Forum - Main Forums : Recording Techniques

SOS Forum

Today's Active Topics · FORUM INDEX · Search Forum · Who's Online? · FAQs/Help · Calendar

John Willett
Sound-Link ProAudio

Reged: 07/03/00
Posts: 11985
Loc: Oxfordshire UK

Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.
10/10/06 10:21 AM

Quote redleicester:

....and what's wrong with good ole 44.1....

Brick-wall filters that resonate down into the audible spectrum.

--------------------
John - Sound-Link ProAudio
President - Federation Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons

Post Extras

Entire thread
Subject	Posted by	Posted on
192K vs. 96K recording.	Shahi	10/10/06 05:29 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	James T Bigglesworth	11/10/06 08:40 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	4TrackMadman	11/10/06 06:31 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Zukan	10/10/06 04:10 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	dementedchord	11/10/06 03:46 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	semtex1974	10/10/06 03:53 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Anonymous	10/10/06 04:07 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	semtex1974	11/10/06 09:18 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Doublehelix	10/10/06 01:16 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Spord	10/10/06 03:20 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	tomafd	10/10/06 11:18 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	TAKEN.BALL.GONE.HOME	10/10/06 03:41 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	ghellquist	10/10/06 01:09 PM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	redleicester	10/10/06 09:36 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	John Willett	10/10/06 10:21 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	redleicester	10/10/06 11:13 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	James Perrett	10/10/06 09:18 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	John Willett	10/10/06 09:04 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Zukan	10/10/06 08:36 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	The_Big_Piano_Player	10/10/06 10:50 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	John Willett	10/10/06 11:06 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	The_Big_Piano_Player	10/10/06 11:09 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Steve Hill	10/10/06 08:31 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Spord	10/10/06 07:36 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Peter Conz Connelly	10/10/06 08:46 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Dark Fader	10/10/06 09:11 AM
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.	Peter Conz Connelly	10/10/06 09:22 AM

Extra Information
1 registered and 110 anonymous users are browsing this forum. Moderator: David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,	Forum Permissions You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled UBBCode is enabled	Rating: Thread views: 3566

June 2013

On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)

SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list

Click image for June 2013

Other recent issues:

>> Access All Issues

DAW Tips from SOS

100s of great articles!

Cubase

Digital Performer

Live

Logic

Pro Tools

Reaper

Reason

Sonar

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media