Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2547
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
#961331 - 31/12/11 05:36 PM
|
|
|
|
It's easy enough to find which wire in a cable is broken with a simple continuity test,
but finding out where is a bit different. Most people opt for checking the plugs
and if there is no break there, sacrifice the cable to two shorter ones by chopping it in
half. However, if you have a 20m cable you can waste a lot of it if the break is only 1m
from one end.
Most modern DMMs as well as continuity testing can also measure
capacitance, and this is what I use to find breaks. Having found which wire is broken
using a continuity test I then measure the capacitance at one of the plugs from that wire
to the screen (if there is no screen I connect all the other wires together). I then do
the same at the other end of the cable. The ratio of the capacitance is then the ratio of
the distances from the ends to where the break is. With a bit of fiddling around:
Assume c1 is the capacitance at one end and d1 is its unknown distance. Similarly
c2 is the capacitance from the other end and d2 the associated distance. dt is the known
total cable length, and ct is the total capacitance, c1 + c2.
d1 / c1 = d2 /
c2
but dt / ct = d1 / c1 = d2 / c2
so: d1 = dt x c1 / (c1 +
c2)
Plonking in some figures for a 10m cable where we find we have
capacitances of 100pF and 400pF
d1 = 10 x 100 / (100 + 400) = 2 So the
break is 2m from one end. As a sanity check the break will be closest to the end with the
lowest capacitance.
Because this relies entirely on ratios we don't need
to know the cable's specific capacitance, and can work on any cable of any length provided
we have a sensibly measurable capacitance.
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
Guy Johnson
Joined: 02/05/03
Posts: 3955
Loc: Pembrokeshire
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961350 - 31/12/11 07:44 PM
|
|
|
Clever. But I think if a cable's gone tits-up, and it's not at the usual point near the
mic-end, it means that the wires are weakened in the whole cable, and it is unreliable.
It's therefor time to chuck it on a fire and watch the pretty colours!
-------------------- PA stuff on FB
|
shufflebeat
Joined: 09/12/07
Posts: 2272
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Guy Johnson]
#961366 - 01/01/12 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Quote Guy Johnson:
Clever. But I
think if a cable's gone tits-up, and it's not at the usual point near the mic-end, it
means that the wires are weakened in the whole cable, and it is unreliable. It's therefor
time to chuck it on a fire and watch the pretty colours!
I don't think you're a proper cheapskate.
-------------------- Ohm's Law states, "Your PA isn't as powerful as you think it is".
|
Exalted Wombat
Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 4198
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Guy Johnson]
#961368 - 01/01/12 01:06 AM
|
|
|
Quote Guy Johnson:
Clever. But I
think if a cable's gone tits-up, and it's not at the usual point near the mic-end, it
means that the wires are weakened in the whole cable, and it is unreliable. It's therefor
time to chuck it on a fire and watch the pretty colours!
Maybe. Because a truck ran over it at one
point doesn't make it all bad!
|
Guy Johnson
Joined: 02/05/03
Posts: 3955
Loc: Pembrokeshire
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961383 - 01/01/12 12:04 PM
|
|
|
Good point about the truck! but then you see where the problem was. And I AM a cheapskate,
'coz I'd keep the old Male XLR ... Females get a bit worn out and intermittent and
unbalanced
-------------------- PA stuff on FB
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2547
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961385 - 01/01/12 12:51 PM
|
|
|
Hmmm not sure it's safe to talk about worn out, slack females  It's very easy to get a snagged cable with no sign of where the snag is, especially long
cables out in the open. One of our customers is a bomb disposal organisation.
They run 50m 6 core cables to some of their detector kit for power and comms. Having
established an area is clear they then unplug the cables and drag them out onto drums.
This is nearly always when they get damaged (they usually survive being run over by
trucks). Out in the desert, nipping down to RS for a new reel of cable isn't an option so
they have to be repaired on-site. However, giving their comms man a cheap meter and a bit
of instruction has worked rather well! Later, they come to us for proper
repairs. Depending on the condition of the cable, we'll do several patches before chopping
it up and replacing it.
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
Exalted Wombat
Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 4198
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961396 - 01/01/12 02:53 PM
|
|
|
Quote Folderol:
One of our
customers is a bomb disposal organisation. They run 50m 6 core cables to some of their
detector kit for power and comms. Having established an area is clear they then unplug the
cables and drag them out onto drums. This is nearly always when they get damaged (they
usually survive being run over by trucks). Out in the desert, nipping down to RS for a new
reel of cable isn't an option so they have to be repaired on-site. However, giving their
comms man a cheap meter and a bit of instruction has worked rather well!
I've seen both telephone and power company
engineers use a single-ended system for locating a cable break. One explained to me that
it injected a pulse and timed the reflection. I don't know if there are compact,
affordable versions of this technology.
|
shufflebeat
Joined: 09/12/07
Posts: 2272
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Guy Johnson]
#961425 - 01/01/12 07:22 PM
|
|
|
Quote Guy Johnson:
Good point
about the truck! but then you see where the problem was. And I AM a cheapskate, 'coz I'd
keep the old Male XLR ... Females get a bit worn out and intermittent and unbalanced
That's just being a prudentskate. In
fact I grew up five miles from Donegal where getting rid of anything on the grounds that
it has become "a bit worn out and intermittent and unbalanced" would be considered
extravagant, hence the preponderance of Clergy in the schools.
-------------------- Ohm's Law states, "Your PA isn't as powerful as you think it is".
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9653
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Exalted Wombat]
#961575 - 02/01/12 09:39 PM
|
|
|
Quote Exalted Wombat:
I've
seen both telephone and power company engineers use a single-ended system for locating a
cable break. One explained to me that it injected a pulse and timed the reflection. I
don't know if there are compact, affordable versions of this technology.
Check your computer network interface
software - some chipsets include this reflection timing. I was surprised to find it on
some Dell laptops.
James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
Boogyman
Joined: 03/01/12
Posts: 1
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961639 - 03/01/12 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
Hi Folderol,
Using your way I was finally able to find where a wire is cut,
awesome!
I have a 2.5 meter cable with 3 core wires (L/N/E) of the same
diameter. The N was cut, so I measured capacitance for N/E or N/L from both sides, they
were 0.225 nf and 0.242 nf. But when I measured the capacitance for the two good wires it
was 0.300nf. Surprisingly 0.225 + 0.242 = 0.467 which is not 0.300.
Can you
explain? am I missing something?
-------------------- Best Regards,
Ahmed Esmat
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2547
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: A cheapskate way to find cable breaks
[Re: Folderol]
#961710 - 03/01/12 07:13 PM
|
|
|
|
@james Interesting Proper portable testers were considerably north of £1000
last time I drooled ^H^H^H^H checked.
@Boogyman Not really sure, but
probably due to the fact you were leaving the unused wire floating instead of connecting L
& E together. Might have also affected the accuracy in a longer lead with the fault
towards one end.
With one wire floating it will have capacitance to both the
other two - the precise result of which is beyond my mathematics!
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|