John,

Firstly you should feel no responsibility for anything that transpired and secondly , why would you feel it necessary to delete the link over at HC to the conversation that transpired here.

I think its important that the guys reading in over at HC actually see the dialogue that transpired as its important to where each of us stand. I am not interested in posting over at HC btw.

Re measuring the RTL, I have a Utility that is delivering results within a few samples , I will make that available when the developer gives me the go ahead to offer the final build.

Re disagreeing with me in regards to the review , more power to you, but lets be clear , my qualm is purely on the discussion of latency and the ongoing stance that 10ms (9.5ms) RTL is actually acceptable at 064. So out of interest , does that mean you also disagree that 9.5ms RTL at 064 samples is excessively high comparatively to other units ?

V:

Post Extras