BenParks
Joined: 23/08/11
Posts: 8
|
Hardware or software?
#948923 - 24/10/11 12:35 PM
|
|
|
I know it's a common question but is software synthesis really as good as hardware? Bit of
a newbie at this but did some research and a lot of people say that software is as good,
plus it has loads of other benefits too... like it says http://bit.ly/pMvFz3Thoughts? Ta
|
Paul Nagle
member
Joined: 30/06/01
Posts: 154
Loc: Lancs
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#948925 - 24/10/11 12:40 PM
|
|
|
It depends. Compare software such as Omnisphere with *any* digital keyboard and I doubt
the hardware would impress you much. But compare a Minimoog model D or Vermona Mono Lancet
with any software virtual analogue and I think the hardware will still be the one you'd
want to use in your tracks.
-------------------- http://www.bogusfocus.com/
|
nathanscribe
Joined: 19/01/07
Posts: 722
Loc: Yorkshire, by gum.
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#948943 - 24/10/11 02:31 PM
|
|
|
|
It's not just a question of sound - the user interface is important too, as is the kind of
flexibility you want. I'm a big fan of hardware as I find it easier to get on with -
programming sounds on a computer just feels too detached for me, and the UIs tend to put
me off. But then, a lot of 80s/90s digital is like that too - poky screen, and 500
parameters to go through with just up/down and yes/no buttons... ugh. Proper analogue
hardware covered in knobs and sliders is a pleasure to use, and when you get on well with
a UI you tend to get better results I think. I've ditched a number of synths because the
UI was awful, but they're all worth trying once.
As for flexibility, maybe I'm
just simple, but I tend to prefer simpler gear to complex gear. I know several pieces of
it inside out, and know how to push them as well as keep them tame. THe more complex
stuff just loses me a bit and I never quite know where to go with it.
YMMV.
|
Paul Nagle
member
Joined: 30/06/01
Posts: 154
Loc: Lancs
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#949103 - 25/10/11 09:09 AM
|
|
|
Totally agree, I was talking specifically about the sound rather than the whole experience
of playing the instrument. Softsynth + generic controller still has a long way to go.
-------------------- http://www.bogusfocus.com/
|
TheChorltonWheelie
Joined: 22/09/09
Posts: 873
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#949371 - 26/10/11 07:09 AM
|
|
|
Quote BenParks:
I know it's a
common question but is software synthesis really as good as hardware?
That depends entirely who the judge is: if
it's a listener then the answer would be "I don't care" or "I have no idea", if it's a
musician, and specifically a musician into those type of sounds, then the answer is
probably "Not quite".
|
johnny h
Joined: 24/07/06
Posts: 2298
|
|
Quote TheChorltonWheelie:
Quote BenParks:
I know it's a
common question but is software synthesis really as good as hardware?
That depends entirely who the judge is: if
it's a listener then the answer would be "I don't care" or "I have no idea", if it's a
musician, and specifically a musician into those type of sounds, then the answer is
probably "Not quite".
They
may not care if it is hardware or software, but they care if it sounds good or not. Some
sounds are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recreate in software. See the "Have
Keyboard OEMs lost the plot" thread for examples.
That said, just because
something is hardware doesn't make it necessarily superior to software. Many hardware
synths (and pretty much all mainstream manufacturers bar Korg) are just a cheap dsp chip
and d/a converter these days.
|
Rob R
Joined: 09/12/04
Posts: 224
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#949479 - 26/10/11 01:16 PM
|
|
|
|
yeah for me UI is king too. I think there's two things to consider. If you want to get
ideas down, or play live, then hardware makes tons of sense. If you want to really get
indepth etc, then software stacks up. It's a personal thing, others will have a
different feeling, but I can recall a few times when I just sat there with Logic and
Kontakt etc, and ended up closing the thing because I did nothing but preset surf for 15
mins, and totally lost the urge.
The other day I sat at a Kronos. Now that
thing has amazing sound - the pianos are fab. After some time of trying to figure out how
to even change a patch, then finding no solo strings that appealed, I got frankly
dispirited, and the neighbouring Nord piano's little nagging voice became noticeable above
the sparkly sheen of the korg and all its lights... and I'm sorry, but... I just don't
feel the kronos does it for me, left me very cold, and I have a mac and daw, so why have
it twice?... I am seriously tempted to a Nord though...
I would like someone to
really go for the hard disc rompler thing. Let's have a proper, simple interfaced, all
buttons and knobs rompler with gigabytes of beautifully recorded samples. Proper attention
paid to piano, strings and synth. No sequencers or arpeggiators unless you bought the add
on widget to do it. Actually, kind of like a Nord Stage, only with more swankier
samples
Sorry I wandered in and out of topic there again. I keep doing that. la
la la....
Move along...
-------------------- cheers, Rob
|
Richie Royale
Joined: 12/09/06
Posts: 3456
Loc: Bristol, England.
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: Rob R]
#949493 - 26/10/11 01:53 PM
|
|
|
Quote Rob R:
I would like
someone to really go for the hard disc rompler thing. Let's have a proper, simple
interfaced, all buttons and knobs rompler with gigabytes of beautifully recorded samples.
Proper attention paid to piano, strings and synth. No sequencers or arpeggiators unless
you bought the add on widget to do it. Actually, kind of like a Nord Stage, only with more
swankier samples
http://www.openlabs.com/ Something
like the NeKo maybe?
-------------------- http://soundcloud.com/richie-royale
http://www.mixcrate.com/richieroyale
|
TheChorltonWheelie
Joined: 22/09/09
Posts: 873
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: johnny h]
#949611 - 26/10/11 05:39 PM
|
|
|
Quote johnny h:
They may not care
if it is hardware or software, but they care if it sounds good or not. Some sounds are
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recreate in software. See the "Have Keyboard
OEMs lost the plot" thread for examples.
I don't disagree with that, but it always comes down to the fact
that unless these sounds are presented untreated, to the initiated, the difference between
hardware/software is completely wasted on the listener.
A sampled piano still
doesn't sound exactly like the real thing, but the 15m people that bought Leona Lewis'
albums couldn't care less.
|
Rob R
Joined: 09/12/04
Posts: 224
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: Richie Royale]
#949630 - 26/10/11 08:47 PM
|
|
|
Quote Richie Royale:
Quote Rob R:
I would like
someone to really go for the hard disc rompler thing. Let's have a proper, simple
interfaced, all buttons and knobs rompler with gigabytes of beautifully recorded samples.
Proper attention paid to piano, strings and synth. No sequencers or arpeggiators unless
you bought the add on widget to do it. Actually, kind of like a Nord Stage, only with more
swankier samples
http://www.openlabs.com/ Something
like the NeKo maybe?
still
looks like a massive computer in a synth keyboard! No, I'm talking about the perfect
combination - I'd have two line LCD displays at the most. the rest would be real knobs
sliders etc
-------------------- cheers, Rob
|
Zukan
Zukan
Joined: 12/09/03
Posts: 8556
|
Re: Hardware or software?
[Re: BenParks]
#949677 - 27/10/11 08:00 AM
|
|
|
|