WiredUp
Joined: 12/12/04
Posts: 489
|
Restoration software
#984777 - 28/04/12 09:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Just looking for any recommendations for restoration software? I've a bunch of reel to
reel recordings from the 70's and 80's that could do with a little attention. Mainly noise
but a few clicks and hums hear and there. Everything has been transferred to pro tools so
it would be best to run it within pro tools I think rather than stand alone, unless that's
the only option.
I don't really want to spend a fortune on this, I probably
won't use it again and this isn't a money maker. Any suggestions?
|
BJG145
Joined: 06/08/05
Posts: 2187
Loc: Norwich UK
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: WiredUp]
#984780 - 28/04/12 10:02 AM
|
|
|
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18539
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: BJG145]
#984782 - 28/04/12 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
+1 on Izotope. The only thing better is from CEDAR's and that costs 20 times as much!
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
The Red Bladder
Joined: 05/06/07
Posts: 2100
Loc: . ...
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#984798 - 28/04/12 11:35 AM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
+1 on
Izotope. The only thing better is from CEDAR's and that costs 20 times as much!
hugh
+1 on that +1!
If you are only going to use it once, well, try the free trail. Who knows, you
might use it again and want to pay for it! As H. says, the only thing out there that is
better is Cedar.
Just remember to keep the tails filled with the noises on
their own, so that sampling and subtraction is possible.
|
Jeraldo
Joined: 10/09/05
Posts: 2134
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: WiredUp]
#984822 - 28/04/12 03:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Another vote for Rx2.
As others have said, there is a generous trial period.
You may, however, decide to keep it.
It will do straightforward things right out
of the box.
Spending substantial creative time with it will lead to some amazing
accomplishments.
Many of its features, such as clip repair, can be used creatively
for other tasks.
It also includes extra's, such as a very good EQ module.
It's
well implemented compare function makes tweaking fast and painless.
One thing that
is often not noticed is how good the user interface is-it's so good it's not noticed!
And-customer support is superb! It's an extraordinarily well thought out product.
|
WiredUp
Joined: 12/12/04
Posts: 489
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: WiredUp]
#984829 - 28/04/12 04:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies. I was thinking RX would be a contender but great to see so many
recommendations. Its the clear winner. Am downloading a trial now. Thanks!
|
Martin Walker
Watcher Of The Skies
Joined: 28/02/01
Posts: 16482
Loc: Cornwall, UK
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: WiredUp]
#985106 - 01/05/12 12:46 AM
|
|
|
Oh poo - I didn't get the chance to add my +1 to the proceedings  Yep, iZotope RX 2 is what I use as well, and every time I need to clean something up I
try at least two or three alternative products and RX 2 almost always gives me the best
result  Martin
-------------------- YewTreeMagic
|
James Perrett
Joined: 10/09/01
Posts: 9709
Loc: The wilds of Hampshire
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: BJG145]
#985140 - 01/05/12 08:35 AM
|
|
|
Quote BJG145:
Izotope RX2 is
among the best, though not the cheapest; £160 from Dolphin for the standard version.
http://www.dolphinmusic.co.uk/article/4584-izotope-rx2-complete-audio-repa
ir.html http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/rx/
How did you get that price? It was £225
when I looked just now.
James.
-------------------- JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration.
http://www.jrpmusic.net
|
WiredUp
Joined: 12/12/04
Posts: 489
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: James Perrett]
#985156 - 01/05/12 09:16 AM
|
|
|
Quote James Perrett:
Quote BJG145:
Izotope RX2 is
among the best, though not the cheapest; £160 from Dolphin for the standard version.
http://www.dolphinmusic.co.uk/article/4584-izotope-rx2-complete-audio-repa
ir.html http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/rx/
How did you get that price? It was £225
when I looked just now.
James.
I usually buy my software via ebay. Its available for around
£150. Of course you are just buying a serial but its legit and legal. That's where I'll
be buying RX.
|
feline1
active member
Joined: 23/06/03
Posts: 3684
Loc: Brighton, UK
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: WiredUp]
#985158 - 01/05/12 09:30 AM
|
|
|
I often spend many many hours remastering old tat off cassette, and I've been using
Izotope Rx2 as my tool of choice now for several years. Prior to that I was
mostly trying to do it with Waves' de-hiss and de-hum tools, and RX2's de-hiss plugin
gives noticeably fewer artifacts. The de-humming plugin can sometimes make
things "ring" a little (i.e. if your feed a sharp drum hit into it) - I guess that's what
inevitably happens when you fire a transient at extremely sharp notch filters... The de-clicker sometimes misbehaves with its latency compensation in my Reaper, but I
raised a bug with Izotope and they did issue an update which cured this a bit. I particularly like the spectral display where you can lasso little noises and attenuate
them on their own. With all these types of plugins, I find it often pays to not
use them too aggressively in any case: your ears can get too focussed on hiss, hum and
crackles, but it's seldom necessary to remove them *entirely* - just reduce them a bit so
that the listener's ears can focus on the music... at this point, the human brain's own
clever filtering system tends to remove the hiss all by itself.
-------------------- ~~~ A weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed with! www.feline1.co.uk ~~~
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18539
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: Restoration software
[Re: feline1]
#985160 - 01/05/12 09:38 AM
|
|
|
Quote feline1:
With all these
types of plugins, I find it often pays to not use them too aggressively
Absolutely -- very good advice.
The trick is to remember you're trying to make a worthwhile improvement, not to achieve
absolute perfection. I also find that it is often better to take several gentle passes
rather than try to do everything in one big hit. You get fewer and much more subtle
artefacts that way.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|