Dino67
Joined: 29/12/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Trenton New Jersey, USA
|
Better sound?
#993588 - 19/06/12 03:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Hello all, Really like this forum, great info here.. Would appreciate any
advice I’m not a sound engineer, just a musician trying to get a better sound. We’re a 4 piece band, 2 Guitars, Bass and Drums. We generally get a good sound most
nights, Guitars seem to get lost in the mix (Although the stage volume seems high), I’m
always compensating, eventually getting it. When I check certain other bands, good ones,
the sound is clean and you hear everything perfectly. We bought our own equipment
about 8 years ago, we were paying sound guys as much as or more than the individual band
members were getting, some were really good, some were really bad, so we invested in a
“set it and forget it” system. Suggested by a friend in the business, we’ve seen
similar set-ups work well for others, so we bought it. It’s a simple PA set-up, Allen & Heath MixWizard 16:2, running through a BBE 882i Sonic Maximizer to two QSC
15” 3 way active speakers, Drums and guitars are miked, Bass runs direct. We use three
Mackie SRM150 monitors, and a floor wedge, trying to keep our stage volume low. My
question is, would an equalizer help clean up the sound? We’ve talked about a sub,
but we feel like we have enough bottom end. I guess I may always think it could sound
better. Thanks in advance for any advice
-------------------- Carpe the hell out of this Diem
|
grab
Joined: 08/07/07
Posts: 2626
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#993605 - 19/06/12 05:07 PM
|
|
|
If you don't have a soundman, your guitarists need foot pedals (either separate FX or amp
settings) to select solo/backing levels. And those relative levels need to be nailed at
practise, or at least at soundcheck. Then when a guitarist goes for a solo, he stomps the
"make-it-louder" pedal and gets the spotlight. Downside of this is that it's easy to
forget to turn off the "make-it-louder" pedal and drown out the vocalist when they come
back in after the solo.
The other way guitars can get lost in the mix is when both guitars have lots of fuzz
going, and one guitar is obscuring what the other guitar is doing. The solution there is
to sort your guitar tones out so it doesn't happen. Again, something that should be
sorted at practise.
EQ is generally good to have anyway - helps you deal with
odd rooms and feedback problems.
Also worth taking the Maximiser out of the
loop and seeing whether it's really helping or whether it's the cause of the
guitar-mangling.
|
Dino67
Joined: 29/12/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Trenton New Jersey, USA
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: grab]
#993625 - 19/06/12 06:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the response and info, The other guitarist and I both use solo channels,
our stage volume was actually quite loud, The crowd wasn't hearing it clearly out of the
loud speakers, it was there, just not THERE... we don't usually have the stage volume up
that loud, suprising for guitarists I know, I have heard bad things referring to the
sonic maximizer with reference to guitars, that's a quick and easy test. Funny, we
played the same club earlier in the year and had great sound, no issues.... We did a
benefit 2 weeks ago with another band and our normal PA settings got "adjusted". We'll look into a EQ. Thanks again
-------------------- Carpe the hell out of this Diem
|
robare99
Joined: 28/02/11
Posts: 129
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#994847 - 26/06/12 03:32 PM
|
|
|
|
I would start with removing the Sonic Maximizer
How are your guitar tones? Are
the mids scooped? Are you running chorus? I find either of those two things cause a guitar
to get lost in the mix...
|
tacitus
Joined: 04/02/08
Posts: 756
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#994855 - 26/06/12 04:20 PM
|
|
|
|
The answers are all in existing posts - get back to basics, sort the levels and tone in
rehearsal, get the PA set back to flat and adjust modestly, favouring cut over boost, and
make sure the stage sound is not muddying up the FOH. I'd certainly take out the sonic
maximiser and see where you are, and I'd go through all the backline and make sure all the
speakers are pointing in useful directions (i.e. to maximise audibility and minimise mud).
You might want to delay FOH to match the bass player's speaker which I assume is some way
further back.
I might use an equaliser for the monitors, although you can use
one half for that and one half for the FOH. There's no need for stereo.
In
general I'd say the tendency is to add something to solve a problem when usually there's
something you can take away.
One other thing if you do your own sound is that
you probably have the desk at the side of the stage somewhere. This is fine, and at least
safe(ish) from prying fingers, but do remember to get out there and check the sound from
where the soundman would have the desk. If one of you has a wireless guitar setup that can
let you play and listen at the same time. When I played bass in a band with no soundman I
had a radio system specifically for that purpose.
|
Bob Bickerton
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 2523
Loc: Nelson, New Zealand
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: tacitus]
#994912 - 26/06/12 10:23 PM
|
|
|
+1 to removing the BBE. I believe a GEQ across FOH is important as no two
rooms are the same. Put it this way, I can't recall running a FOH GEQ flat when there's
been one available - that says something. Bob
-------------------- www.bickerton.co.nz
|
tacitus
Joined: 04/02/08
Posts: 756
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#994947 - 27/06/12 08:22 AM
|
|
|
|
... if only that it's hard to resist fiddling with something when you just can. Seriously,
I agree with you Bob that every venue's different and as long as you don't go wild with
the EQ it's more likely to help than hinder. I'd carry over what's generally said about
this - cutting rather than boosting and no smiley faces - as I've seen aggressive boosting
and smiley faces on EQs turn OK sound into total s**t. Obviously that was down to the hand
of a moron somewhere, but keeping things as simple as possible never hurts and it helps
you to keep on top of the system. Bearing in mind I do mostly relatively low volume,
acoustic-based PA, having a flat-response system is usually the best starting point and
sometimes the finishing point, too.
On a 31-band EQ I always turn the bottom
couple of faders right down and often a couple at the top, just to minimise energy wasted
on sound nobody will hear or want to hear. On monitors maybe another each end, especially
bass, to give a bit more leeway with feedback. Not that it's a solution on its own, but
every little helps.
|
Dino67
Joined: 29/12/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Trenton New Jersey, USA
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#995002 - 27/06/12 01:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Really appreciate the input.. We usually have the board next to the amps in the back,
So it can be adjusted easily. Room sizes that we play can vary quite a bit from bar
to bar. We play from 9:30 to 1:30, early on the bar is empty, later it's packed,
we have to adjust the PA volume to compensate. I think we're going to remove
the BBE, See how it sounds then maybe look into an EQ, although it seems as though
we should have one. Thanks for the advice
-------------------- Carpe the hell out of this Diem
|
Mike Stranks
active member
Joined: 03/01/03
Posts: 3063
Loc: Oxford, UK
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#995012 - 27/06/12 02:18 PM
|
|
|
Quote Dino67:
We play from 9:30
to 1:30, early on the bar is empty, later it's packed, we have to adjust the PA
volume to compensate.
You may need
to do a bit more than that... a room full of people can alter the sound quite markedly
from that when there's no-one or very few there. It's related to both the sound absorbtion
of their bodies and also the probable increase in temperature and change in humidity
caused by their presence.
|
Dino67
Joined: 29/12/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Trenton New Jersey, USA
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Mike Stranks]
#995016 - 27/06/12 03:05 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
You may need to do a
bit more than that... a room full of people can alter the sound quite markedly from that
when there's no-one or very few there. It's related to both the sound absorbtion of their
bodies and also the probable increase in temperature and change in humidity caused by
their presence.
Knew about the
bodies absorbing the sound......Humidity and temperature, I've never considered. I
always thought there was more to it than volume. Thanks
-------------------- Carpe the hell out of this Diem
|
tacitus
Joined: 04/02/08
Posts: 756
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Dino67]
#995053 - 27/06/12 07:54 PM
|
|
|
|
The band I usually play in now generally goes on late-ish, after a bit of disco, and
occasionally they have a bit more disco afterwards, so we get a more consistent sound in
our chunk of the evening. Bob's quite right about temperature and humidity - if you play
outdoors you'll see exactly what he means, but indoors you do need to keep an ear on the
overall sound as well as the volume. Don't get too paranoid, though, because the degree of
critical acuteness falls off in the audience even faster than they soak up the sound. The
main thing is that you're comfortable with the sound and you are inspired to play a
smoking set.
|
Music Wolf
Joined: 17/02/06
Posts: 677
Loc: Exiled to St Helens
|
Re: Better sound?
[Re: Mike Stranks]
#995054 - 27/06/12 07:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote Mike Stranks:
increase in
temperature and change in humidity caused by their presence.
Interesting. Long ago I noticed that the
weather was having an effect on our sound during rehearsals (more so humidity than
temperature). Nice to know that I'm not going mad (or at least, not going mad alone )
Chris
-------------------- http://www.random-thought.co.uk/
|