Jack Ruston
Reged: 21/12/05
Posts: 4064
|
Re: Pro tools and Logic !
05/08/07 09:15 PM
|
|
|
Quote Shedua 511:
Hi there
TPFKAJ you don't have a symbol, do you
Shedua
511 Quote:
No.
Quote Shedua 511:
In Logic, when tracking, I open
mutliple instances of the same track before recording, and add more tracks if I need more
takes. Then I edit a comp track and move all the regions to one single track, before
deleting the others (this is done with one key-command). Any fine tuning will be done on
the comp track. How would that be more straight-forward in PT?
Shedua 511 Quote:
PT uses a playlist system whereby I can use a single key command to create a new audio
track, record on it, and then playlist it so that it renames itself from Kick to Kick.01
and then Kick.02 etc allowing me to record passes over the top which I can then flick
between. It makes it very easy to comp because you end up comping on the same track as
you've worked on. The list of files is also visible in the main window without the
pointless waveform drawing which takes up so much space on a large session.
In
addition to that there are a multitude of key commands and editing tricks in PT that logic
just doesn't have which let you move regions around, edit, trim etc very quickly.
A major bugbear is the tab to transient command which is essential for things like
sample replacement and quick editing of drums.
There are various things in
logic which while not deal breakers are very annoying...the lack of waveform drawing while
recording, the waiting after each record pass for overviews to be calculated etc.
The list goes on but the only way to really show you would be to 'show you'
Quote Shedua 511:
In my studio I have a Mackie Control Universal, two XTs and a C4, so most of these
operations are really made easy by the hardware: for grouping, press the "group" button,
select the tracks and it's done. I've had a MCU since I first started so I have no
idea what it would be like without a control surface. With the MCU it's really straigth
also creating a basic mix balance; I occasionally do some hands on automation, but since
that adds enormous quantities of data, I find it easier to use the mouse for that. I
started working as a sound engineer in the days of tape, so a mixer, even though it's not
a "real" mixer is essential for my workflow. My audio interface is a MOTU 828 mkII:
thanks to CueMix latency has never been an issue (except for soft-synths... THAT is a
bugger!). Another invaluable asset for me is a bluetooth Logic keyboard, with
colour-coded shortcuts. Perhaps my impression that Logic works really well for tracking
and mixing (programming is something I do very seldom) is due to the fact that I've always
used some additional hardware together with Logic...
It seems to me that you have a setup that you're up and working
with. I'd crack on with that. Logic is a good system despite the fact that I dont happen
to like it! You can certainly get some great results. I would leave Pro Tools until such
time as you absolutely can not survive without it.
J
-------------------- www.jackruston.com
|
|
|
|
|
|