Lala
member
Joined: 15/05/03
Posts: 115
|
New re-stringing technique
#995905 - 03/07/12 10:36 AM
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
For the first time in what must be over 30 years I restrung my steel
string acoustic this morning using a new method.
The main reason for this is
that I need to show someone new to the guitar how to restring their instrument and I felt
the method I've been using all this time (quite successfully I should add) is so fiddley
that they're going be in tears by the end of it !!
The method I used today is
the one described on D'Addario's website, namely pushing all of the string through the
string post, bringing it around the back of the post, under the string, then up at 90˚to
the headstock so it's trapped and held in place as you tighten the string.
This
all went smoothly but the only thing I've noticed is that there is now barely one turn of
the string around the string post, in fact on the bass side I'd say the post has only
turned about 3/4 round before the string is at pitch.
I know you don't want
excessive amounts of string wrapped around the post but is this too far the other way ?
Your reassurance would be appreciated !!
Cheers,
Nick
|
shufflebeat
Joined: 09/12/07
Posts: 2271
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#995914 - 03/07/12 11:01 AM
|
|
|
|
I like a few turns round the post but I've no particular science behind it. I do a few
winds (keeping an eye on the hole) then push through and tuck under as you describe.
Might be time for a rethink depending on advice here.
-------------------- Ohm's Law states, "Your PA isn't as powerful as you think it is".
|
IvanSC
Joined: 08/03/05
Posts: 7760
Loc: UK France & USA depending on t...
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#995922 - 03/07/12 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
Okay. The anal version.
Stick string through hole and leave enough slack for
a couple of turns.
First turn goes OVER the free end, the rest go under. This gives
you pressure from above and below the string once it is all tight, plus it gets the best
break angle over the nut.
So the string is gripped between the loop above and the
other loops below.
Works for me.
-------------------- Me? But I`m such a loveable old bugger!
|
grab
Joined: 08/07/07
Posts: 2626
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: IvanSC]
#995947 - 03/07/12 12:37 PM
|
|
|
|
As Ivan says. Which means you need to allow enough slack to get at least 2 full turns
round the binding post. There's no maximum number of turns of string you can have on a
binding post, except that you must *never* have so much that you start coiling string on
string. (It's not very secure, so your tuning accuracy suffers as the reel of string
slips around on the binding post.)
It's always a bit of a game when you're
restringing, trying to leave exactly the right amount of slack. Bottom E and A usually
take two shots at it - I always start with too much, and shorten it by however much it
seems to need. It's better doing it this way around, because the kink you put in the
string at the binding post will create a weak point if you start too short.
|
shufflebeat
Joined: 09/12/07
Posts: 2271
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: grab]
#995951 - 03/07/12 01:02 PM
|
|
|
Quote grab:
...you need to allow
enough slack to get at least 2 full turns round the binding post.
This seems quite instinctive to me but
thinking about it I have nothing to base this on. Can you elaborate?
-------------------- Ohm's Law states, "Your PA isn't as powerful as you think it is".
|
zenguitar
active member
Joined: 05/12/02
Posts: 7594
Loc: Devon
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#995953 - 03/07/12 01:20 PM
|
|
|
Many years ago I was taught by Norman Reid to fit strings. For the plain strings he used
the same technique as D'Addario, but the secret is to allow enough slack to get 3 complete
wraps around the post. For wound strings he taught us to pull the string straight from the
bridge, over the nut, to the tuner post. Then wrap one complete turn around the post, and
then thread the end through the post hole to exit between the two wraps of the string and
pull tight. The string is trapped in place by the windings. Harder to describe than it is
to do, takes about 10-15 seconds to fit a wound string. However, Eltham who
posts here from time to time has put up some useful references with diagrams on his web
site here. And he is spot on, the shape of the tuner post is what does the
work on modern machines and what makes the more complex methods I was taught so long ago
unnecessary. Definitely a recommended read. Andy
-------------------- When the going gets weird, the Weird turn Pro.
|
Music Wolf
Joined: 17/02/06
Posts: 676
Loc: Exiled to St Helens
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: zenguitar]
#995973 - 03/07/12 03:44 PM
|
|
|
I know that not everyone likes them but for me it has to be locking tuners. I've got a couple of guitars that came
with them as standard (Patrick Eggle Berlin Pro and a Parker Dragonfly) plus I've fitted
them to my US Standard Strat. Never had a problem with them and they make re-string a
breeze.
-------------------- http://www.random-thought.co.uk/
|
grab
Joined: 08/07/07
Posts: 2626
Loc: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: shufflebeat]
#995981 - 03/07/12 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Quote shufflebeat:
This seems
quite instinctive to me but thinking about it I have nothing to base this on. Can you
elaborate?
Actually to be
completely accurate it needs a turn-and-a-half plus a little bit. If you're doing the
"above then below" technique then you need half a turn until the string crosses the
pokey-out end (above the end), then another full turn before it crosses the pokey-out end
again (below the end), and then a little bit more to make sure the lower turn grips the
pokey-out end.
This is only really relevant for steel strings, of course,
because they have concave binding posts where the tension on the string pulls the string
windings into the middle and hence grips the string end.
|
Lala
member
Joined: 15/05/03
Posts: 115
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: grab]
#995987 - 03/07/12 05:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Many thanks for all the replies and cheers Andy for that link, interesting reading.
I have to say after a very frustrating day performing four complete string changes
across my two steel string acoustics, trying out different methods, wasting a lot of
strings, doing absolutely no practise and missing most of the tennis, I'm back to where I
started !!?!
By far and away the easiest method is the one on D'Addario's
website (what I now know to be called the 'Nashville Wrap') the big problem though is it
doesn't lay enough turns around the post for my liking.
The problem I have with
the other methods is the wrapping turns around the post BEFORE poking the end through the
post hole, I find it virtually impossible to retain enough tension on the string in order
to stop the windings springing loose whilst I'm fiddling around getting the end through
the hole and pulling the slack through. I end up with the windings laying across each
other, not neatly stacked side by side, when I tune to pitch.
The way I've been
doing it for years is to trim the string about 1" past its string post, I then poke about
a 1/4" through the hole, lay one wrap around the post ABOVE the end sticking out through
the hole, I can then keep enough tension on the string with my right hand while I turn the
machine head with my left, ensuring all subsequent windings lay BELOW the ending sticking
out.
Perhaps someone who's never changed strings in their life before will just
accept it as being a bit fiddly at first, certainly they may well find ANY method fiddly
first time around, I was just looking for a more simple method.
Cheers all for
your input.
Nick
|
Ant Gamble
member
Joined: 16/07/02
Posts: 70
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#995990 - 03/07/12 06:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to clamp your strings if you cut them shorter - especially on bass
stringes. They keep better tones if you use some grips to make a very sharp 90 degree
bend, then clamp the string together - this is because strings are mostly round wound and
it stops the 'round winded' string from moving around the 'core'.
|
Ollie's dad
Joined: 05/02/10
Posts: 5
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: shufflebeat]
#996037 - 03/07/12 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
I found that if you pull the string tight and cut it @ 2 posts past where you're going to
wind it this gives you enough to get 2/3 winds on the post. Obv need to estimate on a
couple of them. Definately recommend stretching them after winding.
Have fun!
|
4TrackMadman
active member
Joined: 30/10/02
Posts: 1642
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#996038 - 03/07/12 10:26 PM
|
|
|
I usually do the one over and one under technique for the 3 low strings. Lately I also
started buying and retrofitting locking tuners, best investment I've ever made.
-------------------- www.descentintomadness.com
|
zenguitar
active member
Joined: 05/12/02
Posts: 7594
Loc: Devon
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Ollie's dad]
#996046 - 03/07/12 11:23 PM
|
|
|
Quote Ollie's dad:
I found that
if you pull the string tight and cut it @ 2 posts past where you're going to wind it this
gives you enough to get 2/3 winds on the post. Obv need to estimate on a couple of them.
Definately recommend stretching them after winding.
Have fun!
+1
But as far as locking
machineheads go, with the exception of a few EXTREME trem abusers, a complete waste of
time. For 99%+ of users they are a solution to a non-problem.
Andy
-------------------- When the going gets weird, the Weird turn Pro.
|
Lala
member
Joined: 15/05/03
Posts: 115
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: zenguitar]
#996081 - 04/07/12 09:31 AM
|
|
|
|
After sleeping on this topic overnight so to speak, it struck me this morning that the
'wrapping around the post before pushing end through hole' technique may well be easier to
execute with the guitar on a bench.
Attempting this technique with the guitar
body gripped between your legs is not easy !!
I suppose I could invest in a
neck support and lay a blanket on the dining room table but still feel I'd need to lightly
pull against something to get some tension on those wraps and a guitar on a blanket, on a
table, is just gonna move towards me.
I feel more investigation/experimentation
is required on my part !
Nick
|
Alfie Noakes
Bluesman
Joined: 14/11/03
Posts: 219
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#996171 - 04/07/12 04:46 PM
|
|
|
I've been doing it like this for more than a decade, and can change string sets very
quickly. Have never broken a string on acoustic or electric in what must amount to several
thousand playing hours.
http://www.frets.com/FretsPages/Musician/Guitar/Setup/SteelStrings/Stringi
ng/ststringing2.html
By pulling the string all the way through, then
backing it off by about an inch, the number of windings on the post always seems to be
pretty good.
Edited by Alfie Noakes (04/07/12 04:47 PM)
|
artzmusic
Joined: 20/05/11
Posts: 113
Loc: usa
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: zenguitar]
#996178 - 04/07/12 05:46 PM
|
|
|
Quote zenguitar:
However,
Eltham who posts here from time to time has put up some useful references with diagrams on
his web site here. And he is spot on, the shape of the tuner post is what does the
work on modern machines and what makes the more complex methods I was taught so long ago
unnecessary. Definitely a recommended read.
Andy
Andy, this was informative to see how
the shaft contributed to locking the string in place. Something I'm going to try next
time.
Thanks Rick
|
zenguitar
active member
Joined: 05/12/02
Posts: 7594
Loc: Devon
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#996232 - 04/07/12 11:31 PM
|
|
|
Cheers Rick  Andy
-------------------- When the going gets weird, the Weird turn Pro.
|
Alfie Noakes
Bluesman
Joined: 14/11/03
Posts: 219
|
Re: New re-stringing technique
[Re: Lala]
#996259 - 05/07/12 08:30 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
The other disadvantage
of the lock wrap is that having locked the string onto the tuner the only way to increase
the number of wraps is to laboriously wind the string on by cranking the tuner. Not only
is this time consuming but it increases wear and tear on the tuner's gearing.
How is this any different to his
preferred method? Get it right and you don't need lots of windings
Quote:
Modern tuners are
designed with a concave radiused profile which is intended to enhance coil compression by
causing each coil to seek the narrowest part of the radius as it tightens. Subsequent
coils slide into place alongside and are forced into contact by the radius so that the
string is clamped effectively on perhaps three or four sides as well as the inside surface
of each coil. !
Exactly the same whether you use a locking wrap or not.
Quote:
It also reduces contact
between the inside of the coil and the tuner spindle, limiting friction hold and
introducing a point of stress where the coils cross over it.
As opposed to a point of stress where
string is against the edge of the spindle hole, which is (especially with cheaper heads)
usually sharp.
I'll be happy to change from my supposedly unstable, time
consuming and inefficient method once someone can come up with fact based evidence to
support this arbitrary reasoning.
|