Gleeman
member
Joined: 30/01/03
Posts: 295
Loc: Ulverston, Cumbria
|
Hammond T202
#468783 - 03/06/07 10:24 AM
|
|
|
|
Anyone know anything about these? I think they're the last tonewheel organs, and I can
pick one up cheaply.
Are they worth having if put through a Leslie? Or should
I spend more and get better?
|
Lento
Joined: 16/12/05
Posts: 161
Loc: Atacama
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#468800 - 03/06/07 12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
I'd personally hold out for at least an M 100 or 102 (Procul Harum's "A Whiter shade of
pale" was recorded with an M102) Plus, you get to use some valves!
As for
the leslie, yes, anything sounds better going through a leslie. A 145, or 147 are the ones
to get if your budget allows.
Lyn
|
Gleeman
member
Joined: 30/01/03
Posts: 295
Loc: Ulverston, Cumbria
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#468885 - 03/06/07 07:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks — I'll give this one a miss.
|
SunShineState
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 1035
Loc: London
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#472156 - 12/06/07 05:58 PM
|
|
|
|
As the other guy implies I think these were tonewheel organs (so worth having in my
opinion) but with transistor amps, rather than valve - maybe not that big a deal as some
of the big classic hammonds had no amps at all and had to be fed into valve leslies. Also
I think some of these had small "leslies" or at least a rotating speaker built in?
Also worth noting that the smaller organs (2x 61 keys I think) have a smaller
complement of tone wheels so don't quite have the sound of the A/B/C series.
Prob still sounds pretty good though if it has tonewheels at all....
There
are def some hammonds to be avoided -1980's jap ones that are fully electronic and dont
sound anything like a hammond whatsoever!
Cheers
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#474808 - 20/06/07 08:12 AM
|
|
|
|
The Hammond T202 is essentially the organ used by Tony Banks of Genesis in the mid to late
1970s (he actually used a T102, but there's very little difference other than a built-in
Leslie). I have a T202 and I love it to bits - I recently had a line output fitted in
place of the near-useless headphone output and I run it through a BOSS CE1 and an MXR
Phase 100 for the true Tony Banks experience - fantastic!!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
|
Quote SunShineState:
...some of
the big classic hammonds had no amps at all and had to be fed into valve leslies.
All tonewheel Hammonds had 'amps' --
meaning preamplifiers. The earlier (nicer) ones had valve preamps. Later ones, like the T
series, had transistor preamps, which don't sound as nice to many people's ears. Some
early Hammonds had built in (valve) power amps and speakers (like the A100), but most
required external speaker cabinets and power amps. Hammond made their own, but Leslie
cabinets quickyl became more popular. Again, some had valve amps and some solid-state
amps.
The T series had builtin solid state amps and speakers, plus a very crude
Leslie system. Doesn't sound as nice as a proper B3/122 combination, but okay for a home
instrument.
Quote:
Also worth noting that the smaller organs (2x 61 keys I think) have a smaller complement
of tone wheels so don't quite have the sound of the A/B/C series.
The full console organs had 2x61 note
keyboards. The smaller 'Spinet' models, like the T series, had offset 44 note keyboards.
Some did have fewer tonewheels, but more significantly, they generated different
frequencies, offering more brilliance in many cases. That's one of the main reasons why
they sound so different.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Korff
Loose Cannon (Reviews Editor)
Joined: 20/10/06
Posts: 1981
Loc: The Wrong Precinct
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#983040 - 19/04/12 11:11 AM
|
|
|
Bamp! I just got a T202 for free (whoop!) and it's been an awful lot of fun so
far 
It's in great nick, and sounds awesome, but one of the pedals is a bit flakey; you have to
press it quite hard, or it either doesn't sound or seems to have a bit of a delay between
pressing and sounding. Does anyone know what the matter with it might be? I'm guessing
it's just a slightly dodgy switch or contact and could be fixed quite easily... Cheers! CHris
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Korff]
#983059 - 19/04/12 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
If it's only one pedal then it can really only be a dodgy contact in the pedal assembly or
its assiciated buffer circuit... but a dirty switch is by far the most likely.
I've got the schematics for the T200 somewhere... I'll send them over...
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Korff]
#983094 - 19/04/12 02:31 PM
|
|
|
Wow!
Mine was nearly free, but the 350 quid repair bill certainly hurt!
The pedal should be a very easy fix.
Some day I'd like to get the amp in
mine working properly again, which failed shortly after having the headphone jack
converted to a line output. The engineer that looked at it was baffled as to the cause. I
don't suppose the diagrams you have might include the T202's amp circuitry would it Hugh?
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983104 - 19/04/12 02:50 PM
|
|
|
Yes, but the whole lot is 77MB, so rather than send it to you directly, you can download
all the circuitry schematics and service info you need here: http://captain-foldback.com/Hammond_sub/tseries/XTP_partial_service_manual
.ziphttp://captain-foldback.com/Hammond_sub/schematics/t100seriesNote that the schematics are GIF files which are too big to open in Windows Explorer, so
download them as files and then convert to something more usable. hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
|
Thanks Hugh - I'll hand these to my friendly local solder monkey and see if he can make
use of them!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983117 - 19/04/12 03:19 PM
|
|
|
Quote The Elf:
Some day I'd like
to get the amp in mine working properly again, which failed shortly after having the
headphone jack converted to a line output. The engineer that looked at it was baffled as
to the cause.
It's a pretty
simple transistor amp, although it retains an old-schol transformer-coupling with feedback
to the push-pull output transistors. The power amp stage also includes the reverb amp
driver and return mixing circuitry, so the easiest way of deriving a line output would be
to tap off the output of the main amp and simply pad it down to an appropriate level.
If you wanted to be able to kill the organ speakers when using the line output
that gets more complicated because you'd have to either provide a dummy load in place of
the speakers, or modify the amp circuitry to isolate the output transistors to avoid
killing them when off load.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote The Elf:
Some day I'd
like to get the amp in mine working properly again, which failed shortly after having the
headphone jack converted to a line output. The engineer that looked at it was baffled as
to the cause.
It's a
pretty simple transistor amp, although it retains an old-schol transformer-coupling with
feedback to the push-pull output transistors. The power amp stage also includes the reverb
amp driver and return mixing circuitry, so the easiest way of deriving a line output would
be to tap off the output of the main amp and simply pad it down to an appropriate
level.
If you wanted to be able to kill the organ speakers when using the
line output that gets more complicated because you'd have to either provide a dummy load
in place of the speakers, or modify the amp circuitry to isolate the output transistors to
avoid killing them when off load.
hugh
My limited electronics knowledge leaves much of that Greek to me, I'm
afraid! Sorry!
But I'm interested by this bit:
Quote:
you'd have to either provide a dummy load in place
of the speakers, or modify the amp circuitry to isolate the output transistors to avoid
killing them when off load.
The
guy that did the mod is a bit of a knowledgeable hacker, but not an expert. The loading
thing was never mentioned while he was doing the (very simple) mod for me. He set the
headphone jack up as a stereo socket. Tip gives me a line output and ring gives (well,
'gave') me an input to the Leslie. But after a week or two of perfect working order the
amp just went into permanent distortion. How and where he tapped the signal is a mystery
to me.
One good aspect of the failure is the end of the whirring Leslie
motor, but I really should re-fit the baffle some day (it lives in my garage).
If there's anyone in the South Yorkshire area who understands Hugh's explanation -
heeeeeeeelp!!! I'm happy to pay for a repair, as long as you can come and do it in situ!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983136 - 19/04/12 04:11 PM
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the output transistors have suffered.
The standard configuration is
for the output transistors to feed the static speakers via a switch on the headphone
socket. If you plug headphones in the signal is fed through the phones and back through a
300ohm resistor to provide some attenuation and set a minimum output loading.
If you don't plug headphones in the signal is passed straight to the two parallel
internal 12 inch speakers.
If you select the Leslie the speaker signal is still
sent to the internal speakers (but via a chunky inductor/capacitor filter), and also to
the internal (or external) leslie speaker.
The internal Leslie has no amp of
its own so needs a speaker-level feed -- so I'm not sure what you expected your leslie
input to do.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
The internal
Leslie has no amp of its own so needs a speaker-level feed -- so I'm not sure what you
expected your leslie input to do.
My sloppy wording I'm afraid. The new input gave me access to the Hammond's amp (not
just the Leslie) - and it worked perfectly like that for a couple of weeks, allowing me to
send sounds into either the straight speaker, or the Leslie by flicking the Hammond's
speaker selection rocker switch. So the feed must be ahead of the amp.
It
wasn't something I wanted or needed, but the guy said it was easy to do while he was at
it, and it might be useful - and I agreed that it might.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983161 - 19/04/12 06:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Ah, okay.
The amp input circuitry is complicated by the way it combines the
signals from organ, pedal percussion and reverb. It is certainly possible to derive a line
output and provide an amp input by hacking the front end of the amp circuitry, but it
would be a hack.
If your amp is dead then it's more probable that a wire has
dropped off or something silly has happened with the front end of the amp.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2551
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#983166 - 19/04/12 07:06 PM
|
|
|
Does anyone mind if I just sit here and drool
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
If your amp
is dead then it's more probable that a wire has dropped off or something silly has
happened with the front end of the amp.
It's not dead, but very heavily distorted (and not even a 'good'
distortion, unfortunately). The modder spent three separate nights trying to track the
problem down, but couldn't fix it, so it has stayed this way for a few years now. When it
was clear it wasn't going to be fixed I asked him to just disable the Leslie motor and put
the organ back together. Since then I've only ever used the line output.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2551
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Yes, but the
whole lot is 77MB, so rather than send it to you directly, you can download all the
circuitry schematics and service info you need here:
http://captain-foldback.com/Hammond_sub/tseries/XTP_partial_service_manual
.zip
http://captain-foldback.com/Hammond_sub/schematics/t100series
Note that the schematics are GIF files which are too big to open in Windows Explorer, so
download them as files and then convert to something more usable.
hugh
Drawings snaffled for some light
bed-time reading
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983254 - 20/04/12 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Quote The Elf:
It's not dead, but
very heavily distorted (and not even a 'good' distortion, unfortunately).
Hmmm.... I'm sure its fixable, but not
remotely. Without knowing what his modification was it's difficult to guess what might
have gone wrong, but I'm thinking possibly a biasing issue at the front of the amp as a
result of his modification, or just a natural faling of something at the front end.
Is the original headphone socket and its associated wiring still intact, or did he
mess around with that too? I'm wondering if he inadvertantly did something odd there that
eneded up cooking the output drivers?
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8156
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
Quote The Elf:
Is the original
headphone socket and its associated wiring still intact...?
No - the socket was replaced with the stereo socket: tip = line out, ring = amp in. It
was a neat way to avoid making any new holes in the organ!
Really appreciate
the brainwork and advice, Hugh. It's inspiring me to get off my bum and fix this thing one
way or the other!
One of the forum regulars (not named unless he is happy for
me to do so?) has offered to come take a diagnostic look when he's near my toadstool in
June. Isn't this a lovely place?!
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18383
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: The Elf]
#983364 - 20/04/12 04:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Excellent -- there are some really great people around here, you're right. I wish you (and
he) all success!
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Folderol
Joined: 15/11/08
Posts: 2551
Loc: Rochester, UK
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#983428 - 20/04/12 10:23 PM
|
|
|
No problem with being named and shamed  I just
didn't want you to feel obliged if it wasn't convenient. I'm hoping it isn't
the output transistors. The fact that they were PNP types warned me, and looking at the
base-emitter voltages confirmed that they are germanium types, what doesn't help is that
they are using some obscure part number - still they may be something like AD149 which
surprisingly are still available!
-------------------- It wasn't me!
(Well, actually, it probably was)
|
JKleban
Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 3
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#989692 - 25/05/12 11:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Hugh,
The T has a transistor amp and there is NO PROBLEM in disconnecting the
speakers.
I have an old T as well but it took about $800 USD to get it up and
running correctly and to have a 9 pin LESLIE kit installed. The built in LESLIE starting
with the 2 series uses a real small speaker and has no horns and only one drum... OK for
built in but the T sounds best through a LESLIE CAB... the 760 (another tranny) is a good
match up to the T and is what T Banks used back in the classic days when he used the T.
Jim
-------------------- Keeper of the Shrine
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI
|
The Red Bladder
Joined: 05/06/07
Posts: 2069
Loc: . ...
|
Re: Hammond T202
[Re: Gleeman]
#989711 - 26/05/12 07:11 AM
|
|
|
The economic crisis is shaking a shed load of good stuff out of people's attics and spare
rooms, so no shortage of Hammonds nowadays - Ebay Listing HERE
|