Main Forums >> Recording Techniques

redleicester
active member


Reged: 24/10/03
Posts: 2484
Loc: England's green and pleasant l...
Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE?
      24/11/08 04:06 PM
I think you'll find that RME don't care much for the MI market as a whole, and concentrate on the pro end, where multiple I/Os on a single card are crucial, and moreover where somewhat more robust and/or advanced connection formats are required, such as 48, 56 and 64k frame MADI or AES3 and the like.

It would be most likely in these given situations that the customer would have their own I/O breakout and transport options, and would be looking merely for the backstop end of the chain to be rock solid, stable, reliable and well clocked.

RME have that side of the market sown up and have done for the best part of 8 years. In particular they were the first to market with OEM PCI MADI cards, at a time when only Euphonix, Fairlight and to a lesser extent Lawo and Harrison were offering such things, and all three of the latter only as part of on- or off-line DSP packages, not for individual I/O use.

In this day an age of expanded comupting rigs, particularly with the adoption of slave machines for outboard DSP processing or sample generation and playback, both the high I/O MADI cards and the lower I/O 9652s and the like have their place. Again, RME were quickest off the bat with PCI-X and again with PCIe, which has kept the pro market very happy indeed.

As for the options cards, they're there for situations where the customer would like to tailor a specific machine quickly and easily if for example they need a quick 6 or 8 out of an OB rig for surround monitoring offline or backup, and the clocking cards for those that are using poorly clocked sources and need reference to an OB, House or Vid clock hard wired and cannot simply resort to RME's own SyncAlign.

For my part I've been using RME gear for seven years now, and I am still running two of the cards I bought right back on day one - still being updated in firmware and drivers, still operating without fault.

You get what you pay for.... and if you don't need their features, then don't buy them.

--------------------
Ars longa, vita brevis, occasio praeceps, experimentum periculosum, iudicium difficile.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? DURDEN 24/11/08 04:44 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   28/11/08 10:57 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? geefunk   28/11/08 11:26 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? * User requested deletion 2 *   28/11/08 12:59 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? adrian_k   28/11/08 11:15 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? redleicester   28/11/08 11:04 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? dmills   25/11/08 06:45 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Martin WalkerModerator   26/11/08 05:25 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? IvanSC   25/11/08 04:17 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Bob Moose   25/11/08 11:46 AM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Hairy Ears   25/11/08 07:52 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Bob Moose   26/11/08 06:43 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Hairy Ears   26/11/08 08:31 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Rousseau   24/11/08 01:46 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   24/11/08 03:06 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? redleicester   24/11/08 04:06 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   25/11/08 01:53 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? andymcbain   25/11/08 04:17 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   27/11/08 04:21 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? redleicester   27/11/08 04:28 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   27/11/08 04:56 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? * User requested deletion 2 *   27/11/08 08:47 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Rousseau   27/11/08 05:46 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? redleicester   27/11/08 05:24 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? redleicester   26/11/08 12:39 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Dr Whom   24/11/08 01:38 PM
. * Re: SOUNDCARD WITH THE BEST LATENCY, WICH ONE? Martin WalkerModerator   24/11/08 01:24 PM

Extra Information
3 registered and 33 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 2660

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media