Adam Inglis
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 332
Loc: Gold Coast Queensland Australi...
|
The "secret" of the vintage sound?
#920846 - 16/06/11 02:15 PM
|
|
|
Two of the most "characterful" or distinctive synths in my studio are the Korg 700 and the
Roland TB303 with Devilfish mod. Over the years I've noticed when recording these
beasties (especially when set to fairly gnarly or aggressive sounds) that the recorded
waveform shows a significant amount of DC offset about the zero line. Anyway, the
other day I took brief possession of a Korg M3 while the owner is between studios. It has
the Radius card in it. I've been playing around with it and have been really impressed
with the sound. I recorded some parts from it, and the most "analogue" sounding part (a
moog-ish lead synth sound from the Radius card) displayed that same DC offset in it's
waveform - first time I can remember seeing it from a digital synth! It's not
exactly a scientific double-blind trial, but I wonder if the DC offset could be a
characteristic of these "vintage" sounds? Any thoughts?
-------------------- Adam Inglis
A Disco Ate My BABY!
|
Korff
Loose Cannon (Reviews Editor)
Joined: 20/10/06
Posts: 1983
Loc: The Wrong Precinct
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920850 - 16/06/11 02:31 PM
|
|
|
|
DC offset or asymmetrical waveform?
|
vinyl_junkie
active member
Joined: 24/06/03
Posts: 1436
Loc: Kent, UK
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920856 - 16/06/11 02:41 PM
|
|
|
The 700 is a pretty damn good synth that really has a lot of it's own character and often
over looked, after ages trying to get one I finally just brought a 700s I
remember ages ago checking out a Yamaha AN-200 (AN-1X board inside) on a oscilloscope and
the waveforms were quite impressive and didn't seem very static at all, that's all I
remember though as I did this ages ago..the AN-1X is a great sounding analogue modeller
too Did I mention I got a 700s? lol
|
The Elf
active member
Joined: 14/08/01
Posts: 8164
Loc: Sheffield, UK
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920857 - 16/06/11 02:42 PM
|
|
|
|
My Moog Taurus pedals always show a waveform with considerably more wavform weight
displayed under the mid line than above it. I have no idea what this means, but I
understand that it's not anything to be concerned about.
In general I agree
that it is probably just such imperfections that help to attract us their sound, however
that might manifest itself.
There is one artist I work for that actually likes
hiss, so prefers his acoustic guitar passed through an amp to impart its noise and
restricted frequency range.
-------------------- An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
|
~Paul
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 1793
Loc: South Herts/North London
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920866 - 16/06/11 03:45 PM
|
|
|
I doubt DC offset plays much of a part. In general, it's a bad thing..
Capacitors
are one of the first things to fail in older kit, and amongst other duties, they are used
to filter out DC. IE, dying caps can easily = more DC leakage.
DC is a bad thing to
have in the audio circuit.. It stresses and eventually kills other components. Amplifiers
& speakers can't deal with it at all, so it's good to be rid of it.
Some
waveforms are asymmetrical anyway. In fact the 303 saw wave is. Kinda looks a bit like DC
offset, but it isn't.
I expect books have been written about why analogue
sounds the way it does! Personally I would put it down to subtle inaccuracies that
analogue circuits are prone to, causing things like slight tuning drift.
And also,
the fact many analogue synths have free running oscillators. IE, it's always running, but
you only hear it when you open a gate. This matters because it means the waveform is
unlikely to start at the same point of it's cycle each time you play it. It is somewhat
random, unlike digital which usually starts at the point every single time.
Im sure there are 1000 other likely explanations too. But that would be delving deep
into anorak and weak lemon drink territory!
-------------------- Paul
|
damoore
Joined: 05/07/09
Posts: 327
Loc: New Hampshire
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920877 - 16/06/11 05:16 PM
|
|
|
|
DC offset will tend to introduce even harmonic distortion, if it is enough to drive any
stage of the signal chain into non-linearity. Even because it is asymmetric - symmetric
distortion gives you odd harmonics.
Even harmonic distortion is considered in
some circles to "sound good". I have met one person who liked lots of it - he had cobbled
together a "wonderfully hifi stereo" that was full of it.
It does not get past
the first series capacitor or transformer though, although in the case of a transformer,
that counts as a "stage" for the purposes of introducing distortion.
Not sure
what the residual effects on an audio transformer are. It is not something I would want to
do without being sure it was not going to permanently magnetise the core.
|
hollowsun
Joined: 20/01/05
Posts: 4517
Loc: Cowbridge, South Wales
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: damoore]
#920878 - 16/06/11 05:34 PM
|
|
|
Quote damoore:
if it is enough to
drive any stage of the signal chain into non-linearity.
This is pretty much what a chum of mine (he wot
designed the VCS3) explained to me once.
The old gear with their crude, often
expediently and penny pinching cobbled together designs/components, are (apparently)
often/sometimes full of non-linearities which can manifest themselves in 'pleasant'
oscillator detune, 'pleasant' filter and amplifier overdrive, 'pleasant' resonant feedback
in the filter, 'pleasant' envelope shapes and 'pleasant', irregular LFO waveforms,'
pleasant' ring mod, etc..
There may well be some subtle 'magic' in it all but
whether it's worth frothing over and paying silly prices for is another matter especially
in this day and age when the VAST majority of people listen to downloaded MP3s on earbuds
or PC speakers or have it pumping out of a club PA with 300% thumping distortion!!!
-------------------- Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog
|
vinyl_junkie
active member
Joined: 24/06/03
Posts: 1436
Loc: Kent, UK
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920912 - 16/06/11 08:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Not just synth but analogue stuff in general.. It's the non-linearity and randomness of
the machine that usually seems to give them "that" sound and also one of the hardest
things to emulate
|
Adam Inglis
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 332
Loc: Gold Coast Queensland Australi...
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Korff]
#920928 - 16/06/11 11:06 PM
|
|
|
Quote Korff:
DC offset or
asymmetrical waveform?
Asymmetry for sure, but offset in so far as the bulk of the waveform energy is to one
side of zero. Why I noticed it particularly is it can get you into trouble with
clipping, when trying to record at optimum levels. The meters in some DAWs must only
"look" at one side of the waveform, so you don't realise you're going over until you hear
the playback/check the waveform on the screen.
-------------------- Adam Inglis
A Disco Ate My BABY!
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18399
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#920970 - 17/06/11 08:36 AM
|
|
|
Quote Adam Inglis:
Asymmetry for
sure, but offset in so far as the bulk of the waveform energy is to one side of zero.
Virtually all audio and musical
equipment designed for the last 70 yeras or more has had some provision to ensure that
there is no DC offset at the output. If you have managed to record something with a DC
offset then either the source, or the recording chain, is faulty. It does happen, but it's
not right and not intended.
As has been said, an internal DC offset, whether by
design or fault, can result in an increased level of even harmonic distortion, and most
people find even significant levels quite benign and pleasant.
Quote:
Why I noticed it
particularly is it can get you into trouble with clipping, when trying to record at
optimum levels.
Ah yes... but
then recording with a negligible headroom margin isn't 'optimum' -- partly for this very
reason! 
Quote:
The meters in some DAWs must only "look" at one side of the waveform, so you don't
realise you're going over until you hear the playback/check the waveform on the screen.
Different digital meter
designs vary a lot... which is another reason for recording with an appropriate headroom
margin. Only an oversampling true peak digital meter can deliver totally accurate level
indications.
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
Adam Inglis
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 332
Loc: Gold Coast Queensland Australi...
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Hugh Robjohns]
#921096 - 18/06/11 01:59 AM
|
|
|
Quote Hugh Robjohns:
If you have managed to record something with a DC offset then either the source, or the
recording chain, is faulty. It does happen, but it's not right and not intended.
As has been said, an internal DC offset, whether by design or fault, can result in an
increased level of even harmonic distortion, and most people find even significant levels
quite benign and pleasant.
Thanks Hugh. But how can one hear an "internal" DC offset if it doesn't appear at the
output? Or are you saying that the harmonic distortion it causes makes it to the output,
but without the offset?
Quote Hugh
Robjohns:
Ah yes... but then recording with a negligible
headroom margin isn't 'optimum' -- partly for this very reason! 
Well, "negligible" was defined
in hindsight in these cases!
-------------------- Adam Inglis
A Disco Ate My BABY!
|
Adam Inglis
Joined: 01/09/04
Posts: 332
Loc: Gold Coast Queensland Australi...
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#921097 - 18/06/11 02:13 AM
|
|
|
OK re-reading the above posts, I think my use of the term DC offset must be incorrect -
what I'm seeing must be the result of extreme waveform asymmetry. I'll keep an eye
out for examples to illustrate...
-------------------- Adam Inglis
A Disco Ate My BABY!
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18399
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: The "secret" of the vintage sound?
[Re: Adam Inglis]
#921110 - 18/06/11 10:17 AM
|
|
|
Quote Adam Inglis:
But how can
one hear an "internal" DC offset if it doesn't appear at the output? Or are you saying
that the harmonic distortion it causes makes it to the output, but without the offset?
The latter.
hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|