maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
#953860 - 17/11/11 05:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Let me preface by saying that I am not a pro sound guy, I am a school music teacher, asked
to recommend a small (relatively inexpensive) PA system for the school. Although it will
not be a pro system, I would like it to have decent sound for music, and be stereo as
well, with two separate speakers.
Of course there are the prefab portable PA
systems, like the Yamaha Stagepas.
However, if I were to put a system togehter
with separate components, first of all i would like to know the advantages and
disadvantages of:
1. a powered mixer with passive speakers
or
2. a passive mixer with powered speaskers?
I guess that decision
has to be made first, before deciding on specific components.
Thanks in advance
for your help.
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2514
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#953870 - 17/11/11 07:40 AM
|
|
|
Have you read THIS thread? Given the choice
offered, I'd tend towards powered speakers as the on board amps are matched very well with
the speaker and tend to have very good protection. Gives you more flexibility in terms of
mixer features too. Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
Setter
member
Joined: 06/11/02
Posts: 546
Loc: Tesside UK
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#953882 - 17/11/11 09:37 AM
|
|
|
|
I prefer passive speakers - otherwise you have to send mains power as well as the audio
signal to the speakers. Frequently in schools there is a shortage of (unused!) mains plugs
close to where you want the speakers to be. It's usually easier to have the amp close to
the mixing desk.
Bob is of course right in principle.
J
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#953883 - 17/11/11 10:00 AM
|
|
|
I don't like powered mixers as they limit flexibility so, if you don't want active
speakers, there is always a third way: passive mixer -> power amp -> passive speakers. The
power amp can always be tucked out of the way somewhere so the system need look no more
complex than your other alternatives to the average user. Personally, I prefer
active speakers as you can also use most of them stand alone with a mic or CD/mp3 player
if you want a very simple PA setup. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#953935 - 17/11/11 01:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies so far. So far opinions seem to be mixed. In general are the
opinions on the subject about equally mixed, or more towards one than the other? Now there
are two preferring active speakers, and one preferring passive.
For those
preferring the former, why do you say there is more flexibility in mixers that way? Are
there many more and varied passive misers available?
Still eager to hear more
opinions. Thank you.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#953938 - 17/11/11 02:09 PM
|
|
|
There are very few high quality powered mixers - most are aimed at the budget end of the
market. If you want decent power you may also have to accept a complex mixer whereas you
could run a huge sound system from a tiny passive mixer if that was what you wanted to
do. And, as I said before, for a simple setup, you may not need to use a mixer
at all with an active speaker. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
smash4686
Joined: 30/05/11
Posts: 64
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#953950 - 17/11/11 02:52 PM
|
|
|
|
I have to use a powered mixer with passive speakers at a venue I do gigs at and I have to
say that it is the worst system ever. The main issue I have is that the PA Amp is highly
underpowered but if the amp were to blow in the mixer then the whole thing would have to
be replaced or sent away for repair. As mentioned in a previous post, amps in active
speakers are set up for that specific speaker so have no trouble powering them. The only
downside is a few extra mains cables but with the amount of cables already on stage, that
is hardly a problem. You could always get a mixer with passive speakers but use a
seperate amplifier.
Small venue or not if you use a powered mixer you will
eventually learn to hate it.
|
Dave Rowles
Joined: 28/02/08
Posts: 1315
Loc: Isle of Man
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: smash4686]
#953986 - 17/11/11 05:22 PM
|
|
|
I'd go for active speakers and passive mixer. Simply put both will be useful in isolation
of each other, I.e. you don't need the mixer if all you want is a single vocal mic, or cd
playback. Similarly you could take the mixer somewhere you need extra channels, or use it
to submit something if there's a bigger system available. While this is unlikely in a
school, you never know! Also, I've generally found active mixers very limited
in features, and so you'd be restricting yourself in what you can do to make things sound
good.
-------------------- www.exaviormusic.com
www.manninmusic.com Music Teacher, Isle of Man
|
Scramble
active member
Joined: 11/09/02
Posts: 1662
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: Dave Rowles]
#954035 - 17/11/11 10:23 PM
|
|
|
|
I would also avoid the powered mixer, and take the active speaker route. I wouldn't go
with the powered amp and passive speaker but only because this will make things a bit
complex for a simple school setup, and probably a bit more expensive.
Being
able to plug straight into a powered speaker will probably come in handy sometime in a
school environment.
|
klank
Joined: 01/10/05
Posts: 70
Loc: Guernsey C.I
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954050 - 18/11/11 12:49 AM
|
|
|
|
Having done a few installations of school PA systems I would ask if you are looking to
have it as a fixed installation in an assembly / sports hall of if you were looking to be
able to move it around within the school?
Powered speakers are great in terms
of flexibility if you want to move them around and as Scramble says plug a mic directly
into for a quick and easy PA.
If it's for an assembly hall or similar it can
be a pain to have the power and controls on the back of the speakers if you want to keep
them out of reach of inquisitive hands.
In that scenario the desk - amp -
passive speakers may be more suitable.
And depending on what and how many
channels / inputs you were looking for the choice of powered desks is a bit limited.
You can achieve good results with either set up. But more info on what the system
needs to do would be helpful.
Klank
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954058 - 18/11/11 04:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all your replies.
Kfank--not fixed, but movable. Why would the
controls on the back of the speakers be a problem? If one uses them with a mixer, one
controls everything with the mixer correct, and doesn't have to fiddle with the controls
on the back of the speakers, other than to set both speaker controls loud, then control
them from the mixer?
It seems like a strong consensus now is for passive mixer
and powered speakers. Thank you for that input.
Now, I will expand my question
to the following. If you were asked to build a system with passive mixer, two powered
speakers, speaker stands, necessary cables, etc., for under $1,000, what speakers and
mixer would you choose, and why?
I know some pros might balk at the
question--that they would never set up a system for that low a price. But humor me--if you
were to do so, what would you choose?
Thank you.
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954060 - 18/11/11 05:05 AM
|
|
|
Quote maiki:
I know some
pros might balk at the question--that they would never set up a system for that low a
price. But humor me--if you were to do so, what would you choose?
Leaving aside this for the moment, I
strongly recommend you look through the recent thread on recommending a system for a
school auditorium. Not for the recommendations of equipment persay but for the reasons
why this is a bad idea.
And leaving that aside, noone can put together a
system with so little information. Basic information like channel requirements, etc. is
still missing, not to mention coverage requirements, portable or installed, etc. It
wouldn't do me any good to recommend a Soundcraft notepad for instance if you are looking
to reinforce a Jazz band.
Finally, you already mentioned this but I figure I
will repeat, your number is exceedingly low for a 'decent' system. I am not talking good
quality, just usable. For one things mics alone tend to run about $100 for the low end of
what most people consider usable, and only go up from there. A 'decent' pair of powered
speakers alone(Again not talking about great quality, just usable, in this case EV ELX112p
for example) would take up much of your budget. You are either going to have to lower
your expectations or raise your budget. Even going to the VERY low end of powered
cabinets, like behringer you are still using up half to over half of your budget on just
the speakers, not even touching mics, cables, stands, mixer, or power.
Seablade
EDIT: Just to come back, for $1000 you are pretty limited to
something along these lines...
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/StagePas500/
Which
is a powered mixer with passive speakers, really you would be replacing the entire setup
when you needed to replace anything, but its about the best quality you will get for that
budget, and still be able to get cables and mics(Maybe not even stands for that budget).
You just won't be able to do anything that most people would qualify as a 'decent' system
for that price, sorry.
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5620
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954069 - 18/11/11 08:41 AM
|
|
|
|
I am with seablade here. There is a cost point in all things below which you simply
cannot go. Well, two cost points really, works but crap. Nothing at all!
Sorry
but this is "life", whether a PA system, the most basic project "studio" or something as
mundane as running a car (legally!) there is an amount of money needed which cannot be
avoided.
So...School eh? Parents? Get the begging bowl out! Run a fund raising
event, Car Boot. Have you seen "Cash in The Attic"? Get a few parents/friends involved
with that.
And talk to local shops, even if they don't sell mics and cables
they could donate stuff for the Boot! Get the Art department involved with some eye
catching flyers!
Dave.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954099 - 18/11/11 10:48 AM
|
|
|
Unlike others here, I think you can probably do it as you're not asking for microphones or
anything before the mixer. Lets say you have a budget of £600 You can buy Soundking
speakers or similar (Alto had a recommendation in another thread today) for around £450
or less. Stands will cost around £40 and cables under £20 if you can solder the
connectors yourself. That leaves you £90 for the mixer. You won't get A&H standard for
that kind of price but the bottom of the Yamaha MG range comes in about that price and
there are Soundcrafts even cheaper. Of course, if you really want value for
money you need to look at used gear but I suspect that a school will insist on new. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954115 - 18/11/11 12:38 PM
|
|
|
Quote James Perrett:
Unlike
others here, I think you can probably do it as you're not asking for microphones or
anything before the mixer. Lets say you have a budget of £600 You can buy Soundking
speakers or similar (Alto had a recommendation in another thread today) for around £450
or less. Stands will cost around £40 and cables under £20 if you can solder the
connectors yourself. That leaves you £90 for the mixer. You won't get A&H standard
for that kind of price but the bottom of the Yamaha MG range comes in about that price and
there are Soundcrafts even cheaper.
Sorry James, this is an area where being on different sides of the pond make a
difference(Again assuming the poster is from the US since the money was listed in $,
although other countries like Australia or Canada are possible, but they would be in even
worse shape in those countries).
You can't even get a Yamaha MG82 for the
money you suggested(And Soundcraft tends to be more expensive that A&H over here in
general), stands and cables will be more than you are thinking as well, and you likely
won't find Soundking at all on this side of the pond, you might find them rebadged as
something else, but even those you will have to look for, besides which they would likely
cost more than you are thinking over here, as even Behringers tend to cost most than that.
Sadly I wasn't joking, I looked up Behringer which I would never recommend and Samson
pricing before i made the post above. There is a single set of Behringers that wouldn't
take up half(8" drivers, and the 10" drivers take up just about half the budget). The
Altos that were recommended I can't find on this side of the pond at all, all I can find
are some passives from Alto that still take up half the budget by themselves, and an amp
would still be needed.
Seablade
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954131 - 18/11/11 02:21 PM
|
|
|
A few minutes searching gives http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAMMG102C $99 http://www.zzounds.com/item--JSTTS40 $69 http://www.zzounds.com/item--HOSCSS403 $15 http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/harbinger-aps15-15-powered-pa-spe
aker $460 which comes to a total of just under $655. The
speakers look like Soundkings although the power isn't as high as the ones we see over
here. You may also need to spend a little more on cables - I just went for the first ones
I found that would work. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954147 - 18/11/11 03:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Thank you for all the replies.
I don't have time to address them in depth now,
but will try to summarize a little.
I already wrote not fixed, but portable.
Yes, I did read the other thread about schools, and did not find it very
helpful, with arguments about hiring a separate audio consultant, etc. In this case, the
consultant is me. I am not a pro, but know more about this stuff than others in the
school, who would have no idea what the question in the title of this thread refers to.
The school will get something better with me involved in choosing it, than withat most
elementary schools here get, I assure you.
Also, something in that thread says
only to amplify the headmaster's voice. In this case, I being the music teacher, am
certainly concerned about decent music reproduction through it, and that it be stereo. I
do not mean havinga rock band play through it. But to play accompaniment for a school
chorus from an ipod whiel they sing, perhaps sometimes a kid singing a solo into a
microphone at the same time, etc.
I am in the USA, and have not heard of
Soundking speakers. If one looks at the web sites of US online music retailers, such as
Musician's Friend, one can get an idea of what is available here.
Channel
requirements--not a lot. A few channels would be OK. Besides, that is a function of the
mixer. Far more expensive, and affecting the sound much more, would be the choice of
powered speakers.
Place to be used--mostly, in the school auditorium, seating
I would guess a couple hundred people. Of coures, being portable, it could be used other
places as well, but the main usage would be in the auditorium.
Can anyone make
concrete suggestions, rather than arguing that it is impossible, or arguing that it is
better not to get anything? Well, we are getting something, and I would appreciate real
suggestions.
Thank you in advance.
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954151 - 18/11/11 03:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Perhaps to give a point of reference as well--
I own myself the Peavey Escort
portable sound system, and have used it for school performances, and find it quite
acceptable for that. (Price, around $650.) So, one option I have is to recommend that, or
another all in one solution. (The new JBL EON 210p looks interesting, for example.) Buying
one integrated system like that would be the easiest way to go. I may still do that, and
if anyone has recommendations on those systems, I would appreciate hearing that as well.
However, I was thinking that perhaps one could get a better system for the
money by purchasing separate components, and that was the main point of this thread, why I
asked the original question, etc.
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5620
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954159 - 18/11/11 03:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote maiki:
Perhaps to give a
point of reference as well--
I own myself the Peavey Escort portable sound
system, and have used it for school performances, and find it quite acceptable for that.
(Price, around $650.) So, one option I have is to recommend that, or another all in one
solution. (The new JBL EON 210p looks interesting, for example.) Buying one integrated
system like that would be the easiest way to go. I may still do that, and if anyone has
recommendations on those systems, I would appreciate hearing that as well.
However, I was thinking that perhaps one could get a better system for the money by
purchasing separate components, and that was the main point of this thread, why I asked
the original question, etc.
Checkout P114 current SoS Alto 115A £498 a pair.
Dave.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954162 - 18/11/11 04:16 PM
|
|
|
I'm not a big fan of the Peavey Escort - the Yamaha StagePAS sounds much better to me. We
use a StagePAS 300 for vocals at rehearsals sometimes and it can certainly keep up with
drums and bass in a fairly large village hall. However, personally I'd still go for the
mixer/powered speakers option. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954164 - 18/11/11 04:35 PM
|
|
|
Quote James Perrett:
A few
minutes searching gives
http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAMMG102C $99
http://www.zzounds.com/item--JSTTS40 $69
http://www.zzounds.com/item--HOSCSS403 $15
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/harbinger-aps15-15-powered-pa-spe
aker $460
which comes to a total of just under $655.
The
speakers look like Soundkings although the power isn't as high as the ones we see over
here. You may also need to spend a little more on cables - I just went for the first ones
I found that would work.
James.
Nice, you did find better prices than I did on a few things on
my quick checks at my normal suppliers(The Yammie specifically). Gonna pick on you a
moment though and point out a few things. First and foremost is you are using 15' cables,
not 15 meter which would be closer to what would be wanted for something like this.
Second is that your speakers are actually more comparable to what I first posted than your
typical speaker, are a bit on the weak side and very cheaply manufactured, to the point in
their spec...
http://www.harbingerproaudio.com/products/aps-series.cfm
...that you get a listing for MaxSPL Long Term, which probably stems from the amp design
and overheating, with a number of 98dBSPL @ 1m, which if you are about 15m away form the
speaker, which is typical for a public school auditorium in the US, you are sitting at
about 75dBSPL, which is pitifully weak in all honesty.
You could probably get
more out of it but the peak SPL out of it, which you will likely never get, means you are
sitting at about 95dBSPL in the average listening area. You average is probably going to
be somewhere around 85dBSPL, which is still pretty much on the weak side, and won't leave
you much headroom at all for clean sound.
Not to mention I certainly wouldn't
consider the speaker decent;)
With the StagePAS system you are at least
sitting at about 95dBSPL peak, probably going to average around 90, which at least can get
the job done, albiet still restricted in terms of headroom for decent clean sound. (Every
tried to get a voice over a bunch of screaming elementary school kids to get their
attention? It can be very interesting at times, trust me. Did some tours on a kids show
for a while, wouldn't really want to touch any of these systems for that personally;).
Of course you didn't have anything in as far as mic cables or or mics or mic
stands either obviously, but one would hope you could fill that in with the approx $300
left. But I would also consider this an exceedingly low quality system personally, and
would go for the Peavey escort system mentioned before this one personally, and that isn't
saying much(I don't have a high opinion of that system either).
Seablade
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954165 - 18/11/11 04:36 PM
|
|
|
Quote James Perrett:
I'm not a
big fan of the Peavey Escort - the Yamaha StagePAS sounds much better to me. We use a
StagePAS 300 for vocals at rehearsals sometimes and it can certainly keep up with drums
and bass in a fairly large village hall. However, personally I'd still go for the
mixer/powered speakers option.
James.
Now this I will agree with, just I would take the StagePAS over
the system posted above;)
Seablade
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954166 - 18/11/11 05:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Ok so I decided to take a look around and see what I could get. Not including shipping,
at $1000 you can get a pair of EV ELX112p speakers, and a small unpowered mixer. At this
point this doesn't include cabling, mics, stands, etc. but would get you an actual decent
capable system. Will you play a rock concert with just this, heck no. But you can use it
to get the speech over the sound of lots of kids, and to amplify choral things pretty
well. A couple of choir mics will probably set you back another few hundred though,
especially if you go for decent ones, so keep that in mind.
Speaker stands
and cabling you could probably do for about $200-$250. A couple of cheap, but decent,
handheld mics and stands for another $200 or so. So overall you are probably looking at
around $1500 not including shipping for a system that might qualify as 'decent'(The
speakers definitely are decent for this use, the rest not so much but you can build on it
if need be). Probably about $2000 to be on the safe side to include shipping and the
general small stuff that comes up(ie. Oh you want the mixer to be 100' from stage, well
you will need at least a snake and a few more cables, etc.). PM me by the way and I will
send you a link to where I got these prices from, it is a place I typically don't
recommend to people that might need support down the road but they do have typically some
of the cheapest prices for system pieces.
Now that being said, your exact
requirements for reinforcement would be necessary to determine what size console you need.
If you are teaching elementary school then I assume we don't need to worry about
amplifying a band much, more just choir and speech. In which case a small mixer like
James linked to would be good enough, but if you for whatever reason need to amplify, say,
a jazz band for the high school, that is a completely different ball of wax in terms of
both mics required and mixer.
Seablade
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954167 - 18/11/11 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Quote maiki:
However, I was
thinking that perhaps one could get a better system for the money by purchasing separate
components, and that was the main point of this thread, why I asked the original question,
etc.
Nope, as I mentioned
for that price I would be looking at the StagePAS system honestly. Much easier in
general, and better quality that trying to piecemeal crap on top of crap IMO, but still
not what I would call 'decent' persay, just not horrible.
Seablade
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954251 - 19/11/11 06:46 AM
|
|
|
|
Once again, thanks for all your replies.
James Perrett--Yes,I have seen those
Harbinger speakers online, and they certainly are cheap. But are they decent? Has anyone
here actually tried them, or heard them somewhere?
Another low price speaker
brand is Kustom. I was surprised to see a very good review of them here on SOS. Anyone
here tried them?
What about Behringer?
I wouldn't worry too much
about microphones. I am sure the school must already have a couple (they do have a poor
built-on PA in the aud), and I hve a few of my own. I don't think speaker stands an cables
need to cost much. (Of course there are some pricy ones,. but I don't think that is
necessary.)
James, --the mixer you recommended is the Yamaha one for about
$100. There are also Soundcraft Notepad mixers for a similar price. Do you think the
Yamaha one is better.
No, the system will absolutely not be doing anything like
mikng a jazz band. Not even a choir either. However, yest to background accompaniment for
an elementary choir, pleyd from an Ipod through the system. Sometimes perhaps in addition
a child singing a solo in a microphone.
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954254 - 19/11/11 07:13 AM
|
|
|
Regarding the comparison between Peavey Escort and Yamaha Stagepas, I am not sure that I
agree that Stagepas is better. I have used a Yamaha Stagepas 500 system before. It was OK.
The mixer on the Peavey Escort is certainly much better, with faders, etc., no? The sound
on the Stagepas I used was OK, but I don't recall it sounding better than the Peavey
Escort.
Concerning Yamaha Stagepas, look at this other system from
Yamaha:
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/yamaha-emx212s-br12-pa-package/63
0196000000000 Better or worse than Stagepas?
And--if one looks at the
all-in-one portable systems on sitesl like musiciansfriend, there are many new ones out,
such as the JBL 210p I mentioned. I would be interested to hear from anyone who has tried
these other ones.
However, still interested in exploring what options there
are with separate components.
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954257 - 19/11/11 07:47 AM
|
|
|
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954274 - 19/11/11 10:57 AM
|
|
|
Seablade - my Google search always defaults to UK sites so I had real problems trying to
find Soundking speakers in the US. Those Harbingers were the only ones I could find but
I'm really surprised that some enterpreneur hasn't imported their better quality models
into the US. They're available under at least 5 brand names in Europe (Soundking now own
the Carlsbro and Studiomaster brands) and they have a good reputation for value for money.
Spares are also easily available for them. Just about all the budget Chinese speakers I've
heard have been better than the budget US made speakers that I've heard. And,
as I said, there has been no mention of mics and stands so no need to fit them into the
budget. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954302 - 19/11/11 04:44 PM
|
|
|
@James Yes the Soundking brand really hasn't made it across to the US much even
in rebadged form. Every now and then I will see something IIRC, but they are very rare
and event hey have only popped up in the past year or two. Quote maiki:
Another low
price speaker brand is Kustom. I was surprised to see a very good review of them here on
SOS. Anyone here tried them?
Yep, they are awful in my opinion. What review was good of them? I am
curious.
Quote:
What about Behringer?
On rare occasions you get decent sounding stuff from them, but are notorious for
breaking as they tend to be exceedingly cheaply made, and more often than not their sound
reflects this as well.
Quote:
I wouldn't worry too much about microphones. I am sure the school must
already have a couple (they do have a poor built-on PA in the aud), and I hve a few of my
own. I don't think speaker stands an cables need to cost much. (Of course there are some
pricy ones,. but I don't think that is necessary.)
Cables certainly shouldn't cost much(A
couple of connectors for the ones you are looking for run $5-$10 and the cable itself
should be fairly cheap). Stands don't need to so long as you have someone capable and
willing to lift speakers onto stands, but you do want to at least make certain they are
sturdy, and lock well without breaking the brakes on the stands.
Quote:
James, --the
mixer you recommended is the Yamaha one for about $100. There are also Soundcraft Notepad
mixers for a similar price. Do you think the Yamaha one is better.
I love the notepad mixers as submixers, but
they are sadly discontinued. I would consider Soundcraft to have a better sound in
general than Yamaha, but the Yamaha MG series that ends in a C also has some basic
compression built in which you will want for your speakers, trust me, so in this case I
would go for Yamaha over Soundcraft without much hesitation.
Quote:
However, yest to
background accompaniment for an elementary choir, pleyd from an Ipod through the system.
Sometimes perhaps in addition a child singing a solo in a microphone.
Ok that is easy, in which case the Yamaha
82CX(More expensive with basic reverb built in for the solo mic) or 102C(No reverb and
cheaper) will work fine.
Personally before you do any purchasing I would get
your hands on those mics and cables and test them that you think the school has, unless
you plan on bringing in your own. I never assume someone has something unless I see it
personally.
Oh one thing that hasn't been addressed, you said stereo system,
don't get hung up on that. The system may be capable of it, but that doesn't mean it is
the best option, and for two speakers covering one area you may find that stereo just
isn't an option, often it isn't. Implementing proper stereo coverage of a space means,
among other things, that each of the two speakers need to cover the entire audience area,
and cover it appropriately(You have to worry about timing difference between speaker
sources and level differences in coverage, etc.) It rarely gets done well, even if you
have someone professional building the system, and takes much more thought and money to do
well. Considering we haven't even discussed coverage needs, well you can probably guess
my response;)
If you absolutely do not need, mics, cabling for the mics, or mic
stands, or cabling for inputs, then I would strongly recommend PMing me and trying to
stretch your budget a little to the speakers I mentioned above(A pair of those speakers
can be gotten for $900), they will blow away most everything mentioned in this thread for
quality. Almost everything else here will need significant EQ to sound even close to
decent out of the box, these probably won't for a voice. Combine that with $85 for the
Yamaha 102C or $120 for the Yamaha 82CX, either of which will do the basic requirements
you mention(See above for difference) and $70 for a pair of speaker stands, and a pair of
cables to drive the speakers for $30...
http://www.amazon.com/GLS-Audio-Patch-Cable-Cords/dp/B003P4XDP2/ref=sr_1_2
2?s=musical-instruments&ie=UTF8&qid=1321720474&sr=1-22
(Surprisingly decent for the price to be honest, but still a bit on the short side at
only 25', I would rather 50' for this, but you can toss on a couple of 30' extensions if
needed...) http://www.amazon.com/GLS-Audio-Cable-Patch-Cords/dp/B003MB7156/ref=sr_1_4
0?s=musical-instruments&ie=UTF8&qid=1321720525&sr=1-40
Which
would also give you cabling for inputs if needed.
All together that brings the
total to... about $1100 or so ($1150 or so with the extra cables above) ignoring shipping,
inputs, pretty much everything but the very bare bones and something that would be much
better quality reproduction than any of the other speakers in this thread. With shipping
you are probably looking at another $100 or so, honestly this is only a guess though.
Seablade
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: James Perrett]
#954303 - 19/11/11 04:46 PM
|
|
|
Quote James Perrett:
Seablade -
my Google search always defaults to UK sites so I had real problems trying to find
Soundking speakers in the US.
Yea I have the same problem coming up with pricing in the UK.
Quote:
Those Harbingers
were the only ones I could find but I'm really surprised that some enterpreneur hasn't
imported their better quality models into the US. They're available under at least 5 brand
names in Europe (Soundking now own the Carlsbro and Studiomaster brands) and they have a
good reputation for value for money. Spares are also easily available for them. Just about
all the budget Chinese speakers I've heard have been better than the budget US made
speakers that I've heard.
Yep can't really argue with that considering I haven't heard them. Have no doubt
they sound good from what I have heard around here, they just aren't on this side of the
pond much.
Quote:
And, as I said, there has been no mention of mics and stands so no need to fit
them into the budget.
My experience with consulting people is assuming that means someone gets pissed later
when it isn't there;)
Seablade
|
ef37a
Joined: 29/05/06
Posts: 5620
Loc: northampton uk
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954306 - 19/11/11 05:09 PM
|
|
|
|
"Yea I have the same problem coming up with pricing in the UK."
Once Upon a
Time, Google used to default to the rest of the world or (here?) you could restrict
searches to only UK. Now it seem it makes your mind up for you!
Dave.
|
damoore
Joined: 05/07/09
Posts: 325
Loc: New Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: ef37a]
#954355 - 20/11/11 03:42 AM
|
|
|
|
The Alto truesonics, which were recently mentioned as decent, do seem to be available in
the US. I see quotes of $279 for the 12" powered versions. I have not heard them, and they
were described as better than the Mackie Thump, which could be construed as damning with
faint praise.
|
seablade
Joined: 21/11/04
Posts: 3768
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: damoore]
#954357 - 20/11/11 04:21 AM
|
|
|
Quote damoore:
The Alto
truesonics, which were recently mentioned as decent, do seem to be available in the US. I
see quotes of $279 for the 12" powered versions. I have not heard them, and they were
described as better than the Mackie Thump, which could be construed as damning with faint
praise.
Good catch, I was
looking for the SX115 for some reason, as that was a model given in one of those posts(But
not the post that I should have checked, yea for moving to fast through a thread for
reference, probably how I only came up with passives), but obviously isn't the truesonic
range. While you are correct that saying it is better than Mackie Thumps isn't exactly
saying much, I would be more likely to take a close look at those than the Harbingers
mentioned, and definitely than the Behringers. Would be interested to hear them, though I
would still put money on the ELX blowing them out of the water(I prefer the ELX to the RCF
Arts that were mentioned in that thread and over here the ELX is less expensive IIRC).
Seablade
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954730 - 22/11/11 04:52 AM
|
|
|
Someone here recommended Alto Truesonics. I never heard of them before. Do you mean like
these: http://www.planetdj.com/i--TS112A ? Anyone hear actually
heard those?
|
midiot
Joined: 20/01/06
Posts: 11
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954731 - 22/11/11 07:44 AM
|
|
|
|
I use Genelec 1031A's with an analog Speck UltraMix.. And in my talking points, I am
talking about quality monitors, not trash like Bheringer.
1) The amp you buy
is not going to be as finely tuned or as well matched as proprietary powered monitors will
incorporate. 2) The cable from mains to speaker is millimeters in a powered
monitor, compared to __ meters coming out of a powered mixer 3) The more power you
have floating around a mixer, the more ground and RF noise problems it can attract,
hence i believe passive mixer / powered monitors are by far the better choice, unless you
are talking top shelf pro design, $$$ components, cableing and installation.
So
, Advantage goes to the passive mixer/powered monitors. Added bonus: if you find you
have to take the session or mix elsewhere, you can bring along your powered monitors so
you have a consistent reference . In my case, the 1031A''s sound better than 75% of
studio nearfields around my city, so i take them everywhere.
|
TheChorltonWheelie
Joined: 22/09/09
Posts: 867
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954733 - 22/11/11 08:08 AM
|
|
|
Quote maiki:
Someone here
recommended Alto Truesonics. I never heard of them before. Do you mean like these: http://www.planetdj.com/i--TS112A ?
Anyone hear actually
heard those?
Yes, I have,
and for the price they're very, very good. I'd definitely put them well ahead of
Mackie/Tapco Thump and the Wharfedale EVP range, but then there's a big gap in price to
the next range of powered speakers, i.e. RCF, so the Alto's sit inbetween.
I'm
going to buy a pair of the 15's and a the sub and see what they're like on the smaller
gigs, on the demo/audition that I did with the setup I'd say that I'm not going to be
unhappy with that as an £800 active rig. Moreover, the power ratings are accurate,
they're genuinely 400w, so with that setup you have a genuine 1200w-1400w output.
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954734 - 22/11/11 08:27 AM
|
|
|
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954736 - 22/11/11 08:33 AM
|
|
|
|
maiki
Joined: 08/08/08
Posts: 52
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: seablade]
#954742 - 22/11/11 08:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Seablade--you write that the Soundcraft Notepads have been discontinued. But they sure
have them on Musicians Friend at close-out prices. The Notepad 102 only $49, I think the
104 is $79, and the 104fx is $99. So for the same price as the lowest Yamaha one could get
the highest end Notepad--the 104fx, which has a lot of effects. Would you still recommend
the Yamaha 102c over the Soundcraft Notepad 104fx, at the same price?
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9645
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Passive mixer with powered speakers, or powered mixer with passive speakers?
[Re: maiki]
#954766 - 22/11/11 10:03 AM
|
|
|
The Nady uses piezo drivers for the horn so can simply be classed as junk. The Peaveys are
passive - I though we'd persuaded you to go active. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|