Previous
Topics
Next
Flat
Re: Wow, YouTube's audio fingerprinting does actually work then.
Edit
Reply
Quote
Quote chris...:Quote:
Cameron at the BBC to manually type all the ever-so-slightly-wrongly-named tracks up into a Cue-sheet in Excel and email them to PRS who then have to send it to Alisha in accounts who's going to put it onto 'the new system' but that's not ready yet so in the meantime she's writing it out in Word and then printing two copies for the Claims Team but they have to scan them first so........ ETC ETC ETC
That stuff clearly needs to get sorted - but it's got nothing to do with snooping on core Internet links.
And here Chris..., I fear, thou art hoist by thine own petard.
For you are living in a BLITHERING FANTASY WORLD if you expect "that stuff" to ever get "sorted out".
You are talking about *people*. Many of them WOMEN! And many of the men involved DON'T EVEN HAVE ASPERGERS! And many of the people supplying the source data are MUSICIANS - christ, some of them are **DRUMMERS**!! They simply are NOT going to EVER supply and process the data in a rigorous, accurate, efficient way. It's physically impossible. That is why it must be done with well-designed, well-programmed computer systems.
In other words, I am right as usual
--------------------
~~~ A weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed with! www.feline1.co.uk ~~~
Post Extras
|
