assemblethelight
Joined: 25/01/12
Posts: 22
Loc: North Carolina
|
Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
#971522 - 21/02/12 11:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Over the past 3 years, i have built my knowledge by online resources, hand on experience
and a lot of study. At this point i have not had experience with other plugins other than
REAPERS stock plugins, Antress Modern Plugins, most of Bootsy's stuff and random free
plugins. I did not go that route because i was being cheap but...because i was a beginner.
I do not like making ignorant choices with out research. I do not buy because it is "the
most popular". I think i have reached enough experience to start really investing in
quality plugins.
I do hear WAVES is professional and very widely used but is
it that much better than the free plugins i mentioned above? Is it truly bang for the buck
or is just hype sorta like Beats Headphones (which is advertising and truly overpriced)
Just using illustration ha.
I am looking a really good "bang for the buck
bundle" which included a decent reverb.
|
assemblethelight
Joined: 25/01/12
Posts: 22
Loc: North Carolina
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971524 - 21/02/12 11:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Also, would it be worth it just to convert over to Pro Tools? Are their plugins more
beneficial over Reapers stock plugins?
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7946
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971530 - 21/02/12 11:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Like any other product, there is great stuff out there, and there is fairly average
stuff.
You just need to research, demo and use the plugins and start to get a
feel for the ones that work good for you. Waves stuff in general, for me, varies from
"meh", to "ok" to "really nice and useful" to "great". There are plenty of other companies
making great plugins too, including Softube, Soundtoys, Lexicon, Sonnox, Universal Audio,
Abbey Road, Brainworx, Cytomic, iZotope, Metrix Halo, Sonalksis, and many others...
Check the user reviews at KVRAudio for more info on particular plugins, and other
forums such as Gearslutz.
However, no matter what you get, none of them are
going to change a bad mix or arrangement into a great one - they all require skill to get
the best out of them, same as the stock plugins.
I have my own list of
essentials and nice to haves, but they are so dependent on your music, styles and tastes
(and budget!) it's pointless to suggest individual ones.
Start with what you
are lacking - perhaps you feel you could do with a better compressor for instance, and
investigate the possibilities that third-parties have.
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971532 - 21/02/12 11:56 PM
|
|
|
I use Logic but almost exclusively use UAD plug-ins and they are utterly worth while! Not only do they sound great, I can get them to sound great with ease and they
really suit my style of working. I do not and would not use Waves plug-ins as a
matter of principal - their pricing, in my opinion, is corrupt. Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7946
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971535 - 22/02/12 12:10 AM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
I do not and
would not use Waves plug-ins as a matter of principal - their pricing, in my opinion, is
corrupt.
Actually, recently
some of their pricing is distinctly better than UAD plugins... ( ! )
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: desmond]
#971545 - 22/02/12 03:20 AM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
Quote Bob Bickerton:
I do not
and would not use Waves plug-ins as a matter of principal - their pricing, in my opinion,
is corrupt.
Actually,
recently some of their pricing is distinctly better than UAD plugins... ( ! )
Do they still do the WUP thing? It was
that aspect that I disagreed with, paying premium prices in the first place and then
paying an effective rental to keep them alive.
Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
Mixedup
active member
Joined: 03/09/03
Posts: 4265
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971554 - 22/02/12 07:36 AM
|
|
|
|
Some great Waves plugins, some less great. Ditto on UA and most others. Far better to mix
and match and build your collection gradually. That way you can gett to know one or two
new tools well, rather than investing lots of time learning all the new tools in a bundle.
Reaper's stock plugins are pretty good, and the wet/dry blend control for each insert
often means you can get away with slightly more heavy handed plugins than in some daws.
The SSL Duende bundle is a nice bite-sized bundle and would add something new to your
setup. DDMF LP10 is inexpensive and very good, and again adds to what you have. And a nice
tape sim could be useful... Tone Boosters Ferox is nice and colourful, and benefits from
the wet/dry control. Melda do a very comprehensive bundle for a decent price, but the GUIs
can be confusing. Depending on what sort of material you're working on, I'm sure we could
offer a whole lot more advice...
|
Scramble
active member
Joined: 11/09/02
Posts: 1719
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Mixedup]
#971561 - 22/02/12 09:19 AM
|
|
|
|
>Also, would it be worth it just to convert over to Pro Tools? Are their plugins more
beneficial over Reapers stock plugins?
I wouldn't go to all the effort of
converting to Pro Tools just for the plugins. There are tons of of good plugins out there
that you can use in Reaper, some of which have already been mentioned.
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9706
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971568 - 22/02/12 09:34 AM
|
|
|
I bought a set of Waves plug-ins in the days when most included plug-ins were a bit
rubbish. However, the built-in Reaper VST plug-ins are just as good and it is also worth
rummaging around the JS plug-ins as there are quite a few interesting ones there too. I
haven't tried installing my Waves plug-ins on my current computer as the Reaper ones do
the same job. James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
The_Big_Piano_Player
active member
Joined: 13/05/04
Posts: 1425
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: desmond]
#971571 - 22/02/12 09:45 AM
|
|
|
Quote desmond:
There are plenty
of other companies making great plugins too, including Softube, Soundtoys, Lexicon,
Sonnox, Universal Audio, Abbey Road, Brainworx, Cytomic, iZotope, Metrix Halo, Sonalksis,
and many others...
...Also, IK Multimedia and SSL Duende you can add to the list of excellence.
-------------------- www.thediplomatz.com
|
jaminem
active member
Joined: 19/03/01
Posts: 1127
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971583 - 22/02/12 11:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
Quote desmond:
Quote Bob Bickerton:
I do not
and would not use Waves plug-ins as a matter of principal - their pricing, in my opinion,
is corrupt.
Actually,
recently some of their pricing is distinctly better than UAD plugins... ( ! )
Do they still do the WUP thing? It was
that aspect that I disagreed with, paying premium prices in the first place and then
paying an effective rental to keep them alive.
Bob
Yeah, they do, but there is a lot of
misinformation about it. It actually just works like moving from say Cubase 5 to Cubase 6,
you'd pay for that if you wanted the new features or compatibility in Cubase 6, if you
didn't you wouldn't. Its not like the plugins stop working or anything.
So for
example all my Waves plugins are on Version 8, if when version 9 comes out there is a
reason for me to upgrade (64bit native compatibility being the obvious one) then I would
consider an upgrade, if not I won't. If I wanted to upgrade to version 10 there are no
catch-up charges...
Agreed that most companies don't offer this model, but with
UAD you have to buy the cards so its swings and roundabouts to me.
Also if you
are smart with your purchases, you don't have to pay full price for any Waves product,
they always have promotions on - I have never paid more than 50% for any of the Waves
plugs I own...
The API collection is amazing as well, you can't get that
anywhere else either...
|
Scramble
active member
Joined: 11/09/02
Posts: 1719
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: jaminem]
#971607 - 22/02/12 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Please don't hijack the OP's thread with another fight about Waves (not that that debate
isn't worth having, but it is a thread-derailer).
|
jaminem
active member
Joined: 19/03/01
Posts: 1127
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Scramble]
#971663 - 22/02/12 03:18 PM
|
|
|
Quote Scramble:
Please don't
hijack the OP's thread with another fight about Waves (not that that debate isn't worth
having, but it is a thread-derailer).
what?
I'm not hijacking anyone's thread or
starting a fight about anything, rather answering a question that's come up during the
course of the conversation that may be of relevance to the OP since he mentioned waves.
|
The_Big_Piano_Player
active member
Joined: 13/05/04
Posts: 1425
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: jaminem]
#971671 - 22/02/12 03:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote jaminem:
Quote Scramble:
Please don't
hijack the OP's thread with another fight about Waves (not that that debate isn't worth
having, but it is a thread-derailer).
what?
I'm not hijacking anyone's thread or
starting a fight about anything, rather answering a question that's come up during the
course of the conversation that may be of relevance to the OP since he mentioned waves.
I think Scramble was
trying to nip a hot topic in the bud, before it become a hijacked-thread.
It's not worked so far(!)
-------------------- www.thediplomatz.com
|
Scramble
active member
Joined: 11/09/02
Posts: 1719
|
|
|
I wasn't saying that you, Jaminem (or anyone else), have now hijacked the thread. I was
saying please don't let another one of those long debates spiral out of control.
|
Billum
Joined: 02/05/08
Posts: 282
Loc: London
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: jaminem]
#971679 - 22/02/12 05:01 PM
|
|
|
Quote jaminem:
The API collection
is amazing as well, you can't get that anywhere else either...
...although UAD are due to bring out their
API emulations before too long...
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2298
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971704 - 22/02/12 07:18 PM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
I use Logic
but almost exclusively use UAD plug-ins and they are utterly worth while!
Not
only do they sound great, I can get them to sound great with ease and they really suit my
style of working.
I do not and would not use Waves plug-ins as a matter of
principal - their pricing, in my opinion, is corrupt.
Bob
This is incredibly biased. UAD do have good
plugins but their DSP platform puts severe limitations on their usage. The new Waves
plugins are very good, as are Sonalksis, Sonnox, Abbey Road, SPL and plenty more...
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7946
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: johnny h]
#971708 - 22/02/12 07:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Can't see anything biased in his post, other than he loves the UAD plugins and finds them
great, and doesn't like Waves for his own reasons. I personally agree with his UAD
opinion, and I own and use a bunch of Waves stuff that I really like.
I'm less
keen on their more modern plugins, personally - I often find the gui's clunky and awkward
to use (often to the point of unusability, eg I find on their API plugins it's almost
impossible to turn the knobs with the mouse!) , and in cases where the products overlap I
tend to prefer the UAD versions.
However, there are some spectacularly good
Waves plugins too, as there also are from other companies. UA have much more (native)
competition these days than they did back in the early/mid 2000's
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971714 - 22/02/12 08:13 PM
|
|
|
Not trying to derail the thread at all, simply stating that I personally prefer UAD for my
own purposes and the way I work, which directly responds to the OPs original question
about third party plugs. But he mentioned Waves and I have an opinion on that too! If considering purchasing third party plugs, it's important to be aware of all
cost implications involved, so it's reasonable to debate such issues. An example being
that UAD is more costly up-front, in terms of buying a card, and, it would appear, in
terms of purchasing individual plug-ins, following which there are no upgrade costs,
compared to other companies where you need to pay for upgrades. Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: johnny h]
#971719 - 22/02/12 08:20 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
Quote Bob Bickerton:
I use
Logic but almost exclusively use UAD plug-ins and they are utterly worth while!
Not only do they sound great, I can get them to sound great with ease and they really
suit my style of working.
I do not and would not use Waves plug-ins as a matter
of principal - their pricing, in my opinion, is corrupt.
Bob
This is incredibly biased. UAD do have good
plugins but their DSP platform puts severe limitations on their usage. The new Waves
plugins are very good, as are Sonalksis, Sonnox, Abbey Road, SPL and plenty more...
Yes, opinions do tend to be
biased! Mine are, however, based on personal experience - end of story.
Oh, and
I've never had DSP limitations with my Quad card - hope you're not being biased in making
such a claim 
Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2298
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971725 - 22/02/12 08:37 PM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
Yes,
opinions do tend to be biased! Mine are, however, based on personal experience - end of
story.
Oh, and I've never had DSP limitations with my Quad card - hope you're
not being biased in making such a claim 
Well, you are the only making the
claim, not me!
UAD work ok for some, but for anyone with an i7 i'd say the
writing is on the wall for DSP cards... How many Manley plugins can you run on a card?
One? So for the quad you can just run four ? You can say the sound quality is good, and
it probably is, but there is nothing stopping native matching or exceeding that quality
and allowing you to run it on as many channels as you want!
|
desmond
Joined: 10/01/06
Posts: 7946
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: johnny h]
#971735 - 22/02/12 09:36 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
You can say the
sound quality is good, and it probably is, but there is nothing stopping native matching
or exceeding that quality and allowing you to run it on as many channels as you want!
Using UAD cards and plugins does
not preclude you from *also* running native plugins in your projects. You don't have to
try and do everything with a UAD card - it's just you have additional flavour options open
to you...
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: johnny h]
#971740 - 22/02/12 10:13 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
UAD work ok for
some, but for anyone with an i7 i'd say the writing is on the wall for DSP cards..
Yes the DSP is limited but it is
sufficient for my purposes. It is of course a glorified dongle - which works very well!
Quote johnny h:
How many
Manley plugins can you run on a card? One? So for the quad you can just run four ?
Correct - but I use it as a
mastering EQ - how many mastering busses do you run at a time?
Quote johnny h:
You can say the
sound quality is good, and it probably is,
'Probably' implies you aren't familiar with UAD 
Quote johnny h:
but there is
nothing stopping native matching or exceeding that quality and allowing you to run it on
as many channels as you want!
Of course, but I'm talking about my own direct experience with third party plug-ins as
opposed to native DAW - for all I know Reaper plugs may exceed anything else in the
universe!
Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
ronmac
Joined: 27/09/06
Posts: 73
Loc: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971742 - 22/02/12 10:22 PM
|
|
|
When is someone going to inject Mac v. PC into this conversation?
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2298
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971763 - 23/02/12 02:35 AM
|
|
|
Quote Bob Bickerton:
Quote johnny h:
UAD work ok for
some, but for anyone with an i7 i'd say the writing is on the wall for DSP cards..
Yes the DSP is limited but it is
sufficient for my purposes. It is of course a glorified dongle - which works very well!
Not as well as native plugins,
which you can easily run on every channel, even on a laptop.
johnny h Quote:
Quote johnny h:
How many Manley plugins can you run on a
card? One? So for the quad you can just run four ?
Correct - but I use it as a mastering EQ - how many mastering
busses do you run at a time?
None, my music gets professionally mastered.
I buy plugins which I have
complete freedom in using, and that don't rely on a couple of archaic 20 dollar sharc
chips sold back to me for 1500 euros.
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2546
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: johnny h]
#971769 - 23/02/12 05:09 AM
|
|
|
I think we're way off topic here. Apologies.
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
* User requested ...
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 2235
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Bob Bickerton]
#971775 - 23/02/12 08:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Don't apologise Bob - you're not the one steering the thread into the abyss.....
For the OP - what sort of budget have you got to play with? That makes quite some
difference to what your options are - if you're ready to spend cash right now, there are
several great deals floating around from respected companies. Softube slashed their prices
very recently - they make some wonderful hardware emulations and 'character' plugs that
get a lot of love from all quarters. Sonalkiss are having a 35% off sale right now, and
Waves seem to be on permanent 50% off discount. I've found that the biggest discounts can
usually be found buying not from the developer themselves, but online stores like
audiodeluxe.com or highprofileaudio.com. My view is that the 'vanilla' plugs that come
with all DAWs these days are usually fine for everyday use, and often it's only worth
shopping around for 3rd party plugs when you're looking for software that's going to add
real character or functionality that you can't find ( or create easily yourself)
elsewhere.
In my case that was stuff like UAD's Studer tape and EMT 140 emus,
and their Little Lab IBP port. Likewise the Waves stereo-surround up mix plug and CLA
signature plugs - all things that either enhance workflow or offer an end result that's
difficult to achieve via other solutions. Maybe it's worth starting by asking yourself the
question 'what do I want to do that my current plugs won't allow?' and progress from
there. Just do a lot of demoing and then cherry pick the good stuff that will really make
a difference to your projects.
|
The_Big_Piano_Player
active member
Joined: 13/05/04
Posts: 1425
Loc: Lincolnshire
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: ronmac]
#971777 - 23/02/12 08:33 AM
|
|
|
Quote ronmac:
When is someone
going to inject Mac v. PC into this conversation?
Surely, there's some mileage left in
discussing illegal downloads
-------------------- www.thediplomatz.com
|
SafeandSound Masteri...
Joined: 23/03/08
Posts: 857
Loc: London UK
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971788 - 23/02/12 10:11 AM
|
|
|
I don't know Reapers plugins but I almost never select a Nuendo stock plug in. Plug ins
over the last 3 years are simply astonishing, they cannot emulate hardware exactly quite
yet. (arguably impossible to ever manage this) However they are not far off at all and
they have huge advantages and sometimes actually sound better, yes shock horror !! (no
noise, do not affect stereo image as much, sometimes you want an eq to enhance the image
and sometimes not etc.) All about knowing the analogue and digital chain and selecting
what one feels is appropriate for a desired goal. cheers SafeandSound Mastering stem
mastering
|
fingers109
Joined: 23/04/07
Posts: 8
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971875 - 23/02/12 05:07 PM
|
|
|
|
I've got SSL Duende (all but the xreverb) they're very nice. Also have Waves Musician 1
and Tony Maserati collection. Supertap is used the most out of all my waves stuff. Though I'm annoyed by their complete lack of doing anything about 64bit DAWs so I'd say
stay away from them, currently.
|
assemblethelight
Joined: 25/01/12
Posts: 22
Loc: North Carolina
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971955 - 24/02/12 01:51 AM
|
|
|
|
What do need for the SSL Duende bundle to use in Reaper? iLok?
|
fingers109
Joined: 23/04/07
Posts: 8
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#971981 - 24/02/12 09:58 AM
|
|
|
SSL have their own dongle, if you feel you need to move between computers, or there's a
bit of licensing software if you just use the 1 computer (though you can only move the
plugins 3 times, so if you're a frequent computer rebuilder you'll want the  dongle)
|
Resonator
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 29
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#976079 - 16/03/12 09:27 AM
|
|
|
Fabfilter,PSP and Camel Audio all make some fantastic plug-ins.
-------------------- 10% discount off FabFilter plug-ins for new customers pm me for details.
|
caveman82
Joined: 30/01/06
Posts: 1264
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: Resonator]
#976086 - 16/03/12 09:46 AM
|
|
|
The UAD v Waves is tiresome to say at the least.... Also Reaper has a excellent
bundle of plugins, that are probably some of the best for any DAW.... When it
comes to buying plugins I'd advocate only getting ones which ones are needed, I myself
anyway have found having fewer plugins to be more beneficial than having lots. Right now I've pretty much reduced everything down to PSP ones; with Old Timer (for
Compression), and sQuad for EQ. They might not give the extra 1 or 2 % of some more
expensive choices but I find them really, really easy to use which I find to be one of the
most important things. Softube also make some great plugins and also for
something a little more esoteric Soundtoys have some excellent plugins.
-------------------- http://soundcloud.com/earwighoney
|
The Red Bladder
Joined: 05/06/07
Posts: 2098
Loc: . ...
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: assemblethelight]
#976089 - 16/03/12 09:53 AM
|
|
|
|
I too like the plugs in Reaper (and I speak as one who has all sorts of plugs and
hardware!)
Failing that, try iZotope! Truly remarkable stuff, but does not
smack you in the face. It kind of creeps up on you, rather like good hardware.
|
Resonator
Joined: 15/02/05
Posts: 29
|
Re: Plugins that matter? WAVES vs others?
[Re: caveman82]
#976090 - 16/03/12 09:53 AM
|
|
|
Quote caveman82:
Right now
I've pretty much reduced everything down to PSP ones; with Old Timer (for Compression),
and sQuad for EQ. They might not give the extra 1 or 2 % of some more expensive choices
but I find them really, really easy to use which I find to be one of the most important
things.
PSP Old Timer
is very good.If you haven't already try PSPNobleQ as well it's excellent.
For
saturation and distortion the new Fabfilter Saturn has raised the bar.
-------------------- 10% discount off FabFilter plug-ins for new customers pm me for details.
|