Main Forums >> Recording Techniques
        Print Thread

Pages: 1
paul1



Joined: 27/09/04
Posts: 1
Sampler help, Akai Z8 vs Yamaha A5000, which one is better?
      #22723 - 27/09/04 10:36 PM
Hello,

I'm in the market for a hardware based sampler. Up until now I've read some very good things about Akai's Z8 sampler. But I've also read some good reviews on Yamaha's A5000 sampler. I know that the A5000 is chock full of effects and is very easy to use. But the Akai sound quality is better. I going to be using either sampler live by triggering samples via roland electronic drum triggers and I don't want to go to a software sampler due to latency issues. Could someone tell me which one is the better choice? Sound quality, effects, sample rate, and hd space is most important to me? Also is it possible to run an external effects unit through either sampler for more effects?

Thanks,
Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Nimhbus



Joined: 21/03/00
Posts: 398
Re: Sampler help, Akai Z8 vs Yamaha A5000, which one is better? new [Re: paul1]
      #22730 - 27/09/04 10:48 PM
IMHO there is no discernable difference in sound quality between the two.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Escapee Planes
No Muppet!


Joined: 26/11/03
Posts: 1923
Loc: Brighton
Re: Sampler help, Akai Z8 vs Yamaha A5000, which one is better? new [Re: Nimhbus]
      #22765 - 28/09/04 12:59 AM
I had the Z8 for a short while and sold it cos it was so noisy, and I found programming the thing slow so I now use software.

Don'r know about the other one though

--------------------
MySpace / Escapee Planes
Virb


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Groakes



Joined: 04/03/04
Posts: 204
Loc: Canberra Australia
Re: Sampler help, Akai Z8 vs Yamaha A5000, which one is better? new [Re: Escapee Planes]
      #22860 - 28/09/04 08:48 AM
I have always preferred the sound mangling potential of the A5000, which cos it is a bit older, should also be considerably cheaper than the Z8. The A5K has a different way of allocating samples than the Akai - I liked it a lot, but it is different to what you would expect if you are used to the way Akai do things.

The disadvantage of the A5K is that the SCSI interface is slower than death although I guess for "drum" samples this will probably not been an issue as they can all be loaded prior to a gig but I would check your work patterns first...

There has been some recent discussion (last week) in these pages about the Z8 so I would look at what they had to say.

--------------------
cheers
Greg


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator     Back to top
Pages: 1

Rate this thread

Jump to

Extra Information
0 registered and 31 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  
Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 1226

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Digital Editions | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Links | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media