Main Forums >> Live Sound & Performance

Gary M
Audio Technica


Reged: 18/04/01
Posts: 985
Loc: Northwood, London
Re: Multicore vs CAT5?
      07/04/12 08:48 PM
Quote Peter Dakin:

The new digital multicores are a fairly new medium, and as mentioned, there is yet to be a standard between manufactures.
The major issue with digital multicores is the sharing of head-amps with a monitor console. Some manufactures handle this with ease (digico) however others are nigh-on impossible and useless, making dual consoles difficult.

If I was doing the installation I would go with a decent copper multicore system any day.
With a digi multicore, if your FOH desk was to crash/die you'd have to find a like for like replacement, whereas with a copper multi, you could quickly sub-hire any desk and still have a show.
It depends on how flexible a system you require. If you're always going to use your own consoles and not having touring ones coming in then there's merit for the Digital systems. However a copper snake will work with nearly all systems, and slot nicely in with stage drops etc.

With both systems, you need to also plan and implement enough returns to feed the house system as well as monitors.
Average is 12, but depending on house system you might require more.




The ilive concept was released 15 years ago in the IDR system. Not particularly new!

I would go with cat5 any day of the week, much easier system to install, far cheaper than buying an analogue desk with external graphic eq's and compressors and gates for every channel.

I do find that a lot of people avoid cat5 systems due to lack of knowledge and prefer to go with the tried and tested copper which is perfectly fine but does have lots of limitations and problems that are not present in a cat5 system. Having said that a cat5 system has many flaws as well but to say you could hire any desk with a copper system is a bit dated as you will find a large majority of hire companies will have a large array of digital cat5 desks in their inventory due to the ease set up and cost effectiveness.

Just my tuppence

Gary

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Multicore vs CAT5? dickiefunk 28/03/12 08:33 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? dmills   08/04/12 07:44 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Folderol   08/04/12 04:29 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   08/04/12 10:26 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Sheriton   03/04/12 11:21 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Ian Hamilton   03/04/12 11:51 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   07/04/12 08:48 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   08/04/12 12:18 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   08/04/12 02:49 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   08/04/12 05:28 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   08/04/12 04:33 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   08/04/12 05:56 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   08/04/12 06:29 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   08/04/12 08:00 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   09/04/12 12:09 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   09/04/12 11:37 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   10/04/12 09:52 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   10/04/12 08:59 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Sheriton   10/04/12 09:08 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   10/04/12 09:13 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   09/04/12 12:43 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   09/04/12 02:29 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   09/04/12 03:24 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   09/04/12 04:05 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   09/04/12 05:34 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Bob Bickerton   01/04/12 09:24 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   02/04/12 04:00 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? dickiefunk   01/04/12 08:33 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   01/04/12 09:11 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? ef37a   29/03/12 11:52 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? dickiefunk   29/03/12 10:32 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   29/03/12 02:36 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   29/03/12 07:53 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   29/03/12 08:54 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Gary M   31/03/12 09:53 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Dave Rowles   29/03/12 11:22 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   29/03/12 10:43 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   29/03/12 02:42 PM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? James PerrettModerator   28/03/12 11:26 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   28/03/12 11:48 AM
. * Re: Multicore vs CAT5? seablade   28/03/12 11:51 AM

Extra Information
0 registered and 24 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, Paul White, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 8329

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media