ChromeDome
member
Joined: 01/01/03
Posts: 41
Loc: North West England
|
Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
#972485 - 26/02/12 10:14 PM
|
|
|
Sorry to start another "what do you think about this interface" thread. I was
ready to buy a PC ( Inta-Audio i7 Project Music PC) from Inta Audio and
after deciding against an Akai interface I had pretty much settled on the Focusrite
Saffire PRO 14 interface, given that the PC comes with TI Firewire and there are limited
USB ports (4 back/2 front). If I was getting a USB2 interface, the Native Instruments
Komplete Audio 6 would probably have been my choice, based on recommendations/reviews but
this costs more and there could be a month's wait to get any in stock. On
Friday, I spoke to the Audio PC expert at Inta-Audio and he said that they had experienced
problems with the NI interfaces and also advised me to choose USB over Firewire (odd,
given that the PCs come with Firewire). He told me to buy a Roland UA-55 "Quad-Capture"
USB2 Interface saying that the drivers Roland produce were far more reliable than those
from other manufacturers. He also said that it had good low-latency performance compared
to the alternatives. There are not a lot of reviews of this unit out there
(similar to the Akai in my other thread) and the unit doesn't seem too popular on the
forums, other than in the USA with Sonar users (I believe there is some connection and
that similar interfaces were branded as Cakewalk until recently). So, I face a
similar choice. On the surface, the Roland is expensive for a 2x2 interface (I don't have
anything that connects digitally so those I/Os are useless to me) and I'll probably need
to get another USB card fitted if I go down this route. The Saffire and NI KA6 offer more
useful I/O (to me) but I feel that if I go against the advice of Inta, I'll not really
have a leg to stand on support-wise if I get the latency/crackling problems that seem so
common. Sorry for the blather but I find this stuff to be a bloody minefield.
Every unit that I hear about seems to have problems of one kind or another and I'm scared
that I'll spend £1100 on a PC/Interface combo that won't work. Any
thoughts? Brendan
|
The_Big_Piano_Player
active member
Joined: 13/05/04
Posts: 1420
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972521 - 27/02/12 08:11 AM
|
|
|
I have it's big brother, the Octa-Capture.(Eight mic pres, instead of four). I've found
it to be rock-solid with excellent sound-quality.
I used it extensively both
in the studio, and live (weekly gigs), and it's never let me down.
I couldn't
recommend it enough.
-------------------- www.thediplomatz.com
|
Shambolic Charm
Joined: 13/07/05
Posts: 898
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972541 - 27/02/12 10:19 AM
|
|
|
I have the Sonar VS100 which was a predecessor of sorts and it is excellent. I switched to
it from a firewire interface because I found that when you overload the system with fw it
outputs a full volume blast of white noise-not great for live use or for the ears at
anytime. I found this to be the case with two different fw interfaces and there is plenty
of talk on forums about this. I don't know if they all do that. With USB I find if I push
the cpu to it's limit I just get the odd crackle or stutter.
-------------------- www.myspace.com/shambolic-charm
|
ChromeDome
member
Joined: 01/01/03
Posts: 41
Loc: North West England
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972769 - 28/02/12 10:26 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies.
I had read about the firewire/white-noise issue
somewhere and I would certainly rather avoid that! Maybe there is some truth in the
Roland gear being solid and reliable then.
For my purposes, it's just a 2x2
interface as I have no digital gear - sort of like a Focusrite 2i2 with added midi. Not
sure how well the auto-sensing feature works or if the inbuilt compressor is of any use.
Both seem to be well thought of from the few user reviews I've seen.
Might just
have to go with it and see. The Inta PCs are comparatively cheap but you don't seem to get
the level of support and commitment to the thing actually working that you get at Rain or
Scan. I suppose you pays your money (if you've got it) and takes your choice.
|
The_Big_Piano_Player
active member
Joined: 13/05/04
Posts: 1420
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972780 - 28/02/12 11:15 AM
|
|
|
Auto-sensing works very well... press the button, and get the musician to play as loudly
as they can, and that's it, your levels are set. I've never used the onboard
compressor.
-------------------- www.thediplomatz.com
|
Pete Kaine
Scan Computers
Joined: 10/07/03
Posts: 3151
Loc: Manchester
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972802 - 28/02/12 12:40 PM
|
|
|
I'm intrigued to hear what NI related issues he had. That aside I was going to
the say the Pro 14 should be fine with Asus P67/Z68 boards in a worse case senario with a
add in firewire card which they appear to fit anyway. Then I realised they were using the
H61 chipset rather than a full size board so errr... I couldn't say for certain but in
theory it should be fine. As for Roland and Sonar. From what I remember I'm
pretty sure Roland bought the majority share of Cakewalk a few years back, and have/had
been joint branding with them on hardware for a while.
-------------------- ScanProAudio & 3XS Audio Systems
ScanProAudio Blog
|
ChromeDome
member
Joined: 01/01/03
Posts: 41
Loc: North West England
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: Pete Kaine]
#972815 - 28/02/12 01:40 PM
|
|
|
Quote Pete Kaine:
That aside I
was going to the say the Pro 14 should be fine with Asus P67/Z68 boards in a worse case
senario with a add in firewire card which they appear to fit anyway. Then I realised they
were using the H61 chipset rather than a full size board so errr... I couldn't say for
certain but in theory it should be fine.
Thanks Pete. It's odd as I was considering the ASUS P8H67 - Intel
H67 Chipset upgrade for £29 in the hope that it would give me more USB ports but I
believe you still only get the 2xfront/4xback setup.
I also thought this would
do away with the firewire card but they still fit it as standard. It also strikes me as
odd that theres no option to go with the motherboard graphics on a PC intended for DAW use
as the Nvidia GeForce 210 also comes as fitted with no removal option
|
Pete Kaine
Scan Computers
Joined: 10/07/03
Posts: 3151
Loc: Manchester
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972864 - 28/02/12 04:36 PM
|
|
|
Yeah, it does seem a odd set of options, but I suppose they've probably got a reason for
it.
-------------------- ScanProAudio & 3XS Audio Systems
ScanProAudio Blog
|
Tombot
Joined: 09/12/04
Posts: 63
Loc: Scan Pro Audio
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972980 - 29/02/12 08:23 AM
|
|
|
The only issue that i've had with the NI interfaces was that they didn't like being
plugged into usb 3 ports. this appears to have been rectified with the latest drivers as i
had no problem getting guitar rig/ rig kontrol to run on usb 3 ports on saturday. IMO... hold out for the komplete audio 6... you'll get a significant performance
increase at low latencies from it in comparison to the firewire boxes. In testing, the ka6
has been getting up towards rme performance levels with the new drivers (rme usb
interfaces get between 7 to 7.5 dawbench low latency rating, the NI stuff has got about
6.5 on the new drivers and the dice based firewire boxes get around 4.3) just
out of interest.... is there any reason you are not considering a overclocked system? The
performance increase per pound has got to be a viable option, compared to a h67/h61 board
that you cant tweak. An overclocked system and the ka6 would probably give you
more than 40% extra power at low latencies than a stock system and a entry level firewire
interface.
-------------------- www.theautobots.com / www.scan.co.uk
|
ChromeDome
member
Joined: 01/01/03
Posts: 41
Loc: North West England
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: Tombot]
#972994 - 29/02/12 09:18 AM
|
|
|
Tombot - Thanks for your thoughts regarding the KA6. I must say that I've heard great
things about it from a couple of chaps who seem to have had a lot of experience with
it. Quote Tombot:
just
out of interest.... is there any reason you are not considering a overclocked system? The
performance increase per pound has got to be a viable option, compared to a h67/h61 board
that you cant tweak.
An overclocked system and the ka6 would probably give you
more than 40% extra power at low latencies than a stock system and a entry level firewire
interface.
Only one reason,
and an all to familiar one: money! 
I'm on a very tight budget and the Inta-Audio PCs, while very basic, are cheap. I
figured that for my modest objectives I don't need the sort of power that most folks here
require. I'm not a power user by any stretch of the imagination - I just want to use
Reaper to run a few plugins (I use Jamstix for drums but would like to get hold of some
entry level keys/synths) and bang a few tracks of guitar, bass and vocals on top.
In an ideal world, I'd buy from you (you're fairly local) but Scan don't cater for the
bottom end of the market (I fully understand why). I need to bring in a new PC and
interface at an absolute maximum of £1200 and that rules out the Scan machines.
Thanks again for your thoughts. I'll probably wait until the NI interfaces are back in
stock.
Regards Brendan
|
Pete Kaine
Scan Computers
Joined: 10/07/03
Posts: 3151
Loc: Manchester
|
Re: Roland UA-55 Quad-Capture Interface - any experience?
[Re: ChromeDome]
#972997 - 29/02/12 09:35 AM
|
|
|
Quote ChromeDome:
In an
ideal world, I'd buy from you (you're fairly local) but Scan don't cater for the bottom
end of the market (I fully understand why). I need to bring in a new PC and interface at
an absolute maximum of £1200 and that rules out the Scan machines.
I'm starting to think we need to run a
advertising campaign for the budget range.
-------------------- ScanProAudio & 3XS Audio Systems
ScanProAudio Blog
|