ryan mead
Joined: 19/06/05
Posts: 1375
Loc: Seoul
|
File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
#956762 - 02/12/11 04:44 AM
|
|
|
So I had a brush with death on the old mbp, and the ordeal, from which I luckily emerged
unscathed, taught me that Time Machine alone isn't enough of a backup strategy. I'd like to keep using it, but additionally use something that just helps me sync one or
two (very voluminous) folders to an external drive. I'm not looking for imaging, but for
something that will let me access files directly on the backup media. Something like
Microsoft's Synctoy. And the drive will absolutely have to be formatted in FAT32 or some
other way that would allow me to get at the contents from a Windoze or linux box. So, any suggestions? I don't mind paying a bit, but I expect what I'm looking for should
be available in freeware, because my requirements aren't really very complicated.
-------------------- http://ryanmead.net
|
Ducasse
member
Joined: 17/09/02
Posts: 187
Loc: Oakland, California
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: ryan mead]
#956765 - 02/12/11 06:57 AM
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is what you are after, but I love it.. http://www.bombich.com/It clones
my drives to an external every night. It is very customizable, so you can retain deleted
files if you want etc... -Free as well..
-------------------- http://www.christopherferreira.com
|
buggymusic
member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 234
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: Ducasse]
#956784 - 02/12/11 09:28 AM
|
|
|
|
"Carbon Copy Cloner" for me the best one by a margin (donationware)
|
matt keen
Joined: 07/01/06
Posts: 1820
Loc: Northants, England
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: ryan mead]
#956893 - 02/12/11 06:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote ryan mead:
So I had a brush
with death on the old mbp, and the ordeal, from which I luckily emerged unscathed, taught
me that Time Machine alone isn't enough of a backup strategy.
I'd like to keep
using it, but additionally use something that just helps me sync one or two (very
voluminous) folders to an external drive. I'm not looking for imaging, but for something
that will let me access files directly on the backup media. Something like Microsoft's
Synctoy. And the drive will absolutely have to be formatted in FAT32 or some other way
that would allow me to get at the contents from a Windoze or linux box.
So, any
suggestions? I don't mind paying a bit, but I expect what I'm looking for should be
available in freeware, because my requirements aren't really very complicated.
Ryan - what did time machine fail to
do?
-------------------- Matt
www.krcollective.org
|
ryan mead
Joined: 19/06/05
Posts: 1375
Loc: Seoul
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: matt keen]
#957066 - 04/12/11 06:45 AM
|
|
|
Quote matt keen:
Ryan - what did time machine fail to do?
Actually, it worked just fine in the end, but there was a hiccup along
the way. I tried to do a full system restore from the backup, and it failed. After an
online search, I encountered people who had got past that hurdle by reinstalling (snow
leopard in this case) and then restoring from the backup.
This seems to have
worked fine.
However, during the process, I was gripped by a bone-chilling
fear. Suppose the time-machine backup(s) also became unreadable? Or (more likely) suppose
my mbp had died permanently and I decided to jump the apple ship and port all my files to
a windoze or linux box? I'd be screwed with nothing but backups in a proprietary apple
format.
I'll give Carbon Copy Cloner a whirl; looks like it might be exactly
what I'm after.
-------------------- http://ryanmead.net
|
matt keen
Joined: 07/01/06
Posts: 1820
Loc: Northants, England
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: ryan mead]
#957072 - 04/12/11 09:32 AM
|
|
|
Quote ryan mead:
Quote matt keen:
Ryan - what did time machine fail to do?
Actually, it worked just fine in the end, but there was a hiccup along
the way. I tried to do a full system restore from the backup, and it failed. After an
online search, I encountered people who had got past that hurdle by reinstalling (snow
leopard in this case) and then restoring from the backup.
This seems to have
worked fine.
However, during the process, I was gripped by a bone-chilling
fear. Suppose the time-machine backup(s) also became unreadable? Or (more likely) suppose
my mbp had died permanently and I decided to jump the apple ship and port all my files to
a windoze or linux box? I'd be screwed with nothing but backups in a proprietary apple
format.
I'll give Carbon Copy Cloner a whirl; looks like it might be exactly
what I'm after.
Well you
know what they say: If its not backed up twice its not backed up
-------------------- Matt
www.krcollective.org
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7890
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: matt keen]
#957077 - 04/12/11 10:29 AM
|
|
|
|
SuperDuper is rock solid for me...
|
ryan mead
Joined: 19/06/05
Posts: 1375
Loc: Seoul
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: matt keen]
#957095 - 04/12/11 12:41 PM
|
|
|
Quote matt keen:
Well you know
what they say: If its not backed up twice its not backed up
Right but even if it's backed up ten times with
Time Machine, it's not backed up in a way that's at all portable to anything running a
non-mac OS, hence this thread.
-------------------- http://ryanmead.net
|
turbodave
Joined: 25/04/08
Posts: 2103
Loc: derbyshire uk
|
Re: File backup strategy to supplement Time Machine?
[Re: ryan mead]
#957104 - 04/12/11 01:40 PM
|
|
|
|
I have now got one external drive doing time machine, one that is a drag and drop for
files of all sorts , and one online storage facility. I think you are right to have one
extra backup that isn't time machine as some functions are not conducive to quick access.
(photos) Dave
-------------------- My head hurts!
|