charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
peak level and fader question
#994256 - 22/06/12 06:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey peeps,
(i'm currently working on some drum n bass tracks in cubase 6 on a
PC)
when mixing drums for example, I tend to leave the channel fader at -10db
and make sure that the signal does not go over this level thus giving myself plenty of
headroom to work with. Recently, I've been experimenting with different methods of
getting my drums to sound even fatter using a variety of different plugins. In no
particular order, vintage warmer, sausage fattner, eq and limiting are the regular
contenders..
The issue that I've been wondering about for a while is that is
that I'll get my drums sounding great but my peak level is a few db above the fader level
but there's no clipping or distortion. Should I reducing the gain knob at the top of the
channel to bring the peak level back down under the fader level? Or do I simply need to
match the re-match output levels on the plugins I'm using to get the gain structure
correct.
Hope that makes sense....
thanks
Charlie
|
Wiseau
Joined: 25/08/04
Posts: 250
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994268 - 22/06/12 07:19 PM
|
|
|
|
not really to be honest, at least to me.
-------------------- 'You know it's a bad role when Nic Cage passes on it.'
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18535
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994272 - 22/06/12 07:30 PM
|
|
|
|
There is no specific relationship between the fader setting and the peak level.
Ideally the fader should sit at or close to unity gain (0dB) when the mix is roughly
right, because that provides the best fader resolution and controllability.
With the fader in that position, the audio should be peaking somewhere around -10dBFS so
that you have some channel headroom, and when all the tracks are combined you will
hopefully still have some mix bus headroom.
If the channel level is a bit hot
with the fader at unity, then put an attenuator plug-in at the top of the chanel strip and
wind the level down there.
A lot of samples are recorded with the levels
banging the end stops, which isn't very helpful when it coems to mixing, so it's not
unusual to have to wind the gain down at the top o the channel strip.
Hope that
helps
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#994275 - 22/06/12 07:53 PM
|
|
|
|
HI Hugh,
thanks for your amazing explanations as always
so the
situation I'm in at the moment is ok? thats what I'm trying to work out really...
I've also tried turning the gain knob down so that the signal is peaking to the same
level as the fader position, but the drums just sound just loses all they're power.
thanks again
charlie
|
Bossman
active member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 1567
Loc: UK
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994277 - 22/06/12 08:11 PM
|
|
|
Quote charlie chalk:
I've also
tried turning the gain knob down so that the signal is peaking to the same level as the
fader position, but the drums just sound just loses all they're power.
If one of your plugins is level dependant,
like a compressor, then adjusting the gain knob will affect the level going into the
plugin and thats why it sounds different.
you should start off, with your fader
at 0dB, with no plugins yet, and set your gain at the top of the channel so that the level
is peaking around -10dBFS. Then don't touch the gain after that (after you've started to
apply plugins).
When you apply a plugin effect, use the output gain in the
plugin to level match it so that it doesn't get louder when you bypass the plugin.. use
your ears to judge this, not the level meters.
-------------------- www.Lozjackson.com
|
charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Bossman]
#994278 - 22/06/12 08:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey Bossman,
thankyou! I'll try that....
thanks again
charlie
|
charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994282 - 22/06/12 09:25 PM
|
|
|
|
WOW
drums sound instantly better
thanks all!
|
Wiseau
Joined: 25/08/04
Posts: 250
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994304 - 23/06/12 09:26 AM
|
|
|
|
Oh,gotcha now. The way you worded it made my brain do a backflip, although it seems no one
else had a problem with it.
I record one drum track at a time from the mpc,
rather than using the 8 outs, pushing some even up to between -2 -1db. So sometimes
sqeezing some energy out of your drums before you get to plugins, eq can work.
Ask that question on gearslutz for giggles. Although be prepared to buy an ampex
recorder, and book studio time at Record One.
-------------------- 'You know it's a bad role when Nic Cage passes on it.'
|
Music Manic
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 1942
Loc: London UK
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994337 - 23/06/12 02:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Could you explain why gain should be adjusted to manage the audio level. Isn't the maths
behind it the same, and does the same thing happen in floating and fixed point?
I thought that it's only when the master output is distorted that things matter.
Thanks
|
Bossman
active member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 1567
Loc: UK
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Music Manic]
#994346 - 23/06/12 03:16 PM
|
|
|
Quote Music Manic:
Could you
explain why gain should be adjusted to manage the audio level.
how else would you manage the audio
level?
Quote Music Manic:
Isn't the maths behind it the same
the same as what?
Quote Music Manic:
and does the same thing happen in
floating and fixed point?
pretty much.. floating point and fixed point numbers are just different ways of
expressing a number. If you add 2dB to a signal, the result is the same signal 2dB louder
than the original - it doesn't matter if you use floating point or fixed point maths (as
long as you don't exceed the maximum value of a fixed point system).
Quote Music Manic:
I thought
that it's only when the master output is distorted that things matter.
Its about good gain structure. Unintended
distortion anywhere on any channel is something that matters.
-------------------- www.Lozjackson.com
|
Music Manic
active member
Joined: 20/12/02
Posts: 1942
Loc: London UK
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994359 - 23/06/12 04:27 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
how else would you
manage the audio level?
With the Fader! There's a gain knob and a fader??
Quote:
the same as what?
What I meant is, if I adjust the gain or the move
the fader on my channel strip.
Quote:
Its about good gain structure. Unintended distortion anywhere on
any channel is something that matters.
Well in Roey Izhaki's Book - Mixing
Audio he states, that it doesn't matter if your channel strips distort in your DAW,
as long as your master doesn't. This is because processing is still 64 Bit.
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18535
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Music Manic]
#994363 - 23/06/12 04:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Clearly if the output is overloading then the d-a is overloaded and it's going to sound
grim. So in most digital desks you can pull the master fader back to reduce the output
level and it gets better... Even though the mix bus itself is handling a huge amount of
level. You can't do that in an analogue desk because it won't have anything like the
potential headroom available in a digital system.
However... Not all floating
point implementations are the same, and the mantissa has a fixed resolution in most
systems, which means that there is always scope for distortions to creep in through
truncation or rounding errors.
Add to that the fact that not all plugins deal
with floating point in the same way, and you come back to the simple fact that maintaining
a healthy headroom margin through the processing chain makes sense theoretically,
practically and sonically.
Which means optimising levels through the channel
path starting at the top witha gain control, just like we always did in analogue desks.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Wiseau]
#994370 - 23/06/12 05:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey wiseeau,
Sorry about the brain flipping, it took me a good half hour to
work out how to word the question as I did not really know whether what I was doing was
right or wrong.
charlie
|
charlie chalk
Joined: 24/02/05
Posts: 107
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: charlie chalk]
#994371 - 23/06/12 05:51 PM
|
|
|
|
With the the tune I am now working on, I've reset all my channel faders to 0db and now
pretty much using the gain knob's to control the levels. I have to say that everything is
now sounding much better...
|
Bossman
active member
Joined: 30/09/02
Posts: 1567
Loc: UK
|
Re: peak level and fader question
[Re: Music Manic]
#994383 - 23/06/12 07:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote Music Manic:
There's a gain
knob and a fader??
The gain
knob (as found in Cubase and on a mixing desk) is pre inserts/EQ. The Fader is Post
Inserts/EQ. So, although they both do the same thing as far as adding/attenuating the
gain, they do it at different places in the signal path.
Use the Gain knob to
set the gain structure correctly.. and use the fader for fine adjustments in the mix.
-------------------- www.Lozjackson.com
|