Main Forums >> Keyboards & Synthesis

Hashmoder



Reged: 12/12/10
Posts: 7
Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2
      15/06/11 12:43 PM
I think it all depends on the sound you want to get out of any synth. To me, I prefer an analog synth (such as the Moog Phatty) over a digital synth. What I like about most (if not all) analog synths is their ability to pitch down their oscillators to the lowest note till you hear their single cycles. For example, on the Moog Phatty, if you were to pitch down and play a square-wave oscillator to its lowest note and play the lowest note on the keyboard's lowest octave, then you'll hear the sound in its single waveform-cycle which sounds like deep, fat heart-beat sounds that could blow your speakers. Adjust the pulse-width, then you'll hear every two cycle-beats closer together.

But if you did the same thing on a digital synth, then what you'll hear of its single-cycled square-waveform (at the lowest pitch) are just digital-sounding 'ticks'.

The only digital synths that are capable of producing (almost) fat, heart-beat-like pulsating sounds at the lowest cycles of a square-wave oscillator like that of analog synth(s) are the Nordlead 1 and Nordlead 2, 2x, etc.

In any case, I am a person who loves pure analog sound. And when it comes to digital synths that emulate or physically model analog synths are the Nordleads. No other digital synths (whether hardware or software) in my experience were ever capable of producing sounds like the heart-beat. To me, that is the ultimate test. That is how I test digital synths by pitching down only one of their oscillators till I hear the single-cycles. If I hear ticks, then they're CRAP.

Again, depending on what kind of sound(s) you like. If you like the Roland pads and such, then stick with the Rolands. But if you like real and true analog, then by all means go for the moog Phatty.

I have an old Moog Prodigy, Phatty and Minimoog Voyager. I am able to produce sounds on those analogs that digital synths could never produce. For example, sounds like zaps and clicks!

Here's a link of my custom samples of zips/clicks which I've personally recorded from my old Moog Prodigy analog synth. It is a zip file.

The file contains over 300 one-shot samples of fat zaps/zips/clicks. The soundfiles are numbered. The very first soundfile with the "00" number is the entire continuous recording of all the zaps for you to hear them in one go. And the files numbers "01" and above are sound-files which are the cropped/individual zaps, each one stemming from the "00" soundfile. Each zap are slightly different in texture, as I was turning the Moog's knobs in realtime.

http://homepage.mac.com/cavecybernation/moogzaps.zip

Zaps that good (in my experience) are next to impossible to achieve with digital synths.

Analog = voltage = MAMA-MIA.

Edited by Hashmoder (15/06/11 12:54 PM)

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 lostintechnology 08/06/11 05:41 PM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 Hashmoder   15/06/11 12:43 PM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 Chaconne   09/06/11 07:15 PM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 Strangy   09/06/11 10:33 AM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 johnny h   09/06/11 10:58 AM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 Sam Inglis   09/06/11 09:17 AM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 ZukanModerator   09/06/11 08:45 AM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 johnny h   09/06/11 08:17 AM
. * Re: Roland Juno 60 VS Moog Little Phatty Stage 2 The Elf   08/06/11 06:20 PM

Extra Information
0 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 4318

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media