Main Forums >> Production - Mixing, Mastering, Gear & Techniques
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist

Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1510
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Calvin Harris: 'Bounce'
      #954007 - 17/11/11 06:47 PM
I love the sound of this record, and the way it comes across as clearer and more up-front, yet at the same time less abrasive, than strong competitors such as Example’s ‘Changed The Way You Kissed Me’ or Pitbull’s ‘Give Me Everything’. Part of the trick of this, it seems to me, is simply that ‘Bounce’ doesn’t have any padding instruments at all — in other words nothing that exists simply for the purpose of stating the harmonies. The only harmony in this track is that implied by the way the bass line and melody fit together, which makes it extraordinarily efficient, sonically speaking. It’s the old maxim: the less you put into the mix, the bigger each thing can sound.

The production scores highly on other grounds too. The low end is powerful and tight, although the track doesn’t rely on that — kick and bass come through fine even on a smartphone’s internal speaker. The high end is airy and extended. The mid-range gets maximum value out of the 600Hz-1.2kHz octave, so that the lead synth hook has real substance in the mix and doesn’t need to sharpen the 3-5kHz zone too severely to stay right in your face. Mono compatibility is also great, despite a decent sense of stereo width. This is a track I’ll be referring back to for some time.

One specific aspect of the sonics that’s worth picking out as well is the grainy digital effect that has been applied to the opening synth riff. It’s difficult to reverse-engineer a treatment like this very precisely, but it sounds to me as if the audio signal is frequency-modulating itself, and that there’s probably some kind of digital ‘bit-crusher’ in there too, alongside more typical analogue-style distortions. Whatever the settings, though, it’s creating a slew of additional frequency information all the way across the mid-range and high end, much of which is not musically related to the synth notes themselves.

This serves a number of purposes here. Firstly it allows what are inherently rather pure and simple synth waveforms to pack out the mix texture to a much greater extent than you’d normally expect. Secondly, the dissonant frequencies of the effect inevitably blend poorly with the song’s harmonies, which helps them poke out of the mix in much the same way that a wayward bit of tuning tends to do. And, finally, it creates a kind of auditory illusion, particularly during the song’s synth-only intro, that the upper octaves of the mix as a whole are strong and clear, even though the synth patches themselves are subjectively quite dull-sounding. Analogue distortions are a more instinctive choice for many people, but this track provides a great demonstration of how some of the less ‘musical’ digital harmonics-generation processes can also have their place, especially in electronic styles.

Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Mike Senior
SOS Mix Specialist

Joined: 08/08/03
Posts: 1510
Loc: Cambridge, UK
Re: Calvin Harris: 'Bounce' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #954008 - 17/11/11 06:51 PM
I reviewed this from the version on the NOW 79 compilation. gives the following credits:

Written, arranged, performed, and produced by Calvin Harris
Vocals by Kelis
Mastered by Mike Marsh

If you want to hear another example of synth distortion as a mix effect, check out Alex Guadino's 'What A Feeling' as well -- the main synth line which first appears at 0:08 adopts the same kind of principle as in 'Bounce'. It's difficult to say exactly what the distortion stems from, but once again it sounds more digital than analogue to me, even though it's not quite as extreme as Calvin Harris's. So many plug-ins to abuse, so little time...

Another interesting comparison with 'Bounce' is Example's recent UK smash 'Changed The Way You Kiss Me', in that both feature prominent use of upward pitch-shifting as a build-up into their final hook sections. I personally like the Calvin Harris version more (2:45-3:00) because of the novelty of its series of progressively ascending pitch-dives, but there's no denying the effectiveness of Example's slower and more predictable continuous upwards ramp (2:22-2:37), and the subsequent dive-bomb into the section boundary is a nice touch.

For more critiques of commercial productions, browse The Mix Review Index.

Recording Secrets for the Small Studio
Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top

Joined: 09/02/08
Posts: 1660
Loc: Leeds, UK
Re: Calvin Harris: 'Bounce' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #954038 - 17/11/11 10:55 PM
Sounds like tape jitter on the fuzzy synth. Could it be that the raw synth patch was recorded to dodgy tape as an effect and played back before having the digital distortion added? Or possibly an equivalent modeling plugin.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top

Re: Calvin Harris: 'Bounce' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #954061 - 18/11/11 05:15 AM
Thanks Mike. Enjoy your reviews.
Would love to see which equipment is used to master these pop tracks.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top

Joined: 24/03/01
Posts: 94
Loc: London
Re: Calvin Harris: 'Bounce' new [Re: Mike Senior]
      #954118 - 18/11/11 01:21 PM
Hey...have been using the Example track as a mix ref for past few weeks...really rate it (believe it's Michael Woods the veteran dance producer behind it)...but sounds like the Calvin track is a step up!

Haven't heard Bounce properly (apart from out and about where it's screaming through a club system) will give it a proper listen on the monitors. His stuff has always been pretty minimal and effective

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
2 registered and 14 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, SOS News Editor 
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating: *
Thread views: 25988

June 2016
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for June 2016
DAW Techniques


Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Blog | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help


Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26


We accept the following payment methods in our web Shop:

Pay by PayPal - fast and secure  VISA  MasterCard  Solo  Electron  Maestro (used to be Switch)  

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2016. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents.
The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media