SOS Forum
Today's Active Topics · FORUM INDEX · Search Forum · Who's Online? · FAQs/Help · Calendar

Main Forums >> Recording Techniques
Previous thread Previous   View all threads Topics   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

Jack Ruston



Reged: 21/12/05
Posts: 4066
Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good?
      22/06/12 02:03 PM
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote  
Yeah, the implication is that this loss of 'resolution' and detail makes things sound bad in relation to analogue. But since all the reduction in word length means is that the signal is closer to the noise floor, then by that logic digital should sound better than tape.

Strange article.

J

--------------------
www.jackruston.com


Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? alexis 22/06/12 01:13 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? dmills   09/07/12 06:16 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Len   06/07/12 11:27 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? James PerrettModerator   07/07/12 09:52 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ef37a   07/07/12 10:54 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? James PerrettModerator   08/07/12 07:46 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   09/07/12 09:33 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ef37a   09/07/12 10:17 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? James PerrettModerator   09/07/12 09:47 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Exalted Wombat   07/07/12 10:46 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tomás Mulcahy   03/07/12 08:53 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Richie Royale   03/07/12 02:50 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Richard Graham   02/07/12 12:44 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Exalted Wombat   02/07/12 01:16 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Richard Graham   03/07/12 12:25 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Richie Royale   01/07/12 10:42 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   01/07/12 09:37 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? zenguitarModerator   01/07/12 12:55 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Exalted Wombat   02/07/12 12:16 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   01/07/12 08:54 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? zenguitarModerator   02/07/12 12:13 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? markhodges   07/07/12 11:11 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? grab   02/07/12 10:36 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   02/07/12 10:31 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? dmills   01/07/12 01:56 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ef37a   01/07/12 10:07 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   01/07/12 08:47 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? BJG145   01/07/12 08:37 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   30/06/12 11:59 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ConcertinaChap   01/07/12 06:57 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ef37a   01/07/12 09:19 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   01/07/12 08:06 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   01/07/12 08:31 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Tui   01/07/12 08:48 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ConcertinaChap   01/07/12 08:30 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? dmills   30/06/12 06:21 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? ZukanModerator   29/06/12 07:57 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? TimJN   29/06/12 04:35 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? The Elf   29/06/12 06:25 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? MonkeySpank   29/06/12 09:57 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Music Manic   23/06/12 02:20 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Gone To Lunch   23/06/12 02:13 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Ariosto   23/06/12 12:46 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? MonkeySpank   23/06/12 03:17 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Exalted Wombat   02/07/12 12:26 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   22/06/12 07:24 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Jack Ruston   22/06/12 07:12 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Ariosto   22/06/12 05:54 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   22/06/12 06:43 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Jack Ruston   22/06/12 05:03 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   22/06/12 05:07 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   22/06/12 04:52 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Anonymous   22/06/12 04:54 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Jack Ruston   22/06/12 02:03 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   22/06/12 04:02 PM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Hugh RobjohnsAdministrator   22/06/12 09:48 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Billum   22/06/12 09:12 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? narcoman   22/06/12 09:07 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? The Elf   22/06/12 06:08 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? desmond   22/06/12 09:16 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Mike Stranks   22/06/12 07:34 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? Richie Royale   22/06/12 07:32 AM
. * Re: Is Dr. Doherty saying that the now common advice to not worry about low recording levels is not good? narcoman   22/06/12 01:24 AM

Extra Information
1 registered and 38 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 12375

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

June 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for June 2013
Other recent issues:
DAW Tips from SOS
100s of great articles!
Cubase
Digital Performer
Live
Logic
Pro Tools
Reaper
Reason
Sonar
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media