the spud
member
Joined: 17/03/02
Posts: 72
|
any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
#95481 - 01/03/05 12:41 PM
|
|
|
hello mummies & daddies  seeing that i'm still in my nappies as regard to this mixing & mastering
malarky plese offer some pampers as to what volume you mix & master at.
 personally when i've wet myself on low volume i've found the mix to be
more accurate (when later tested out on high volume and on different speakers) conversely when i wail at high volume i find the mix to be inaccurate (when
tested later on) much cuddles ps. i'm mixing on beyer dt150,
straight from soundcard
|
Doublehelix
Joined: 04/12/02
Posts: 4162
Loc: USA
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#95506 - 01/03/05 01:17 PM
|
|
|
Well, the number I hear bantered about all the time is 85-90 dB, which is were I mix and
master at. Buy yourself a sound meter and use it always!!!  From your post however, it sounds like you are using headphones (only) for your mixing.
This can be very dangerous, and will not give you a true picture of your sound, or the
stereo spread. Think about this: You have 2 speakers on your stereo...each of
your ears is hearing sound from *both* speakers, not just one. Albiet, there is a slight
delay between when the sound from the one speaker reaches one ear vs. the other. This
slight delay is what the brain uses to determine the position and distance of the sound.
By using only headphones, you are losing all of this. My advice, get yourself
some decent monitors, and some basic room treatment, and hear the difference!!!
-------------------- James
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake" ~Napoleon Bonaparte~
|
Marky
posting's fun
Joined: 30/06/04
Posts: 560
Loc: Boston, MA
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: Doublehelix]
#95552 - 01/03/05 02:29 PM
|
|
|
You should mix at whatever level you feel comfortable with, so long as you take into
account the Fletcher-Munson
curve. Essentially, at low volume levels, most of what you're hearing is
mid-range. As the levels increase, the bass and hi frequencies come out and end up
dominating. If you're mixing music with lots of emphasis on bass, it's critical you run
some checks on the music at higher levels to make sure the bass is neither non-existant or
wiping out everything else in the mix. - Mark
-------------------- "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent."
|
archdake mkII
won't go away
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 1303
Loc: Greece, west coast
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#95597 - 01/03/05 03:31 PM
|
|
|
|
It is recommended to monitor at low, mid and high volumes not only because of
Fletcher-Munson but also because people will listen to it at various levels. Some times at
low volumes the bass will get lost so EQ it accordingly for better recognition (you might
have to use a different frequency than the one you used at mid or high volume!). Of course
don't go mad over this. Use a sensible standard and check the mix at lower and higher
levels occasionally...
|
Darclinc
Joined: 04/08/03
Posts: 1942
Loc: Earth
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: archdake mkII]
#95614 - 01/03/05 03:50 PM
|
|
|
Another thing to bear in mind is potential room problems. If you have an
untreated room, monitoring at high levels could mean that room problems / problem
frequencies could become accentuated and influence what you think you hear. Ultimately
this can cause damage to your mix and your songs may not translate well onto other
systems. For what it's worth, few people on this board have properly treated
rooms, but this is just another thing to consider while mixing really ... For
me personally I work at lowish to mid levels most of the time, but will turn it up to
check the low and high ends for short periods of time. But again, the above statement
applies to me as well. Regards, D
-------------------- www.thirdfloormusic.com
|
gerard
Joined: 07/02/05
Posts: 2608
Loc: London, UK
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#95710 - 01/03/05 07:20 PM
|
|
|
|
mix at low/moderate volumes and then crank it occaissionally to check it at high
volumes...
i also mix down to cd and try it in the car... make notes and then
continue mixing...
i have the mission speakers and pretty flat headphones,
forget the brand/model.. i think they are AKG...
|
Oli_F
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 639
Loc: London
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#95962 - 02/03/05 10:40 AM
|
|
|
Don't forget that monitoring at extended loud volumes reduces your ears' ability to detect
subtlety as the tendons/muscles in your ears will tighten to protect the the eardrum. (Do
it for long enough and this is what causes the ringing after clubbing & gigs, etc) Hence they move less for the same amount of volume, and therefore affect your
ability to hear what's really going on. It only takes a few minutes of loudness
to cause this effect, so go easy on yr ears!
-------------------- Cassette Electrik
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18399
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#95981 - 02/03/05 11:09 AM
|
|
|
|
I think the key points have been made. When mixing/mastering most people find they get
better results when monitoring at relatively modest levels -- low to mid volumes.
Not only does this protect their hearing in the long term, it is also less fatiguing, so
mixing sessions can continue longer and with more consistency.
However, when
monitoring at moderate levels the hearing response changes slightly with frequency, making
us less able to hear the extremes of the frequency range. Furthermore most speakers
(especially reflex ported types) exaggerate this effect.
As a result, when
monitoring at lower levels, both your ears and the speakers become more critical of the
midrange frequencies. This is helpful because this is where the bulk of the 'information'
is in music, and balancing the various 'lead' instruments voices and percussion correctly
is the key to a good mix. This is the same reason why the Yamaha NS10 monitors are so
often used as reference tools.
If you monitor at high volumes, both the ears
and many speakers tend to become less critical of midrange signals, partly because of a
'masking' effect from loud LF signals, and also because with grater dynamics it becomes
easier to hear 'into' the mix and disregard balance errors.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
the spud
member
Joined: 17/03/02
Posts: 72
|
Re: any advice please : mixing & mastering: should one do it on low, mid or high volume
[Re: the spud]
#96227 - 02/03/05 04:58 PM
|
|
|
* burp *  (thats infantile for : u r so fab, o thank u, i'm so happy)
|