OneWorld
Joined: 07/04/09
Posts: 1566
|
SPDIF vs ADAT
#900697 - 13/03/11 05:53 PM
|
|
|
|
My ADA8000 has gone belly up, and it's broke too! (Subject of another post) and I have
been trying other options. I have an olde Roland Stereo Interface which has Optional SPDIF
and the RCA (Coax?) phono plug type digital in/outs and this will do the job.
But when I use the RCA output to the input of my interface, the timecode 'slips' every
few seconds.
I have a DM24 also which I have tried as both Master and Slave for
the clock.
I have tried Word CLock(using BNC connectors), ADAT, etc to try and
fix the 'slip' which causes a little pop.
The Roland has neither word clock not
any other visible means of setting as master/slave as regards clock source. SO I have
tried it as slave both to the DM24 and the interface in my PC.
The interface
has always seemed quite happy with the ADAT for the sync. But when I try the SPDIF optical
out of the Roland to the input of my interface I get no signal, though I can if I use the
RCA connections between the same two devices.
Now the burning question - will a
stereo optical signal be passed to an 8 channel i/o ADAT, which is what my PC interface
(soundcard) uses. Or even though the both share the same connectors one cannot be
recognised be the other.
I had this notion that the Stereo SPDIF output will be
picked up by channels 1+2 of the ADAT?
ANother quick question - do the BNC
connectors have to be terminated using one of the T-shaped connectors with the resistor on
both devices. I have a single cable running between the DM24 and soundcard.
Can
anyone tell me why I bothered going digital - hardest question of the lot!
|
chris...
active member
Joined: 12/03/03
Posts: 4151
Loc: Glasgow
|
Re: SPDIF vs ADAT
[Re: OneWorld]
#900729 - 13/03/11 07:21 PM
|
|
|
Quote OneWorld:
Or even though
the both share the same connectors one cannot be recognised be the other.
That.
Quote:
I had this notion that
the Stereo SPDIF output will be picked up by channels 1+2 of the ADAT?
No. They are 2 different protocols that happen
to use the same connector.
That said, some devices are capable of handling
both protocols. No idea if that applies to yours (I assume not).
|
OneWorld
Joined: 07/04/09
Posts: 1566
|
Re: SPDIF vs ADAT
[Re: OneWorld]
#900758 - 13/03/11 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Right, that explains a lot. Have managed ot get it working direct from the mixer now and
there's no slip or breakfast cereal type snap crackle and pop noises. THanks
|
Hugh Robjohns
SOS Technical Editor
Joined: 25/07/03
Posts: 18348
Loc: Worcestershire
|
Re: SPDIF vs ADAT
[Re: OneWorld]
#900761 - 13/03/11 10:18 PM
|
|
|
Quote OneWorld:
But when I use
the RCA output to the input of my interface, the timecode 'slips' every few seconds.
What timecode? Do you mean you
get a glitch? If so the problem is probably that the interface is not configured to derive
its clock from the S/PDIF input. There must only be one clock source in any system, so if
you are sending digits from a preamp etc, the interface has to become a clock slave to
those digits.
Quote:
The Roland has neither word clock not any other visible means of setting as master/slave
as regards clock source. SO I have tried it as slave both to the DM24 and the interface in
my PC.
If it doesn't have a
wordclock input or any means to select a digital input as a reference clock, it can only
serve as a master, and everything else will have to slave to it.
Quote:
The interface has
always seemed quite happy with the ADAT for the sync. But when I try the SPDIF optical out
of the Roland to the input of my interface I get no signal, though I can if I use the RCA
connections between the same two devices.
Although ADAT optical and S/PDIF optical use the same physical
connectors and lightpipe, the data they carry is totally non-compatible. That's why you
get no signal. Some devices have a mode switch somewhere (hardware or software) to
configure the optical port for either ADAT or S/PDIF data formats.
Quote:
Now the burning
question - will a stereo optical signal be passed to an 8 channel i/o ADAT, which is what
my PC interface (soundcard) uses.
No.
Quote:
even though the both share the same connectors one cannot be recognised be the other.
Correct.
Quote:
I had this notion that
the Stereo SPDIF output will be picked up by channels 1+2 of the ADAT?
No, I'm afraid not. Completely different
data structures means they are wholly incompatible.
Quote:
do the BNC connectors have to be terminated using
one of the T-shaped connectors with the resistor on both devices.
Not necessarily -- it depends on the
equipment and the configuration of the cables.
Word Clock is distributed as a
constant impednace interface, which means that there has to be a 75 ohm source at the
clock output terminal, and the end of the cable has to be terminated with 75 ohms.
If you are connecting one clock output to one clock input, then the input should
be terminated with 75 ohms. Most devices have that built in and sometimes switchable to a
high-impednace bridging mode.
If you are 'daisy-chaining' a clock around
several devices, then you can use the T-piece to link the clock across the back of one
device and on to the next. Each device along the chain should present a high-impednace
(bridging) load -- so if the product has a 75 ohm termination switch it should be set to
hi-Z mode. Only the very last device in the chain should be set to terminate that line
with 75 ohms, or the last T-piece can be fitted with a 75 ohm resistor.
Quote:
I have a single cable
running between the DM24 and soundcard.
Simply switch the device receiving the clock input signal to terminate with
75 ohms. Check the handbook -- it might be fixed that way anyway.
Quote:
Can anyone tell me why
I bothered going digital - hardest question of the lot!
Because you are a slave to fashion?
Hugh
-------------------- Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
|
OneWorld
Joined: 07/04/09
Posts: 1566
|
Re: SPDIF vs ADAT
[Re: OneWorld]
#900868 - 14/03/11 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot Hugh, that clears a lot up. Have managed to get it working now.
What started al this off was that my ADA8000 went pop and had to find a way round the
system without that piece of equipment. Have managed to set up using just the desk and DAW
without the Roland or spare 2408 as an external AD converter.
Why did I go
digital? Because of you lot at SOS, I read a review of the desk and it was given a good
review so I bought one!
And the old analogue desk, with the meter bridge etc
blocked my view out of the window, which gives a brilliant view of the Etherow Valley,
facing East, good for inspiration, doesn't affect the sound much, but nice anyway!
And most of all, wanted recall on the desk, a smaller footprint, a more compact
setup. In an ideal world though, I would have more space, an analogue desk, with some
ability to recall. The digital result is more 'brittle' sounding, but am sure if I really
gen up on the desk and production techniques I can use one of those 'analogue feel' type
VSTs
Thanks again for such a detailed answer - SOS comes to the rescue yet
again!
|