing is working out if it is his true calling or not.
If it is, then there are great careers to be had with tonnes of hard work, dedication, commitment, cultured talent etc ..

It's not as simple as, it's all hopeless, the industry's f**ked etc etc ..
- Actually there are great opportunities, for clever, committed, VERY hard working people ..

But you really do have to be the best. the best of the best. And the hardest working.
And the most stubborn and steely willed.

- And it might take decades before you have an actual career. And you jeopardise everything else in your life.

But if it's your calling, it's your calling.

For most people though, it's a hobby plus. That they kinda hope they kinda might be able to go big time with may be some day.. They usually don't get there ..

And a desire to waste a couple of years at Uni, avoiding graft, is usually the first sign that someone isn't serious.

---

+1000!!

--------------------
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Quote blue manga:

---

.

But you really do have to be the best. the best of the best.

---

As indeed George Best was - the very best Best of them all IMO.

Quote bugiolacchi:

---

This must be the millionth time there is a thread about 'how useless and pointless both polyversities and private diplomas are in MT'. 99.99%, not really, 100% of alleged professionals here call these courses anything short of "rip-offs", waste of time, or worse.

Then, a 'poor' parent, opens the most prestigious sector's magazine and sees lavish adverts from these institutions advertising full page their courses "learn how to mix like the pros".
SOS, of which I am an online subscriber, maybe should run, once and for all, a good, exhaustive and definitive inquest/report article about this side of our business. This would be used as a 'reference' for yet another, "I am/my son/my dog is going to start a three years blah blah, what are his prospects in 'making' it within"... query.

These 'suppliers', especially SAE and PB are continuously slated here in this forum. Any response from them, except continuing investing huge amount of money in advertising? Can SOS survive without their adverts?

If I were them, I would re-phrase their offered wares as a "chance for the music hobbyists and enthusiasts to improve their recording skills", i.e. as a FE course in knitting or bottle ship building. Sure, as hobbyist IF you can justify the purchase of a £2,000 mic preamp for your spare bedroom 'studio', then you should invest many folds into a course or two. And in this case, and just this case, these courses make sense. To me, that is..

---

Yes this has been done to death. It has been stated before by the SOS guys, they have no control at all over which companies advertise in the mag.

Quote blue manga:

---

yeh - but he got the slice of luck - by being there, grafting.
That's the point.
- It's not pure 'luck' - that would be when he didnt bother to go out and work, just sat at home watching TV, and a big potential client's car breaks down outside, and you let them in to use your phone, and they end up giving you your lucky break .. that's 'luck'

---

Couldn't agree more. He's not lucky to be where he is. He earned it.

I was just making the point that it was a job he technically should have walked into, being as he was so qualified to do it. However, he still required a lucky break to get where he is.

I guess "you make your own luck" is as true in this industry as it is anywhere.

Sure, luck is what you make it.

I think the overall picture probably isn't quite as 'black and white' as some of this thread would make it appear.

Yes, there are a couple of obvious stand-out UK university courses with fantastic track records at producing top-notch graduates that the industry employers are only too pleased to take on.

And there are certainly some private colleges that have pretty poor track records and are probably a waste of money and time.

But there are also a lot of middle ground colleges and courses from which a few -- those who really put in the effort -- do succeed. The 'cream' will always rise to the top and will make it precisely because they make their own luck. They put in the hours. They suck information and advice from everyone. They read the books and magazines. They ask the questions. They try things out for themselves... and so on.

When PW and I do our college Q&A sessions it's always very obvious who the two or three students out of the 50 or more attending are that will succeed.

And there are valid beneficical reasons for attending a college or university that go beyond the limits of the course itself...

But in general, I support the others here who have recommended studying a traditional music or engineering-based degree rather than pure music tech. For anyone conversant in the science, the practicalities of music tech are obvious, and the production side can't easily be taught anyway, in my view.

A solid engineering degree is a better basis for long term employment, allows greater freedom of movement to other employment areas throughout a career, and seems still to be looked upon more favourably by employers.

Combining a 'proper' engineering degree with music-tech experience while at college, such as with university radio, stage events, PA working etc... would be my ideal solution. And that's what I did. Got me a job with the BBC and the rest is history...

hugh

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

But there are also a lot of middle ground colleges and courses from which a few -- those who really put in the effort -- do succeed. The 'cream' will always rise to the top and will make it precisely because they make their own luck. They put in the hours. They suck information and advice from everyone. They read the books and magazines. They ask the questions. They try things out for themselves... and so on.

---

Except that there aren't. Intention is not everything. We have something like 2 to 3 thousand grads a year. Most from these middling courses. But it is STILL all useless no matter how well intentioned. It's not a degree subject (unless you do the math/electrical side to an in depth level) and there re no employment prospects. Universities ARE now money oriented. If we can get back to capped places then having a smattering of production or music tech course would be acceptable. It is NOT acceptable for every university to be offering versions of the same courses nationally ESPECIALLY in an oversubscribed industry area.

Sorry Hugh - but there is no way round this. The music tech courses are a money rinse EVEN IF the course leaders don't intend them to be and they DAMN WELL shouldn't be running them. The industry doesn't want them and, when they've finished the degree, the students won't either.

The problem is making universities privately held and necessarily profitable. Naturally - the profitable courses are going to be the ones that that average 18 year old finds sexiest. SOS should not be supporting this area. I was invited to one talk at SAE. They never asked me back after I told the truth.... weren't expecting that.

2 or 3 out of 50? Doesn't that give you a clue Hugh? Even those 2 or 3 are going to find it bloody hard and if only 2 or 3 (I doubt its that many long term) are showing any potential on a course doesn't it speak volumes of the courses you are having a chat with? Dammit there is supposed to be entry levels in Uni... no wonder a UK education is becoming a laughing stock.

It's not for me to comment on SOS music tech policy. I understand taking the adverts but I've long not been greatly enamoured by SOS "talks" at courses. Best that I not mention it any further.

Rant apologies

Brilliant thread - I'll chirp in with my 2 pesetas.

In my experience the the most important constructive thing you can do to move forward aside from everything above is to place yourself in the best/richest/busiest environment possible. Learn as you go in the environment you want to be in, not in a lecture hall fantastically insulated from the real world.

My career/learning only began rapidly moving forward after I left uni and started at the bottom as a tea boy in a large studio, I bagged this spending one afternoon going round a dozen studios chatting to anyone who would listen with an immaculately presented showreel backed up with a concise CV showing a fairly solid amount of pro experience (with references) for my age. Reading SOS and the forums fanatically for a few years took care of the academic side.

It's been fascinating seeing how my original tea boy mates have progressed in the last few years - a lot of them aren't necessarily doing studio stuff now but starting off in the thick of it bang in the centre of London, being keen, grafting, discovering parts of this and other industries they didn't know existed, becoming mates with the people they aspired to etc. etc. has seen the bulk of them doing cool stuff, going somewhere, and paying the rent.

The most successful young people I know started as runners/gaffers/tea boys/whatever in the real world at 18 whilst I was still comparatively arsing about, and they'll always be a couple of steps ahead of me.

Best of luck!

Mash

--------------------
www.matthewcracknell.com

Quite honestly, all this talk of "You can make it if you try!" is just so much cock!

You can't - not any more! Not as an audio engineer. As a producer perhaps, as an artist, well, obviously! As a promoter, yes. As an agency, yes. But never as an engineer.

All this talk of the big break is just pie-in-the-sky nonsense! What big break, just who do you have to record to be able to claim that you have 'made it'? Give me the name!

Who, the Who? The Rolling Stones? Pavarotti or the Berlin Philharmonic? Pink or Prince? Mark Knopfler or Michael Jackson? Is Genesis, Grateful Dead or Tina too small? Just how big does the act have to be, before you can claim that you have 'made it'? Is Queen big enough to claim that you have made it?

Well, I know someone who has recorded ALL the above and dozens more and usually more than once. In fact, I have known this guy since we both had hair! Is he famous? Does he drive the fancy car and own the big house?

No.

He's doing OK, but that's about it.

And he is the audio engineer with the most credits for famous acts that can or could fill a stadium on Planet Earth. He is as successful as you can get. He manages a company with three large OB trucks and several flightcased OBs. When it comes to being an audio engineer, he is at the very, very top. I will not go into details, but trust me, he is far from rich and definitely not famous! He gets by!

Below him are thousands and thousands of audio engineers who just do not get by - and many of them have recorded some amazing projects!

I can't think of a career field where the rewards are so meagre. The large room at Abbey Road is now so cheap, you could hire it for your birthday party! It costs less to hire than a 60-ton crane, but that crane costs less than the desk at Abbey Road. Just stop to think about it! Imagine, you are entering a career where the very very best just gets by - and only if you record the Rolling Stones often enough!

It's not the only uni course where there's no direct employment opportunities though. Pretty much every arts subject is the same. Add literature, history, PPE, and I'm sure we can all think of others. Forensic science was another majorly popular area when "Witless Silence" was first on, and probably still is - massively oversubscribed compared to the actual number of forensic scientist jobs out there. Hell, even astrophysics (about as hard science as you get) is pretty short on opportunities outside of academia.

TBH, this is where I'm in favour of students paying fees. If it's going to cost you serious money, anyone with half a brain should be having a serious look at what they're getting out of it. If they don't, then honestly I can't really complain too much about the sheep getting shorn. The problem is that they're subsidised by our tax money, and that we *can* complain about.

What I'd really like to see though is a sliding scale of tuition fees paid by the government based on the amount the country's economy needs people with those qualifications. Engineering and hard science give the greatest benefit to UK PLC, and as such should basically be free. Arts degrees give the least benefit to UK PLC, and as such should be entirely paid by the student. This should help tilt the balance towards worthwhile courses. Add a properly-financed system of grants for the truly talented 5%, say, to be based solely on outstanding ability *and* continued achievement at uni. If you're really great, you'll get a grant. If you're not great but you can make a career work at something where you're middling good and we need lots of those people, then the inherent weightings in the fees should make it more attractive to do the more useful subject.

Yes, this makes a judgement about how worthwhile a degree is. WE SHOULD BE MAKING THAT JUDGEMENT! Anyone who thinks a qualified graphic designer is as important as a qualified junior doctor, go get your head examined. (Except you can't, bcos there's no doctors...) Sure there's opportunity for discussing how we weight those courses - does a corporate lawyer contribute more or less than a welder qualified for gas pipes, say? But we need to be having that discussion, otherwise we'll keep pissing money up the walls of universities whose only justification for taking that money is "we're here bcos we're here bcos we're here bcos we're here..."

Quote narcoman:

---

Except that there aren't. ... But it is STILL all useless no matter how well intentioned. ... and there re no employment prospects.

---

Sorry, I disagree. I don't think it's quite that black and white... but I do appreciate your fundamental position.

My position is that if someone really wants to work in the industry they still can... But -- and it's a big BUT -- it's a huge uphill struggle with overwhelming competition and no guarantees. Success will not be instant and rewards will be meagre. A music tech degree from most univeristies is completely meaningless to virtually all employers. But that's not to say that attending a course is inherently a total waste of time, although in most cases a course on it's own will be insufficient. Think of it as a small stepping stone at best with the need for a lot of external input and self-driven learning.

Audio engineering is a technical subject and there is an important role for academic education of the underlying scientific principles. That's where a music tech degree course should deliver... not all do.

But I know there ~are~ employment opportunities out there, even though it's only a very few each year. Therefore only the very best will succeed. While the vast majority of the thousands of music tech grads produced each year won't find gainful employment in the industry, a tiny handful undoutedly will... and do... Not many, sure, but a few. No one walks straight into a 'sound engineer' role, obviously, but there are still introductory steps in most areas of the industry and careers can still progress.

Most of them will probably come from the high-end courses that have already been mentioned. Probably something like 90% of graduates from Surrey or LIPA will find roles in the industry with relative ease. Probably only 1% or so will do the same from most of the mid-ranging uni courses, and they will struggle a lot.

Maybe that 1% might have made it anyway, regardless of the course they attended simply because they are so motivated and determined. They succeed despite the course, not because of it. And those are the people who naturally stand out at the talks PW and I give to the 'also ran' colleges and unis.

Quote:

---

It is NOT acceptable for every university to be offering versions of the same courses nationally ESPECIALLY in an oversubscribed industry area.

---

I agree. Universities simply offer these 'popular' and 'soft' courses to get bums on seats. It seems to me that these are mostly designed as vocational courses, not academic ones. There's nothing wrong with vocaltioanl courses in principle -- although that's not what universities are for in my opinion -- but it does require a suitably sized workplace to employ the output. You're right in that we no longer have that (if we ever did), and that makes such courses morally dubious to my way of thinking.

I'm not a fan of student-funded university tuition as a political concept, but hopefully the steep rise in tuition fees next year will focus the minds of prospective students and their parents and bring a return to proper academic university courses that deliver genuine value that warrants long and worthwhile careers. The softer vocational options like music tech will hopefully fade away from university prospectuses.

To be honest, if someone wants to go down the vocational route then they would find employment easier (and they'd earn considerably more) if they did vocational electrician or plumbing courses!

Quote:

---

I was invited to one talk at SAE. They never asked me back after I told the truth.... weren't expecting that.

---

I'd love to have been a fly on the wall...

Quote:

---

I've long not been greatly enamoured by SOS "talks" at courses.

---

Wasn't aware you'd attended any. Colleges like to have external speakers like you and us to give talks because it ticks the 'industry links' box in the curriculum. If we are invited we usually go, and we do so for several reasons. From the SOS point of view it's a useful marketing tool, and useful for gathering feedback about the magazine and general topics of interest to readers (or potential readers).

Most of the Q&A is usually about equipment and techniques, but there are almost always some questions about education, career paths, getting jobs and so on... and we always give our genuine honest opinions, highlighting the real challenges the students face even if this contradicts what their college might have told them. It's not always popular, but the truth is the truth and most recognise that. We are usually invited back... but not always!

Hugh

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Wasn't aware you'd attended

---

Didn't mean it THAT way. I meant about the fact you were doing them !!

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

Quote:

---

I was invited to one talk at SAE. They never asked me back after I told the truth.... weren't expecting that.

---

I'd love to have been a fly on the wall...

---

The best question was "do you employ any SAE grads?".

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

The softer vocational options like music tech will hopefully fade away from university prospectuses.

---

..which is precisely why we shouldn't endorse their very existence in the first place .

so.... wehave well over 200 degree music tech course pushing out at LEAST 2000 grads a year (I've heard nearer 6000). Out of that 90% of the 4 or 5 jobs a year will be taken by LIPA etc grads (quite true - and much better odds as there are a few grads per year). The rest of the roles - may or may not be filled by the top 1% from the middle ground courses.... those are disgraceful statistics!! Honestly - that alone is a reasons to shut down ALL of the music tech degrees and remove accredited status from the likes of SAE.

I've been speaking to David Willetts about this very subject recently (online). I've had some responses back but I cannot go into it here. Suffice to say - there may be walls and writing.

Quote narcoman:

---

I've been speaking to David Willetts about this very subject recently (online). I've had some responses back but I cannot go into it here. Suffice to say - there may be walls and writing.

---

Say what you like about Cameron, but you can't argue with appointing a Minister for Universities and Science whose nickname is "two brains".

To reiterate what has already been said, the only sound tech courses worth bothering with are the BA at LIPA or the Tonmeister at Surrey. The only worthwhile academic alternative to those would be a good degree in Electrical Engineering. If your lad isn't expecting at least three "A" grades at A level, he should probably do an electrical NVQ, get an LGV license and blag his way into live sound.

Quote narcoman:

---

..which is precisely why we shouldn't endorse their very existence in the first place .

---

I don't think responding to an invitation is an endorsement. If our comments help to open the eyes of the students (and their lecturers) to the real world situation then that has to be a good thing as far as I'm concerned.

You've seen my comments on this topic here often enough. You know I try to disuade potential students from these courses and encourage 'proper' engineering degrees instead whenever I can. But I'm not going to ignore those who are already on these courses or tell them untruths.

It ~is~ possible to gain worthwhile employment in the industry from these courses... but only in exceptional circumstances for exceptional people. That's the reality. It would be a heck of a lot easier (although still bloomin difficult) from LIPA or Surrey etc, obviously. But there are shades of grey here. It's not totally black and white.

Quote:

---

Honestly - that alone is a reasons to shut down ALL of the music tech degrees and remove accredited status from the likes of SAE.

---

Not everyone partakes of these courses (especially the short and diploma style courses) because they want to be employed directly in the industry (although most probably do). Some do it for their personal development and hobbyist pleasure, and I don't see anything wrong with that. So I don't think they should be shut down completely at all -- there is a valid market for them to remain. But if awarding degree status that should certainly be revisited to ensure genuine ~academic~ achievement is involved, and the employment prospects should be made much more explicit in all of them.

Hugh

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

It ~is~ possible to gain worthwhile employment in the industry from these courses... but only in exceptional circumstances for exceptional people. That's the reality. It would be a heck of a lot easier (although still bloomin difficult) from LIPA or Surrey etc, obviously. But there are shades of grey here. It's not totally black and white.

---

A few years ago, perhaps, but not any more. It's now black and white. There was a time when some of the better courses could see a select few, who attended one of the better colleges (e.g. Leeds) start careers. Now LIPA is roughly there, where Leeds was. A few are able to gain some sort of employment, the rest get nothing.

Surrey graduates are now struggling. See my post above. The only good careers for Tonmeister gards right now, are NOT as pure sound engineers. Musicians, composers, sound designers, perhaps, salesmen and support staff at Avid, but not as the guy behind the big desk with all the buttons.

You may have noticed that we are possibly heading right down into a massive depression. Greece will probably default totally on its bonds and the Germanic-Gothic 'Pleitegeier' (the vulture of poverty) is beating its wings over Italy and Spain. If Greece and Italy collapse into chaos, denuded of Euros and with nothing to replace it, we may have yet another war in Europe. The last thing we need is more ProTools operators!

Building and selling audio equipment and software has become almost impossible and even good used stuff is now hitting the market at below rock-bottom prices. (I just picked up a complete 5.1 M&K system for £100. My wife asked if we shouldn't wait until they are even cheaper!) What price employment in a market like that?

But I did spend some of the formative years of my life, learning how to kill people - this may just come in handy!

Quote The Red Bladder:

---

But I did spend some of the formative years of my life, learning how to kill people .....

---

First time you let on that you worked as a chef, Byre - interesting!

Quote The Red Bladder:

---

The only good careers for Tonmeister gards right now, are ...salesmen and support staff at Avid

---

Cross that one off - see the 200 worldwide staff redundancies at Avid this week?

The industry is on the final fade of the ending track of the music biz's last contractual obligation album...

The message has to be emphasised that there isn't really a viable recording industry left - lots of touring, lots of sponsorships, lots of merchandise, some profitable sync & library composition work - how can you fit your dreams and aspirations into the industries that are working? Or just wake up and pursue one of the best non-profit passtimes the world has to offer, funded from some useful work that people *are* prepared to pay you for doing (e.g. plumbing, electrical).

Quote Billum:

---

The message has to be emphasised that there isn't really a viable recording industry left

---

Again, I would counter and say that's simply not true in the black and white way you are preaching -- it's way too black!

There is a recording industry, and there always will be -- but it is currently very small and very different from what was around a decade ago.

Commercial music of all forms is still being recorded on a daily basis. People change jobs, retire, die on a daily basis. New blood will always be needed to replace them. Yes, the positions are few and far between, and the competition is huge, but they do exist and some young people do find their way onto the first rungs of the industry every year.

Moreover, the audio industry is much bigger and more expansive than just the big console and pop-artist 'recording studio' area, and experience in any and all areas is good whatever one's hoped-for end goal position might be. Radio and TV broadcast, theatre, touring, PA, game audio, event and attractions sound design, manufacturing... the list is actually quite expansive. However, to succeed one needs to be able to translate skills and knowledge quickly and intelligently -- and that requires good technical understanding rather than the narrow vocational 'I can drive a Pro Tools' approach of so many colleges and courses.

I think it is important to inform potential students about the huge challenges ahead and the realities of the industry at large, but simply shouting that there is no work and no one will succeed is just idiotic and easily disproved by all those that do succeed... even if you can count them on the fingers of a few hands.

The honest fact is that the best of the best of the best will make it. They will find work and they will eventually end up doing what they want. But the hurdles are huge and it will require more commitment, perserverence and sheer hard work than most can ever imagine.

I want to encourage those people, while simultaneously discouraging those without the right attitude. Your comments, and all those similar preceding ones, do the latter very well, but not the former. Let's encourage and empower those who will succeed us one day!

hugh


--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote Billum:

---

Quote The Red Bladder:

---

The only good careers for Tonmeister gards right now, are ...salesmen and support staff at Avid

---

Cross that one off - see the 200 worldwide staff redundancies at Avid this week?

The industry is on the final fade of the ending track of the music biz's last contractual obligation album...

The message has to be emphasised that there isn't really a viable recording industry left - lots of touring, lots of sponsorships, lots of merchandise, some profitable sync & library composition work - how can you fit your dreams and aspirations into the industries that are working? Or just wake up and pursue one of the best non-profit passtimes the world has to offer, funded from some useful work that people *are* prepared to pay you for doing (e.g. plumbing, electrical).

---

The recording industry is actually growing. Just not as fast as the number of grads.

What isn't growing is PAYE jobs. There are more opportunities around now than ever befopre BUT you have to know how to run a business.

Oh - and the pop music industry has NEVER been the biggest user of the recording industry, in fact it's the most attractive, it's what everyone "wants" to do (my arse they do... X factor job seeking) but it's such a small area. Make the huge distinction between the two. VO on its own is much bigger than the whole record label business. There are also many other music areas to work in.... the only part that has been suffering is that which relies on direct sales.

Everyone always puts the biz in context of making "famous music" - it has never been the largest sector. Get into broadcast, religious record, ADr, VO, post, foley recording etc and see that far from dying, the recording biz is very alive. Avid redundancies do not reflect the state of the industry - they merely reflect the buoyancy of digital equipment sellers; I mean, how many PT rigs do they want me to buy?

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

I think it is important to inform potential students about the huge challenges ahead and the realities of the industry at large, but simply shouting that there is no work and no one will succeed is just idiotic and easily disproved by all those that do succeed... even if you can count them on the fingers of a few hands.

---

They don't need encouraging.

And it's far from idiotic - you're taking a pedantic view literally affixing no-one to mean no people. Of course 4 or 5 will succeed. That isn't a reason to give even 1% endorsement to the current "educashun" system.

Quote Hugh Robjohns:

---

I want to encourage those people, while simultaneously discouraging those without the right attitude. Your comments, and all those similar preceding ones, do the latter very well, but not the former. Let's encourage and empower those who will succeed us one day!

---

Yes, but two points:

- when saying there wasn't a viable recording industry, I should have qualified that as the "big studio/rich investing label" industry that served the once-burgeoning 'pop' industry, which appears to be the aspiration of most of the Music Tech course fodder. As you both point out, in the wake of that industry, there are innumerable other ways of 'getting involved' in music & media in slightly different directions, and that was my point too really - widen your definition of "success"

- the negative comments simply won't put off the ambitious people at all. If this sort of talk puts them off, they are almost by definition not going to make it, coz there is far worse dissuasion to come!

Quote Billum:

---

...the negative comments simply won't put off the ambitious people at all.

---

Probably not... but it might sew strong seeds of doubt. More importantly in the context of this particular thread, it might give parents an unfair perspective and reduce their willingness to support a potentially very talented student.

hugh

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote narcoman:

---

That isn't a reason to give even 1% endorsement to the current "educashun" system.

---

I wasn't refering to the education system specifically, and I think we're already singng fromthe same hymn sheet where that is concerned. We all agree that the current arrangements are deeply flawed in so many ways and the whole thing needs to be changed radically.

hugh

--------------------
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Quote The Red Bladder:

---

You may have noticed that we are possibly heading right down into a massive depression. Greece will probably default totally on its bonds and the Germanic-Gothic 'Pleitegeier' (the vulture of poverty) is beating its wings over Italy and Spain. If Greece and Italy collapse into chaos, denuded of Euros and with nothing to replace it, we may have yet another war in Europe. The last thing we need is more ProTools operators!

---

haha

Looking on the bright side, at least there won't be any shortage of Propaganda...

Or you could always convince the military to make some computer controlled tanks and planes and such which are controlled via Pro Tools from some cave somewhere, but then perhaps those Pro Tools operators are better on the front lines where some of them might get taken out... Schooling for Pro Tools??? People actually pay money for that??? scary stuff...


Is it the chicken or the egg though?? Are these programs being offered to simply grab money, or, are they being offered as a means to appease the people who keep filling them?? Governments seemingly only care about 51%, so long as that amount is happy they are winning right... When has there been any onus or motivation for anyone to do anything but make money, surely these schools doing the right thing would initiate a catastrophic series of events that would surely run your Country to its demise. Could you imagine them being proactive and taking the initiative to make the necessary change instead of waiting and reacting once it's past the point?? ... probably already is

It's just one of those things, the total over glorification of industries has basically cut their noses off to spite their face... People watch TV, see how cool it looks to be a Cop, or whatever, good or bad, get into it, and eventually become robotic because it's totally different in reality... Build em up, break em down, keeps em in line better that way i guess... I mean why educate people when we can keep them stupid, much easier to lift their wallet from their back pocket that way...

Anyhoo, i know the media loves to bang on about the recession and depression and how bad it is, but, the reality is that the baby boomers are getting older and nearing retirement and sadly, at least i know our society, has sort of dropped the ball on preparing and educating the next wave of those employees, managers, bosses etc. to keep it clicking along... I wonder if it is the same over there??? Wouldn't a forward thinking society be preparing itself for that???

A thought i had the other day, would be to make every college or University take half of the tuition fee and require every student to start their own business with that money instead and to run that for the time they are in school, it sure would teach people a lot of stuff the school won't and would contribute to the economy at the same time, of course, they might not be able to build that new fancy wing as soon as possible and their glorious funding might not come through as thick...

Quote narcoman:

---

VO on its own is much bigger than the whole record label business.

---

What's VO?

--------------------
Spanky

voice over. not to be confused with BO.

--------------------
I'm All Ears.

Quote ken long:

---

voice over. not to be confused with BO.

---

Or indeed....L O.

Dave.

or FO.


hohoho...

VO - the biggest sector in recoding and an area where those doing pro work still charge £1k a day for the studio.

I'm 2x years old and have done these courses, I'm embarassed to say for how long and from what age. I'm nearly 10k in debt from them and that wasn't even to degree level.

I didn't do Music Technology/Audio Recording etc. at university, I nearly did when I was 18, I thank to high heavens I didn't in the end. I decided to do Engineering (Electronics). I know how your son feels, but he might resent everything you are trying to do for him and to be honest, at A level age, an engineering degree was laughable if you'd told me, then I started to read these threads and it became clear over months and the denial inside me started to fade.

Suggest to him maybe Acoustical Engineering, then try and work away from there. There are also Engineering foundation years he could apply to.

From doing those 'courses' to engineering within a month of my course I was calculating things which were alien to me just before starting, and even then I was not keeping up with the workload, but it's interesting, 18 year old me would hate it....I did more real useful math in one week than I could ever have done in 5...heck 20 years of these courses. In one month of those courses what would I have achieved? A cheesy track in a well known DAW and a few thousands words telling a lecturer what's so great about it.

He will be paying 12k per year whatever age he starts, I assume he's year 13?, he doesn't have to go straight to uni at 18 and for many people, it's the worst thing they could do and end up on a course they hate or is no use to them.

These courses are all run by graduates of the subject, and they tend to only be hiring those graduates by the looks of it and IMO trying to glorify their qualification by doing so, I think just about everyone of those that taught me were graduates of music tech from head of department to the technician in the building. I was even kind of nudged towards the university they all studied at over Surrey and LIPA, a few I know went for interviews there and couldn't do the physics test, and the staff turned up their nose and pulled the wool over their eyes....they should be teaching physics and various principles...but no, they were ignorant of that.

Some of the research lead universities push out a lot of work, I read through some of the stuff the Russell groups are doing and even though I understand about 1% of it, the person writing it is probably top of the field academically, but at best will get to lecture in it.

It's sterotypical for a parent to push their kids into medicine, science, law (even though it has awful prospects as well atm) or accounting etc. but you're going to have to somehow get him to see that what he wants is a pipe dream. He can always be interested in making music, local studios are always around and can stick around for as long as the owner cares, but a career? No. The music industry has changed and the people that rub shoulders with massive acts aren't audio engineers anymore.

Edit:

I'd also go with the Surrey Tonmeister course, but I've heard it's having problems finding placements for it's students, could be wrong but I wouldn't be surprised either way.

I got accepted to engineering with one of those diplomas in my hand whereas Tonmeister rejected me straight up, it's very competitive and I'm sure there are a few students on that course with the right attitude to succeed and overwhelming maths/physics capabilities.

Edited by Chris No.1 (06/11/11 11:56 PM)

Great thread this and its a subject I've been contemplating for some time. I graduated from leeds college of music a few years ago and I'd say the experience was mostly positive. It certainly didn't give me any employment prospects but it really helped me find an area of the industry to focus on and through talking to the lecturers I discovered just what it would take to establish myself.

I also just loved being part of a community of musicians etc and having access to some equipment that I could never afford.

I certainly wouldn't say its the best route to employment and the supposed industry links these places advertise in my experience (and many others) is a load of rubbish.

I recently saved up a few grand that was going to go on another "pro" course but decided in the end to spend it on location sound kit, which so far is turning out to be a very good decision. I've learnt more in the last year from starting out on sets and working my way up than 2 years of "education".

--------------------
http://www.williammorrismusic.com

Quote Chris No.1:

---

He will be paying 12k per year whatever age he starts...

---

No he won't. He won't pay a penny unless he earns over over £21k if and when he qualifies and gets a job that pays that much .... and only while he earns over £21k a year.

Yes - he'll run up living costs (rent, accommodation, beer fund, etc.) but that's always been the case .... and there are non-repayable grants depending on the parents' income.

It's not an ideal situation and I don't like it any more than others. But......!

And for those who had free higher education in the 70s, whatever, it's worth noting that only about 8% went to (proper) universities back then to gain (proper) degrees in (proper) subjects but now we have - I believe - 49% of young people going to trumped up 'polyversities' (or 'unitechnics') doing Mickey Mouse courses ... and someone has to pay for it all and there's not a bottomless pit of money.

And FWIW, there's a window cleaner here who is £35,000 in debt just to pay for his van to accommodate the expensive pump thingy he had to buy that feeds his special brush to clean windows after local council H&S regs killed off the regular window cleaners with a ladder and a chamoise leather. He felt it was worth investing in.

I do wish people would read the facts rather than the Daily Mail!

--------------------
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Hi Guys,

I realised I owe you all an update.

I have had some very interesting discussions with my son since starting this thread. They were not the easiest of conversations as I felt I was trying to destroy his dream, but we had a very grown up discussion about the initial comments here and about the state of the music industry and his ambitions.

On reflection he has decided to embark on a different path of higher education choice. I think that the relative ease in which we he changed his decision confirmed that this was not the industry for him.

I would like to thank you all for your frank views which has helped me a great deal.

From a personal note I have found this thread a really interesting insight into the music industry and how hard it is today.

I wish you all the best.

Mark

Personally - I think that's great news, and a glowing testament to your sons maturity in understanding the pro's and cons of a situation. Nice one.

And, if he plays an instrument, he can still do music as a hobby which might lead to something. Also, if he goes to University, many Student Unions have proper venues with proper stage crews nowadays (I know because I used to be Technical Co-ordinator at one); so he could try and get paid work where he could learn something about the technical side of live shows while studying something entirely different.

When you and he are looking at potential Unis do check out what the SU have while you're at it. And, if the SU is obviously just a glorified bar; check out what the town/city has in the way of venues - they all need crew at some point.

--------------------
Gear List: reverse only.

Spending the next 3 - 5 years studying is a waste of time!
Let me put that a bit more reasonably. Doing something to further his education is good but NOT the answer. - You dont just walk in post this period. Getting IN is what matters.

I would recommend seeking out openings as soon as possible, unpaid if thats what it takes so he can build a CV that will open doors! In the mean time keep learning. I did this 35 years ago. Is it any different now in this industry? I would say no. I have two daughters both work in music industry for some years now. Got started by doing intern gigs and working for next to nothing. Made contacts, within 6 months you can have a CV that will open other doors. One is now Head of International Marketing and personally looks after Miley Cyrus, Jonas Brothers, Selena Gomez and co.
I know this is a different area from what your son wants to do (at the moment) But I would say the rules are the same. My daughters have succeeded because they work hard, have excellent people skills, learned fast and are very good at what they do. My other daughter was PA to the Chairwoman of a hugh worldwide advertising company by age 24! Most people said it was not possible. They have succeeded because they value 'being' educated in the life school. They have no so called academic qualifications or letters after their names.

Your son can do the same with the right mindset and attitude - Dont waste the next three years learning the theory only to then start looking for someone to start to give you the 'hands on' experience. Trust me the music world will of changed a whole bunch by then.....
Hope this is food for thought . . .good luck
kevin

--------------------
Kev Ryan
Website: http://makemoneyinmusic.com

Is he interested in anything else?
Its pointless going to Uni studying something hes not interested in it will be personal torture.
I know I did it and didnt last much to my parents dispointment.
I dont want to be a building surveyor I screamed at my Dad it bores me to death.
If he has no interest in electronic engineering (putting plugs on cables)then dont encourage him.
There are very few people who have made inroads this way either.
If he wants a studio get him to raise the money another way and perhaps to a business degree.
Just my opinion which means nothing other than to me.

Quote GLENN:

---

If he has no interest in electronic engineering (putting plugs on cables)

---

You really think that's electronic engineering?

Oh boy.

--------------------
New album 'Fantasy Bridge' available now!
Making of Fantasy Bridge Diary

Quote MarkOne:

---

Quote GLENN:

---

If he has no interest in electronic engineering (putting plugs on cables)

---

You really think that's electronic engineering?

Oh boy.

---

What do you call a tea maker/speaker carrier/driver/bloke with screw driver earning less than 25k after doing an electronics degree other than deluded or unemployed?

No, I call that over-qualified studio assistant.

But that's the nub of the problem isn't it? Even if you get through the door the chances of getting a job that pays a living wage are remote at best.

A friend of mine was a really successful studio engineer and producer. I mean *really* successful, he worked with artists we've all heard of. He has the gold and platinum disks on the wall to show for it. At one time he ran the multi-million pound personal studio of someone whose music the entire planet has heard and would readily recognise, he has people in his phonebook I consider musical icons, he's on first name terms with a lot of them. I mean in terms of the technical side of the music business, he s the epitome of success. You know what? his own studio had to close because he wasn't making any money from it. His last job was working for a small provincial theatre. Last time we chatted, he was unemployed. And, make no mistake, this guy is really GOOD.

But an electronic engineering career doesn't have to be about making up cables or rolling splifs for the talent.

In my time as an electronics engineer, I helped design the electronics for active loudspeaker systems, back in the 70s when nobody had heard of active speakers, stuff I designed was until quite recently still flying in front line fighters, some is still probably sat on a bunch of seabeds monitoring well-head telemetry, I've traveled all over the world, sat on international standards committees which have quite literally defined the technology for an industry segment, had a bunch of patents granted, many of my colleagues in the various companies I've worked in have similar experiences, some doing equipment sea-trials on aircraft carriers in the Pacific, one did a 1 month equipment trial on a nuclear sub somewhere in the atlantic. Other colleagues have done keynote speeches in front of thousands at international industry congress meetings, others have taken secondment, living and working in Beijing, Thailand, the USA.

Electronics can be a career that is varied, interesting, well paid, with lots of potential prospects in multiple industries. I've worked in Audio, Defence, Computing, Industrial recording/telemetry, and telecoms. I've loved all of it.

The fact that very few of us have had jobs sat behind a Neve or SSL in a big-name studio, doesn't make us any less electronics engineers (Hey, somebody designed that SSL - In fact I met one of their ex-designers, a couple of years back and he had some really interesting career anecdotes about places he'd been and people he'd met.)

--------------------
New album 'Fantasy Bridge' available now!
Making of Fantasy Bridge Diary