Main Forums >> Keyboards & Synthesis

Kolakube



Reged: 01/12/09
Posts: 1643
Loc: Geordieland
Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000
      07/10/10 10:31 AM
I have both of these samplers. The S950 was decided upon by members help from this forum so as a way of thanks I thought Id leave me feelings of the S950 making comparisons to an S1000.

Sound quality wise all as I can say is my ears must be failing. Wrote all over the internet is people saying "ooo you must have am S950 to give you that 12Bit crunch"

Well I can hear no bit crunch at all!! If you set the S950 to the max bandwidth which is something like 48K and compare to the S1000 there is nothing in it. Nothing worth talking about anyhow. This is a technical feat from Akai re 12 bit Samplers.

If you want crunch or rather lo fi, set the bandwidth to a low setting. But then this is all about sampling frequency crunch and not how many bits are used. The S1000 only goes to 20k or somewhere near (Havent the manual to hand) so thats the reason the S950 sounds more lo fi. If the S1000 went to 7k also im sure the results would be similar.

When these samplers first came out in 88 Id have gone for the S950 if sound quality was the only issue as the S950 was far cheaper than the S1000. However these days if a hardware sampler with an akai sound (and not lo fi) is your thing Id go for an S1000. Why? Because you could get 3x S1000s for the price of one S950 and there is nothing in it.

Of course im taking raw sampler to sampler comparison. Stick these two in a mix compressed, EG'd, Delayed and reverbed and I honestly think everyone would fail the pepsi challenge.

If we now move away from sound quality all together and just look at features then the S1000 wipes the floor. With an LCD screen to 32 meg, SCSI (that you can actually buy) I could go on all day.
However, if like me you like very light and easy (I am a guy that finds the SH-101 overwhelming :] ) than the S950 is for you.

To conclude I am very happy I have bought the S950. I personally prefer it to the S1000 as it can sound the same or lo fi but this crunch everyone bangs on about eludes me. Also I prefer the ultra simplicity as it hardly has any features. It can sample, filter, timestetch and thats about it. Suits me fine.

However if you looking for a budget hardware sampler for what ever reason (I can give you plenty) then don't overlook the S1000

Anyone else ever compared these directly?

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Kolakube 07/10/10 10:31 AM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Kolakube   07/10/10 04:38 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Kolakube   07/10/10 02:29 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 jellyjim   07/10/10 04:37 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Kolakube   07/10/10 02:26 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 jellyjim   07/10/10 04:36 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 jellyjim   07/10/10 11:40 AM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 ken long   07/10/10 11:54 AM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 jellyjim   07/10/10 12:04 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 ken long   07/10/10 01:17 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 The Elf   07/10/10 01:21 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 ken long   07/10/10 01:32 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 The Elf   07/10/10 01:52 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Chevytraveller   07/10/10 01:57 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Chevytraveller   07/10/10 12:20 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 ken long   07/10/10 01:20 PM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 Kolakube   07/10/10 10:41 AM
. * Re: Initial thoughts:- S950 v S1000 ken long   07/10/10 10:38 AM

Extra Information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 4564

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
DAW Tips from SOS
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media